AUTHOR=Reimer Andrew P. , Zafar Atif , Hustey Fredric M. , Kralovic Damon , Russman Andrew N. , Uchino Ken , Hussain Muhammad S. , Udeh Belinda L.
TITLE=Cost-Consequence Analysis of Mobile Stroke Units vs. Standard Prehospital Care and Transport
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neurology
VOLUME=10
YEAR=2020
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2019.01422
DOI=10.3389/fneur.2019.01422
ISSN=1664-2295
ABSTRACT=Background: Mobile stroke units (MSUs) are the latest approach to improving time-sensitive stroke care delivery. Currently, there are no published studies looking at the expanded value of the MSU to diagnose and transport patients to the closest most appropriate facility. The purpose of this paper is to perform a cost consequence analysis of standard transport (ST) vs. MSU.
Methods and Results: A cost consequence analysis was undertaken within a decision framework to compare the incremental cost of care for patients with confirmed stroke that were served by the MSU vs. their simulated care had they been served by standard emergency medical services between July 2014 and October 2015. At baseline values, the incremental cost between MSU and ST was $70,613 ($856,482 vs. $785,869) for 355 patient transports. The MSU avoided 76 secondary interhospital transfers and 76 emergency department (ED) encounters. Sensitivity analysis identified six variables that had measurable impact on the model's variability and a threshold value at which MSU becomes the optimal strategy: number of stroke patients (>391), probability of requiring transfer to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC, >0.52), annual cost of MSU operations (<$696,053), cost of air transfer (>$8,841), probability initial receiving hospital is a CSC (<0.32), and probability of ischemic stroke with ST (<0.76).
Conclusions: MSUs can avert significant costs in the administration of stroke care once optimal thresholds are achieved. A comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis is required to determine not just the operational value of an MSU but also its clinical value to patients and the society.