AUTHOR=Huang Wenhao , Chen Jiayi , Zheng Yadan , Zhang Jin , Li Xin , Su Liujie , Li Yinying , Dou Zulin 

TITLE=The Effectiveness of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Stroke Patients With Upper Limb Impairments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neurology

VOLUME=13

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.896651

DOI=10.3389/fneur.2022.896651

ISSN=1664-2295

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Background</title><p>Upper limb impairments are one of the most common health problems of stroke, affecting both motor function and independence in daily life. It has been demonstrated that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) increases brain excitability and improves upper limb function. Our study sought to determine the role of iTBS in stroke recovery.</p></sec><sec><title>Objective</title><p>The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of iTBS in individuals with upper limb impairments following stroke.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>The databases used included Cumulative Index to PubMed, EMBASE, ESCBOhost, The Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Database, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and WanFang Database. Studies published before November 2021 were included. Each participant received an iTBS-based intervention aimed at improving activity levels or impairment, which was compared to usual care, a sham intervention, or another intervention. The primary outcome measure was a change in upper limb function assessment. Secondary outcomes included impairment, participation, and quality of life measures.</p></sec><sec><title>Result</title><p>A total of 18 studies (<italic>n</italic> = 401 participants) that met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. There was a slight change in the upper limb function of the iTBS group compared with the control group, as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score (mean difference 2.70, 95% CI −0.02 to 5.42, <italic>p</italic> = 0.05). Significant improvement in resting motor threshold (RMT) and motor-evoked potential (MEP) was also observed in the meta-analysis of iTBS (MD 3.46, 95% CI 2.63 to 4.28, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.00001); (MD 1.34, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.51, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.00001). In addition, we got similar results when the studies were using the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) assessment (mean difference of 7.34, 95% CI 0.47 to 14.21, <italic>p</italic> = 0.04).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Our study established the efficacy of iTBS in improving motor cortical plasticity, motor function, and daily functioning in stroke patients. However, the review requires evidence from additional randomized controlled trials and high-quality research.</p></sec><sec><title>Systematic Review Registration</title><p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/</ext-link></p></sec>