Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 19 August 2024
Sec. Stroke
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances and controversies in ischemic stroke management: from prevention to diagnosis and acute treatment View all 82 articles

No genetic association between iron deficiency anemia and ischemic stroke and its subtypes: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Xingyu ChenXingyu Chen1Aiping LiAiping Li1Wensheng ZhouWensheng Zhou1Liping Yao
Liping Yao2*
  • 1Department of Neurology, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
  • 2Department of Neurology, The Third Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, China

Background: Observational researches have suggested a connection between iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and an increased likelihood of ischemic stroke (IS), yet establishing causality is challenging owing to the inherent limitations of such studies, including their vulnerability to confounding factors and the potential for reverse causation. This study employs a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to assess the causal linkage between IDA and IS and its subtypes.

Methods: Identifiable single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with significant links to either IDA or IS and its subtypes were employed as instrumental variables (IVs). The relationship between IDA and any IS, small vessel stroke (SVS), cardioembolic stroke (CES), and large artery stroke (LAS), was quantified using the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method. Complementary analyses utilizing MR-Egger and weighted median methods further supplemented the IVW findings. Moreover, the leave-one-out analysis, MR-Egger intercept test, MR-PRESSO global test, and Cochrane’s Q test were conducted for sensitivity analyses.

Results: This study revealed no correlation between IDA and any IS (IVW method: OR [95% CI] = 0.977 [0.863–1.106]; p = 0.716), LAS (OR [95% CI] = 1.158 [0.771–1.740]; p = 0.479), CES (OR [95% CI] = 1.065 [0.882–1.285]; p = 0.512), or SVS (OR [95% CI] = 1.138 [0.865–1.498]; p = 0.357). Conducting a reverse MR analysis, it was determined that there is no causal connection between any IS, LAS, CES, SVS, and IDA (all p > 0.05). Sensitivity analysis indicated that heterogeneity was not significant and no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy was detected.

Conclusion: This MR study suggested no causal effect of IDA on IS, LAS, CES, and SVS. Through reverse MR analyses, it was determined that IS and its subtypes did not exert a causal impact on IDA.

1 Introduction

Stroke represents a major global health challenge and a leading cause of mortality, affecting approximately 80 million people worldwide and representing the second greatest burden of disease globally (1). Of all stroke types, ischemic stroke (IS) accounts for approximately 87% (2), with the major causative categories being small vessel stroke (SVS), cardioembolic stroke (CES), and large artery stroke (LAS) (3). Characterized by high rates of mortality and disability, IS is a principal contributor to human disability and death, causing neurological impairments such as hemiplegia and aphasia that profoundly diminish individuals’ quality of life (4). Despite substantial progress in managing traditional contributing factors-including diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and high blood pressure-through medical interventions, the incidence of IS continues to be a paramount public health issue worldwide (5). Given complex etiology of IS and the involvement of multiple risk factors (6), the early detection and management of these risks are critical (7).

Anemia, designated as the fifth cardinal cardiovascular risk factor (8), exhibits a global prevalence of 32.9%, making it one of the most widespread medical conditions (9). It is typified by diminished levels of hemoglobin or hematocrit, leading to reduced oxygen transport capability of the red blood cells, with potential systemic effects (10). Among the various causes of anemia, iron deficiency anemia (IDA) emerges as a predominant factor worldwide (11). IDA has been documented as an infrequent etiological factor for IS. In certain case reports, instances of thrombosis in the carotid arteries have been documented, with aortic thrombosis being a rarer occurrence, in patients suffering from IDA (12, 13). Findings from case–control investigations suggested a notable correlation between IDA and the increased incidence of stroke, specifically IS (14, 15). An observational study revealed that the incidence of IS in patients with IDA was 24.4% (782/3199) (14). Several mechanisms may elucidate the potential link between IDA and increased IS risk. The reduction in hemoglobin levels associated with IDA compromises oxygen transport, potentially leading to tissue hypoxia, including in cerebral regions, thereby elevating stroke risk (16). Additionally, the body’s compensatory response to anemia may involve enhanced erythropoiesis, resulting in increased red blood cell production and higher blood viscosity, which could contribute to thrombotic events (17). However, observational research, while indicating a relationship of IDA and ischemic IS risk, may be subject to biases from potential confounding factors and reverse causality. This underscores the limitations of these studies in conclusively establishing a causal association between IDA and IS risk.

Mendelian randomization (MR) serves as a statistical approach leveraging genetic variations as instrumental variables (IVs) for elucidating causative associations of exposure factors and outcomes (18). This model leverages the random allocation of genetic variants at conception, mitigating the influence of environmental confounders and the risk of reverse causation (19). Consequently, MR offers a robust alternative to traditional epidemiologic approaches (20). To date, the potential causal link between IDA and IS, along with its subtypes, has not been investigated through MR analysis. This study aimed to explore the causal relationship between IDA and IS and its subtype risk based on large-sample genome-wide association study (GWAS) databases through a bidirectional two-sample MR analysis.

2 Methods

2.1 Study design

In this research, we used a two-sample bidirectional MR approach to thoroughly evaluate the two-way causative link between IDA and IS and its subtypes. The research employed IVs, derived from genetic variances, particularly single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which show strong associations with IDA or IS and its subtypes. For the MR analysis to be deemed credible, it was imperative to satisfy three essential conditions: (1) A strong association existed between the IVs and exposure variables; (2) The selected SNPs had no links to any underlying confounders; (3) The IVs exclusively influenced the outcomes via the exposure mechanism (21). A brief overview of the bidirectional MR analysis was presented in Figure 1. Our methodology adhered to the guidelines outlined in the STROBE-MR for documenting our findings (22). Given that the data for our analysis were secondary data sourced from an existing study with prior ethical approval, the necessity for additional ethics approval and informed consent was circumvented in this case.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Study design diagram and three assumptions of Mendelian randomization. SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.

2.2 Data sources

Data from GWAS pertaining to IDA and SNPs were acquired from the FinnGen consortium,1 encompassing publicly accessible summary statistics for IDA and 21,306,290 SNPs from 408,837 European descent individuals. IS-related information was derived from the MEGASTROKE consortium’s European cohort (23, 24), involving European ancestry participants. The principal endpoint analyzed was IS, contrasting 34,217 cases and 406,111 control subjects. Distinct subcategories of IS explored included LAS, with an analysis of 6,399 cases; CES, involving 7,193 cases; and SVS, assessing 5,386 cases, against a control cohort of 1,234,808 for LAS, 192,662 for SVS and 406,111 for CES. Details of the GWAS are encapsulated in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Detailed information of the GWAS included in Mendelian randomization analysis.

2.3 Instrumental variable selection

In the selection process for genetic variants related to exposures and outcomes, a standardized criterion was employed. Acknowledging the potential limitation in the number of SNPs reaching comprehensive genome-wide significance, we moderated the significance threshold to a p-value of less than 5 × 10−7 for LAS and SVS. Independent IVs were distinguished through a process of linkage disequilibrium (LD) clumping, applying an r2 threshold at 0.001 with a clumping distance of 10,000 kb, based on the LD reference derived from the 1,000 Genomes Project. Variants presenting the lowest p-values were selected as independent instruments (25). Further, SNPs demonstrating significant associations with the exposure variables were evaluated using the F-statistic, identifying strong IVs by the criterion F > 10 (26). The GWAS catalog2 was then used to assess potential correlations between selected SNPs and confounding factors. SNPs associated with exposures and directly linked to outcomes (p < 5 × 10−8) were excluded. Finally, the gathered data from exposure and outcome databases were merged, ensuring the elimination of palindromic sequences to maintain uniformity in effector alleles.

2.4 MR analysis

The primary method for estimating the causal effect between IDA and IS was the inverse variance weighted (IVW) approach, which derives weighted summaries based on the inverse of the variance, presuming the validity of all instrumental variables. As a pivotal method within MR research, IVW synthesizes Wald ratios from individual SNPs to generate an overall causal estimate (27). To assess the robustness of the results and examine the presence of pleiotropy, additional analyses were conducted using the MR-Egger regression and weighted median method. The MR-Egger method is capable of identifying pleiotropic effects via its intercept, offering adjustments for pleiotropy in its estimates, albeit with reduced statistical power (28). The weighted median method integrates data across numerous genetic variants, providing a consolidated causal estimate (29). The findings reached statistical significance with the p-value below 0.0125 (0.05/4) following the application of the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests. A p-value within the range of 0.0125 to 0.05 are considered indicative of potential statistical significance.

2.5 Sensitivity analysis

To assess the heterogeneity across individual genetic variance estimates, Cochran’s Q test was employed. A p-value from Cochran’s Q test less than 0.05 prompted the adoption of the random effects model for subsequent MR analysis, while a higher p-value warranted the use of a fixed-effects model (30). Assessment of horizontal pleiotropy relied on the Egger intercept, considering the absence of pleiotropy when p > 0.05 (28). To identify and mitigate the impact of outliers on causal inference, the MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) approach was employed (31). The leave-one-out strategy was applied to identify IVs potentially impacting causal effect estimates, sequentially excluding each SNP to determine the meta-effect of the remaining SNPs. Visual representation of our findings was achieved through scatter and forest plots, elucidating the linkage between IDA and IS. Funnel plot analysis was conducted to verify the results’ stability. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (v4.3.1) with the TwoSampleMR and MRPRESSO packages (v0.5.7).

3 Results

3.1 Selection of instrumental variables

Using IDA as the exposure variable, we screened 7 SNPs as IVs, none of which were excluded because of their non-significant association with confounding variables. Consequently, 7 SNPs were used as IVs for causal effect analysis of IDA on IS, LAS, CES, and SVS. In the scenario where IDA served as the outcome variable, our research identified a total of 29 SNPs, segmented as 10 associated with IS, 9 with LAS, 4 with CES, and 6 with SVS. Among them, rs3184504 was excluded due to its significant correlation with IS as well as red blood cell count and hemoglobin levels. We also eliminated any SNPs that were palindromic and held a moderate allele frequency. The robustness of our instruments was supported by F-statistics exceeding 10 for all included SNPs, suggesting no weak instrument bias. Details about these SNPs was provided in Supplementary Tables S1–S13.

3.2 Causal effects of IDA on IS and its subtypes

The correlation of IDA with IS and its various types was depicted in Figure 2. Utilizing the IVW approach, we observed no causal relationships between IDA with the incidence of IS (OR [95% CI] = 0.977 [0.863–1.106]; p = 0.716), LAS (OR [95% CI] = 1.158 [0.771–1.740]; p = 0.479), CES (OR [95% CI] = 1.065 [0.882–1.285]; p = 0.512), and SVS (OR [95% CI] = 1.138 [0.865–1.498]; p = 0.357). This observation was supported by both MR-Egger and weighted median analyses, with both of them showing no statistical significance (all p > 0.05). Forest plots in Figure 3 presented the estimates of causal effects between IDA and IS and its subtypes. Additionally, Figure 4 displayed scatter plots with MR intercepts approaching zero, suggesting a minimal presence of horizontal pleiotropy across the analyses.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. MR analysis of the causal effect of iron deficiency anemia on ischemic stroke and its subtypes. IDA, iron deficiency anemia; IS, ischemic stroke; LAS, large artery stroke; CES, cardioembolic stroke; SVS, small vessel stroke.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Forest plots of iron deficiency anemia on ischemic stroke and its subtypes. (A) Ischemic stroke; (B) large artery stroke; (C) cardioembolic stroke; (D) small vessel stroke.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. MR analysis scatter plots of iron deficiency anemia on ischemic stroke and its subtypes. (A) Ischemic stroke; (B) large artery stroke; (C) cardioembolic stroke; (D) small vessel stroke.

3.3 Causal effects of IS and its subtypes on IDA

In the analysis conducted through the IVW approach, our study found no causal relationships of IS (OR [95% CI] = 0.952 [0.835–1.086]; p = 0.465), LAS (OR [95% CI] = 1.052 [0.975–1.134]; p = 0.191), CES (OR [95% CI] = 1.021 [0.950–1.098]; p = 0.564), and SVS (OR [95% CI] = 1.010 [0.926–1.103]; p = 0.815) with IDA (Figure 5). However, the MR-Egger method suggested that LAS may potentially increase the risk of IDA (OR [95% CI] = 1.391 [1.062–1.821]; p = 0.048). Additionally, no causal association between IS, CES, SVS, and IDA was found through MR-Egger and weighted median methods (all p > 0.05). The forest plots and scatter plots were shown in Supplementary Figures S1, S2.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. MR analysis of the causal effect of ischemic stroke and its subtypes on iron deficiency anemia. IS, ischemic stroke; IDA, iron deficiency anemia; LAS, large artery stroke; CES, cardioembolic stroke; SVS, small vessel stroke.

3.4 Sensitivity analyses

The MR sensitivity analysis results are presented in Table 2. Upon conducting a heterogeneity test, all p-values derived from Cochrane’s Q statistics were found to be greater than 0.05, suggesting a lack of heterogeneity among the SNPs. Additionally, the MR-Egger regression intercept, used to assess horizontal pleiotropy, did not provide substantial evidence for the presence of pleiotropy. This lack of significant horizontal pleiotropy outliers was also corroborated by the MR-PRESSO results. The leave-one-out analysis did not indicate any significant influence of individual SNPs on the overall findings. The detailed outcomes of the leave-one-out analysis can be found in Supplementary Figures S3, S4. The funnel plots, depicted in Supplementary Figures S5, S6, did not reveal any significant bias, further corroborating the robustness of our results.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Sensitivity analysis of the MR analysis results of iron deficiency anemia and ischemic stroke and its subtypes.

4 Discussion

Employing available GWAS datasets and bidirectional two-sample MR methodologies, this research probed the causal connections between IDA and IS, as well as its specific subtypes. The MR analysis was executed through the IVW approach, MR-Egger, and the weighted median estimation technique, accompanied by rigorous sensitivity analyses to mitigate confounding influences and solidify result validity. The results revealed no causal correlation between IDA and any IS, or its LAS, CES, and SVS subtypes. Furthermore, the exploration of reverse causality did not uphold a causal influence of IS and its subtypes on IDA. This study stands as the first effort to elucidate a potential causal relationship between IDA and SVS.

Earlier research has predominantly focused on the link between anemia and IS. These studies, particularly long-term observational follow-ups, have demonstrated that individuals with anemia were at approximately a 1.5 times greater risk of developing IS (32, 33). Further investigation has found that within the span of one to two years, anemia could heighten the risk of IS by 1.6 and 1.35 times, respectively (34). Additionally, individuals with chronic kidney disease who also suffer from anemia have been identified as having a heightened risk for stroke (35). Despite these associations, a recent MR study examining anemia and cardiovascular disease has concluded that anemia did not causally impact IS (36). On this basis, the discoveries from our investigation contribute novel evidence supporting the non-causal associations between IDA and IS, inclusive of its various subtypes.

While the majority of preceding experimental and observational research pointed toward a possible association between IDA and IS, the precise mechanism through which IDA contributes to IS remains partially understood. Several hypotheses have been advanced, positing that IDA may lead to IS through the formation of a hypercoagulable state, a direct consequence of iron deficiency or anemia itself. Secondary thrombocytosis due to IDA and the resultant anemia-induced hypoxia can create a disparity between the supply and demand of oxygen in end-arteries, precipitating ischemia and infarction (15). Anemia is known to cause hyperdynamic circulation, which in turn increases molecular adhesion expression on vascular endothelial cells (37), triggering an inflammatory response that may result in thrombosis, akin to atherosclerotic processes (38). In the context of IDA, there is an increase in erythropoietin secretion, which not only augments red blood cell count but also stimulates platelet production, thereby inducing thrombocytosis and thrombus formation (39). On the cellular level, diminished hemoglobin levels impair oxygen delivery to tissues, potentially leading to hypoxia. Exposure of arteries to hypoxic conditions initiates signaling in monocytes/macrophages and T lymphocytes via endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts, which may hasten atheroma development (40, 41). Hypoxia can also disrupt the mitochondrial respiratory chain, severely affecting energy production. Given the high oxygen demands of neurons, they are particularly vulnerable to hypoxic conditions. Research by Akins et al. has indicated that turbulent blood flow, a common occurrence in severe anemia, can damage vascular endothelium and promote platelet aggregation and clot formation (12). Consequently, while our study did not substantiate a direct elevation in IS risk attributable to IDA, the possibility of anemia contributing to thrombosis warrants attention.

Additionally, the potential link between iron deficiency and IS was also a research focus that cannot be ignored. Sequential research following the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) unveiled a pronounced U-shaped correlation between transferrin saturation levels and stroke incidence among Caucasian females aged 45–74 (42), indicating heightened stroke risks at both deficient and excessive iron levels in the bloodstream. Similarly, Ekblom et al. found an elevated risk of stroke within the highest quartile of total iron binding capacity-a metric that escalates with iron deficiency (43). The correlation between iron deficiency and thrombophilia has gained increasing recognition over recent years (4446). Iron deficiency is linked to a spectrum of thrombotic conditions, including cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (47) and carotid artery thrombosis (12), as well as numerous cases of embolic stroke (48) and IS (14, 49). Epidemiological research also delineated a higher prevalence of IDA among individuals with cerebral venous thrombosis compared to a control group (50). Diverging from earlier research, our bidirectional MR analysis revealed no causal link between IDA and (IS), including its various subtypes. Nonetheless, prior investigations suggested that the combined impact of anemia and iron deficiency may have a higher propensity for promoting blood clot formation (51). Evidence suggests that IDA can precipitate IS through a triad of mechanisms: (i) Reduced hemoglobin levels precipitate a hypoxic condition; (ii) Hypoxia induces transferrin production via hypoxia-inducible factor-1, which then activates and interacts with thrombin/factor XIIa, impairing the activity of anticoagulant proteases, thus leading to a hypercoagulable state; (iii) IDA stimulates thrombin generation by platelets, resulting in thrombocytosis (51). These interconnected mechanisms collectively exacerbate cerebral ischemic damage, elevating the risk of IS in the context of IDA.

A recent two-sample bidirectional MR study has elucidated that IS increases the risk of anemia (36). Our findings further delineate that IS does not augment the risk for IDA, hinting at a potential causative linkage between IS and other anemia subtypes, warranting additional scrutiny. In addition, the relatively extensive 95% CI in our MR-Egger analysis signals instability in the causal effect of IS on IDA, possibly due to the scarce IVs employed in the analysis. Hence, the conclusions drawn regarding the causal effect of IS on IDA necessitate further empirical corroboration upon the refreshment of the GWAS database. Nonetheless, our study is distinguished by several strengths. First, MR analysis sidesteps issues like reverse causation and confounding variables common in observational research, offering a more time-and resource-efficient approach to dissecting complex disease etiologies. Second, the deployment of summary-level data from individuals of European ancestry, encompassing a vast array of IS subtype cases and controls, minimizes the risk of bias from population stratification. Third, leveraging publicly accessible GWAS summary statistics capitalizes on a broad sample size, ensuring more accurate estimates and stronger statistical power, thereby reducing research expenses, enhancing bioinformatics use, and bolstering the credibility of our findings.

Our study inevitably encounters certain limitations. First, the GWAS summary statistics utilized herein are exclusively sourced from European cohorts, casting uncertainty on the generalizability of our conclusions across diverse ethnicities. The necessity for future corroboration of our results with large-scale GWAS summary statistics encompassing varied populations is paramount. Second, the aggregate data used in our analysis restricts access to detailed individual-level information. Third, akin to all MR studies, our study is unable to completely exclude the influence of unobserved pleiotropy, potentially introducing bias into our results. This underscores the need for extensive further research to elucidate the relationship between IDA and IS. Fourth, the study failed to identify a causal effect of IDA on LAS, with the MR-Egger analysis displaying broad 95% CIs, indicating the potential instability of these outcomes and the necessity for further inquiry.

5 Conclusion

In summary, our research furnished evidence advocating for no causative influence of IDA on the susceptibility to IS, LAS, CES or SVS. Bidirectional MR analysis yielded no evidence of a causal relationship between IDA and any IS, LAS, CES and SVS. Future studies should employ well-conducted clinical trials, featuring robust methodologies and substantial numbers of participants, to delve deeper into the mechanisms connecting IDA to IS and its various subtypes.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval and participant consent were pre-acquired for each original GWAS, negating the need for additional approvals. These studies adhered to relevant local laws and institutional protocols, with participants furnishing written informed consent for their involvement.

Author contributions

XC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. AL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft. WZ: Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft. LY: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1408758/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

References

1. Feigin, VL, Brainin, M, Norrving, B, Martins, S, Sacco, RL, Hacke, W, et al. World stroke organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2022. Int J Stroke. (2022) 17:18–29. doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Benjamin, EJ, Virani, SS, Callaway, CW, Chamberlain, AM, Chang, AR, Cheng, S, et al. Heart disease and stroke Statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2018) 137:e67–e492. doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000558

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Adams, HP Jr, Bendixen, BH, Kappelle, LJ, Biller, J, Love, BB, Gordon, DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke. (1993) 24:35–41. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.35

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Boot, E, Ekker, MS, Putaala, J, Kittner, S, De Leeuw, FE, and Tuladhar, AM. Ischaemic stroke in young adults: a global perspective. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2020) 91:411–7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322424

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Feske, SK . Ischemic stroke. Am J Med. (2021) 134:1457–64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.07.027

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hankey, GJ . Stroke. Lancet. (2017) 389:641–54. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30962-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Herpich, F, and Rincon, F. Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Crit Care Med. (2020) 48:1654–63. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004597

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kaiafa, G, Kanellos, I, Savopoulos, C, Kakaletsis, N, Giannakoulas, G, and Hatzitolios, AI. Is anemia a new cardiovascular risk factor? Int J Cardiol. (2015) 186:117–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.159

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lopez, A, Cacoub, P, Macdougall, IC, and Peyrin-Biroulet, L. Iron deficiency anaemia. Lancet. (2016) 387:907–16. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60865-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Fonseca, AC, Silva, DP, Infante, J, and Ferro, JM. Cerebrovascular complications of Anemia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. (2021) 21:51. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01141-y

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kassebaum, NJ, Jasrasaria, R, Naghavi, M, Wulf, SK, Johns, N, Lozano, R, et al. A systematic analysis of global anemia burden from 1990 to 2010. Blood. (2014) 123:615–24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-508325

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Akins, PT, Glenn, S, Nemeth, PM, and Derdeyn, CP. Carotid artery thrombus associated with severe iron-deficiency anemia and thrombocytosis. Stroke. (1996) 27:1002–5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.5.1002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Emamikhah, M, Yazdi, N, Mohebi, N, Eslami, M, and Moghaddasi, M. Anemia: an unusual cause of free-floating thrombus of carotid artery. Iran J Neurol. (2019) 18:87–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

14. Chang, YL, Hung, SH, Ling, W, Lin, HC, Li, HC, and Chung, SD. Association between ischemic stroke and iron-deficiency anemia: a population-based study. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e82952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082952

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Maguire, JL, de Veber, G, and Parkin, PC. Association between iron-deficiency anemia and stroke in young children. Pediatrics. (2007) 120:1053–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0502

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Mehta, PJ, Chapman, S, Jayam-Trouth, A, and Kurukumbi, M. Acute ischemic stroke secondary to iron deficiency anemia: a case report. Case Rep Neurol Med. (2012) 2012:487080. doi: 10.1155/2012/487080

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Kuhn, V, Diederich, L, TCS, K, Kramer, CM, Lückstädt, W, Panknin, C, et al. Red blood cell function and dysfunction: redox regulation, nitric oxide metabolism, Anemia. Antioxid Redox Signal. (2017) 26:718–42. doi: 10.1089/ars.2016.6954

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Sekula, P, Del Greco, MF, Pattaro, C, and Köttgen, A. Mendelian randomization as an approach to assess causality using observational data. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2016) 27:3253–65. doi: 10.1681/asn.2016010098

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Davey Smith, G, and Hemani, G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum Mol Genet. (2014) 23:R89–98. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu328

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Hammer, GP, du Prel, JB, and Blettner, M. Avoiding bias in observational studies: part 8 in a series of articles on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. (2009) 106:664–8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0664

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Skrivankova, VW, Richmond, RC, Woolf, BAR, Yarmolinsky, J, Davies, NM, Swanson, SA, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using Mendelian randomization: the STROBE-MR statement. JAMA. (2021) 326:1614–21. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18236

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Skrivankova, VW, Richmond, RC, Woolf, BAR, Davies, NM, Swanson, SA, Vander Weele, TJ, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration. BMJ. (2021) 375:n2233. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2233

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Malik, R, Chauhan, G, Traylor, M, Sargurupremraj, M, Okada, Y, Mishra, A, et al. Multiancestry genome-wide association study of 520, 000 subjects identifies 32 loci associated with stroke and stroke subtypes. Nat Genet. (2018) 50:524–37. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0058-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Mishra, A, Malik, R, Hachiya, T, Jürgenson, T, Namba, S, Posner, DC, et al. Stroke genetics informs drug discovery and risk prediction across ancestries. Nature. (2022) 611:115–23. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05165-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Clarke, L, Zheng-Bradley, X, Smith, R, Kulesha, E, Xiao, C, Toneva, I, et al. The 1000 genomes project: data management and community access. Nat Methods. (2012) 9:459–62. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1974

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Palmer, TM, Lawlor, DA, Harbord, RM, Sheehan, NA, Tobias, JH, Timpson, NJ, et al. Using multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk factors. Stat Methods Med Res. (2012) 21:223–42. doi: 10.1177/0962280210394459

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Pierce, BL, and Burgess, S. Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators. Am J Epidemiol. (2013) 178:1177–84. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt084

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Bowden, J, Davey Smith, G, and Burgess, S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. (2015) 44:512–25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Bowden, J, Davey Smith, G, Haycock, PC, and Burgess, S. Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol. (2016) 40:304–14. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21965

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Bowden, J, Del Greco, MF, Minelli, C, Davey Smith, G, Sheehan, N, and Thompson, J. A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization. Stat Med. (2017) 36:1783–802. doi: 10.1002/sim.7221

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Verbanck, M, Chen, CY, Neale, B, and Do, R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet. (2018) 50:693–8. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Gotoh, S, Hata, J, Ninomiya, T, Hirakawa, Y, Nagata, M, Mukai, N, et al. Hematocrit and the risk of cardiovascular disease in a Japanese community: the Hisayama study. Atherosclerosis. (2015) 242:199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.07.014

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Panwar, B, Judd, SE, Warnock, DG, McClellan, WM, Booth, JN 3rd, Muntner, P, et al. Hemoglobin concentration and risk of incident stroke in community-living adults. Stroke. (2016) 47:2017–24. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.116.013077

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Heo, J, Youk, TM, and Seo, KD. Anemia is a risk factor for the development of ischemic stroke and post-stroke mortality. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:2556. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122556

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Abramson, JL, Jurkovitz, CT, Vaccarino, V, Weintraub, WS, and McClellan, W. Chronic kidney disease, anemia, and incident stroke in a middle-aged, community-based population: the ARIC study. Kidney Int. (2003) 64:610–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00109.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Gan, T, Hu, J, Liu, W, Li, C, Xu, Q, Wang, Y, et al. Causal association between Anemia and cardiovascular disease: a 2-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. J Am Heart Assoc. (2023) 12:e029689. doi: 10.1161/jaha.123.029689

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Kim, JS, and Kang, SY. Bleeding and subsequent anemia: a precipitant for cerebral infarction. Eur Neurol. (2000) 43:201–8. doi: 10.1159/000008176

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Nagel, T, Resnick, N, Atkinson, WJ, Dewey, CF Jr, and Gimbrone, MA Jr. Shear stress selectively upregulates intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in cultured human vascular endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. (1994) 94:885–91. doi: 10.1172/jci117410

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Kuku, I, Kaya, E, Yologlu, S, Gokdeniz, R, and Baydin, A. Platelet counts in adults with iron deficiency anemia. Platelets. (2009) 20:401–5. doi: 10.1080/09537100903137306

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Abe, H, Semba, H, and Takeda, N. The roles of hypoxia signaling in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. J Atheroscler Thromb. (2017) 24:884–94. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Lévy, P, Kohler, M, McNicholas, WT, Barbé, F, McEvoy, RD, Somers, VK, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2015) 1:15015. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.15

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Gillum, RF, Sempos, CT, Makuc, DM, Looker, AC, Chien, CY, and Ingram, DD. Serum transferrin saturation, stroke incidence, and mortality in women and men. The NHANES I epidemiologic Followup study. National Health and nutrition examination survey. Am J Epidemiol. (1996) 144:59–68. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008855

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Ekblom, K, Hultdin, J, Stegmayr, B, Johansson, I, Van Guelpen, B, Hallmans, G, et al. Iron stores and HFE genotypes are not related to increased risk of ischemic stroke. A prospective nested case-referent study. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2007) 24:405–11. doi: 10.1159/000108429

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Batur Caglayan, HZ, Nazliel, B, Irkec, C, Dumlu, A, Filiz, A, and Panpalli, AM. Iron-deficiency Anemia leading to transient ischemic attacks due to intraluminal carotid artery Thrombus. Case Rep Neurol Med. (2013) 2013:813415:1–3. doi: 10.1155/2013/813415

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Makhija, S, Aneja, S, Tripathi, RP, and Narayan, S. Etiological profile of stroke and its relation with prothrombotic states. Indian J Pediatr. (2008) 75:579–84. doi: 10.1007/s12098-008-0112-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Nagai, T, Komatsu, N, Sakata, Y, Miura, Y, and Ozawa, K. Iron deficiency anemia with marked thrombocytosis complicated by central retinal vein occlusion. Intern Med. (2005) 44:1090–2. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.44.1090

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Kinoshita, Y, Taniura, S, Shishido, H, Nojima, T, Kamitani, H, and Watanebe, T. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis associated with iron deficiency: two case reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). (2006) 46:589–93. doi: 10.2176/nmc.46.589

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Roshal, D . Embolic stroke due to a common carotid artery Thrombus in a young patient with severe Iron-deficiency Anemia without thrombocytosis. Case Rep Neurol Med. (2016) 2016:6920303–4. doi: 10.1155/2016/6920303

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Munot, P, De Vile, C, Hemingway, C, Gunny, R, and Ganesan, V. Severe iron deficiency anaemia and ischaemic stroke in children. Arch Dis Child. (2011) 96:276–9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.189241

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Coutinho, JM, Zuurbier, SM, Gaartman, AE, Dikstaal, AA, Stam, J, Middeldorp, S, et al. Association between Anemia and cerebral venous thrombosis: case-control study. Stroke. (2015) 46:2735–40. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.115.009843

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Guo, J, Tuo, QZ, and Lei, P. Iron, ferroptosis, and ischemic stroke. J Neurochem. (2023) 165:487–520. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15807

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: iron deficiency anemia, ischemic stroke, small vessel stroke, cardioembolic stroke, large artery stroke, Mendelian randomization

Citation: Chen X, Li A, Zhou W and Yao L (2024) No genetic association between iron deficiency anemia and ischemic stroke and its subtypes: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front. Neurol. 15:1408758. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1408758

Received: 28 March 2024; Accepted: 08 August 2024;
Published: 19 August 2024.

Edited by:

Matteo Foschi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (AUSL) della Romagna, Italy

Reviewed by:

Hatice Mine Cakmak, Duzce University, Türkiye
Puspa Sari, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia

Copyright © 2024 Chen, Li, Zhou and Yao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Liping Yao, ylp256032@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.