Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Neurol., 12 October 2023
Sec. Headache and Neurogenic Pain

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome following intracranial hypotension in a postpartum patient: a case report and literature review

Shuhua Li&#x;Shuhua Li1Yi Yang,&#x;Yi Yang2,3Jiacai ZuoJiacai Zuo2Ningli DuNingli Du1Guoxian Kou
Guoxian Kou1*
  • 1Department of Infectious Diseases, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China
  • 2Department of Neurology, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China
  • 3Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Introduction: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a potentially life-threatening neurological disorder, rarely linked to intracranial hypotension. The presentation showed a patient with intracranial hypotension after peridural anesthesia who experienced RCVS during the early postpartum period, suggesting a potential involvement of intracranial hypotension in RCVS occurrence.

Case report: A young female of 29 years of age initially developed an orthostatic headache after undergoing a painless delivery with lumbar epidural anesthesia. Intracranial hypotension was considered the underlying cause. Her headache was partially resolved after intravenous fluid therapy and strict bed rest. After 2 days, the patient had a new onset thunderclap headache with generalized seizures, cortical blindness, and elevated blood pressure. An MRI scan revealed high signal intensity within the temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes, left caudate nucleus, and right cerebellum on T2-FLAIR imaging with vasogenic edema. MR angiography indicated multifocal, segmental, diffuse narrowing affecting the cerebral arteries that are large and medium. An RCVS2 score was six, and the patient was diagnosed with RCVS. She was managed conservatively, quickly improving her symptoms. After 10 days, a follow-up MRI indicated a significant reduction in the abnormal signal, and a substantial resolution of the constriction of the cerebral artery constriction was confirmed by MR angiography.

Conclusion: Intracranial hypotension could potentially lead to RCVS in postpartum patients, and it may be triggered by cerebral vasospasm secondary to intracranial hypotension.

Introduction

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a potentially fatal and uncommon disease (1). It is usually benign following a monophasic and self-limited process. However, some patients could suffer from catastrophic forms, including ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, cortical subarachnoid hemorrhage, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), and death (2, 3). Small distal arteries are first affected by this vasospastic disease causing thunderclap headaches, hemorrhagic strokes, and PRES. Later, the disorder leads to ischemic strokes involving the medium and large arteries (4). RCVS has an unknown pathophysiological process, but endothelial dysfunction, sympathetic hyperstimulation, and alteration of vascular smooth muscle by oxidative stress have been postulated (5).

Intracranial hypotension is mainly presenting with an orthostatic headache accompanied by low opening pressure of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (<60 mmH20). Intracranial hypotension after the leakage of CSF may mechanically stimulate the arterial wall due to displacement of the brain anatomy. Moreover, the adrenergic system is activated, leading to cerebral vessel vasospasm and RCVS occurrence (68). Multiple potential etiologies of RCVS have been previously identified, but the association between intracranial hypotension and RCVS is rarely discussed. Limited reports have proposed RCVS may trigger by intracranial hypotension, and the pathophysiology is not clearly known at this time (6). Here, a postpartum patient was presented with intracranial hypotension after peridural anesthesia with subsequent RCVS.

Case report

A young female who was 29 years old presented to the obstetrical department and underwent a painless delivery with lumbar epidural anesthesia at 39 weeks +6/7 gestation. After 8 hours of giving birth, the patient experienced an orthostatic headache. The cause was suspected of intracranial hypotension caused by CSF leakage due to an inadvertent epidural puncture. After receiving intravenous fluid therapy and strict bed rest, her symptoms were partially resolved in the next 2 days. However, the patient developed a new-onset thunderclap headache that peaked in less than a minute, lasting for more than 5 minutes, and differing from the previous headaches. She also reported blurred vision and recurrent generalized tonic–clonic seizures, requiring an emergency consult from a neurologist. She had vital signs with a blood pressure of 170/110 mmHg, a pulse rate of 92 beats/min, and a body temperature of 36.9°C. The neurological examination indicated cortical blindness, which was otherwise unremarkable. The complete blood counts, inflammatory markers, and standard chemistry panels were normal. The patient had a new-onset thunderclap headache with epileptic seizures and cortical blindness, suggesting a lesion in the cerebral cortex. An MRI scan revealed hyperintensities inside the temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes, left caudate nucleus, and right cerebellum on T2-FLAIR imaging (Figure 1A) without the restriction of diffusion displayed on diffusion-weighted imaging. Postpartum, the patient had an acute onset of symptoms with multiple brain lesions, indicating inflammatory or vascular disorders as the probable causes. Even though the intracranial infection could have been a possible cause, the patient had no fever, with normal inflammatory markers and negative meningeal signs. Additionally, the widespread enhancement of the dura mater indicated by the enhanced MRI could have been caused by low intracranial pressure syndrome (Figure 2), further decreasing the intracranial infection possibility. Cerebral vascular examinations were conducted to clarify the cause of the disease. Due to the peripartum status of the patient, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was considered a possible cause. However, MR venography gave a normal result, leading to the exclusion of cerebral venous infarction. MR angiography indicated multifocal, diffuse, and segmental narrowing of arteries (both large and medium) within the anterior and posterior circulations, with occasional dilation of the segments (Figure 1B). The patient had an RCVS2 score of six (Figure 3). The clinical and imaging features were consistent with RCVS, and abnormal hypersignals on MRI FLAIR indicated vasogenic edema, depicting PRES. The patient was conservatively managed with continued bed rest and intravenous fluid infusion with a daily dosage of 2000 mL for 9 days. Moreover, a calcium channel antagonist (nifedipine 10 mg qd) and intravenous 10 mg diazepam followed by an antiepileptic drug (levetiracetam, 0.5 g bid) were also administered. These interventions quickly resolved her headache symptoms with vision recovery and no further seizures. After 10 days, another MRI was performed, which indicated markedly attenuated abnormal signals (Figure 1C). MRA showed that the cerebral arteries, which were diffuse and segmentally constricted, were improved significantly (Figure 1D).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. T2-FLAIR MRI revealed hyperintensities in the temporal, parietal, occipital lobes, left caudate nucleus, and right cerebellum (A). An MRA indicated multifocal, segmental, and diffuse narrowing of cerebral arteries (large and medium) [(B), red arrows]. After 10 days, complete remission of abnormalities was observed in a follow-up MRI compared to the previous signals (C). An MRA demonstrated significant cerebral artery recovery from diffuse segmental constriction (D).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Axial and coronal gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR images showed diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement [(A,B), red arrows].

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. RCVS2 score for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.

Discussion

RCVS is a neurovascular condition with characteristics of thunderclap headache which may or may not be associated with further neurological deficits that are focally placed. Additionally, RCVS is accompanied by seizures and diffuse segmental cerebral artery narrowing, improving within 3 months of onset (1). Approximately 70% of RCVS patients possess a known precipitating factor, with postpartum state, vasoactive drugs, and nasal decongestants being the primary recognized triggers (5, 9). A recent study demonstrated that the RCVS prevalence rate (11.9%) is relatively high among postpartum patients (10). However, a prospective study investigating 900 consecutive puerperae observed that the risk of puerperal RCVS is negligible, with only a 0.1% proportion (11). Therefore, intracranial hypotension may be crucial in RCVS pathogenesis other than the potential postpartum trigger.

Currently, the potential mechanisms concerning RCVS secondary to intracranial hypotension remain speculative. Chaves et al. (7) described a patient with diffuse cerebral vasospasm in intracranial hypotension and explained that severe CSF volume reduction could have triggered the vasospasm. Schievink et al. (12) presented a case with intracranial hypotension with severe, transient, and segmental cerebral arterial stenosis. They believed intracranial hypotension could be the underlying cause of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction. Caranzano et al. (13) indicated that intracranial hypotension could have been the primum movens of RCVS and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Cerebral vasospasm among patients with intracranial hypotension may be triggered by stimulating the arterial wall with mechanical force, which occurs by displacing the brain anatomy through CSF quantity reduction (7, 8). According to the doctrine provided by Monro-Kellie, the brain, CSF, and blood volume inside the cranium remain constant. CSF leakage leads to a decrease in intracranial volume. Thus, the intracranial venous system may be dilated as compensation, leading to adrenergic overstimulation and subsequent cerebral vessel vasospasm (6).

In a postpartum patient, positional headaches following epidural anesthesia and the presence of neurological signs guide the diagnosis of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), occurring from intracranial hypotension due to leakage of CSF inside the epidural space through the location of dural puncture (14). PDPH may lead to neurological complications, such as persistent headache, subdural hematoma, depression, cerebral venous thrombosis, or bacterial meningitis (15). However, RCVS secondary to intracranial hypotension has limited reports. We suspected RCVS in our patient when the clinical headache features changed from positional to thunderclap headache (TCH) postpartum. RCVS is a common cause of TCH, except for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), ischaemic stroke, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, cervical artery dissection, intracranial infection and pituitary apoplexy (16). Moreover, RCVS can manifest as neurological symptoms, including seizures, altered mental status, disturbances in vision, ataxic gait, or motor and sensory insufficiencies (17, 18). Vascular RCVS imaging may indicate the alternating diffusing pattern of dilation and constriction of cerebral artery vessels while excluding other differentials (19). Additionally, 25–33% of RCVS patients may experience various complications, such as PRES, cortical subarachnoid hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage (5, 20).

Advancement in imaging methods and clinical decision-making has made RCVS more recognizable. However, precisely diagnosing this disease could be challenging. The differential diagnosis of cerebral arteriopathies often includes RCVS and primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS). PACNS is treated with immunosuppressive drugs for a prolonged time, but steroids in RCVS could have deleterious effects (21). Female gender, migraines, and postpartum are usual in RCVS patients. Additionally, TCH, infarcts at the border regions, cortical SAH, and vasogenic edema highly predict RCVS. However, PACNS patients may have several tiny and deep infarcts, white matter lesions that are quite deep, lesions resembling tumors, or various lesions elevated by gadolinium (9, 22). Furthermore, an RCVS2 score of ≥5 demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for detecting RCVS, while a ≤ 2 effectively excluded it (23). Vasogenic edema resembling PRES can be identified across 9–38% of RCVS patients, consistent with our case (24). Over one-third of RCVS cases possess increased headache-induced blood pressure. Enhanced pressure of blood within the arteries and vasoconstrictions in the major cerebral vessels were essential PRES identifiers in such patients (25, 26).

No official guidelines exist for RCVS therapy. RCVS patients must avoid headache triggers, withdraw precipitating vasoactive agents, and require calcium channel antagonists to reduce TCH (25). In our case, intracranial hypotension may be the primum movens of RCVS. Most patients with intracranial hypotension respond to a short conservative management course followed by non-targeted patching of epidural blood (27). RCVS drug treatment with antagonists of calcium ion channels (nifedipine, verapamil, or nimodipine) positively impacts the clinical progression. However, glucocorticoids can lead to adverse outcomes (24).

Conclusion

In summary, new-onset headaches should be carefully assessed for secondary headaches during the peripartum period. This study presented a postpartum RCVS patient after intracranial hypotension due to a CSF leakage caused by an inadvertent epidural puncture. Thus, due to cerebral vasospasm, intracranial hypotension could trigger RCVS.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Institutional Ethics Committee of Mianyang Central Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.

Author contributions

SL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Software. YY: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. JZ: Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. ND: Formal analysis, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. GK: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Ducros, A . Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Lancet Neurol. (2012) 11:906–17. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70135-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Xing, B, Lenck, S, Krings, T, Hengwei, J, Jaigobin, CS, and Schaafsma, JD. Angiographic characteristics of hemorrhagic and ischemic phases of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Clin Neuroradiol. (2020) 30:85–9. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0736-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Boitet, R, de Gaalon, S, Duflos, C, Marin, G, Mawet, J, Burcin, C, et al. Long-term outcomes after reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Stroke. (2020) 51:670–3. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027703

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Ducros, A, Boukobza, M, Porcher, R, Sarov, M, Valade, D, and Bousser, MG. The clinical and radiological spectrum of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. A prospective series of 67 patients. Brain. (2007) 130:3091–101. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ribas, MZ, Paticcié, GF, de Medeiros, SDP, de Oliveira, VA, Noleto, FM, and Dos Santos, JCC. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: literature review. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatr Neurosurg. (2023) 59:5. doi: 10.1186/s41983-023-00607-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Feil, K, Forbrig, R, Thaler, FS, Conrad, J, Heck, S, Dorn, F, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome associated with intracranial hypotension. Neurocrit Care. (2017) 26:103–8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0320-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Chaves, C, Freidberg, SR, Lee, G, Zerris, V, Ries, S, and Chavali, R. Cerebral vasospasm following intracranial hypotension caused by cerebrospinal fluid leak from an incidental lumbar durotomy. Case report. J Neurosurg. (2005) 102:152–5. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.1.0152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Arutiunov, AI, Baron, MA, and Majorova, NA. The role of mechanical factors in the pathogenesis of short-term and prolonged spasm of the cerebral arteries. J Neurosurg. (1974) 40:459–72. doi: 10.3171/jns.1974.40.4.0459

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. de Boysson, H, Parienti, JJ, Mawet, J, Arquizan, C, Boulouis, G, Burcin, C, et al. Primary angiitis of the CNS and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a comparative study. Neurology. (2018) 91:e1468–78. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006367

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Valicente, VM, Peng, CH, Pacheco, KN, Lin, L, Kielb, EI, Dawoodani, E, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in the postpartum period: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Neurol Int. (2022) 14:488–96. doi: 10.3390/neurolint14020040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Anzola, GP, Brighenti, R, Cobelli, M, Giossi, A, Mazzucco, S, Olivato, S, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in puerperium: a prospective study. J Neurol Sci. (2017) 375:130–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.01.056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Schievink, WI, Maya, MM, Chow, W, and Louy, C. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Headache. (2007) 47:284–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00696.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Caranzano, L, Fenter, H, Maeder, P, Michel, P, and Strambo, D. Pearls and oy-sters: post-dural puncture headache, cerebral sinus venous thrombosis, and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in the Peripartum. Neurology. (2022) 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201111. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Turnbull, DK, and Shepherd, DB. Post-dural puncture headache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Br J Anaesth. (2003) 91:718–29. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg231

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Guglielminotti, J, Landau, R, and Li, G. Major neurologic complications associated with postdural puncture headache in obstetrics: a retrospective cohort study. Anesth Analg. (2019) 129:1328–36. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004336

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Cheng, YC, Kuo, KH, and Lai, TH. A common cause of sudden and thunderclap headaches: reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. J Headache Pain. (2014) 15:13. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Wolff, V, and Ducros, A. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome without typical thunderclap headache. Headache. (2016) 56:674–87. doi: 10.1111/head.12794

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Forman, R, Conners, JJ, Song, SY, John, S, Garg, R, Harris, J, et al. The Spectrum of nontraumatic convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2019) 28:104473. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104473

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yancy, H, Lee-Iannotti, JK, Schwedt, TJ, and Dodick, DW. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Headache. (2013) 53:570–6. doi: 10.1111/head.12040

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Valencia-Mendoza, M, Ramírez-Rodríguez, N, Vargas-Avila, N, Peña-Ortiz, A, Corzo-Villamizar, M, Serna-Ramírez, L, et al. Fatal reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a systematic review of case series and case reports. J Clin Neurosci. (2019) 70:183–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Singhal, AB, and Topcuoglu, MA. Glucocorticoid-associated worsening in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Neurology. (2017) 88:228–36. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003510

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Singhal, AB, Topcuoglu, MA, Fok, JW, Kursun, O, Nogueira, RG, Frosch, MP, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes and primary angiitis of the central nervous system: clinical, imaging, and angiographic comparison. Ann Neurol. (2016) 79:882–94. doi: 10.1002/ana.24652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Rocha, EA, Topcuoglu, MA, Silva, GS, and Singhal, AB. RCVS2 score and diagnostic approach for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Neurology. (2019) 92:e639–47. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006917

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Erhart, DK, Ludolph, AC, and Althaus, K. RCVS: by clinicians for clinicians-a narrative review. J Neurol. (2023) 270:673–88. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11425-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Ducros, A . Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Handb Clin Neurol. (2014) 121:1725–41. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-4088-7.00111-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Pilato, F, Distefano, M, and Calandrelli, R. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: clinical and radiological considerations. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:34. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Mehta, D, Cheema, S, Davagnanam, I, and Matharu, M. Diagnosis and treatment evaluation in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Front Neurol. (2023) 14:1145949. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1145949

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: intracranial hypotension, RCVS, cerebral vasospasm, postpartum, case report

Citation: Li S, Yang Y, Zuo J, Du N and Kou G (2023) Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome following intracranial hypotension in a postpartum patient: a case report and literature review. Front. Neurol. 14:1281074. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1281074

Received: 21 August 2023; Accepted: 21 September 2023;
Published: 12 October 2023.

Edited by:

Sait Ashina, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, United States

Reviewed by:

Thomas Berk, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, United States
Shazia Afridi, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2023 Li, Yang, Zuo, Du and Kou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guoxian Kou, 854506708@qq.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.