AUTHOR=Lin Yazhou , Gao Qiang , Jin Huiping , Wang Nana , Xu Dingkang , Wang Fang , Guo A. Bao , Zang Weidong , Li Zhihua , Guo Fuyou 

TITLE=Analysis of Approaches in the Microsurgical Treatment of 102 Cases of Petroclival Meningioma in a Single Center

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neurology

VOLUME=12

YEAR=2021

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.627736

DOI=10.3389/fneur.2021.627736

ISSN=1664-2295

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Objectives:</bold> We identified the optimal approaches for treating the diverse tumor subtypes of petroclival meningioma (PM) by analyzing the clinical benefits of various surgical approaches adopted for each subtype.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> Tumors in 102 PM patients from a single center who underwent surgical treatment were classified as upper clivus (UC), cavernous sinus (CS), tentorium (TE), or petrous apex (PA) types based on the attachment site of the tumor base and the displacement of the trigeminal nerve. The therapeutic effects of different surgical approaches among the subtypes were evaluated according to the patient outcomes.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> The subtemporal (33.33%), retrosigmoid (16.67%), and Kawase approaches (50%) were used for the UC type. Simpson I/II resection was achieved in 46.66% of patients with the Kawase approach. Significant differences were found between the other two approaches (<italic>P</italic> = 0.044) and in the follow-up Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) scores (<italic>P</italic> = 0.008). The subtemporal (60%) and Kawase approaches (40%) were used for the CS type; neither approach achieved Simpson I/II resection. The retrosigmoid (25.81%) and Kawase approaches (74.19%) were used for the TE type. The Simpson I/II resection rates of the two approaches were 55.55 and 86.95%, respectively, and a significant difference was observed between them (<italic>P</italic> = 0.039). The retrosigmoid (43.75%) and Kawase approaches (56.25%) were used for the PA type. The Simpson I/II resection rates of the two approaches were 31.25 and 50%, respectively. The resection degrees of the two approaches and the KPS scores at follow-up were significantly different (<italic>P</italic> = 0.034).</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> The individual microsurgical approaches adopted for the various PM tumor subtypes can provide maximal safe resection and good KPS scores. The Kawase approach is more suitable for PM, especially for UC- and PA-type PM tumors.</p>