Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 13 March 2023
Sec. Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology
This article is part of the Research Topic 365 Days of Progress In Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology View all 11 articles

Association of smoking with the survival of patients with brain metastasis of lung cancer

  • 1School of Medical and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 2Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • 3Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 4Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 5West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Background: Smoking is associated with increased mortality in patients with cancer. However, there are limited data on the impact of smoking on the survival of patients with brain metastases. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether smoking was associated with survival and whether smoking cessation was beneficial to these patients.

Methods: This study used lung cancer with a brain metastasis cohort of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from 2013 to 2021. Patients were stratified according to smoking history; the distribution, clinical characteristics, and survival data of each group were estimated. Kaplan-Meier analysis and risk analysis were performed for the survival endpoint.

Results: Of the 2,647 patients included in the analysis, the median age was 57.8 years, and 55.4% were men. Among them, 67.1% had no smoking history, 18.9% still smoked, and 14% reported quitting smoking. Compared with never smokers, current smokers [HR, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.35-1.69), p < 0.01] and former smokers [HR, 1.32 (95% CI, 1.16-1.49), p<0.01] had an increased risk of death. However, quitting smoking was not associated with improved survival [HR, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77-1.04), p = 0.16]. The overall survival increased with the increase of smoking cessation years.

Conclusions: In lung cancer patients with brain metastases, smoking was associated with an increased risk of death, but quitting smoking was not associated with improved survival.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death (1). Approximately 81.3% of patients with lung cancer are related to smoking (2). Although the overall smoking prevalence has decreased significantly in the past years, cigarette smoking remains the leading cause of lung cancer cases and deaths (3). Smoking in patients with cancer increases overall mortality, cancer-specific mortality, treatment-related toxicity, and second primary cancer (4, 5). The 2020 Surgeon General's Report on quitting smoking added many new pieces of evidence and conclusions to reveal the benefits of quitting smoking even after the diagnosis of cancer (6). The American Association for Cancer Research, EMSO, the WHO, and other organizations advocate smoking cessation as a standard cancer treatment (710). More than half of lung cancers develop into brain metastasis during the course of the disease (11). However, guidelines rarely specifically recommend smoking cessation for brain metastasis. Brain metastasis is a sign of poor prognosis in patients with lung cancer, and the expected survival time is short (12). Patients with advanced cancer are willing to quit smoking differently from those diagnosed early. Pain, second-hand smoke exposure, guilt about smoking, fear of stigmatization, and fatalism of disease may represent obstacles to smoking cessation in patients with cancer, particularly in those with advanced disease (1316).

There is less evidence about the impact of smoking on the survival of patients with brain metastases and the benefits of quitting smoking on patients with brain metastases. Only a small study of 366 brain metastases in patients with lung cancer found that smoking had no effect on overall survival (17). Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate whether smoking affects the overall survival rate of lung cancer patients with brain metastasis and the benefits of quitting smoking on survival.

Methods

Study population

This study is a single-center retrospective cohort study on the survival rate of lung cancer patients with brain metastasis in China. From December 2013 to August 2021, lung cancer patients with brain metastasis coded C34 and secondary invasive C79.3 were screened from the West China Hospital of Sichuan University database according to the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (18).

Data collection and follow-up

Electronic medical records and social population registration records collected information about demographic characteristics, family, medical history, and survival time. We actively collected data on smoking behavior through the electronic medical record, including the years of smoking, the average amount of smoking per day, whether they had quit smoking, and the time they had quit smoking. We multiplied the number of cigarette packs smoked per day by the patient's number of years and calculated the cumulative smoking per pack-year (based on 20 cigarettes per pack). A patient was classified as a current smoker if he/she had evidence of active smoking or had < 1 year of smoking cessation. Moreover, we classified patients who quit smoking at least 1 year before diagnosis as former smokers.

Patients' general conditions when diagnosing diseases were also obtained, including anthropometric data, functional status, chronic health conditions, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score. The number of brain metastases and other metastases was also recorded. We also collected their history of drinking in their life. Drinking is defined as drinking alcoholic drinks at least one time a week in a year. We sorted all relevant treatment history, imaging, and histopathological information into the patient's data, and determined electronic medical records and follow-up records after the patient's diagnosis, life state, tumor progression, and the treatment process during the disease. This study was approved by the ethics committees of the West China Hospital and the written consent for patients included 161 in the study was exempted by the ethics committees since the study only used retrospective observation data (No. 2022127).

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were conducted to summarize baseline characteristics, with numbers and percentages for categorical variables and means for continuous variables. We imputed the missing values with the average value. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for survival associated with smoke were estimated using Cox proportional hazards model. Stratified analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses controlled for potential confounding. The multivariable model was adjusted according to the age, gender, KPS score at diagnosis, histological type (including adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma), past medical history (including diabetes mellitus and hypertension), the number of intracranial metastases, the presence of extracranial metastasis, the radiotherapy alone, target therapy alone, chemotherapy alone, the cumulative amount of smoking at diagnosis, whether to quit smoking, the time of quitting smoking, and the drinking status at diagnosis. The model covariates were selected based on the available literature to include the suspected prognostic factors for lung cancer with brain metastasis survival and the variables that might influence the assessed exposure (1922). Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to compare the survival of current, former, and never smokers, and the log-rank test was used to test this difference.

In this model, the start time is defined as the patient's first admission date and diagnosis as brain metastasis of lung cancer. To assess the effect of smoking and quitting smoking on overall survival, the date of death from any cause was set as the end time. If the patient is still alive within the follow-up time, we set the follow-up time (15 August 2021) as the end date for the patient. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from diagnosis of brain metastases to death. A subgroup analysis was also performed among current and former smokers, including the smoking intensity and duration since smoking cessation. P-values that were reported as two-sided and < 0.05 were considered statistical differences. All statistical analyses were bilateral and performed using R statistical software (version 4.0.3, Vienna, Austria).

Results

The study collected 2,647 lung cancer patients with brain metastasis, the median age was 57.8, and 55.4% were men. Among them, 67.1% had no smoking history, 18.9% still smoked, and 14% reported quitting smoking. The median overall survival for the cohort was 2 years (95%CI: 1.9–2.1). The median overall survival rates of never smokers, former smokers, and current smokers were 2.2 years (95%CI: 2.1–2.3), 1.7 years (95%CI: 1.5–1.9), and 1.5 years (95%CI: 1.3–1.7), respectively. The baseline characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Clinical and smoking characteristics of lung cancer patients with brain metastases.

In a univariate analysis of the entire population, current smokers [HR, 1.51 (CI, 1.35–1.69), p < 0.01] and former smokers [HR, 1.32 (CI, 1.16–1.49), p < 0.01] had an increased risk of death compared with never smokers. After adjustment for potential confounders and risk factors, smokers (current and former smokers) still had an increased risk of death (Figure 1). However, compared with the current smoker, we did not see the benefits of quitting smoking for the overall survival of patients [HR, 0.90 (CI, 0.77–1.04), p = 0.16] (Supplementary Figure 1). Figure 2 shows the Kaplan–Meier plots of overall survival for patients based on smoking status. The cumulative pack years of smoking and smoking cessation duration of 371 former smokers and 501 current smokers were analyzed by subgroup analysis. According to the Cox proportional hazard analysis, annual cumulative smoking was used as a categorical variable, and smokers were divided into cumulative package years of ≤ 40 pack-year and cumulative package years of >40 pack-year; we found that cumulative smoking was not associated with overall survival in current smokers and former smokers (Figure 3). To assess the “time response” effect of quitting smoking, a total of five groups were generated according to the time of quitting smoking: current smokers, quitting smoking for 1–5 years, quitting smoking for 5–10 years, quitting smoking for ≥10 years, and never smokers. Figure 4 shows that the overall survival rate increased with smoking cessation years, but this was not statistically significant.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Multivariate Cox forest map of lung cancer patients with brain metastases. BMI, body mass index (recorded when brain metastases was diagnosed); KPS, Karnofsky performance status; Brain metastases, number of brain metastases.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier plots of overall survival for lung cancer patients with brain metastases based on smoking status.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Subgroup analysis of cumulative smoking in current smokers and former smokers for lung cancer patients with brain metastases. BMI, body mass index (recorded when brain metastases was diagnosed); KPS, Karnofsky performance status; Brain metastases, number of brain metastases.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The overall survival rate stratified according to smoke status and years since tobacco cessation.

Discussion

This retrospective study analyzed the survival of 2,647 lung cancer patients with brain metastasis. The results showed that smoking affected the overall survival rate of lung cancer patients with brain metastasis. However, smoking cessation was not associated with higher survival than current smoking.

Contrary to our study, previous studies did not find an association between smoking and lung cancer brain metastasis. Kim et al. analyzed 313 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis, and univariate analysis showed that smoking affected the overall survival; however, there was no difference in the overall survival in the multivariate analysis (23). In another study of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, only non-smokers in stage I had a significant survival advantage over smokers, and smokers who quit smoking in stage II or III disease had no significant reduction in the risk of death (24). But our study found that smoking increased the risk of death in lung cancer patients with brain metastases. This difference in part may be explained by our large size simple to make the results more precise.

Previous studies have shown that smoking increases the risk of brain metastasis (17, 25). Nicotine promotes brain metastasis by polarizing microglia and inhibiting innate immune function (25, 26). In addition, smoking affects the effect of chemotherapy in advanced patients (27), and a significant difference in tumor biology is the higher EGFR mutation rate of never smokers, which may explain the better prognosis of never smokers after treatment for the EGFR gene (28). It is shown that smoking and tobacco products alter biological pathways of cancer leading to increased proliferation, invasion, migration, angiogenesis, decreased response to cytotoxic therapy, and activation of pro-survival cellular pathways (29, 30). These may be the reasons for the difference in prognosis between never smokers and patients with a history of smoking. Some study also suggests that there is a dose-dependent relationship between smoking and the survival of patients with lung cancer (31, 32). In contrast to these results, our study showed that compared with light to moderate smokers, the overall survival of the heavy smoker (>40 pack-years) was not significantly decreased.

Smoking is a main prognostic factor of lung cancer. Evidence has shown that smokers who quit smoking for more than 1 year had higher survival than current smokers. Zhou et al. suggested that overall survival increased with the increase in smoking cessation time among patients with early-stage NSCLC (33). Nia et al. concluded that patients with early-stage NSCLC who quit smoking have significantly less mortality than current smokers (34). In a study of 4,200 smokers in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network NSCLC cohort, only young patients with stage IV disease who quit smoking >12 months before the diagnosis gained survival benefits (35). However, we did not find the benefits of quitting smoking for lung cancer patients with brain metastasis. Our study suggested that long-term continuous quitting smoking may have the trend of increasing survival. Paradoxically, when patients with lung cancer have brain metastasis, the median survival time is short, thus, they may not get the benefits of long-term quitting smoking. However, cumulative smoking cessation time before the diagnosis of brain metastasis may be essential to improve survival.

This study has several limitations. First, the patient's smoking history and smoking cessation are from electronic medical records, which will deviate from the patient's self-report. A study revealed that up to 50% of cancer patients' self-reporting about smoking may be inaccurate (36). Second, our information collection on tobacco intake is based on cigarettes, ignoring alternative products such as tobacco and nicotine. Third, although the large sample size is a strength of our study, this is a study of a single agency and the patients included in the cohort are all Asian. Therefore, the generalizability of the results to other populations is questionable.

Conclusion

Different from previous studies, this study is not limited to patients with non-metastatic lung cancer. Although the survival time of patients with metastatic lung cancer is short, our results still show the harm of smoking to patients with brain metastasis of lung cancer. The survival rate of patients with smoking is lower than that of patients without smoking. We failed to find the relationship between quitting smoking and survival.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the patients/participants or patients/participants' legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

XP and FF conceived the study. JY performed the main analysis and wrote the original draft. ZL retrieved the data. YZ participates in the revision of the manuscript. The study reported in the manuscript has been performed by JY, YZ, ZL, YH, YP, RZ, XP, and FF unless clearly specified in the text. All authors read, approved the manuscript, and conducted data screening and collation.

Funding

The study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFE0206600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172842 and 81672386), the Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support grant, the TianFu Laboratory (2022SYSX0064, 2021YFSY0008, and 2020YFS0276), the West China Nursing Discipline Development Special Fund Project (HXHL21008), the Post-Doctor Research Project, the West China Hospital, Sichuan University (2020HXBH119), and the Translational Medicine Fund of the West China Hospital (2020HXBH119 and CGZH19002). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1036387/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1. Multivariate Cox forest map of lung cancer patients with brain metastases. BMI, body mass index (recorded when brain metastases was diagnosed); KPS, Karnofsky performance status; Brain metastases, number of brain metastases.

References

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Islami F, Goding Sauer A, Miller KD, Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Jacobs EJ, et al. Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin. (2018) 68:31–54. doi: 10.3322/caac.21440

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Sauer AG, Siegel RL, Jemal A, Fedewa SA. Updated review of prevalence of major risk factors and use of screening tests for cancer in the United States. Can Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2017) 26:1192–208. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sheikh M, Mukeriya A, Shangina O, Brennan P, Zaridze D. Postdiagnosis smoking cessation and reduced risk for lung cancer progression and mortality: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. (2021) 174:1232–9. doi: 10.7326/M21-0252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Warren GW, Cummings KM. Tobacco and lung cancer: risks, trends, and outcomes in patients with cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book (2013) 359–64. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2013.33.359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Smoking Cessation: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health (2020).

Google Scholar

7. Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, Novello S, Smit EF, Faivre-Finn C, et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. (2018) 29:iv192–237. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy275

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Merrill JK, Alberg AJ, Goffin JR, Ramalingam SS, Simmons VN, Warren GW. American society of clinical oncology policy brief: FDA's regulation of electronic nicotine delivery systems and tobacco products. J Oncol Pract. (2017) 13:58–60. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.018200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Toll BA, Brandon TH, Gritz ER, Warren GW, Herbst RS. Assessing tobacco use by cancer patients and facilitating cessation: an American association for cancer research policy statement. Clin Cancer Res. (2013) 19:1941–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0666

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Peacock A, Leung J, Larney S, Colledge S, Hickman M, Rehm J, et al. Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report. Addiction. (2018) 13:1905–26. doi: 10.1111/add.14234

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hatiboglu MA, Akdur K, Sawaya R. Neurosurgical management of patients with brain metastasis. Neurosurg Rev. (2020) 43:483–95. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-1013-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Waqar SN, Samson PP, Robinson CG, Bradley J, Devarakonda S, Du L, et al. Non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastasis at presentation. Clin Lung Cancer. (2018) 19:e373–e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.01.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A. Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study. BMJ. (2004) 328:1470. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38111.639734.7C

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Aigner CJ, Cinciripini PM, Anderson KO, Baum GP, Gritz ER, Lam CY. The association of pain with smoking and quit attempts in an electronic diary study of cancer patients trying to quit. Nicotine Tob Res. (2016) 18:1449–55. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Eng L, Qiu X, Su J, Pringle D, Niu C, Mahler M, et al. The role of second-hand smoke exposure on smoking cessation in non-tobacco-related cancers. Cancer. (2015) 121:2655–63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29340

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wells M, Aitchison P, Harris F, Ozakinci G, Radley A, Bauld L, et al. Barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation in a cancer context: a qualitative study of patient, family and professional views. BMC Cancer. (2017) 17:348. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3344-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Shenker RF, McTyre ER, Ruiz J, Weaver KE, Cramer C, Alphonse-Sullivan NK, et al. The effects of smoking status and smoking history on patients with brain metastases from lung cancer. Cancer Med. (2017) 6:944–52. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Winters-Miner LA, Bolding PS, Hilbe JM, Goldstein M, Hill T, Nisbet R, et al. ICD-10. In: Practical Predictive Analytics and Decisioning Systems for Medicine. Florida, FL: Academic Press (2015). p. 106–115.

Google Scholar

19. Bacha S, Cherif H, Rabaa D, Habibech S, Cheikhrouhou S, Racil H, et al. Brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer: prognostic factors and management. Tunis Med. (2018) 96:165–71.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

20. Sperduto PW, Yang TJ, Beal K, Pan H, Brown PD, Bangdiwala A, et al. Estimating survival in patients with lung cancer and brain metastases: an update of the graded prognostic assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung-molGPA). JAMA Oncol. (2017) 3:827–31. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3834

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Sperduto PW, Kased N, Roberge D, Xu Z, Shanley R, Luo X, et al. Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases. J Clin Oncol. (2012) 30:419–25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Sperduto PW, Berkey B, Gaspar LE, Mehta M, Curran W. A new prognostic index and comparison to three other indices for patients with brain metastases: an analysis of 1,960 patients in the RTOG database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2008) 70:510–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Kim J, Lee SM, Yim JJ, Yoo CG, Kim YW, Han SK, et al. Prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases. Thorac Cancer. (2013) 4:167–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-7714.2012.00164.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Bryant A, Cerfolio RJ. Differences in epidemiology, histology, and survival between cigarette smokers and never-smokers who develop non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. (2007) 132:185–92. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0442

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wu SY, Xing F, Sharma S, Wu K, Tyagi A, Liu Y, et al. Nicotine promotes brain metastasis by polarizing microglia and suppressing innate immune function. J Exp Med. (2020) 217:e20191131. doi: 10.1084/jem.20191131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Heishman SJ. Behavioral and cognitive effects of smoking: relationship to nicotine addiction. Nicotine Tob Res. (1999) 1(Suppl. 2):S143–7; discussion S165–6. doi: 10.1080/14622299050011971

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, et al. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. (2005) 353:123–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050753

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Tsao AS, Liu D, Lee JJ, Spitz M, Hong WK. Smoking affects treatment outcome in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. (2006) 106:2428–36. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21884

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Dobson Amato KA, Hyland A, Reed R, Mahoney MC, Marshall J, Giovino G, et al. Tobacco cessation may improve lung cancer patient survival. J Thorac Oncol. (2015) 10:1014–9. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000578

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Sobus SL, Warren GW. The biologic effects of cigarette smoke on cancer cells. Cancer. (2014) 120:3617–26. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ban WH, Yeo CD, Han S, Kang HS, Park CK, Kim JS, et al. Impact of smoking amount on clinicopathological features and survival in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. (2020) 20:848. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07358-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Kogure Y, Ando M, Saka H, Chiba Y, Yamamoto N, Asami K, et al. Histology and smoking status predict survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Results of West Japan Oncology group (WJOG) study 3906L. J Thorac Oncol. (2013) 8:753–8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31828b51f5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Zhou W, Heist RS, Liu G, Park S, Neuberg DS, Asomaning K, et al. Smoking cessation before diagnosis and survival in early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer. (2006) 53:375–80. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.05.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Sardari Nia P, Weyler J, Colpaert C, Vermeulen P, Van Marck E, Van Schil P. Prognostic value of smoking status in operated non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. (2005) 47:351–9. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.08.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ferketich AK, Niland JC, Mamet R, Zornosa C, D'Amico TA, Ettinger DS, et al. Smoking status and survival in the national comprehensive cancer network non-small cell lung cancer cohort. Cancer. (2013) 119:847–53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Hald J, Overgaard J, Grau C. Evaluation of objective measures of smoking status–a prospective clinical study in a group of head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. (2003) 42:154–9. doi: 10.1080/02841860310005020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: smoking, lung cancer, brain metastasis, smoking cessation, the overall survival

Citation: Yu J, Zhang Y, Liu Z, He Y, Pei Y, Zhang R, Peng X and Fang F (2023) Association of smoking with the survival of patients with brain metastasis of lung cancer. Front. Neurol. 14:1036387. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1036387

Received: 04 September 2022; Accepted: 20 February 2023;
Published: 13 March 2023.

Edited by:

David D. Eisenstat, Royal Children's Hospital, Australia

Reviewed by:

Ye Zhang, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China
Zhigang Liu, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, China

Copyright © 2023 Yu, Zhang, Liu, He, Pei, Zhang, Peng and Fang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xingchen Peng, cHh4MjAxNCYjeDAwMDQwOzE2My5jb20=; Fang Fang, ZmFuZ2ZhbmcwMSYjeDAwMDQwO3NjdS5lZHUuY24=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.