The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the volume of specific regional infarction and the prognosis of patients who undergo mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute large vessel occlusion.
In this study, we collected the clinical and imaging features of patients with unilateral acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke from January 2021 to June 2023 in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. All patients underwent CT perfusion and non-contrast CT scan before MT. The ASPECTS was assessed based on imaging data, and artificial intelligence was used to obtain the percentage of infarction in each of the 10 regions of ASPECTS. According to the modified Rankin Scale, the patients were divided into the good prognosis group and poor prognosis group at the 90-day follow-up. Various indicators in the two groups were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors for poor prognosis. The relationship between core infarction volume and the probability of poor prognosis was plotted to analyze the trend of poor prognosis with changes in the proportion of infarction volume. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to analyze the predictive ability on poor prognosis.
A total of 91 patients were included, with 58 patients having a good prognosis (mRS ≤ 2) and 33 patients having a poor prognosis (mRS ≥ 3). Multivariate analysis showed that NIHSS score and core infarction involving the internal capsule and M6 region were independent risk factors for poor prognosis. According to the linear correlation, a higher ratio of core infarction volume in the internal capsule or M6 region was linked to an increased risk of a poor prognosis. However, the non-linear analysis revealed that the prognostic impact of core infarction volume was significant when the ratio was greater than 69.7%. The ROC curve indicated that the combination of NIHSS score, infarct location, and the ratio of infarct volume has an AUC of 0.87, with a sensitivity of 84.8% and a specificity of 84.5%.
It is important to examine the location and volume of the infarct in the internal capsule and M6 when deciding whether to do a MT.