A Scoping Review of Inborn Errors of Metabolism Causing Progressive Intellectual and Neurologic Deterioration (PIND)

Background: Progressive intellectual and neurological deterioration (PIND) is a rare but severe childhood disorder characterized by loss of intellectual or developmental abilities, and requires quick diagnosis to ensure timely treatment to prevent possible irreversible neurological damage. Inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) constitute a group of more than 1,000 monogenic conditions in which the impairment of a biochemical pathway is intrinsic to the pathophysiology of the disease, resulting in either accumulation of toxic metabolites and/or shortage of energy and building blocks for the cells. Many IEMs are amenable to treatment with the potential to improve outcomes. With this literature review we aim to create an overview of IEMs presenting with PIND in children, to aid clinicians in accelerating the diagnostic process.

Methods: We performed a PubMed search on IEMs presenting with PIND in individuals aged 0–18 years. We applied stringent selection criteria and subsequently derived information on encoding genes, pathways, clinical and biochemical signs and diagnostic tests from IEMbase (www.iembase.org) and other sources.

Results: The PubMed search resulted in a total of 2,152 articles and a review of references added another 19 articles. After applying our selection criteria, a total of 85 IEMs presenting with PIND remained, of which 57 IEMs were reported in multiple unrelated cases and 28 in single families. For 44 IEMs (52%) diagnosis can be achieved through generally accessible metabolic blood and urine screening tests; the remainder requires enzymatic and/or genetic testing. Treatment targeting the underlying pathophysiology is available for 35 IEMs (41%). All treatment strategies are reported to achieve stabilization of deterioration, and a subset improved seizure control and/or neurodevelopment.

Conclusions: We present the first comprehensive overview of IEMs presenting with PIND, and provide a structured approach to diagnosis and overview of treatability. Clearly IEMs constitute the largest group of genetic PIND conditions and have the advantage of detectable biomarkers as well as amenability to treatment. Thus, the clinician should keep IEMs at the forefront of the diagnostic workup of a child with PIND. With the ongoing discovery of new IEMs, expanded phenotypes, and novel treatment strategies, continuous updates to this work will be required.

Introduction

Progressive intellectual and neurological deterioration (PIND) in children is defined as “progressive deterioration for more than 3 months with loss of already attained intellectual or developmental abilities and development of abnormal neurological signs” (1–6). Initial psychomotor development might be delayed, but this is not required. PIND is a rare, yet alarming phenomenon. It will urge every pediatrician to find a diagnosis and quickly start treatment in order to halt or even reverse the intellectual decline in the patient. Additionally, this will provide an opportunity for accurate prognostication and genetic counseling for the family.

However, evaluation is extremely challenging given the immense heterogeneity of underlying disorders, varying from genetic causes such as intellectual disability syndromes (e.g., Rett disease, MIM#312750), neurodegenerative repeat expansion diseases, chromosome breakage diseases as well as inborn errors of metabolism, to environmental causes such as infectious encephalitis, traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain injury, or immune mediated conditions such as anti-MNDA receptor encephalitis (8, 9). Inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) constitute a well-known cause of PIND and intellectual developmental disabilities in general; examples include neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL), Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC), and different types of mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) (8–10). Nonetheless, a complete overview of IEMs causing PIND remains unavailable in the current literature, and this group of single gene disorders is not commonly screened for with biochemical urine/blood tests, despite increasing opportunities to causally treat and improve prognosis. Treatment strategies include diet, vitamin supplements, medications, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to enzyme replacement or gene therapy.

Here we aim to present an up-to-date literature review of all known IEMs reported with a clinical presentation of PIND. With the information provided about phenotypic features, diagnostic tests and therapeutic modalities, we hope to aid the clinician in the efficient identification and management of IEMs in children presenting with PIND.

Methods

Search Strategy and Defining PIND and IEMs

We searched PubMed with terms encompassing and describing our definitions of PIND and IEMs to ensure the search yielded articles meeting our search query, i.e., IEMs presenting with PIND in children (Table 1).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Terms used for search strategy in Pubmed.

Inborn metabolic diseases were re-defined in 2015 by Morava et al. as “a disruption of a metabolic pathway irrespective of whether it is associated with abnormalities in biochemical laboratory tests” (7). Recently Ferreira et al. proposed a new nosology using this re-definition of IEMs, the inclusion criteria of which are shown in Table 2 (8). These criteria were subsequently used to define IEMs in this review.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Criteria inborn errors of metabolism by Ferreira et al. (8).

Table 3 shows the definition of PIND as used for this review and is based on the definition of UK (1–4), Canadian (5) and Australian (6) research groups exploring which disorders present with symptoms consistent with PIND (1–6). Our definition of PIND includes progressive deterioration with loss of already attained intellectual and developmental abilities and development of neurological signs including epilepsy. Deterioration through loss of intellectual or developmental abilities may be present in children with previously normal or delayed development. No distinction is made in this review.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Definition PIND.

Expert Opinion

If the literature was inconclusive, individual experts were consulted for their input on specific (groups) of IEMs and requested to provide an evidence- or expert-based opinion on the presence or absence of PIND as a presenting feature. If literature of sufficient quality meeting our criteria was available, then the IEM was included in this list.

Literature Search and Selection

We searched PubMed for all articles published between 1953 and October 2018 with the aim of establishing which inborn errors of metabolism cause neurocognitive regression in children aged 0–18 years.

A flow diagram representing the different phases of the selection process is shown in Figure 1. Selection of articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria was performed with the use of Rayyan (https://rayyan.qcri.org), a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (9). Exclusion criteria were as followed: (1) not meeting definitions of IEM and/or PIND; (2) IEM not manifesting with PIND; (3) IEM presenting with completely reversible intellectual and neurologic deterioration, e.g., during (febrile) disease; (4) IEM presenting with neurologic or movement disorders without intellectual deterioration; (5) IEM presenting solely with developmental delay; (6) age of proband(s) over 18 years; (7) animal studies; (8) no (English or Dutch) full text available.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Flow diagram showing the different phases of the literature selection process.

We compared our list of selected IEMs with those of PIND research groups and added IEMs of the latter if these met our selection criteria. Also, we consulted experts for their opinion.

Articles publishing on IEMs causing symptoms meeting the definition of PIND were further pursued. When meeting all criteria, the IEMs were categorized in nine groups using the proposed nosology by Ferreira et al.: A. Disorders of nitrogen-containing compounds; B. Disorders of vitamins, cofactors, metals and minerals; C. Disorders of carbohydrates; D. Mitochondrial disorders of energy metabolism; E. Disorders of lipids; F. Disorders of tetrapyrroles; G. Storage disorders; H. Disorders of peroxisomes and oxalate; and I. Congenital disorders of glycosylation (8).

Disease Information

If the literature search yielded multiple articles for a specific disorder (e.g., neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis and Leigh syndrome), databases such as GeneReviews, OMIM, OMMBID and IEMbase were consulted for more concise summaries or reviews.

IEMbase (www.iembase.org), an online IEM knowledgebase, was searched for information on each IEM such as encoding genes, pathways, clinical symptoms, biochemical signs, and diagnostic tests. Other databases such as Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)¹, GeneReviews (11) and the Online Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease (OMMBID) (12) were consulted if additional information was required.

Diagnostic Strategies

To facilitate a practical guide for biochemical and genetic diagnosis, we assessed which tests are necessary to diagnose each of the conditions. Accordingly, we grouped the diseases into IEMs diagnosed via “metabolic screening tests” vs. IEMs diagnosed via “enzymatic and/or genetic testing”. As screening tests we defined biochemical tests in blood and urine for IEMs with reliable biomarkers, generally available in biochemical laboratories in most developed countries.

Therapeutic Modalities

Information about treatment was extracted from two articles on treatable intellectual disabilities, i.e., IEMs causing global developmental delay (DD)/intellectual disability (ID) which are amenable to causal treatment (13, 14) (this information is available via an online digital tool, www.treatable-id.org) (15). A treatable IEM is defined as the availability of a particular therapeutic modality capable of preventing or improving the DD/ID phenotype, or halting/slowing neurocognitive decline with acceptable adverse effects, i.e., positively influencing the “outcome measures”. Therapeutic modalities include dietary restriction/supplementation, cofactor or vitamin supplementation, substrate inhibition (small molecule), substrate reduction, enzyme replacement, bone marrow and hematopoietic stem cell transplant and gene therapy. Outcome measure/effect are defined as primary = IQ, developmental testing score/performance, survival; secondary = epilepsy, behavior, psychiatric, neurological deficit (e.g., movement disorder), neuro-imaging, or systemic symptoms influencing developmental/cognitive performance (e.g., ichthyosis, liver disease). The level of evidence, i.e., the quality of the evidence describing the beneficial effect of each therapeutic modality, was ranked 1–5 according to the Center of Evidence Based Medicine (www.cebm.net).

Results

Literature Yield

Our Pubmed search yielded 2,152 articles. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria we identified a total of 79 IEMs presenting with PIND. Of these 79 IEMs, 55 (70%) presented with PIND in multiple cases and in multiple families, while the remaining 24 IEMs presented with PIND in single cases or single families (Supplemental Table S1).

We added four IEMs to Supplemental Table S1 that did not emerge from our literature search but rather were reported in articles by PIND research groups, and agreed upon by our expert colleagues as IEMs to present with PIND. Based on expert opinion, we included two more IEMs, mitochondrial DNA polymerase-gamma catalytic subunit (POLG) deficiency, and folate receptor-alfa deficiency, resulting in a total of 85 IEMs presenting with PIND.

Taking the total of 85 IEMs presenting with PIND, storage disorders (n = 34/85, 40%) represented the largest category. The other IEMs were classified as follows: nitrogen-containing compounds (n = 15); disorders of vitamins, cofactors, metals and minerals (n = 15); disorders of carbohydrates (n = 1); mitochondrial disorders of energy metabolism (n = 14); disorders of lipids (n = 2); disorders of tetrapyrroles (n = 1); disorders of peroxisomes and oxalate (n = 2); and congenital disorders of glycosylation (n = 1).

Neurologic and systemic symptoms registered in IEMBase are shown in Supplemental Table S1 Besides PIND, these disorders present with a variety of neurologic symptoms, most commonly: seizures (or epilepsy, convulsions, 67 IEMs, 79%), global developmental delay/intellectual disability (GDD/ID, 33 IEMs, 39%), and ataxia (54 IEMs, 63%), but hypotonia, nystagmus, MRI abnormalities, loss of vision and loss of hearing may also be present. Non-neurologic symptoms vary widely from vomiting, retinopathy and hepatosplenomegaly to psychiatric and behavioral disorders.

The case of Leigh syndrome (MIM#256000), one of the IEMs associated with PIND, deserves special mention. Leigh syndrome is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with developmental regression, usually between ages 3 and 12 months, due to mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation defects. Typical MRI abnormalities include symmetrical lesions in the basal ganglia or brainstem. This syndrome is not associated with mutations in a single gene, but is caused by many different gene defects; currently there are 178 genes associated with Leigh syndrome in the Leigh Map (available at vmh.uni.lu/#leighmap) (16).

Diagnostic Strategies

Table 4 summarizes the diagnostic methods required for identification of IEMs presenting with PIND. A total of 44 IEMs can be identified through metabolic screening tests in blood and urine, 14 IEMs require enzymatic analysis, while for the remaining 30 IEMs, reliable biomarkers are lacking and genetic testing is obligatory. This information is summarized in Figure 2, i.e., a two-tiered diagnostic algorithm comprising biochemical and genetic testing. Exome/genome sequencing should be initiated according to the insight of the clinician. Finally, 7 IEMs associated with PIND are included in newborn screening (NBS) panels in various countries (Supplemental Table S1).

TABLE 4

Table 4. Diagnostic tests.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Two-tiered diagnostic biochemical and genetic algorithm. The potential yield of the 1st tier laboratory tests is 52% (n = 44 IEMs) while the remaining 41 IEMs are identified via the 2nd tier tests. Exome/genome sequencing can be initiated according to the local availability and clinical practice as well as specialists' insights.

Therapeutic Modalities

Table 5 provides an overview of all IEMs presenting with PIND for which causal treatment is available, totaling 35 IEMs (41%).

TABLE 5

Table 5. Therapeutic modalities for IEMs causing PIND.

The main effect of therapy is stabilization of clinical deterioration, as this effect is reported for every registered therapeutic modality. Other reported effects include improvement of seizure control (n = 9); behavior (n = 2); and neurological and/or systemic manifestations (n = 19).

The level of evidence for these therapies varies; for the majority the level of evidence is 4 (case series) to 5 (single case report/expert opinion) (n = 24, 69%). For 4 therapeutic strategies (11%), the level of evidence is 1 including: HSCT in MPS I, miglustat treatment in Niemann-Pick type C1 and C2, enzyme replacement therapy in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2, and HSCT in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy.

Discussion

Here we present, for the first time, a comprehensive list of IEMs presenting with PIND, based on a PubMed search of relevant literature. The total number (n = 85) is higher than previously estimated, although prevalence remains unknown in the PIND and general population. Several groups have analyzed and published data on the etiology and epidemiology of PIND while researching childhood dementia, progressive deterioration, or prevalence of variant Creutzfeld-Jacob disease in children. An overview of the reported presence of inborn errors of metabolism in children with PIND is shown in Table 6. These studies show varying causes of PIND and report that 62.5–75.0% of all PIND cases are caused by IEMs. In the surveillance reports from the large cohort of the UK PIND research group, IEMs represent 82.3–88.2% of the most common diagnoses (1, 4). These numbers indicate that IEMs represent a significant proportion of the diagnoses reported in children presenting with PIND.

TABLE 6

Table 6. Overview of articles reporting the identified etiology of PIND, overall and specifically the IEMs.

Interestingly, most of these IEMs represent storage disorders, but other categories are represented as well. In summary, more than half, 59% of the well-documented IEMs (34/57) were categorized in the group “storage disorders” mainly due to different types of MPS (type I, II, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, IIID, VII) and NCL (type 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14) which represent 17 of the 34 included storage disorders (50%).

It is known that IEMs may present with stable DD/ID. Metabolic evaluation is advised in children with DD/ID and yields a diagnosis in 0.2–4.6% of tested children (17). In 2012, 81 IEMs presenting with intellectual disability were listed in the review of Karnebeek et al. (22). By 2018, this number had increased to more than 110 (14, 18, 19). Since 52% of the IEMs presenting with PIND (n = 44) can be detected through standard metabolic blood and urine tests and a growing number of IEMs are amenable to treatment. Leading to stabilization or reversal of deterioration, early diagnosis of IEMs is advantageous. In addition, the correct diagnosis of IEMs will aid in accurate care of the child, through management of symptoms or co-morbidities and genetic counseling including assessment of prognosis to the family. Diagnosis of IEMs is becoming more accessible through exome and genome sequencing. Its place in the diagnostic work-up varies according to local availability and clinical practice as well as the patient's phenotype; the yield of exomes in metabolic and neurogenetic phenotypes varies form 16–68% (20, 21). Metabolic testing has the advantage of a fast turn-around time, relative affordability and specificity and can validate exome findings or point toward the affected pathway.

Treatment such as vitamin supplementation or dietary management may lead to halt of progression or reversal of symptoms caused by IEMs. An example is hydroxocobalamin in cobalamin C deficiency (MIM#277400), where supplementation of hydroxocobalamin stabilizes clinical deterioration, prevents metabolic decompensation, and improves systemic manifestations. Biotinidase deficiency (MIM#253260) is another example of an IEM causing intellectual disability where treatment through biotin supplementation improves psychomotor development, neurological and systemic manifestations. Dietary restrictions range from dietary phenylalanine restrictions in patients with phenylketonuria (MIM#261600), protein restriction in patients with isovaleric acidemia (MIM#243500), citrullinemia (MIM#215700) and argininemia (MIM#207800), to a ketogenic diet as treatment for patients with GLUT1 deficiency syndrome (MIM#606777) and PDH complex deficiency (MIM#312170) (15). New therapeutic modalities for IEMs that may present with PIND are continuously under development, and treatments targeting the pathophysiology of IEMs are showing promising results. Cerliponase alfa (Brineura^TM), a recombinant human tripeptidyl peptidase-1 (TPP1) is an example of a recently developed treatment for neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (NCL2, MIM# 204500). NCL2 presents with progressive intellectual and neurological deterioration in children due to tripeptidyl peptidase-1 (TPP1) deficiency which causes accumulation of ceroid lipopigments in cells. Infusion of cerliponase alfa into the cerebrospinal fluid has shown to significantly slow the rate of deterioration of motor and language function in children with NCL2 (22, 23). Another emerging therapeutic modality is hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy (HSCGT). HSCGT which is currently under development for IEMS such as metachromatic leukodystrophy (MIM#250100) (24), X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (MIM#300100) (25), Canavan disease (MIM#271900) (26, 27), mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS type I, II, IIIA, IIIB, VI) (28, 29) and neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL type 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, and 11) (30). The possibility of treating IEMs and thereby halting or reversing symptoms enhances the demand of an expeditious diagnostic process to ensure timely treatment in children presenting with symptoms caused by IEMs.

Limitations

Progressive intellectual and neurological deterioration is a definition used by PIND research groups and in this review, but this definition is not used consistently throughout the medical literature. We tried to include all potential terms for PIND, and discussed this with experts specialized in metabolic diseases and an intellectual disability physician. However, it remains possible that some articles describe PIND with terms that were not included in the search. Therefore, this article should be perceived as a scope of the latest articles of PIND and not a full review.

Several of the included case reports described symptoms insufficiently, for example not mentioning frequency of seizures, leading to difficulties matching these symptoms with our definition of PIND. This contributed to the extensive list of IEMs with PIND in single cases or families, for example with IEMs like MERRF, Wilson's disease, thiamine 2 transporter deficiency, and vanishing white matter leucodystrophy.

An additional limitation of this review is the occurrence of seizures and metabolic strokes in IEMs. Neurocognitive regression or loss of skills appearing after seizures or metabolic strokes may be due to brain damage rather than a primary consequence of the IEMs. Since, in turn, seizures or metabolic strokes are caused by the underlying IEMs, these disorders were not excluded. When epilepsy or metabolic decompensation is recorded in IEMbase, the data is displayed in Supplemental Table S1. An example is the inclusion of MELAS, in which metabolic strokes are a characteristic feature, and thus PIND may be due to progressive brain damage caused by these strokes (10).

We are aware of the aforementioned limitations and acknowledge the risk of bias due to the low level of evidence in this review. Additional research on these rare IEMs and consultation of metabolic disease experts should decrease this risk.

Conclusions

In summary, we present the first comprehensive overview of IEMs presenting with PIND, and provide a structured approach to diagnosis and treatment. Clearly IEMs constitute the largest group of genetic PIND conditions and have the advantage of detectable biomarkers as well as amenability to treatment. Thus, the clinician should keep IEMs at the forefront of the diagnostic workup of a child with PIND. With the ongoing discovery of new IEMs, expanded phenotypes, and novel treatment strategies, continuous updates to this work will be required. We invite colleagues from around the world to provide input on this topic which will enable us to practice precision medicine, optimizing clinical care and outcomes for these individuals and their families.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/; http://www.iembase.org/; http://treatable-id.org/.

Author Contributions

HW, ET-F, and LT performed the literature review, selected articles and extracted data, prepared the 1st draft of manuscript and tables (all under subversion). JL extracted data on each IEM from diverse research sources and contributed to the tables and manuscript. AE contributed to the systematic search, supervision of co-authors and editing of the manuscript. CF and CK designed the study, supervised the work of the co-authors and drafted the manuscript and made edits. All authors critically read, revised, and approved the current manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Foundation Metakids provides a salary award to CK.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to our patients and families who teach and inspire us. We thank Prof. Dr. F. Wijburg and Dr. A. Bosch (Amsterdam UMC, NL) for their valuable input and expert opinion on IEMs and PIND, and acknowledge our colleagues who maintain the IEMbase and Treatable ID tools, which are important information sources for the current manuscript.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2019.01369/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

1. ^OMIM^® and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man^® are registered trademarks of the Johns Hopkins University. www.omim.org.

References

1. Devereux G, Stellitano L, Verity CM, Nicoll A, Will RG, Rogers P. Variations in neurodegenerative disease across the UK : and neurological deterioration (PIND). Arch Dis Child. (2004) 89:8–13.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

2. Verity CM, Winstone AM, Stellitano L, Will R, Nicoll A. The epidemiology of progressive intellectual and neurological deterioration in childhood. Arch Dis Child. (2010) 95:361–4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.173419

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Verity CM, Nicoll A, Will RG, Devereux G, Stellitano L. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in UK children: a national surveillance study. Lancet. (2000) 356:1224–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02785-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Verity C, Winstone AM, Will R, Powell A, Baxter P, de Sousa C, et al. Surveillance for variant CJD: should more children with neurodegenerative diseases have autopsies? Arch Dis Child. (2019) 104:360–5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315458

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Keene DL, Sutcliffe T, Harman P, Grenier D. Surveillance for progressive intellectual and neurological deterioration in the Canadian paediatric population. Can J Neurol Sci. (2004) 31:220–4. doi: 10.1017/S0317167100053865

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Nunn K, Williams K. The Australian childhood dementia study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatr. (2002) 70:63–70. doi: 10.1007/s007870200012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Morava E, Rahman S, Peters V, Baumgartner MR, Patterson M, Zschocke J. Quo vadis: the re-definition of “inborn metabolic diseases.” J Inherit Metab Dis. (2015) 38:1003–6. doi: 10.1007/s10545-015-9893-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ferreira CR, van Karnebeek CDM, Vockley J, Blau N. A proposed nosology of inborn errors of metabolism. Genet Med. (2018) 21:102–6. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0022-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. (2016) 5:210. doi: 10.1186/s1364.-016-0384-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. OMIM^® and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man^® are registered trademarks of the Johns Hopkins University. Available online at: www.omim.org

Google Scholar

11. Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, editors. GeneReviews^®. Seattle, WA: University of Washington S (1993–2018). Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1116.GeneReviews (accessed October 17, 2018).

Google Scholar

12. Valle D, Beaudet AL, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, Antonarakis SE, Ballabio A, et al. editors. OMMBID Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Available online at: https://ommbid.mhmedical.com/ (accessed October 17, 2018).

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Van Karnebeek CDM, Shevell M, Zschocke J, Moeschler JB, Stockler S. The metabolic evaluation of the child with an intellectual developmental disorder: diagnostic algorithm for identification of treatable causes and new digital resource. Mol Genet Metab. (2014) 111:428–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.01.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Van Karnebeek CDM, Stockler S. Treatable inborn errors of metabolism causing intellectual disability: a systematic literature review. Mol Genet Metab. (2012) 105:368–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.11.191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Sirrs S, Lehman A, Stockler S, van Karnebeek C. Treatable inborn errors of metabolism causing neurological symptoms in adults. Mol Genet Metab. (2013) 110:431–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Rahman J, Noronha A, Thiele I, Rahman S. Leigh map: a novel diagnostic resource for mitochondrial disease. Neuromuscul Disord. (2017) 27:S19. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8966(17)30274-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Michelson DJ, Shevell MI, Sherr EH, Moeschler JB, Gropman AL, Ashwal S. Evidence report: genetic and metabolic testing on children with global developmental delay: report of the quality standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. (2011) 77:1629–35. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182345896

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Flore LA, Milunsky JM. Updates in the genetic evaluation of the child with global developmental delay or intellectual disability. Semin Pediatr Neurol. (2012) 19:173–80. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2012.09.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Breuning M, de Coo IFM, van den Elzen APM, van Karnebeek CDM, Klaassens M, Kleefstra T, et al. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Kindergeneeskunde—various authors. Richtlijn voor de initiële etiologische diagnostiek bij kinderen met een ontwikkelingsachterstand/verstandelijke beperking. (2017):1–87.

Google Scholar

20. Al-Shamsi A, Hertecant JL, Souid AK, Al-Jasmi FA. Whole exome sequencing diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism and other disorders in United Arab Emirates. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2016) 312:1870–9. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0474-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Shakiba M, Keramatipour M. Effect of whole exome sequencing in diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism and neurogenetic disorders. Iran J Child Neurol. (2018) 12:7–15.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

22. Schulz A, Ajayi T, Specchio N, de Los Reyes E, Gissen P, Ballon G, et al. Study of intraventricular cerliponase alfa for CLN2 disease. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378:1898–907. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Markham A. Cerliponase alfa: first global approval. Drugs. (2017) 77:1247–9. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0771-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Sessa M, Lorioli L, Fumagalli F, Acquati S, Redaelli D, Baldoli C, et al. Lentiviral haemopoietic stem-cell gene therapy in early-onset metachromatic leukodystrophy: an ad-hoc analysis of a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet. (2016) 388: 476–87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30374-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Eichler F, Duncan C, Musolino PL, Orchard PJ, De Oliveira, SThrasher AJ, et al. Hematopoietic stem-cell gene therapy for cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:1630–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700554

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Janson C, McPhee S, Bilaniuk L, Haselgrove J, Testaiuti M, Freese A, et al. Gene therapy of Canavan disease: AAV-2 vector for neurosurgical delivery of aspartoacylase gene (ASPA) to the human brain. Hum Gene Ther. (2002) 13:1391–412. doi: 10.1089/104303402760128612

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Leone P, Shera D, McPhee SW, Francis JS, Kolodny EH, Bilaniuk LT, et al. Long-term follow-up after gene therapy for canavan disease. Sci Transl Med. (2012) 4:165ra163. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003454

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Tardieu M, Zérah M, Gougeon ML, Ausseil J, de Bournonville S, Husson B, et al. Intracerebral gene therapy in children with mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIB syndrome: an uncontrolled phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Neurol. (2017) 16:712–20. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30169-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Fraldi A, Serafini M, Sorrentino NC, Gentner B, Aiuti A, Bernardo ME. Gene therapy for mucopolysaccharidoses: in vivo and ex vivo approaches. Ital J Pediatr. (2018) 44 (Suppl. 2):130. doi: 10.1186/s13052-018-0565-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Donsante A, Boulis NM. Progress in gene and cell therapies for the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses. Expert Opin Biol Ther. (2018) 18:755–64. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1492544

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Koch J, Mayr JA, Alhaddad B, Rauscher C, Bierau J, Kovacs-Nagy R, et al. CAD mutations and uridine-responsive epileptic encephalopathy. Brain. (2017) 140:279–86. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1602868

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Daci A, Bozalija A, Jashari F, Krasniqi S. Individualizing treatment approaches for epileptic patients with glucose transporter type1 (GLUT-1) deficiency. Int J Mol Sci. (2018) 19:E122. doi: 10.3390/ijms19010122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Escolar ML, West T, Dalavecchia A, Poe MD, LaPoint K. Clinical management of Krabbe disease. J Neuroschience Res. (2016) 94:1118–25. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23891

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Schwahn BC, van Spronsen FJ, Belaidi AA, Bowhay S, Christodoulou J, Derks TG. Efficacy and safety of cyclic pyranopterin monophosphate substitution in severe molybdenum cofactor deficiency type A: a prospective cohort study. Lancet2. (2015) 386:1955–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00124-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Geraets RD, Koh SY, Hastings ML, Kielian T, Pearce DA, Weimer JM. Moving towards effective therapeutic strategies for Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2016) 11:40. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0414-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar