Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Neurol., 12 February 2024
Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology
This article is part of the Research Topic Case Reports in Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimaging, volume III - 2023 View all 15 articles

Cerebellar encephalitis associated with anti-mGluR1 antibodies: a case report and comprehensive literature review

Xue Chen&#x;Xue Chen1Yanan Chen&#x;Yanan Chen1Lu Di&#x;Lu Di2Na LiuNa Liu1Ting LiuTing Liu1Yun Cai
\n&#x;Yun Cai1*Weiying Di
\n&#x;Weiying Di1*
  • 1Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China
  • 2Hospital of Stomatology Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China

Anti-metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 encephalitis is an uncommon autoimmune condition characterized by a subacute onset of cerebellar syndrome. Frequently, it also manifests as sleep disorders and cognitive or behavioral changes. While immunotherapy is the primary treatment approach, the disease remains poorly understood. Herein, we present a case of anti-metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 encephalitis, highlighting its primary cerebellar syndrome manifestation. The first magnetic resonance imaging scan showed no obvious abnormality. Lumbar puncture showed increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure, increased white blood cell count and protein level. The next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid showed Epstein–Barr virus infection, and the patient was diagnosed with viral cerebellar encephalitis. However, antiviral therapy was ineffective. Finally, anti-metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 was measured at 1:1,000, and the patient was definitely diagnosed with anti-metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 encephalitis. Therefore, clinicians should pay attention to such diseases to avoid misdiagnosis.

Introduction

Anti-metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) encephalitis is a seldom-encountered autoimmune disorder impacting both the central and the peripheral nervous system. It primarily instigates an acute or subacute cerebellar syndrome with varying severity. mGluRs are G-protein-coupled receptors situated both pre-and post-synaptically across the central and peripheral nervous systems, predominantly expressed in Purkinje cells. Their roles span cerebellar development, synaptic transmission modulation, synaptic plasticity, pain perception, memory, learning, and anxiety management (1). mGluR1 activation fosters long-term depression in parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses, a pivotal process for cerebellar motor learning (2). In this report, we present a case of cerebellar encephalitis associated with anti-mGluR1.

Case presentation

A 50-year old male laborer with a 15-year history of hypertension was admitted to our facility on 25 March 2020, presenting with symptoms of fever, dizziness, slurred speech, and unsteady gait persisting for 20 days. About 20 days before admission, he had shown a peak temperature of 37.5°C accompanied by the same neurological symptoms. An initial cranial MR scan did not indicate any anomalies (Figure 1A). Further, the head and neck CTA revealed a stenosed right middle cerebral artery and a barely discernible constriction at the ostium of the left vertebral artery. Lumbar puncture indicated a pressure of 230 mmH2O. The cerebrospinal fluid had leukocytes at 190 × 106/L (reference range: 0–8 × 106/L) and protein levels at 0.54 g/L (reference range: 0.2–0.4 g/L). CSF mNGS identified 4 sequences of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV). Viral cerebellar encephalitis was suspected, but despite antiviral therapy, there was no symptomatic improvement, prompting his visit to our hospital.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. On 25 March 2020 (A), cranial MRI showed no abnormality, and on 20 April 2023 (B), cranial MRI showed cerebellar atrophy.

Upon examination, his vitals were recorded as: temperature 36.6°C, pulse rate 70 bpm, respiratory rate 19 breaths per minute, and blood pressure at 141/92 mmHg. Cardio-respiratory and abdominal assessments were unremarkable. Neurological evaluation indicated clear consciousness, coherent speech, horizontal nystagmus in both eyes, imprecise bilateral finger-nose and heel-shin tests, positive Romberg sign, and no other evident abnormalities. A preliminary diagnosis suggested cerebellar encephalitis, and a treatment regimen of Acyclovir combined with Dexamethasone (10 mg) was initiated.

Post-admission, standard blood tests, biochemistry, coagulation profile, D-dimer, myocardial enzymes, BNP, thyroid function and antibodies, PCT, ESR, CRP, tumor markers, and TORCH were all found to be within normal limits. A repeat lumbar puncture yielded a pressure of 210 mmH2O, white blood cells at 50 × 106/L, protein at 0.50 g/L, with cerebrospinal fluid cytology predominantly indicating a lymphocytic response. Both the cerebrospinal fluid and serum tested negative for a series of autoimmune encephalitis antibodies (anti-NMDAR, AMPAR1, AMPAR2, LGI1, CASPR2, GABABR, GAD65), paraneoplastic neurological syndrome antibodies (Hu, Yo, Ri, Amphiphysin、Ma2, CV2/CRMP5), and ganglioside antibodies (GM1-IgG, GD1b-IgG, GQ1b-IgG, GM1-IgM, GD1b-IgM, GQ1b-IgM).

During hospitalization, the patient’s condition deteriorated, exhibiting sleep disturbances and altered mental behavior. A treatment regimen comprising Olanzapine, Eszopiclone, intravenous human immunoglobulin (0.4 g/kg for 5 days), and methylprednisolone sodium succinate (500 mg for 3 days) was administered. The patient was discharged after showing improvement. However, on 1 May 2020, he experienced exacerbation of dizziness and unsteady walking, with a new symptom of coughing when drinking water. A subsequent head MRI did not reveal any discernible abnormalities. Both serum autoimmune encephalitis antibody and serum AQP-4 tests were negative. Further examination of cerebellar encephalitis antibody profile at Peking Union Medical College Hospital revealed the presence of serum anti-mGluR1 with an end-point titer of 1:1,000 (Figure 2), leading to a definitive diagnosis of Anti-mGluR1 encephalitis. The patient was readmitted to our facility, receiving Human Immunoglobulin (0.4 g/kg for 5 days), Methylprednisolone (500 mg for 3 days followed by a tapering regimen), Mycophenolate Mofetil (0.5 g twice daily), and Olanzapine (5 mg nightly). Although the patient’s psychiatric symptoms improved, there was negligible enhancement in cerebellar ataxia. Post-discharge, he continued rehabilitation exercises with periodic follow-ups. A subsequent review on 14 April 2023, revealed an mRS score of 3, and a cranial MRI indicated cerebellar atrophy (Figure 1B).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Serum anti-mGluR1-IgG positive (A) and negative control (B) of another serum individuals sample (transfected cell method).

Discussion

In the presented case, the patient’s initial symptoms, characterized by clumsiness in speech and unstable gait, were accompanied by a prodromal infection. Physical examination confirmed the presence of cerebellar syndrome. The progression of the illness saw the patient manifesting psycho-behavioral disturbances and cognitive impairments. An initial MRI scan did not reveal notable abnormalities. Lumbar puncture indicated elevated cerebrospinal fluid pressure, increased white blood cell count, and elevated protein levels. The next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid revealed a viral infection, leading to a presumptive diagnosis of viral cerebellar encephalitis. However, given the ineffectiveness of the antiviral therapy, the differential diagnosis was refined to consider immune-related cerebellar encephalitis. This led to an extended immune-related antibody profile test, confirming the presence of anti-mGluR1 with an end-point titer of 1:1,000, and culminating in a definitive diagnosis of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis.

Smitt et al. (3) first documented two anti-mGluR1 encephalitis cases, where both individuals exhibited cerebellar ataxia and had a prior history of Hodgkin lymphoma. To date, literature has recorded 36 such cases globally. Research by Khojah et al. (4) highlighted that 25% of patients experienced one or more prodromal symptoms—ranging from fever, headache, and fatigue to weight loss, nausea, vomiting, night sweats, and flu-like manifestations—with a median interval of 30 days leading up to neurological symptom onset. In a literature review, three patients reported prior infections, including a trigeminal herpes zoster infection a month before onset (5), a streptococcal pharyngitis 2 months prior (6), and a dengue virus infection (7). The link between such infections and anti-mGluR1 encephalitis remains ambiguous. These findings hint at potential post-infectious factors contributing to the development of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis, or the possibility that infections could catalyze its pathogenesis (4). EBV was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients. As the first discovered human oncovirus, EBV infects more than 90% of the world’s people, and once infected, most will remain latent in B lymphocytes in an asymptomatic form of infection and cannot be cleared (8). Infection leads to a spectrum of EBV-associated diseases when the balance between the virus and the host is disrupted (9). The relationship between viral infection and cerebellar encephalitis in this patient needs further investigation.

Over the recent years, it’s been reported that 27% of patients with herpes simplex virus encephalitis (HSE) subsequently develop secondary autoimmune encephalitis (AE), which includes predominant cases of anti-NMDAR encephalitis (64%) and other variations such as GABAbR encephalitis, LGI1 encephalitis, and AMPAR encephalitis (10). Notably, 30% of patients without neurological symptoms post-HSE infection demonstrated autoantibodies, including NMDAR (27%) and other antibodies (73%) in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid. This case study postulates that the emergence of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis in the presented patient might be associated with preceding viral infection. Several hypotheses abound regarding the etiology of autoimmune encephalitis post-HSV (herpes simplex virus) infection (11): (1) Molecular mimicry, where exogenous pathogen antigens structurally resemble the host’s own antigens, resulting in specific antibodies or effector T cells produced against these exogenous antigens inadvertently cross-reacting with the host’s analogous antigens, leading to autoimmune repercussions. (2) The release of autoantigens from disintegrated neurons post-viral infection, which disrupts central immune tolerance (12). (3) Autoinflammatory responses against the herpes virus infection, where HSV triggers T and B cell activation, producing a cascade of inflammatory cytokines. These might infiltrate the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, instigating immune responses in the CNS and subsequently recognizing CNS autoantigens (13). (4) Genetic predispositions (14). (5) Secondary immunodeficiencies. For instance, HIV infections might induce an immune response dysregulation to NMDAR, culminating in the emergence of AEs (15). However, the nexus between anti-mGluR1 encephalitis, its prodromal infections, and its specific mechanisms remains nebulous and warrants further in-depth research.

In a retrospective analysis encompassing 36 cases of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis (4), 16.7% of patients had diagnoses of unrelated autoimmune diseases to mGluR1 antibodies, including conditions like multiple sclerosis, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, Sjögren’s syndrome, and pernicious anemia. Furthermore, 22.2% had associated malignancies, with six cases being lymphomas. Notably, 50% of these malignancy cases manifested autoimmune cerebellar or encephalitis within 5 years of onset. Iorio et al. (16) reported a unique case of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis associated with prostate cancer. Immunohistochemistry of the patient’s prostate adenocarcinoma revealed significant mGluR1 expression in the tumor’s luminal acinar epithelial cells. Additionally, patient IgG was observed binding to tumor mGluR1. Intriguingly, mGluR1 receptor expression has been substantiated in prostate cancer, with its expression correlating with the progression of the malignancy (17). Additionally, mGluR1 expression is evident in human cutaneous T-cell lymphoma cell lines (18). While it’s uncertain if malignancies play a direct role in instigating anti-mGluR1 encephalitis, it’s paramount for physicians to undertake tumor-related assessments, including tumor markers and PET-CT scans in such patients. As of now, this patient has not demonstrated autoimmune diseases unrelated to mGluR1 antibodies or malignant tumors. Continuous observation and regular follow-ups are crucial.

The clinical presentation of this patient centered on cerebellar syndrome. In the literature, anti-mGluR1 encephalitis manifests a spectrum of symptoms, including gait instability, cerebellar dysarthria, abnormal eye movements, and limb ataxia (Table 1). As the disease unfolds, the majority of patients exhibit behavioral changes, cognitive impairments, taste dysfunction, autonomic dysregulation, seizures, and sleep disorders. Rarer clinical manifestations encompass visual disturbances and limb weakness (19). Dyskinesias, when manifested, present as myoclonus or dystonia in adults, while children predominantly exhibit athetosis (20).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Basic information, clinical symptoms and laboratory tests of 36 patients diagnosed with anti-mGluR1 encephalitis in the literature.

For the anti-mGluR1, detection rates in serum and cerebrospinal fluid stood at 97% and 95%, respectively (19). In some cases, the antibody was detected solely either in serum or cerebrospinal fluid. For our particular patient, only the serum was tested, as he opted against a repeated lumbar puncture. Notably, NMDA-R, LGI1 and CASPR2 encaphalitis, typically present with CSF cell numbers in the range of 0–20 leukocytes/μL. Our patient had 190 leukocytes/μL in CFS, which was significantly higher than other typical autoimmune encephalitis. We reviewed the literature and found that the number of CSF cells in patients with mGLuR1 encephalitis, which has been reported so far, ranges from 0 to 214 leukocytes/μL. And nearly half of such patients demonstrated leukocytosis in the cerebrospinal fluid, accompanied by specific oligoclonal bands or an increased IgG index.

Electroencephalography (EEG) can reveal bilateral focal frontotemporal slow waves, potentially associated with epileptiform discharges (6). Though early imaging displayed abnormalities in merely one-third of the patients, encompassing findings like brain atrophy, variable brain and spinal cord lesions, and cerebellar abnormalities such as cerebellar hyperintensity, leptomeningeal enhancement, atrophy, or edema, these typically were concentrated in the medial cerebellar hemisphere and vermis (4). Intriguingly, as time progressed, positive MRI results were observed in three-quarters of these patients. Such deviations in MRI results, transitioning from normal to abnormal, are attributed to the degeneration of Purkinje cells due to prolonged antibody exposure (21)—a shift highlighting the imperative of timely intervention. PET scans are instrumental in excluding hidden malignancies. In line with the guidelines from the European Federation of Neurological Societies, a PET-CT follow-up is strongly advised in instances with heightened suspicion of a paraneoplastic syndrome (22). In the context of our patient, the initial cranial MRI did not present any abnormalities. Despite this, post-initiation of the immunomodulatory therapy, while the patient’s clinical symptoms remained stable over the span of 3 years, subsequent MRI scans indicated cerebellar atrophy. This evokes concerns about the long-term prognosis for patients with anti-mGluR1 encephalitis.

For most individuals diagnosed with anti-mGluR1 antibody-associated encephalitis, first-line immunotherapy treatments such as steroids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulins are prescribed. According to a study by Khojah et al. (4), 41.7% of these patients progressed to second-line therapy, including agents such as rituximab, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and hydroxychloroquine. Among these, 93.3% did not achieve full remission with the second-line treatment, and 36.1% utilized more than three distinct treatment modalities. Even then, merely 15.4% managed to attain complete remission. Comparatively, patients with anti-mGluR1 encephalitis tend to have a grimmer prognosis than those with other autoimmune encephalitides, such as anti-mGluR5 encephalitis, anti-NMDAR encephalitis, or anti-LGI1 encephalitis (6, 23, 24). Independent of the underlying cause of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis, commencing treatment at an early stage remains pivotal.

Conclusion

In summation, when encountering patients with acute or subacute onset prominently manifesting cerebellar syndromes—and where common autoimmune and paraneoplastic antibody profiles return negative—screening for the rarer anti-mGluR1 becomes imperative. A minority of these patients might harbor tumors. Acute-phase cerebrospinal fluid evaluations might display mildly elevated leukocyte counts. A definitive diagnosis necessitates the detection of anti-mGluR1-IgG in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid. It’s evident that this disease exhibits a limited response to immunotherapy, underscoring the importance of early therapeutic interventions. Upcoming research endeavors should aim to elucidate the intricate relationship between anti-mGluR1 antibody-associated encephalitis, prodromal infections, and tumors. Additionally, we must embark on the quest to uncover more effective treatment regimens.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the patients/participants or patients/participants' legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

XC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. YaC: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. LD: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. NL: Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. TL: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YuC: Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. WD: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by grants from the Government-funded Clinical Medicine Excellence Training Program in 2022 (no. 361007), Medical Science Research Project of Hebei Province in 2023 (no. 20231510), Science and technology self-funded project of Baoding City in 2022 (no. 2241ZF337), Medical Science Foundation of Hebei University in 2022 (no. 2022B02), and Foundation Project of Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University in 2021 (no. 2021Q039).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the medical staff of Neurology who participated in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of this patient.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Scotton, WJ, Karim, A, and Jacob, S. "Glutamate receptor antibodies in autoimmune central nervous system disease: Basic mechanisms, clinical features, and antibody detection,". New York, NY: Springer New York (2019). p. 225–255.

Google Scholar

2. Benarroch, EE . Metabotropic glutamate receptors: synaptic modulators and therapeutic targets for neurologic disease. Neurology. (2008) 70:964–8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000306315.03021.2a

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Smitt, PS, Kinoshita, A, De Leeuw, B, Moll, W, Coesmans, M, Jaarsma, D, et al. Paraneoplastic cerebellar Ataxia due to autoantibodies against a glutamate receptor. N Engl J Med. (2000) 342:21–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001063420104

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Khojah, O, Makkawi, S, and Alghamdi, S. Anti-mGluR1 encephalitis: case illustration and systematic review. Front Neurol. (2023) 14:1142160. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1142160

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lopez-Chiriboga, AS, Komorowski, L, Kumpfel, T, Probst, C, Hinson, SR, Pittock, SJ, et al. Metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1 autoimmunity: clinical features and treatment outcomes. Neurology. (2016) 86:1009–13. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002476

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Spatola, M, Petit Peol, M, Maudes, E, Simabukuro, M, Muñiz-Castrillo, S, Pinto, AL, et al. Clinical features, prognostic factors, and antibody effects in anti-mGluR1 encephalitis. Neurology. (2020) 95:e3012–25. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010854

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Chaumont, H, Petit, A, Mameri, T, Schollhammer, R, Honnorat, J, and Lannuzel, A. Successful management of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis with immunosuppressive treatment: Dengue virus as a trigger? Move Disord Clin Pract. (2019) 6:727–8. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12841

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Nowalk, A, and Green, M. Epstein-Barr Virus. Microbiol Spectr. (2016) 4:2015. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.DMIH2-0011-2015

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Taylor, GS, Long, HM, Brooks, JM, Rickinson, AB, and Hislop, AD. The immunology of Epstein-Barr virus-induced disease. Annu Rev Immunol. (2015) 33:787–821. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112326

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Armangue, T, Spatola, M, Vlagea, A, Mattozzi, S, Cárceles-Cordon, M, Martinez-Heras, E, et al. Frequency, symptoms, risk factors, and outcomes of autoimmune encephalitis after herpes simplex encephalitis: a prospective observational study and retrospective analysis. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:760–72. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30244-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Gelfand, JM . Autoimmune encephalitis after herpes simplex encephalitis: insights into pathogenesis. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:733–5. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30279-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Alexopoulos, H, Akrivou, S, Mastroyanni, S, Antonopoulou, M, Dinopoulos, A, Giorgi, M, et al. Postherpes simplex encephalitis: a case series of viral-triggered autoimmunity, synaptic autoantibodies and response to therapy. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. (2018) 11:175628641876877. doi: 10.1177/1756286418768778

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Liu, J, Liu, L, Kang, W, Peng, G, Yu, D, Ma, Q, et al. Cytokines/chemokines: potential biomarkers for non-paraneoplastic anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:582296. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.582296

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Gnann, JW Jr, and Whitley, RJ. Herpes simplex encephalitis an update. Curr Infect Dis Rep. (2017) 19:13. doi: 10.1007/s11908-017-0568-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Cunill, V, Arboleya, S, Jiménez, MDLR, Campins, A, Herbera, P, Mestre, L, et al. Neuronal surface antibodies in HIV-infected patients with isolated psychosis. J Neuroimmunol. (2016) 301:49–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.10.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Iorio, R, Damato, V, Mirabella, M, Vita, MG, Hulsenboom, E, Plantone, D, et al. Cerebellar degeneration associated with mGluR1 autoantibodies as a paraneoplastic manifestation of prostate adenocarcinoma. J Neuroimmunol. (2013) 263:155–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2013.07.015

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Koochekpour, S, Majumdar, S, Shourideh, M, Rezaei, K, Sartor, O, Mohler, JL, et al. Serum glutamate levels correlate with Gleason score and glutamate blockade decreases proliferation, migration, and invasion and induces apoptosis in prostate Cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. (2012) 18:5888–901. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1308

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chiocchetti, A, Miglio, G, Mesturini, R, Varsaldi, F, Mocellin, M, Orilieri, E, et al. Group I mGlu receptor stimulation inhibits activation-induced cell death of human T lymphocytes. Br J Pharmacol. (2006) 148:760–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706746

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Lei, L, Jianguo, L, Zhang Jingxiao, Y, Yingxin, QX, and Jiawei, W. A case of antimetabotropic glutamate receptor 1 antibody-associated encephalitis. Chin J Neurol. (2021) 54:104. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113694-20210208-00104

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Chandler, E, Arvantis, N, and Morgan, B. A novel case of idiopathic MGluR1 encephalitis in a pediatric patient. Child Neurol Open. (2022) 9:2329048X2210956–221095695X. doi: 10.1177/2329048X221095695

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Yoshikura, N, Kimura, A, Fukata, M, Fukata, Y, Yokoi, N, Harada, N, et al. Long-term clinical follow-up of a patient with non-paraneoplastic cerebellar ataxia associated with anti-mGluR1 autoantibodies. J Neuroimmunol. (2018) 319:63–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.04.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Bresler, R, Schroeder, HWI, Chow, DZ, and Lim, R. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis of suspected paraneoplastic syndromes: a retrospective analysis. World J Nucl Med. (2020) 19:124–30. doi: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_48_19

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. van Sonderen, A, Thijs, RD, Coenders, EC, Jiskoot, LC, Sanchez, E, de Bruijn, MA, et al. Anti-LGI1 encephalitis: clinical syndrome and long-term follow-up. Neurology. (2016) 87:1449–56. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003173

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Spatola, M, Sabater, L, Planagumà, J, Martínez-Hernandez, E, Armangué, T, Prüss, H, et al. Encephalitis with mGluR5 antibodies: symptoms and antibody effects. Neurology. (2018) 90:e1964–72. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005614

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cerebellar encephalitis, anti-mGluR1 antibodies, case report, EBV, literature review

Citation: Chen X, Chen Y, Di L, Liu N, Liu T, Cai Y and Di W (2024) Cerebellar encephalitis associated with anti-mGluR1 antibodies: a case report and comprehensive literature review. Front. Neurol. 15:1333658. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1333658

Received: 05 November 2023; Accepted: 02 February 2024;
Published: 12 February 2024.

Edited by:

Ronny Wickstrom, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Sweden

Reviewed by:

Jakob Theorell, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
Morten Blaabjerg, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
Andrew McKeon, Mayo Clinic, United States

Copyright © 2024 Chen, Chen, Di, Liu, Liu, Cai and Di. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yun Cai, caiyun8327@126.com; Weiying Di, diweiying@126.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.