AUTHOR=Zhang Zaiyu , Wu Yuxin , Zhao Xueling , Ji Wenyuan , Li Lusheng , Zhai Xuan , Liang Ping , Cheng Yuan , Zhou Jianjun TITLE=Pediatric WNT medulloblastoma predisposition in intraoperative blood loss: a retrospective observational cohort study JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neurology VOLUME=15 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1386121 DOI=10.3389/fneur.2024.1386121 ISSN=1664-2295 ABSTRACT=Introduction

Molecular subgroups influence the vascular architecture within medulloblastomas, particularly the wingless (WNT) subgroup, which contributes to its propensity for primary tumor hemorrhage. Whether this mechanism affects intraoperative blood loss remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the association between WNT medulloblastoma and the predisposition for blood loss.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study using data from a neuro-oncology center comprising molecular data on patients treated between December 31, 2014, and April 30, 2023. Differences between WNT and other subgroups in the risk of primary outcome-intraoperative blood loss were assessed using multivariable-adjusted linear regression.

Results

Of the 148 patients included in the analysis, 18 patients (12.2%) had WNT, 42 (28.4%) had sonic hedgehog (SHH) TP53-wildtype, 7 (4.7%) had SHH TP53-mutant, and 81 (54.7%) were non-WNT/ non-SHH. The WNT subgroup more frequently underwent primary intratumoral hemorrhage (22% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.011). The median intraoperative blood loss was 400.00 (interquartile range [IQR] 250, 500) mL for WNT and 300.00 [200, 400] mL for the other subgroups (p = 0.136), with an adjusted β of 135.264 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 11.701–258.827; p = 0.032). Similar results were observed in both midline and noninfiltrative margin medulloblastoma.

Discussion

WNT medulloblastoma is typically associated with primary intratumoral hemorrhage and intraoperative blood loss. The validity of determining the surgical approach based on predicted molecular subtypes from imaging data is questionable. However, attempting to engage in risk communication with patients in a molecular-specific way is worthwhile to validate.