Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Dementia and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1394499
This article is part of the Research Topic Neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment View all 9 articles

Effect of hypoglycemic events on cognitive function in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a dose-response meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Min Ye Min Ye 1*Qiqi Yang Qiqi Yang 1Lele Zhang Lele Zhang 1Hudie Song Hudie Song 1Qin Fu Qin Fu 1Jun Qian Jun Qian 1Hongyu Xie Hongyu Xie 2Ai Hong Yuan Ai Hong Yuan 2
  • 1 The first school of clinical medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
  • 2 The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is widely acknowledged as a vital warning sign contributing to cognitive dysfunction. However, there is still a lack of consensus on whether hypoglycemic events resulting from poor glycemic control increase the risk of cognitive dysfunction in people with diabetes, and the potential dose-response correlation between hypoglycemic events and cognitive dysfunction remains unexplored. The primary objective of the current study was to assess the contribution of hypoglycemic events to cognitive dysfunction in T2DM patients and the dose-response correlation between the two.A comprehensive search of nine major databases was executed from inception to May 2023. We screened all observational studies examining the connection between hypoglycemia and cognitive dysfunction. The DerSimonian-Laird method was used to compute the combined risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Additionally, dose-response analysis was employed to investigate the correlation between the frequency of hypoglycemia and the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction.Results: A total of 30 studies of different levels in 17 articles with 3961352 participants were included in this review. The pooled RR for the connection of hypoglycemia and the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction was 1.47 (95% CI: 1.35-1.60). Subgroup analyses showed that the pooled RR for the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction was 1.20 (95% CI: 1.11-1.31) for one episode of hypoglycemia, 1.41 (95% CI: 1.05-1.88) for two episodes of hypoglycemia, and 1.62 (95% CI: 1.20-2.91) for three or more episodes of hypoglycemia. Dose-response analysis showed a linear dose-response relationship between hypoglycemia and the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction (exp (b) = 1.178694, z = 7.12, P < 0.001).Our investigations demonstrated a 47% heightened likelihood of cognitive dysfunction in individuals with hypoglycemia compared to those without. Furthermore, the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction climbed by 17.87% for every subsequent episode of hypoglycemia. Therefore, long-term monitoring of blood glucose, periodic screening of cognitive function, and moderate health education should be encouraged, which will be beneficial for people with diabetes to prevent hypoglycemic events and cognitive dysfunction.Registration: PROSPERO ID CRD42023432352.

    Keywords: type 2 diabetes mellitus, cognitive dysfunction, Hypoglycemia, Dose-response analysis, metaanalysis

    Received: 01 Mar 2024; Accepted: 26 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Ye, Yang, Zhang, Song, Fu, Qian, Xie and Yuan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Min Ye, The first school of clinical medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.