Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Neurol., 23 May 2022
Sec. Neuroinfectious Diseases
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights in Neuroinfectious Diseases: 2021 View all 5 articles

Opioid-Use, COVID-19 Infection, and Their Neurological Implications

  • Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an imminent threat to human health and public safety. ACE2 and transmembrane serine protease 2 proteins on host cells provide the viral entry point to SARS-CoV-2. Although SARS-CoV-2 mainly infects the respiratory system, there have been reports of viral neurotropism and central nervous system injury as indicated by plasma biomarkers, including neurofilament light chain protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein. Even with a small proportion of infections leading to neurological manifestation, the overall number remains high. Common neurological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection include anosmia, ageusia, encephalopathy, and stroke, which are not restricted to only the most severe infection cases. Opioids and opioid antagonists bind to the ACE2 receptor and thereby have been hypothesized to have therapeutic potential in treating COVID-19. However, in the case of other neurotropic viral infections such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), opioid use has been established to exacerbate HIV-mediated central nervous system pathogenesis. An analysis of electronic health record data from more than 73 million patients shows that people with Substance Use Disorders are at higher risk of contracting COVID-19 and suffer worse consequences then non-users. Our in-vivo and in-vitro unpublished studies show that morphine treatment causes increased expression of ACE2 in murine lung and brain tissue as early as 24 h post treatment. At the same time, we also observed morphine and lipopolysaccharides treatment lead to a synergistic increase in ACE2 expression in the microglial cell line, SIM-A9. This data suggests that opioid treatment may potentially increase neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We have previously shown that opioids induce gut microbial dysbiosis. Similarly, gut microbiome alterations have been reported with SARS-CoV-2 infection and may play a role in predicting COVID-19 disease severity. However, there are no studies thus far linking opioid-mediated dysbiosis with the severity of neuron-specific COVID-19 infection.

Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which emerged in China in late 2019 is the causative agent for the global coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. COVID-19 severity, ranging from asymptomatic to lethal, is an imminent threat to human health and public safety (1). SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus belonging to the Coronaviridae family and is a single stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus that shares a close resemblance to the bat-derived coronavirus strains (2). In the past two decades, three highly pathogenic zoonotic coronaviruses, SARS-CoV, 2002, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS, 2012) and SARS-CoV-2, 2019 have emerged as major public health concerns (3).

On an average, it takes 5-6 days for COVID-19 symptoms to appear, with fever, cough, and tiredness being the most common symptoms, and sore throat, headache, and diarrhea being less common. A subgroup of COVID-19 survivors (~10%) experience long-COVID or post-COVID syndrome with symptoms persisting beyond the acute phase of the disease, including fatigue, myalgia, reduced physical activity, dyspnea, long-term anosmia, and ageusia (4, 5). Post-COVID syndrome also includes sequelae affecting the mental health of the survivors (6). Symptoms include depression, anxiety, mood swings, and cognitive symptoms impacting memory and attention deficits (7). Prolonged cognitive impairment is observed in both severely ill COVID-19 patients and those with relatively mild symptoms (8) and referred to as “COVID long haulers.” This long-term effect of disease lasting for years was also observed in previous coronavirus outbreaks with SARS-CoV and MERS (9).

The presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA has also been detected in a few cases in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients as well as animal models (10, 11). However, even in absence of detectable viral RNA in brain, evidence of encephalitis, neuroinflammation and neuronal damage is reported (12). Central nervous system (CNS) histopathology of SARS-CoV-2 infection includes hypoxic/ischemic encephalopathy, microglial activation, T cell infiltration, acute myelitis, encephalitis, demyelinating disorder with report of lesion in some cases (13, 14). Hypoxia/ ischemic encephalopathy related clinical symptoms such as headache, dysphoria, delirium, confusion loss of consciousness are the most common correlates in COVID-19 patients (15).

Pre-existing comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus are mostly observed in more than one third of post-COVID syndrome patients (16). Factors such as viral load, tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) density, vascular permeability, and cytokine activation cascade can have a possible role in determining the incapacitating clinical picture in patients suffering from post-COVID syndrome (17). Accumulating evidence also highlight the role of microbiota in determining COVID-19 disease severity and recovery (1823). Opioid use disorder (OUD) has been associated with factor such as respiratory depression, immune modulation, microbial dysbiosis, and bacterial translocation, which can influence COVID-19 disease progression and severity. In this review, we will explore the role of opioid use in the rate and severity of COVID-19 infection.

Review Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature review of COVID-19, OUD, and microbiome using PubMed, Google scholar, and SCOPUS databases using the keywords: “microbiome,” “SARS-CoV-2,” “Coronavirus,” “Opioids,” and “Opioid use disorder.” References listed in review articles and original articles were scanned for relevant studies.

In total, 478 articles were retrieved from all databases. Initial screening based on title of the study excluded 225 articles. Based on the abstract and title, 63 articles were found to be irrelevant and were excluded from the study. We conducted a full-text assessment of 190 review and research articles. A secondary exclusion based on articles having a different subject or discussion and those that were not in line with the purpose of the review. We included 137 articles investigating COVID-19, Opioids, and the microbiome (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flow-chart of the literature search and inclusion/exclusion criteria used in this study. ***P ≤ 0.001.

Clinical And Epidemiological Features of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

COVID-19 disease can have diverse clinical manifestations in individuals based on their age, gender, ethnicity, and the presence of underlying health conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, and kidney damage (2426). Infection symptoms for COVID-19 range from mild symptoms in 80% of patients to severe illness in 14% of patients and critical illness in 5% of symptomatic patients. Typical symptoms of COVID-19 infection as listed by CDC include fever (58.66%), cough (54.52%), dyspnea (30.82%), fatigue (28.16%), malaise (29.75%), sputum secretion (25.33%) chills (13.49%), muscle pain (16.9%), sore throat (14.41%), and diarrhea (9.59%) (27, 28). New loss of taste or smell has also been added to the list of COVID-19 symptoms. In a temporal study, a subgroup of COVID-19 patients showed persistent radiographic and physiological changes in the lung over a period of 12 months, which were reflected in their pulmonary function, suggesting a long-term effect of the infection (29).

Most symptomatic patients start showing symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 from 2-14 days of infection (27). Among critically ill COVID-19 patients, the average time for developing dyspnea was 5-8 days, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was 8–12 days, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission was 9.5–12 days from the onset of illness (30, 31). Based on current data, the case fatality rate for COVID-19 infection seems to be lower than that of MERS (34.4%) and SARS (9.5%), but higher than influenza (0.1%) (32). Age is the strongest risk factor for severe COVID-19 illness, with a case fatality ratio of 8% in people above 80 years (3234). In addition, 29–91% of critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU need invasive mechanical ventilation and are at higher mortality risk (3537). The average length of hospitalization among COVID-19 survivors was 10-13 days and those who spend more than 30 days in hospitals have an increased risk of death. With long-term ICU stay, the bacterial and fungal superinfections rate also increases in COVID-19 patients (38, 39).

Critically ill COVID-19 patients have been recorded to have high cytokine concentrations in plasma, referred to as a “cytokine storm,” triggering systemic inflammation and leading to multi-organ failure and death (40). Cytokine storm also referred to as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), is a systemic inflammatory response by monocytes and macrophages activated by infectious agents. These activated monocytes and macrophages trigger leukocyte recruitment and production of inflammatory mediators, which play a major role in the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections and lung injury (41). IL-6 is the most frequently reported pro-inflammatory cytokine found to be elevated in the serum of severe SARS-CoV-2 patients (42, 43). An elevated level of several other pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), IL-8, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-2, IL-4, soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R), and interferon-γ (IFNγ) were also observed in severe COVID-19 patients. However, the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 during SARS-CoV-2 cytokine storm remain profoundly lower than ARDS, sepsis, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell induced CRS, and influenza (4446). In addition, serum levels of several other biomarkers such as D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and ferritin were also elevated in COVID-19 patients (40).

Neurological Aspect of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

As the number of patients with COVID-19 increased, several neurological manifestations have been reported. The SARS-CoV-2 virus seems to damage the CNS through direct entry into the CNS (10). The spike (S) protein of CoV binds to the ACE2 receptor on the host cell surface to facilitate viral entry. Various cells in the CNS express ACE2 along with the other receptors needed for viral entry. These cells include the endothelial cells (47), which are part of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), neuronal cells, and the neuroglia, including the microglia and astrocytes (48, 49). Such co-expression in the neurovascular unit facilitates SARS-CoV-2 infection in the CNS. In addition to direct entry, the SARS-CoV-2 virus causes a systemic inflammation with a “cytokine storm” that reaches the CNS and results in damage (12, 50). The predominant neurological syndromes of COVID-19 include anosmia, ageusia, encephalopathy, and stroke (51). The most common neurological symptom of SARS-CoV-2 infection is anosmia, and, in most cases, it occurs even in the absence of other symptoms. The underlying mechanisms of this symptom include the expression of ACE2 in the supporting and non-neuronal cells in the olfactory system. In both human and mouse samples, ACE2 was significantly expressed in the supporting cells of the olfactory system but not in the sensory neurons (52). Thus, such expression of these genes in the non-neuronal cells of the olfactory system seems to be responsible for the anosmia and the other issues in odor perception experienced by COVID-19 patients. The other important neurological symptom of SARS-CoV-2 infection is encephalopathy, which can alter higher cognitive function. The term encephalopathy is used to describe “a rapidly developing (in < 4 weeks) pathobiological brain process which is expressed clinically as either subsyndromal delirium, delirium or coma and may have additional features, such as seizures or extrapyramidal signs” (53). In a study looking at encephalopathy and neurological symptoms of COVID-19 in ICU patients, 118 of 140 patients (84.3%) developed delirium with a combination of acute attention, awareness, and cognition disturbances, and 88 patients (69.3%) presented an unexpected state of agitation despite high infusion rates of sedative treatments and neuroleptics. Only 22 (15.7%) patients had normal neurological examination (54). Such neurological symptoms may be due to a systemic inflammatory reaction to SARS-CoV-2, as the previous study found inflammatory disturbances in two-third of the patients when analyzing their CSF.

Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 viral elements were found within endothelial cells, along with an accumulation of inflammatory cells and evidence of endothelial and inflammatory cell death (55). Consequently, the resulting endotheliitis can cause disruptions in the blood-brain barrier and may explain the inflammatory component of the brain in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Another neurological syndrome associated with COVID-19, which may not be as prevalent but occurs in many patients, is an acute cerebrovascular disease (CVD). A recent paper reported that out of 108,571 patients with COVID-19, acute CVD occurred in 1.4% of the patients. The most common manifestation was acute ischemic stroke (87.4%). Patients with COVID-19 developing acute cerebrovascular diseases were older and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and severe infection (56). Interestingly, COVID-19 does not worsen psychiatric or neurological impairments in some neuropsychiatric disorders such as Wilson's disease (57). However, research is still limited on the effect of COVID-19 on other neuropsychiatric diseases.

Opioid Use, Respiratory Depression, And The SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic

Opioids are commonly used in the ICU and in mechanically ventilated patients for sedation and analgesia (58). Invasive mechanical ventilation involves using sedatives to reduce discomfort and distress, and prevent the patient from unintentionally extubating (58). Due to concerns about the adverse effects of benzodiazepines and Propofol, such as delirium and hypotension, updated guidelines have recommended reducing their use (59). As a result, opioids are almost always used as the routine sedative and analgesic agent for mechanically ventilated patients (59). According to observational studies, 85% of mechanically ventilated patients received opioids as part of their treatment (59). However, the use of opioids in these circumstances can have adverse effects and extend a patient's time in the ICU and on mechanical ventilation (58).

According to a recent study published in NEJM, 100% of COVID-19 patients admitted due to ARDS were given opioids for pain management along with Midazolam (86% of patients) or Propofol (47% of patients) (60). Opioid treatment is routinely used as palliative care in COVID-19 patients, and according to a recent study, patients with post-COVID have a high rate of opioid use post pain management. According to a recent study, for every 1000 post-COVID patients at US Veteran Health Administration (VHA), 9 more patients received opioid prescriptions than normally would. They also received other prescription medications for benzodiazepines, such as Xanax for anxiety (61). The global COVID-19 pandemic is exacerbating the opioid epidemic in the USA. According to a recent retrospective case-controlled study, OUD increased the risk for COVID-19 infection [adjusted odds ratio = 10.244 (9.10–11.52), P < 10−30] and also resulted in worse outcomes in these patients (death: 9.6%, hospitalization: 41.0%, P < 0.05) (62). People with OUD with or without pre-existing medical conditions are more vulnerable to severe COVID-19 infection due to poor health. Additionally, individuals with OUD are also at higher risk of getting infected and transmitting SARS-CoV-2, because drug procurement and drug use practices often require social contact.

Opioid use and abuse have been established to cause several comorbidities, increasing the risk of developing severe illness among COVID-19 patients. Respiratory depression is a serious adverse effect of opioid use, often leading to respiratory arrest and death (63). Opioid-induced respiratory depression is a consequence of the activation of μ opioid receptors (MOR) expressed on neurons in the brainstem (63). Morphine can cause hypoventilation even at low doses, significantly lowering respiratory rate and airflow and reducing ventilatory response to carbon dioxide (64). Therefore, together with opioid use, the impact of COVID-19 infection on the lungs may lead to worse outcomes (65).

Acute respiratory distress syndrome results from a disrupted pulmonary barrier caused by underlying inflammation and can be triggered by opioid abuse (66). About 10% of patients in the ICU develop ARDS, often resulting in death. A study using MOR agonist, endorphin-1, showed a protective effect on lung tissue after LPS induced pulmonary injury, characteristic of ARDS (66). Endorphin-1 is an endogenous opioid agonist. Endogenous opioids have been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties and promote immune function, as opposed to exogenous opioids (67, 68). These findings suggest that exogenous opioids may have the opposite effect, exacerbating ARDS. Interestingly, opioids are often used to treat patients with ARDS. A study showed that >80% of patients with ARDS were given opioids, and this treatment was associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and worse outcomes (69). Clinical data needs to be collected and analyzed to understand the impact of opioid use on respiratory function in the context of COVID-19.

Gut Microbial Alterations in OUD and SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Several recent studies have found that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with altered gut microbiota composition, serving as a prognosis tool for COVID-19 disease severity (1823). Bacteroidetes phylum was most abundant in patients with COVID-19, and Actinobacteria was found to be depleted (22). Gut microbiota composition between COVID-19 ICU patients and COVID-19 infectious disease ward patients also varied with a significant increase in bacterial phylum Staphylococcaceae, Microbacteriaceae, Micrococcaceae, Pseudonocardiaceae, Erysipelotrichales (19). Studies also reported the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virion in fecal samples of COVID-19 patients even after having a negative result in respiratory samples suggesting a possible oral-fecal contamination route (70, 71). Metagenomic analysis of gut microbial composition in COVID-19 patients revealed a significant reduction in overall bacterial diversity with a marked increase in opportunistic pathogenic species and a decrease in commensal bacterial species (18, 72) (Table 1). Furthermore, recently published studies also show secondary bacterial infection and bacterial translocation among 12–14% of COVID-19 patients (74, 75). Decreased microbial richness and microbial dysbiosis observed in COVID-19 patients may persist for a long duration even after recovery and respiratory clearance of the virus (22, 73, 76). Contrary to that, another study with a majority African American cohort reveals that dysbiotic gut microbial composition is restored back to uninfected status upon recovery (77). Several confounding factors such as demography, small cohort size, healthy control vs. hospitalized control groups, co-morbidities in the COVID-19 patient group, and antibiotics treatment during hospitalization etc. can contribute to the variation in microbiome observed in different studies. Despite of the variations observed in the composition of dysbiotic microbial communities, the COVID-19 patients' microbiome are consistently depleted in Faecalibacterium (18, 2123), which has been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties and is recognized as a biomarker of a healthy gut microbiome (20) (Table 1). Gut microbial dysbiosis is also observed in SARS-CoV-2 patients suffering from long-term COVID-19 complications (78). Gut microbial dysbiosis observed in SARS-CoV-2 patients is also accompanied by an altered metabolite profile (20, 7981). COVID-19 patient fecal samples were found to be enriched in several metabolites, including sucrose, oxalate, 1,5-anhydroglucose, and D-pinitol; the elevated level for some of which remained unchanged at discharge (79). Purine metabolite acids were also depleted in the fecal samples of COVID-19 patients, which can directly impact the repair function of damaged intestinal epithelium (79). On the other hand, the level of metabolites that are known to exhibit immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects such as D-allose and D-arabinose were found to be depleted in patient fecal samples (79). Metagenomic and meta-transcriptomic data reveal significant depletion of short chain fatty acid (SCFA) producing bacterial taxa Ruminococcaceae and Clostridiaceae (19) and decreased activity of butyrate-producing bacteria, which is reflected in the reduced SCFAs levels observed in fecal samples of COVID-19 patients (73, 82). Depletion of SCFA synthesis pathways was associated with disease severity and showed persistent depletion in patients even after viral clearance (82). Furthermore, a recently published study investigating the role of butyrate releaser (N-(1-carbamoyl-2-phenyl-ethyl) butyramide (FBA) showed promising results in modulating the expression of ACE2, TMPRSS2, and inflammatory cytokines IL-15, MCP-1 and TNF-α in intestinal biopsies (83). SCFAs are also play important role in strengthening intestinal barrier function, regulating inflammation and oxidative stress in intestinal epithelial cells (84). Taken together, regulation of gut microbial homeostasis is not only crucial for the management of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 disease severity but may also be an essential factor for the recovery process after infection.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary of studies exploring SARS-CoV-2 infection associated alteration in the gut microbiome.

Opioids are also shown to cause significant alteration in gut microbial composition. Abundant evidence from human and animal studies shows the effect of opioids in altering gut microbial composition (8588). Pre-clinical models showed variation in opioid-induced dysbiotic gut microbiome based on the mode of drug delivery, administration schedule, and animal models. However, opioid use consistently results in increased pathogenic bacteria such as Enterococcus, Sutterella, Clostridium, Flavobacterium, Fusobacterium, and decreased commensal microbes, including Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium (85, 89). Opioid use has also been shown to increase susceptibility to several pathogenic infections, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, and Listeria monocytogenes, thereby predisposing toward sepsis and immune dysregulation (9094). A recent clinical study identified an enrichment of family Bifidobacteriaceae and depletion of Akkermansiaceae among opioid users, along with a significant reduction in fecal SCFA levels (95). Opioid treatment has also been shown to change the level of bacterial metabolites. Animal studies also show that opioid treatment results in significant changes in bacterial metabolites, including bile acids and SCFAs (85, 96). Opioid treatment also causes intestinal barrier disruption and gut bacterial translocation to the peritoneal cavity, liver, and spleen (97, 98).

Gut microbial dysbiosis, altered metabolic profile, and increased inflammatory environment are common denominators in opioid use disorder and SARS-CoV-2 infection. So far, there have been no clinical studies focused on identifying the compounding effect of gut microbial dysbiosis and opioid use on SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, based on available data, it would be reasonable to hypothesize that opioid use may serve as a comorbidity for SARS-CoV-2 infection and can result in poor disease progression and recovery outcomes. Therefore, pre and probiotic therapies to restore microbial homeostasis, and supplementation of metabolites such as SCFA to enhance intestinal barrier integrity may be used to manage SARS-CoV-2 infection and opioid-associated comorbidities on intestinal functions.

Immuno-Suppressive Role of Opioids

Another life-threatening adverse-effect of opioid use is the increased risk of serious infection due to suppression of the immune response (99). Various in vitro as well as in vivo experiments have established the immunosuppressive effects of opioids (63). Opioids bind to MOR in the CNS, peripheral neurons, and immune cells, affecting both, the innate and adaptive immune systems (67). Opioids modulate the immune response by a variety of mechanisms which include down-regulating the activity of natural killer-cells, neutrophils, and macrophages, reducing antibody production, dampening the response of B and T cells, and inhibiting cytokine production by macrophages, microglia, and astrocytes (100). When morphine binds to MOR, chemokine receptors on macrophages such as CCR1, CCR2, CXCR1, and CXCR2 are desensitized, phagocytosis is inhibited, and their capacity to kill pathogens is reduced (67). Neutrophil migration is inhibited by opioids, as well their ability to produce superoxide species (67). The effect of opioids on the adaptive immune system includes reduced T-cell apoptosis, impaired T-cell differentiation, modified expression of cytokines, as well as B-cell dysfunction (67).The major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) is compromised by morphine treatment impairing their ability to activate T-cells and switching T-cells toward the T-helper type 2 cells, attenuating the immune response (67). These published data on the immunosuppressive effect of opioids raise concern for the enhanced risk for bacterial and viral infection in severely ill COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU. Morphine treatment has been shown to significantly increase pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially IL-6, IFNγ, and TNFα thereby alleviating hyperinflammatory status (101, 102). Since CRS is one of the major challenges to control the severity of COVID-19 infection, modulation of immune function by morphine and other opioids may have a potential role in treating COVID-19 patients.

A study investigating the effect of opioids on the innate immune response against Streptococcus pneumoniae found an 80% increase in mortality after morphine treatment (103). Analysis of lung tissue revealed inflammation in the lungs of the morphine treated mice was amplified (103). This was due to a delay in the recruitment of neutrophils to the lungs at the start of the infection (103). Opioids also dampen the response to viral infection and can enhance replication of viruses such as hepatitis C virus and HIV (104). The interferon system of innate immunity is essential for responding to viral infection promptly and preventing systemic viral dissemination (104). When interferons are secreted, they act as antiviral messengers by triggering cells to express antiviral proteins (104). Type-I IFNs are capable of modulating apoptosis, cell proliferation, and regulating the immune response (104). Opioids suppress the IFN signaling pathway, which causes an increased susceptibility to viral infection (105). A study using single cell RNA sequencing analyzed gene expression for immune subpopulations to investigate the effect of opioids on antiviral genes (105). Compared to control samples, opioid treatment resulted in a suppression of interferon stimulated genes (105). Furthermore, antiviral genes in all immune cell populations were inhibited, affecting both branches of the immune system (106). Overall, opioid use and abuse may lead to more severe lung damage in severely ill COVID-19 patients and significantly increase the chances of bacterial pneumonia.

Opioid And SARS-CoV-2 Viral Entry

Similar to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 enters the target cells through the receptor-binding domain (RBD) on viral spike (S) proteins which specifically engages with ACE2 on the target cell surface (107). After receptor binding, host cell-expressed cell surface transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2 is required for cleavage of S protein and entry of SARS-CoV-2 inside the host cell (108). ACE2 and TMPRSS2 have been detected in the nasal and bronchial epithelium and the highest expression of ACE2 is found in nasal epithelial cells (109). ACE2 and TMPRSS2 co-expression was also found in the esophagus, ileum, and colon which can explain clinically observed viral fecal shedding (71).

Limited data is currently available about the impact of opioid use on SARS-CoV-2 infection. In order to study the direct effect of opioids on SARS-CoV-2 viral infection, our unpublished data show that 24-h morphine (25 mg slow-release pellet) treatment in C57BL/6J mice significantly increases the transcription levels of ACE2 in lung tissue (Figure 2A).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Morphine treatment significantly upregulate ACE2 gene expression in (A) mice lung tissue, (B) mice brain tissue at 24 h post morphine treatment subcutaneously (n = 5), and (C) ACE2 expression in SIMA9 cells along with LPS treatment (n = 8–10). Data were analyzed by student's t-test and one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's test. ***P ≤ 0.001. Mean ± SD.

Furthermore, our data also show an increased expression of ACE2 in mouse brain tissue after morphine treatment (Figure 2B). Our in-vitro data also showed an increased ACE2 expression in microglial cell line SIMA9 after treatment with morphine and LPS (Figure 2C). Since SARS-CoV-2 requires ACE2 to infect host cells, opioid use in COVID-19 patients can further increase the risk for disease severity and also increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in already vulnerable, severely ill COVID-19 patients and OUD group.

ACE2 expression level can be a significant factor associated with COVID-19 severity (110, 111). Therapies targeting ACE2, such as recombinant human ACE2 (rhACE2) and camostat mesilate are being explored for treating severe COVID-19 (112, 113). Interestingly, according to a recent docking screening conducted by AutoDock Vina, codeine and morphine are found to have a high affinity for ACE2 receptor binding (docking score < −10 Kcal/mol) (114) and can be potentially used as a therapeutic for COVID-19 by blocking ACE2 receptor binding (115). Because of the increased use of prescription opioids in COVID-19 patients and the higher risk of opioid abuse as a result of decreased support, it is essential to focus research on understanding the consequence of opioid use in SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication, disease severity, and recovery.

ACE2 is a component of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system which essentially regulates vasoconstriction and blood pressure. Briefly, ACE2 converts angiotensin I (Ang I) to Ang II which causes vasoconstriction, stimulates pro-inflammatory chemokines and promotes inflammation. To counter regulate, ACE2 metabolizes Ang II into Ang-(1-7) and also Ang I into Ang-(1-9) (116). ACE inhibitors (ACEI) and ACE receptor blockers (ARB) have been a part of first line therapy for treating micro and macrovascular complication in hypertension and preventing neuropathy in diabetes patients by upregulating ACE2 expression (117). Since ACE2 is the main receptor for entry of SARS-CoV-2 in cells, the use of ACEIs and ARBs could increase viral entry in patients using these therapies. However, no substantial data has yet been found relating the use of ACEI and ARB and the severity of COVID-19 (118, 119).

In addition to ACE2 and TMPRSS2 proteins, another protein that is a relevant factor in SARS-CoV-2 entry and severity is the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). AhR is a ligand-activated transcription factor that integrates several cues including environmental, microbial, and metabolic cues to control complex gene transcriptions in a ligand-specific, cell-type-specific, and context-specific manner (120). All cells consistently need sensors such as AhR to adapt and respond to molecular changes in their micromilieu. Upon activation by its ligands, AhR translocate in the nucleus and controls the expression of several target genes that contain AhR-responsive DNA elements in their regulatory regions (120).

Several studies have looked at the importance of the AhR in the mechanisms by which the SARS-CoV-2 virus enters cells of different organs. AhR has been found to regulate the expression of ACE2 by binding to the ACE2 promoter, thus increasing its expression. More specifically, AhR was found to increase ACE2 expression in SARS-CoV-2-infected primates; such increased expression favored a higher viral load and a greater severity of histopathological damage (121). The involvement of AhR in SARS-CoV-2 entry and severity was further established by demonstrating that AhR inhibitors decrease ACE2 expression and viral load and that AhR endogenous agonists stimulate ACE2 gene transcription and protein expression (121). Another study, looking at a link between smoking and susceptibility to coronavirus disease 2019, found cigarette smoke condensates (CSC) to upregulate ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression in human gingival epithelial cells (GECs) by activating AhR signaling (122). They further demonstrated that AhR depletion decreased SARS-CoV-2 pseudo virus internalization in CSC-treated GECs compared with control GECs. Therefore, these results highlight the importance of studying both exogenous and endogenous ligands activating the AhR receptor and resulting in increased ACE2 expression. Such increased expression reveals itself as important to both the susceptibility to COVID-19 infection and disease severity.

Melatonin Therapy For SARS-CoV-2 Infection And OUD

Numerous pharmaceutical drugs have been re-examined for their potential efficacy in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among them, melatonin has brought massive attention to research throughout the COVID-19 pandemic as it has a broad spectrum of antiviral properties, including against three different coronaviruses (123, 124). Moreover, other studies have reported that melatonin is an anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative molecule with a high safety profile (125). Recent findings demonstrated that melatonin has a potential effect against destructive inflammatory consequences of a SARS-CoV-2 infection by counteracting excessive free radical-mediated oxidative damage and hyper inflammation (126, 127). A recent review by Reiter et al. (128) demonstrated that melatonin counteracts elevated sPLA2-IIA, development of pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, conversion to Warburg-type metabolism of immune cells, damage to mitochondria, massive release of cytokines, and oxidative stress due to the destructive inflammatory consequences of a SARS-CoV-2 infection (128).

Melatonin treatment also shows a potential role in combating the harmful effects of opiate addiction and opioid-induced behavioral sensitization (129). Using animal models, several studies reported that systemic use of melatonin has an analgesic effect and reverses morphine-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance (130132). Clinical administration of melatonin is used to treat sleep disorders and mood disorders (133), and therefore can also be helpful in managing poor sleep (insomnia) or disrupted sleep (apnea) commonly associated with OUD (134).

Melatonin is synthesized in the enterochromaffin (EC) cells throughout the gut, and deficiencies in melatonin have been linked to increased permeability of the gut, increasingly associated with a range of diseases (135, 136). A recent study conducted by Zhao et al. demonstrated that melatonin reverses Oxazolone-induced colitis by suppressing type 2 immune response and attenuating intestinal permeability and neutrophil infiltration (137). Melatonin's role in treating intestinal co-morbidities associated with OUD and SARS-CoV-2 infection should be further explored.

Limitations

The present review has two major limitations. Firstly, most of the studies reviewed here are clinical data gathered from a small cohort of COVID-19 patients from an observational or cross-sectional study, therefore, sometimes presenting contrasting observations based on the age, race, geographic location of the cohort. Secondly, since limited data is availability on the effect of opioid on COVID-19 disease severity and progression, therefore, some information is, in fact, extrapolations about the potential effect of opioids on physiological and neurological manifestation in COVID-19 patients.

Conclusion

The association between opioid use and risk for infection and developing severe COVID-19 illness should be investigated with better study designs and clinical data analysis. The mechanism underlying the morphine-mediated upregulation of ACE2 in lung tissue and brain is not fully understood and warrants further exploration. Furthermore, a change in the expression profile of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 needs to be evaluated in the nasal epithelium since that is implicated as a portal for initial infection and transmission. Since opioids are also known to cause hospital acquired secondary infections, careful investigation needs to be done to inspect the effect of opioid treatment on secondary infection in severely ill COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, the potential role of SCFAs and melatonin should be explored as a therapeutic in SARS-CoV-2 infection and opioid-associated comorbidities.

More research should be done on socio economic conditions that cause OUD thereby increasing infection risk and immune modulations, putting the vulnerable groups at risk of COVID-19 infection. Concentrated efforts should also be done to provide support to OUD patients since they are at high risk for relapse or involuntary withdrawal.

Author Contributions

RJ and SRo: conceptualization. RJ, DA, and RB: writing-original draft preparation. SRa and SRo: writing-review and editing. RJ, DA, and RD: data acquisition and interpretation. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants (R01DA044582, R01DA043252, R01DA050542, R01DK117576, and T32DA045734) awarded to SRo.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. JAMA. (2020) 324:782–93. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. (2020) 395:565–74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Cui J, Li F, Shi ZL. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2019) 17:181–92. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0118-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Xiong Q, Xu M, Li J, Liu Y, Zhang J, Xu Y, et al. Clinical sequelae of COVID-19 survivors in Wuhan, China: a single-centre longitudinal study. Clin Microbiol Infect. (2021) 27:89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Yelin D, Margalit I, Yahav D, Runold M, Bruchfeld J. Long COVID-19-it's not over until? Clin Microbiol Infect. (2021) 27:506–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Weerahandi H, Hochman KA, Simon E, Blaum C, Chodosh J, Duan E, et al. Post-discharge health status and symptoms in patients with severe COVID-19. medRxiv. (2020). doi: 10.1101/2020.08.11.20172742

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Mendelson M, Nel J, Blumberg L, Madhi SA, Dryden M, Stevens W, et al. Long-COVID: an evolving problem with an extensive impact. S Afr Med J. (2020) 111:10–2. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v111i11.15433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Hampshire A, Trender W, Chamberlain SR, Jolly A, Grant JE, Patrick F, et al. Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19 relative to controls: an N=84,285 online study. MedRxiv. (2020). doi: 10.1101/2020.10.20.20215863

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ngai JC, Ko FW, Ng SS, To KW, Tong M, Hui DS. The long-term impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on pulmonary function, exercise capacity and health status. Respirology. (2010) 15:543–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01720.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Luis MB, Liguori NF, Lopez PA, Alonso R. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in cerebrospinal fluid: presentation of two cases and review of literature. Brain Behav Immun Health. (2021) 15:100282. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100282

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Rutkai I, Mayer MG, Hellmers LM, Ning B, Huang Z, Monjure CJ, et al. Neuropathology and virus in brain of SARS-CoV-2 infected non-human primates. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:1745. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29440-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Bernard-Valnet R, Pizzarotti B, Anichini A, Demars Y, Russo E, Schmidhauser M, et al. Two patients with acute meningoencephalitis concomitant with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur J Neurol. (2020) 27:e43–4. doi: 10.1111/ene.14298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Al-Dalahmah O, Thakur KT, Nordvig AS, Prust ML, Roth W, Lignelli A, et al. Neuronophagia and microglial nodules in a SARS-CoV-2 patient with cerebellar hemorrhage. Acta Neuropathol Commun. (2020) 8:147. doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01024-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Stoyanov GS, Lyutfi E, Dzhenkov DL, Petkova L. Acute necrotizing encephalitis in viral respiratory tract infection: an autopsy case report. Cureus. (2020) 12:e8070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Fisicaro F, Di Napoli M, Liberto A, Fanella M, Di Stasio F, Pennisi M, et al. Neurological sequelae in patients with COVID-19: a histopathological perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:1415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Pavli A, Theodoridou M, Maltezou HC. Post-COVID syndrome: incidence, clinical spectrum, and challenges for primary healthcare professionals. Arch Med Res. (2021) 52:575–81. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2021.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Baig AM. Deleterious outcomes in long-hauler COVID-19: the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the CNS in chronic COVID syndrome. ACS Chem Neurosci. (2020) 11:4017–20. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00725

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Gu S, Chen Y, Wu Z, Chen Y, Gao H, Lv L, et al. Alterations of the gut microbiota in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 or H1N1 influenza. Clin Infect Dis. (2020) 71:2669–78. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa709

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Mazzarelli A, Giancola ML, Farina A, Marchioni L, Rueca M, Gruber CEM, et al. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of rectal swab in patients affected by COVID-19. PLoS ONE. (2021) 16:e0247041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ren Z, Wang H, Cui G, Lu H, Wang L, Luo H, et al. Alterations in the human oral and gut microbiomes and lipidomics in COVID-19. Gut. (2021) 70:1253–65. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323826

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Schult D, Reitmeier S, Koyumdzhieva P, Lahmer T, Middelhof M, Erber J, et al. Gut bacterial dysbiosis and instability is associated with the onset of complications and mortality in COVID-19. Gut Microbes. (2022) 14:2031840. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2031840

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Yeoh YK, Zuo T, Lui GC, Zhang F, Liu Q, Li AY, et al. Gut microbiota composition reflects disease severity and dysfunctional immune responses in patients with COVID-19. Gut. (2021) 70:698–706. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Zuo T, Zhang F, Lui GCY, Yeoh YK, Li AYL, Zhan H, et al. Alterations in gut microbiota of patients with COVID-19 during time of hospitalization. Gastroenterology. (2020) 159:944–55.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Sze S, Pan D, Nevill CR, Gray LJ, Martin CA, Nazareth J, et al. Ethnicity and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. (2020) 29:100630. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100630

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Vahidy FS, Pan AP, Ahnstedt H, Munshi Y, Choi HA, Tiruneh Y, et al. Sex differences in susceptibility, severity, and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019: Cross-sectional analysis from a diverse US metropolitan area. PLoS ONE. (2021) 16:e0245556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245556

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wang L, He W, Yu X, Hu D, Bao M, Liu H, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in elderly patients: characteristics and prognostic factors based on 4-week follow-up. J Infect. (2020) 80:639–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of USA (CDC). Symtoms of COVID-19 (2021). Available online at: Https://www.cdc.gov/Coronavirus/2019-Ncov/Symptoms-Testing/Symptoms.Html.

Google Scholar

28. da Rosa Mesquita R, Francelino Silva Junior LC, Santos Santana FM, Farias de Oliveira T, Campos Alcantara R, Monteiro Arnozo G, et al. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in the general population: systematic review. Wien Klin Wochenschr. (2021) 133:377–82. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01760-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Wu X, Liu X, Zhou Y, Yu H, Li R, Zhan Q, et al. 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month respiratory outcomes in patients following COVID-19-related hospitalisation: a prospective study. Lancet Respir Med. (2021). doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00174-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia J, Liu H, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. (2020) 8:475–81. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. (2020) 395:1054–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Rajgor DD, Lee MH, Archuleta S, Bagdasarian N, Quek SC. The many estimates of the COVID-19 case fatality rate. Lancet Infect Dis. (2020) 20:776–7. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30244-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Cao Y, Hiyoshi A, Montgomery S. COVID-19 case-fatality rate and demographic and socioeconomic influencers: worldwide spatial regression analysis based on country-level data. BMJ Open. (2020) 10:e043560. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043560

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Baud D, Qi X, Nielsen-Saines K, Musso D, Pomar L, Favre G. Real estimates of mortality following COVID-19 infection. Lancet Infect Dis. (2020) 20:773. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30195-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Grasselli G, Greco M, Zanella A, Albano G, Antonelli M, Bellani G, et al. Risk factors associated with mortality among patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med. (2020) 180:1345–55. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3539

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the new york city area. JAMA. (2020) 323:2052–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Oliveira E, Parikh A, Lopez-Ruiz A, Carrilo M, Goldberg J, Cearras M, et al. ICU outcomes and survival in patients with severe COVID-19 in the largest health care system in central Florida. PLoS ONE. (2021) 16:e0249038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Salmanton-Garcia J, Sprute R, Stemler J, Bartoletti M, Dupont D, Valerio M, et al. COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis, march-august 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. (2021) 27:1077–86. doi: 10.3201/eid2704.204895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Huang C, Soleimani J, Herasevich S, Pinevich Y, Pennington KM, Dong Y, et al. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19: a scoping review. Mayo Clin Proc. (2021) 96:183–202. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.10.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zeron P, Mariette X. Systemic and organ-specific immune-related manifestations of COVID-19. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2021) 17:315–32. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00608-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Meidaninikjeh S, Sabouni N, Marzouni HZ, Bengar S, Khalili A, Jafari R. Monocytes and macrophages in COVID-19: friends and foes. Life Sci. (2021) 269:119010. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.119010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Chen L, Liu HG, Liu W, Liu J, Liu K, Shang J, et al. [Analysis of clinical features of 29 patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. (2020) 43:203–8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2020.03.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Coomes EA, Haghbayan H. Interleukin-6 in Covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol. (2020) 30:1–9. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Leisman DE, Ronner L, Pinotti R, Taylor MD, Sinha P, Calfee CS, et al. Cytokine elevation in severe and critical COVID-19: a rapid systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparison with other inflammatory syndromes. Lancet Respir Med. (2020) 8:1233–44. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30404-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Sinha P, Matthay MA, Calfee CS. Is a “cytokine storm” relevant to COVID-19? JAMA Intern Med. (2020) 180:1152–4. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Mudd PA, Crawford JC, Turner JS, Souquette A, Reynolds D, Bender D, et al. Distinct inflammatory profiles distinguish COVID-19 from influenza with limited contributions from cytokine storm. Sci Adv. (2020) 6:eabe3024. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe3024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Zeisel A, Munoz-Manchado AB, Codeluppi S, Lonnerberg P, La Manno G, Jureus A, et al. Brain structure. cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science. (2015) 347:1138–42. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1934

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Gowrisankar YV, Clark MA. Angiotensin II regulation of angiotensin-converting enzymes in spontaneously hypertensive rat primary astrocyte cultures. J Neurochem. (2016) 138:74–85. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13641

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Torices S, Cabrera R, Stangis M, Naranjo O, Fattakhov N, Teglas T, et al. Expression of SARS-CoV-2-related receptors in cells of the neurovascular unit: implications for HIV-1 infection. J Neuroinflammation. (2021) 18:167. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02210-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Coperchini F, Chiovato L, Croce L, Magri F, Rotondi M. The cytokine storm in COVID-19: an overview of the involvement of the chemokine/chemokine-receptor system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2020) 53:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Ellul MA, Benjamin L, Singh B, Lant S, Michael BD, Easton A, et al. Neurological associations of COVID-19. Lancet Neurol. (2020) 19:767–83. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30221-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Brann DH, Tsukahara T, Weinreb C, Lipovsek M, Van den Berge K, Gong B, et al. Non-neuronal expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the olfactory system suggests mechanisms underlying COVID-19-associated anosmia. Sci Adv. (2020) 6:eabc5801. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc5801

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Slooter AJC, Otte WM, Devlin JW, Arora RC, Bleck TP, Claassen J, et al. Updated nomenclature of delirium and acute encephalopathy: statement of ten Societies. Intensive Care Med. (2020) 46:1020–2. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05907-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Helms J, Kremer S, Merdji H, Schenck M, Severac F, Clere-Jehl R, et al. Delirium and encephalopathy in severe COVID-19: a cohort analysis of ICU patients. Crit Care. (2020) 24:491. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03200-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, Haberecker M, Andermatt R, Zinkernagel AS, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet. (2020) 395:1417–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30937-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Nannoni S, de Groot R, Bell S, Markus HS. Stroke in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. (2021) 16:137–49. doi: 10.1177/1747493020972922

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Lanza G, Godani M, Ferri R, Raggi A. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the neuropsychiatric status of Wilson's disease. World J Gastroenterol. (2021) 27:6733–6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i39.6733

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Payen JF, Chanques G, Mantz J, Hercule C, Auriant I, Leguillou JL, et al. Current practices in sedation and analgesia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a prospective multicenter patient-based study. Anesthesiology. (2007) 106:687–95. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000264747.09017.da

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Wunsch H, Hill AD, Fu L, Fowler RA, Wang HT, Gomes T, et al. New opioid use after invasive mechanical ventilation and hospital discharge. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2020) 202:568–75. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201912-2503OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Helms J, Kremer S, Merdji H, Clere-Jehl R, Schenck M, Kummerlen C, et al. Neurologic features in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:2268–70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2008597

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Al-Aly Z, Xie Y, Bowe B. High-dimensional characterization of post-acute sequalae of COVID-19. Nature. (2021) 594:259–64. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03553-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Wang QQ, Kaelber DC, Xu R, Volkow ND. COVID-19 risk and outcomes in patients with substance use disorders: analyses from electronic health records in the United States. Mol Psychiatry. (2021) 26:30–9. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-00880-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Nagappa M, Weingarten TN, Montandon G, Sprung J, Chung F. Opioids, respiratory depression, sleep-disordered breathing. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. (2017) 31:469–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Algera MH, Kamp J, van der Schrier R, van Velzen M, Niesters M, Aarts L, et al. Opioid-induced respiratory depression in humans: a review of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of reversal. Br J Anaesth. (2019) 122:e168–79. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Ataei M, Shirazi FM, Lamarine RJ, Nakhaee S, Mehrpour O. A double-edged sword of using opioids and COVID-19: a toxicological view. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. (2020) 15:91. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00333-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Arroliga AC, Thompson BT, Ancukiewicz M, Gonzales JP, Guntupalli KK, Park PK, et al. Use of sedatives, opioids, and neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. (2008) 36:1083–8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E3181653895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Plein LM, Rittner HL. Opioids and the immune system-friend or foe. Br J Pharmacol. (2018) 175:2717–25. doi: 10.1111/bph.13750

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Moyano J, Aguirre L. Opioids in the immune system: from experimental studies to clinical practice. Rev Assoc Med Bras. (2019) 65:262–9. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.2.262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Lucking EF, O'Halloran KD. Opioids for the relief of acute respiratory distress syndrome: endomorphins are the mu kids on the block!. Exp Physiol. (2019) 104:1445–6. doi: 10.1113/EP087996

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Xiao F, Tang M, Zheng X, Liu Y, Li X, Shan H. Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterology. (2020) 158:1831–3.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Xu Y, Li X, Zhu B, Liang H, Fang C, Gong Y, et al. Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding. Nat Med. (2020) 26:502–5. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0817-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Sun Z, Song ZG, Liu C, Tan S, Lin S, Zhu J, et al. Gut microbiome alterations and gut barrier dysfunction are associated with host immune homeostasis in COVID-19 patients. BMC Med. (2022) 20:24. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02212-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Zhou T, Wu J, Zeng Y, Li J, Yan J, Meng W, et al. SARS-CoV-2 triggered oxidative stress and abnormal energy metabolism in gut microbiota. MedComm. (2022) 3:e112. doi: 10.1002/mco2.112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Venzon M, Bernard-Raichon L, Klein J, Axelrad JE, Zhang C, Hussey GA, et al. Gut microbiome dysbiosis during COVID-19 is associated with increased risk for bacteremia and microbial translocation. bioRxiv. (2022). doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-726620/v1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Shafran N, Shafran I, Ben-Zvi H, Sofer S, Sheena L, Krause I, et al. Secondary bacterial infection in COVID-19 patients is a stronger predictor for death compared to influenza patients. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:12703. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92220-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Chen Y, Gu S, Chen Y, Lu H, Shi D, Guo J, et al. Six-month follow-up of gut microbiota richness in patients with COVID-19. Gut. (2022) 71:222–5. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Newsome RC, Gauthier J, Hernandez MC, Abraham GE, Robinson TO, Williams HB, et al. The gut microbiome of COVID-19 recovered patients returns to uninfected status in a minority-dominated United States cohort. Gut Microbes. (2021) 13:1–15. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1926840

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Liu Q, Mak JWY, Su Q, Yeoh YK, Lui GC, Ng SSS, et al. Gut microbiota dynamics in a prospective cohort of patients with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Gut. (2022) 71:544–52. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325989

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Lv L, Jiang H, Chen Y, Gu S, Xia J, Zhang H, et al. The faecal metabolome in COVID-19 patients is altered and associated with clinical features and gut microbes. Anal Chim Acta. (2021) 1152:338267. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Pozzi C, Levi R, Braga D, Carli F, Darwich A, Spadoni I, et al. A 'multiomic' approach of saliva metabolomics, microbiota, and serum biomarkers to assess the need of hospitalization in coronavirus disease 2019. Gastro Hep Adv. (2022) 1:194–209. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2021.12.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Sokol H, Contreras V, Maisonnasse P, Desmons A, Delache B, Sencio V, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in nonhuman primates alters the composition and functional activity of the gut microbiota. Gut Microbes. (2021) 13:1–19. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1893113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Zhang F, Wan Y, Zuo T, Yeoh YK, Liu Q, Zhang L, et al. Prolonged impairment of short-chain fatty acid and l-isoleucine biosynthesis in gut microbiome in patients with COVID-19. Gastroenterology. (2022) 162:548–61.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Paparo L, Maglio MA, Cortese M, Bruno C, Capasso M, Punzo E, et al. A new butyrate releaser exerts a protective action against SARS-CoV-2 infection in human intestine. Molecules. (2022) 27:862. doi: 10.3390/molecules27030862

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Liu P, Wang Y, Yang G, Zhang Q, Meng L, Xin Y, et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids in intestinal barrier function, inflammation, oxidative stress, colonic carcinogenesis. Pharmacol Res. (2021) 165:105420. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105420

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Wang F, Meng J, Zhang L, Johnson T, Chen C, Roy S. Morphine induces changes in the gut microbiome and metabolome in a morphine dependence model. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:3596. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21915-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Xu Y, Xie Z, Wang H, Shen Z, Guo Y, Gao Y, et al. Bacterial diversity of intestinal microbiota in patients with substance use disorders revealed by 16S rRNA gene deep sequencing. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:3628. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03706-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Acharya C, Betrapally NS, Gillevet PM, Sterling RK, Akbarali H, White MB, et al. Chronic opioid use is associated with altered gut microbiota and predicts readmissions in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2017) 45:319–31. doi: 10.1111/apt.13858

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Jalodia R, Abu YF, Oppenheimer MR, Herlihy B, Meng J, Chupikova I, et al. Opioid use, gut dysbiosis, inflammation, and the nervous system. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. (2022). doi: 10.1007/s11481-021-10046-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Zhang L, Meng J, Ban Y, Jalodia R, Chupikova I, Fernandez I, et al. Morphine tolerance is attenuated in germfree mice and reversed by probiotics, implicating the role of gut microbiome. (2019) 116:13523–32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1901182116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Meng J, Banerjee S, Li D, Sindberg GM, Wang F, Ma J, et al. Opioid exacerbation of gram-positive sepsis, induced by gut microbial modulation, is rescued by IL-17A neutralization. Sci Rep. (2015) 5:10918. doi: 10.1038/srep10918

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Ocasio FM, Jiang Y, House SD, Chang SL. Chronic morphine accelerates the progression of lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis to septic shock. J Neuroimmunol. (2004) 149:90–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.12.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Babrowski T, Holbrook C, Moss J, Gottlieb L, Valuckaite V, Zaborin A, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence expression is directly activated by morphine and is capable of causing lethal gut-derived sepsis in mice during chronic morphine administration. Ann Surg. (2012) 255:386–93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182331870

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Shakhsheer BA, Versten LA, Luo JN, Defazio JR, Klabbers R, Christley S, et al. Morphine promotes colonization of anastomotic tissues with collagenase-producing enterococcus faecalis and causes leak. J Gastrointest Surg. (2016) 20:1744–51. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3237-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Asakura H, Kawamoto K, Igimi S, Yamamoto S, Makino S. Enhancement of mice susceptibility to infection with Listeria monocytogenes by the treatment of morphine. Microbiol Immunol. (2006) 50:543–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2006.tb03824.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Cruz-Lebron A, Johnson R, Mazahery C, Troyer Z, Joussef-Pina S, Quinones-Mateu ME, et al. Chronic opioid use modulates human enteric microbiota and intestinal barrier integrity. Gut Microbes. (2021) 13:1946368. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1946368

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Hofford RS, Mervosh NL, Euston TJ, Meckel KR, Orr AT, Kiraly DD. Alterations in microbiome composition and metabolic byproducts drive behavioral and transcriptional responses to morphine. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2021) 46:2062–72. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01043-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Meng J, Yu H, Ma J, Wang J, Banerjee S, Charboneau R, et al. Morphine induces bacterial translocation in mice by compromising intestinal barrier function in a TLR-dependent manner. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e54040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Meng J, Banerjee S, Zhang L, Sindberg G, Moidunny S, Li B, et al. Opioids impair intestinal epithelial repair in HIV-Infected Humanized Mice. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:2999. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Hussey HH, Katz S. Infections resulting from narcotic addiction; report of 102 cases. Am J Med. (1950) 9:186–93. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(50)90021-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Eisenstein TK. The role of opioid receptors in immune system function. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:2904. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Gomez-Flores R, Weber RJ. Differential effects of buprenorphine and morphine on immune and neuroendocrine functions following acute administration in the rat mesencephalon periaqueductal gray. Immunopharmacology. (2000) 48:145–56. doi: 10.1016/S0162-3109(00)00198-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Salimi V, Hennus MP, Mokhtari-Azad T, Shokri F, Janssen R, Hodemaekers HM, et al. Opioid receptors control viral replication in the airways. Crit Care Med. (2013) 41:205–14. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826767a8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Wang J, Barke RA, Charboneau R, Roy S. Morphine impairs host innate immune response and increases susceptibility to Streptococcus pneumoniae lung infection. J Immunol. (2005) 174:426–34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.1.426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Thiel V, Weber F. Interferon and cytokine responses to SARS-coronavirus infection. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2008) 19:121–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2008.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Wang Y, Wang X, Ye L, Li J, Song L, Fulambarkar N, et al. Morphine suppresses IFN signaling pathway and enhances AIDS virus infection. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e31167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031167

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Karagiannis TT, Cleary JP Jr, Gok B, Henderson AJ, Martin NG, Yajima M, et al. Single cell transcriptomics reveals opioid usage evokes widespread suppression of antiviral gene program. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:2611. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16159-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Kruger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. (2020) 181:271–80.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Shang J, Wan Y, Luo C, Ye G, Geng Q, Auerbach A, et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2020) 117:11727–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003138117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Sungnak W, Huang N, Becavin C, Berg M, Queen R, Litvinukova M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat Med. (2020) 26:681–7. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0868-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Kuba K, Imai Y, Rao S, Gao H, Guo F, Guan B, et al. A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat Med. (2005) 11:875–9. doi: 10.1038/nm1267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Hodlmoser S, Eskandary F, Poglitsch M, Bonderman D, Strassl R, et al. ACE2 elevation in severe COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2021) 203:1191–6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202101-0142LE

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Abd El-Aziz TM, Al-Sabi A, Stockand JD. Human recombinant soluble ACE2 (hrsACE2) shows promise for treating severe COVID-19. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2020) 5:258. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00374-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Gunst JD, Staerke NB, Pahus MH, Kristensen LH, Bodilsen J, Lohse N, et al. Efficacy of the TMPRSS2 inhibitor camostat mesilate in patients hospitalized with Covid-19-a double-blind randomized controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine. (2021) 35:100849. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100849

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Yan Y, Shen X, Cao Y, Zhang J, Wang Y, Cheng Y. Discovery of Anti-2019-nCoV agents from 38 chinese patent drugs toward respiratory diseases via docking screening. Preprints. (2020).

Google Scholar

115. Roshanravan N, Ghaffari S, Hedayati M. Angiotensin converting enzyme-2 as therapeutic target in COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Syndr. (2020) 14:637–9. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Bhalla V, Blish CA, South AM. A historical perspective on ACE2 in the COVID-19 era. J Hum Hypertens. (2020) 35:935–9. doi: 10.1038/s41371-020-00459-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Arauz-Pacheco C, Parrott MA, Raskin P, American Diabetes Association. Hypertension management in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. (2004) 27:S65–7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2007.S65

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Mancia G, Rea F, Ludergnani M, Apolone G, Corrao G. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers and the risk of covid-19. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:2431–40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2006923

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Michel T, McMurray JJV, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with covid-19. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:1653–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2005760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Rothhammer V, Quintana FJ. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: an environmental sensor integrating immune responses in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. (2019) 19:184–97. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0125-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Lv J, Yu P, Wang Z, Deng W, Bao L, Liu J, et al. ACE2 expression is regulated by AhR in SARS-CoV-2-infected macaques. Cell Mol Immunol. (2021) 18:1308–10. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00672-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Almeida-da-Silva CLC, Matshik Dakafay H, Liu K, Ojcius DM. Cigarette smoke stimulates SARS-CoV-2 internalization by activating AhR and increasing ACE2 expression in human gingival epithelial cells. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:7669. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147669

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Silvestri M, Rossi GA. Melatonin: its possible role in the management of viral infections–a brief review. Ital J Pediatr. (2013) 39:61. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-39-61

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. DiNicolantonio JJ, McCarty M, Barroso-Aranda J. Melatonin may decrease risk for and aid treatment of COVID-19 and other RNA viral infections. Open Heart. (2021) 8:e001568. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001568

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Tarocco A, Caroccia N, Morciano G, Wieckowski MR, Ancora G, Garani G, et al. Melatonin as a master regulator of cell death and inflammation: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications for newborn care. Cell Death Dis. (2019) 10:317. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1556-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Ramlall V, Zucker J, Tatonetti N. Melatonin is significantly associated with survival of intubated COVID-19 patients. medRxiv. (2020). doi: 10.1101/2020.10.15.20213546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Zhang R, Wang X, Ni L, Di X, Ma B, Niu S, et al. COVID-19: Melatonin as a potential adjuvant treatment. Life Sci. (2020) 250:117583. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117583

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Reiter RJ, Sharma R, Simko F, Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Tesarik J, Neel RL, et al. Melatonin: highlighting its use as a potential treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2022) 79:143. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-04102-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Feng YM, Jia YF, Su LY, Wang D, Lv L, Xu L, et al. Decreased mitochondrial DNA copy number in the hippocampus and peripheral blood during opiate addiction is mediated by autophagy and can be salvaged by melatonin. Autophagy. (2013) 9:1395–406. doi: 10.4161/auto.25468

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Song L, Wu C, Zuo Y. Melatonin prevents morphine-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance in rats: role of protein kinase C and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. BMC Anesthesiol. (2015) 15:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-15-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Lin SH, Huang YN, Kao JH, Tien LT, Tsai RY, Wong CS. Melatonin reverses morphine tolerance by inhibiting microglia activation and HSP27 expression. Life Sci. (2016) 152:38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.03.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Chen IJ, Yang CP, Lin SH, Lai CM, Wong CS. The circadian hormone melatonin inhibits morphine-induced tolerance and inflammation via the activation of antioxidative enzymes. Antioxidants. (2020) 9:780. doi: 10.3390/antiox9090780

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Liu J, Clough SJ, Hutchinson AJ, Adamah-Biassi EB, Popovska-Gorevski M, Dubocovich ML. MT1 and MT2 melatonin receptors: a therapeutic perspective. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. (2016) 56:361–83. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124742

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Rhon DI, Snodgrass SJ, Cleland JA, Cook CE. Comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea are associated with greater downstream health care utilization and chronic opioid use after arthroscopic hip surgery. Pain Physician. (2019) 22:E351–60. doi: 10.36076/ppj/2019.22.E351

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Mukherjee S, Maitra SK. Gut melatonin in vertebrates: chronobiology and physiology. Front Endocrinol. (2015) 6:112. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2015.00112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Anderson G, Maes M. The gut–brain axis: the role of melatonin in linking psychiatric, inflammatory and neurodegenerative conditions. Advances In Integrative Medicine. (2015) 2:31–7. doi: 10.1016/j.aimed.2014.12.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Zhao ZX, Yuan X, Cui YY, Liu J, Shen J, Jin BY, et al. Melatonin mitigates oxazolone-induced colitis in microbiota-dependent manner. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:783806. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.783806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: ACE2, COVID-19, CNS injury, opioid use and abuse, microbiome and dysbiosis

Citation: Jalodia R, Antoine D, Braniff RG, Dutta RK, Ramakrishnan S and Roy S (2022) Opioid-Use, COVID-19 Infection, and Their Neurological Implications. Front. Neurol. 13:884216. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.884216

Received: 25 February 2022; Accepted: 25 April 2022;
Published: 23 May 2022.

Edited by:

Avindra Nath, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NIH), United States

Reviewed by:

George Anderson, CRC Scotland & London, United Kingdom
Giuseppe Lanza, University of Catania, Italy

Copyright © 2022 Jalodia, Antoine, Braniff, Dutta, Ramakrishnan and Roy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Sabita Roy, c2FiaXRhLnJveSYjeDAwMDQwO21pYW1pLmVkdQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.