Stroke Rate Increases Around the Time of Cancer Diagnosis

Objective: To test whether strokes increase around the time of cancer diagnosis, we comprehensively examined the correlations of cancer and stroke by employing a population-based cohort study design.

Methods: One million people insured under the Taiwan's National Health Insurance program in 2005 were randomly sampled to create the study's dataset. According to the presence of cancer and/or stroke, patients were separated into cancer and stroke, cancer-only, and stroke-only groups. Diagnoses of cancer, stroke, and comorbidities were defined according to ICD9-CM codes. Cancer and non-cancer populations were matched by age at cancer diagnosis, gender, and stroke risk factors, and each patient with cancer was matched with two non-cancer controls nested in the same year of cancer diagnosis. The hazards of stroke and cumulative incidences within a year after cancer diagnosis were evaluated using Fine and Gray's subdistributional hazard model.

Results: The temporal distribution of first-ever stroke in patients with both cancer and stroke was a sharpened bell shape that peaked between 0.5 years before and after cancer diagnosis. Frequencies of stroke were further adjusted by number of cancer survivors. The monthly event rate of stroke remained nested around the time of cancer diagnosis in all strokes. Brain malignancies, lung cancer, gastric cancer, prostate cancer, and leukemia patients obtained higher ratio of stroke, while breast cancer and thyroid cancer patients had low percentage of combining stroke. When compared to non-cancer matched control, the hazard of stroke within one year after cancer diagnosis was increased by cancer at a subdistributional hazard ratio of 1.72 (95% confident interval 1.48 to 2.01; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Cancer increased the risk of stroke and stroke events were nested around the time of cancer diagnosis, occurring 0.5 years prior to cancer on average regardless of stroke type.

Introduction

A study on lung cancer that analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) found a higher stroke rate just after lung cancer diagnosis (1). Furthermore, the median time from cancer to cryptogenic stroke was 9.6 months in patient data from the cancer registry of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the poststroke survival was less favorable than other patients with stroke with known mechanisms (2). In addition, the Bergen Norwegian Stroke Research Registry found 15.7% patients with stroke had a history of cancer (3). Concealed cancers were evident in several stroke registries (4, 5) with a 5-month mean interval from stroke to the discovery of the concealed cancer (6). These observations suggest a concept in which active cancer and acute stroke codevelop. Relevant studies have either been based on cancer or stroke registries or been confined to a certain type of cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively examine the correlations of cancer and stroke by employing a population-based cohort study design.

Methods

Database

Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) program was launched by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in 1995 (7). In this study, 1 million people insured under the NHI program in 2005 were randomly sampled from the NHIRD to create the study dataset. Medical utilization data were traced back to January 1, 1996 and recorded until December 31, 2013. Patients who had either cancer or stroke before January 1, 2005 were excluded. Depending on the presence of cancer and/or stroke, patients were separated into the following groups: cancer and stroke, cancer only, and stroke only (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Flow chart of enrollment. NHIRD, National Health Insurance Research Database; ICD9-CM, the Ninth Revision of International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (No. 201700303B1). Because all the data of NHIRD were de-identified secondary data, individual informed consent was not required. All methods were performed in accordance to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline (8). For data availability, anonymized data not published within this article will be made available by request from any qualified investigator.

Definitions of Cancer, Stroke, and Comorbidities

Diagnoses were based on diagnostic codes of the Ninth Revision of International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD9-CM). Cancer was defined by registration of malignant neoplasm on a catastrophic illness certificate and ICD9-CM code 140-208 (9). In a validation study, NHIRD-based cancer diagnosis had a positive predictive value of 94% when validated by the Taiwan National Cancer Registry (10). Types of cancer were defined by the following ICD9-CM codes: 162 for lung cancer, 153 and 154 for colorectal cancer, 155 for hepatocellular carcinoma, 188 and 189 for urogenital cancer, 151 for gastric cancer, 185 for prostate cancer, 174 for breast cancer, 191 for brain malignancy, 150 for esophageal cancer, 147 for nasopharyngeal cancer, 183 for ovarian cancer, 193 for thyroid cancer, 200–202 and 203.0 for lymphoma, and 204–208 for leukemia.

Stroke events were identified from inpatient payment records using ICD9-CM codes 430–437 (11). Stroke classifications were made according to the validation study with a high degree of accuracy (88.4% positive predictive value and 97.3% sensitivity) (12, 13). ICD9-CM code 430 defined subarachnoid hemorrhage, 431 defined intracerebral hemorrhage, 433 and 434 defined acute ischemic stroke, and 435 defined transient ischemic attack (Table 1). For venous infarction of brain, cerebral venous thrombosis was defined by code 325.0, 437.6, and 671.5 (14).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Age, sex, and comorbidities of patients with both cancer and stroke, cancer only, and stroke only.

Comorbidities were defined by at least two outpatient records or one inpatient record of the definitive ICD9-CM codes (15). The ICD9-CM codes used to define comorbidities were 401 and 405 for hypertension (11), 250 for diabetes mellitus (11), 585 for chronic kidney disease, (16) 427.31 for atrial fibrillation, (11) 413 and 414.0 for coronary artery disease (11), 428 for heart failure (11) and 272 for hyperlipidemia (11). Alcohol consumption and smoking habit could not be reflected directly by ICD9-CM codes. To overcome this limitation, the consequent diseases represented exposures of alcohol and tobacco (17). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by ICD9-CM code 491, 492, and 496 represented personal history of tobacco exposure (18). ICD9-CM codes for alcohol-use disorder (V113, 305.0, and 303) and alcoholic organ damages (291, 357.5, 425.5, 571.0, 571.1, 571.2, 571.3, and 980.0) together represented alcohol overuse (19).

Temporal Correlation of Cancer and Stroke Development

Among the patients with both cancer and stroke, the cancer-to-stroke interval was defined as the time from the date that cancer was first recorded from either inpatient, outpatient, or catastrophic illness certificate records to the date of the first inpatient record of stroke. The zero point of timescales was set as the date that cancer was first recorded. When stroke occurred before the diagnosis of cancer, the cancer-to-stroke interval had a negative value. Only the first stroke event was considered; recurrent strokes were not repetitively recorded.

Statistics

Cancer and non-cancer populations were matched by age at cancer diagnosis, sex, and stroke risk factors including diabetes mellitus (20), hypertension (20), chronic kidney disease (21), and atrial fibrillation (22). Each patient with cancer was matched with two non-cancer controls nested in the same year of cancer diagnosis. We further tested the competing risk of stroke between cancer patients and non-cancer matched controls. The hazards of stroke and cumulative incidences within a year after cancer diagnosis were evaluated using Fine and Gray's subdistributional hazard model, which considers all-cause mortality as a competing risk (23, 24). All-cause mortality was defined by either (1) remark of death in the catastrophic illness database, (2) either death or critical discharge against medical advice as the status of discharge from hospital AND no new record within 28 days after discharge, (3) discharge against medical advice as the status of discharge AND withdrawal of insurance within 28 days after discharge, or (4) record of resuscitation diagnosis and resuscitation medications in emergency department AND withdrawal of insurance within 28 days (25). The reasons of making the definition of mortality were that NHI is the solitary public health insurance in Taiwan and therefore withdrawals from NHI were rare. Certain people favor to bring their dying families back to home instead of being announced death in hospital. Therefore, the combination of withdrawing insurance and critical discharge was considered mortality. Covariates in the subdistributional hazard model were age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and alcohol overuse. The cumulative event rate of stroke was calculated by dividing cumulative strokes by number of survivors. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS Enterprise Guide. For continuous variables, independent t tests were used to test for statistical significance. For binary data, the chi-squared test was used. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Enrollment and Group Characteristics

Of 1181,222 random samples, 11,965 patients were excluded because of information missing for identity, age, sex, or date of birth. Another 26,512 patients were removed because they had records of either cancer or stroke before the creation of the database on January 1, 2005. Of the 1142,745 enrolled patients during the follow-up period from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2013, 1,877 patients developed both cancer and stroke, 26,446 patients solely had cancer, and 19,689 patients only suffered stroke (Figure 1).

When we compared the age at time of cancer diagnosis, the cancer and stroke group was older than the cancer-only group (70.5 ± 13.4, 61.1 ± 15.4 years, p < 0.0001) and comprised more men (64.1, 54.1%, p < 0.0001) as well as more stroke risk factors (hypertension: 81.6, 49.5%, p < 0.0001; diabetes mellitus: 48.2, 29.7%, p < 0.0001; chronic kidney disease: 15.0, 7.9%, p < 0.0001; atrial fibrillation: 13.8, 3.6%, p < 0.0001; coronary artery disease 33.8, 18.3%, p < 0.0001; heart failure: 23.5, 10.0%, p < 0.0001; and hyperlipidemia: 49.2, 35.1%, p < 0.0001). When we compared the age at first occurrence of stroke, the cancer and stroke group was older (70.1 ± 13.2, 67.3 ± 14.8 years, p < 0.0001) and comprised more men (64.1, 57.1%, p < 0.0001) but exhibited less hypertension (81.6, 85.8%, p < 0.0001) and hyperlipidemia (49.2, 56.2%, p < 0.0001) than the stroke-only group (Table 1). Stroke classifications between groups were not significantly different, except for less subarachnoid hemorrhage (1.6, 3.7%, p < 0.0001) in the cancer and stroke group (Table 1).

Strong Temporal Correlations of Cancer and Stroke Co-development

The temporal distribution of first stroke in the patients with both cancer and stroke was a sharpened bell shape, which peaked between 0.5 years before and after cancer diagnosis (Figure 2A). Frequency of stroke was further adjusted by the number of cancer survivors. The monthly event rate of stroke remained nested around the time of cancer diagnosis in all strokes (Figure 2B), acute ischemic stroke (Figure 2C), transient ischemic stroke (Figure 2D), and intracerebral hemorrhage (Figure 2E).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Temporal correlation of cancer and stroke. Frequencies of first stroke nested between 0.5 years before and after cancer was first recorded in the database and were nested around the time of cancer diagnosis in the patients with both cancer and stroke (A). Under time correction of the number of cancer survivors, the monthly event rate of first stroke for all strokes (B), acute ischemic stroke (C), transient ischemic attack (D), and intracerebral hemorrhage (E) remained nested and peaked at the time of cancer diagnosis.

Certain Cancer Types Are Prone to Co-developing Stroke

Subsequently, this study ranked the frequencies of various cancers among the 1,877 patients with both cancer and stroke and found that there were 282 (15.0%) lung cancer cases, 281 (15.0%) colorectal cancer cases, 244 (13.0%) hepatocellular carcinoma cases, 141 (7.5%) urogenital cancer cases, 125 (6.7%) gastric cancer cases, and 122 (6.5%) prostate cancer cases (Figure 3A). For each cancer type, the chance of experiencing stroke was ranked from 20.2% for malignant brain tumor, 10.2% for gastric cancer, 9.4% for prostate cancer, 9.0% for urogenital cancer, 8.7% for lung cancer, and 8.2% for leukemia (Figure 3B). The cancer-to-stroke interval was −0.4 ± 3.0 years on average. Some patients developed stroke before cancer, including cancer-to-stroke intervals of −2.3 ± 2.4 years in esophageal cancer, −0.9 ± 2.8 years in hepatocellular carcinoma, and −0.9 ± 2.8 years in gastric cancer. Some other patients experienced stroke after cancer, including stroke onsets of 2.0 ± 2.6 years after ovarian cancer and 1.6 ± 3.6 years after nasopharyngeal cancer (Figure 3C).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Stroke in different types of cancer. Frequencies of patients with both cancer and stroke were ranked in (A). When patients with stroke were encountered with suspected coexisting cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma should be considered first because of their relatively high frequencies. In individual cancers, certain cancers presented with a relatively high ratio of codeveloping stroke, such as malignant brain tumor, gastric cancer, and prostate cancer (B). The intervals between developing cancer and stroke were also different among cancers (C). Preceding strokes in esophageal cancer and following strokes in nasopharyngeal cancer and ovarian cancer should be considered; otherwise most strokes developed within ± 0.5 years of cancer detection, with a mean interval of −0.4 ± 3.0 years. Abbreviations: ca, cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; NPC, nasopharyngeal cancer.

Cancer Increased the Risk of Stroke When Compared With Noncancer Matched Controls

All 1142,745 enrolled patients were divided into groups with cancer and without cancer after 1,237 patients were excluded for having stroke records prior to cancer being recorded. The 27,106 patients with cancer were matched at cancer diagnosis to the 1114,402 non-cancer patients at a 1:2 ratio according to the following matching criteria: age, sex, and the presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and atrial fibrillation (Figure 4). After successful matching, 25,920 patients with cancer and 51,840 non-cancer matched controls were entered into a proportional hazards model.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Matching method between cancer and noncancer populations.

In Fine and Gray's subdistributional hazards model, all-cause mortality was considered a competing risk, the hazard of stroke within a year after cancer diagnosis was increased by cancer at a subdistributional hazard ratio (SHR) of 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48–2.01; p < 0.0001; Table 2). The cumulative stroke rates in patients with cancer were higher than those in the non-cancer matched controls; they initially matched and then increased to reach 1.26 vs. 0.78% at the twelfth month of follow-up, respectively (Figure 5). When the comparison period was extended to the end of the cohort follow-up on December 31, 2013, statistics failed to show significant differences in stroke hazards between patients with cancer and non-cancer matched controls (data not shown).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Competing risk of stroke in patients with cancer and noncancer matched controls.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Cumulative stroke event rate in cancer and noncancer matched controls. Subdistribution hazard ratio of stroke increased 1.72-fold in patients with cancer compared with noncancer matched controls under adjustment by all-cause mortality as a competing risk. At the end of the 1-year follow-up, the cumulative rates of stroke were 1.26% in patients with cancer and 0.78% in noncancer matched controls. SHR, subdistribution hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

The other variables in the model that increased stroke hazards during the 1-year follow-up period were age (SHR 1.04; 95% CI 1.03–1.05), male gender (SHR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04–1.43), hypertension (SHR 1.95; 95% CI 1.60–2.38), diabetes mellitus (SHR 1.41; 95% CI 1.19–1.67), heart failure (SHR 1.49; 95% CI 1.19–1.86), atrial fibrillation (SHR 2.13; 95% CI 1.42–3.20) and alcohol overuse (SHR 1.76; 95% CI 1.16–2.66; Table 2).

Discussion

This population-based cohort study examined the co-development of cancer and stroke. A nesting phenomenon of first strokes was noticed around the time of cancer diagnosis, regardless of whether strokes were classified as acute ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or intracerebral hemorrhage. Because of the uneven baselines between the cancer and stroke group and the stroke-only group, cancer and non-cancer populations were matched to control the risk factors. Thereafter, the proportional hazard model demonstrated increased stroke hazards with the presence of cancer.

Because this study was conducted on the basis of data from databases, certain limitations and statistical solutions should be mentioned. First, both cancer and stroke are major diseases with high mortality rates. To avoid survivorship bias, it was necessary to exclude patients with a history of cancer or stroke before creating the database. Furthermore, to correct for possible population decay–related selection bias, timely adjustments of survivor numbers should be performed when encountering incidence statistics and survival analysis (26). When performing hazard estimation of patients with cancer, considering mortality as a competing risk was determined to be crucial (24). Second, because of the limitations of the claims database, patients' stroke-related neurological deficit, performance, independence, brain image, and laboratory data could not be extracted from the database. Cancer staging and pathology were not provided by the NHIRD. Substance and environment exposures could not be directly measured. Alcohol consumption was indirectly estimated by alcoholic organ damage and alcohol-use disorder. Smoking was alternatively coded by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Possible biases existed in both indirect representations and inter-individual variations to exposures. Lastly, since all-cause mortality was measured by indirect coding, there's still possibilities of misclassification of death.

The trend of co-development of cancer and stroke has been implied in different registries and database studies. Some cancer registries have found increased risk of stroke in patients with cancer (27), and the risk was high at the onset of cancer (28). Another stroke registry found a cancer history was more common in patients with stroke than in a matched general population (3). Several NHIRD studies have indicated the relationship between cancer and stroke in single cancer types (29–32). For example, an NHIRD study on lung cancer found the highest hazard of stroke in the first 3 months of lung cancer, after which the hazard gradually reduced in the following year (1).

According to our results, most strokes occurred slightly earlier than cancer. A possible mediator is paraneoplastic thromboembolism of active cancer. In addition to stroke, active cancer increases the risk of pulmonary embolism during the peri-cancerous period (33). General considerations of cancer-related cerebral arterial thromboembolism have included paraneoplastic hypercoagulopathy (34, 35), chemotherapy (36), hyperviscosity syndrome in hematologic malignancies (37), Trousseau's syndrome of mucin-positive carcinoma (38), radiotherapy vasculopathy of head and neck cancer (39) and tumor emboli of lung cancer (40). In addition to cancer-specific risks, common vascular risk factors including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillations have been found to be common in patients with cancer and stroke (41, 42). Therefore, concerns about stroke in patients with cancer are not negligible because of their high risks. Nevertheless, the patients with both cancer and stroke in our study exhibited less hypertension and hyperlipidemia but were older and more often male than the patients in the stroke-only group; therefore, the stroke risk factors were slightly different from the general population. Regarding stroke classifications, there were also fewer subarachnoid hemorrhages in patients with both cancer and stroke. Because most subarachnoid hemorrhages are related to aneurysm rupture or traumatic brain injury (43), this might reflect their non-relevance to cancer-related stroke. In sum, the population features of cancer-related stroke were slightly different from noncancer-related stroke.

The other explanation for the nesting phenomenon of cancer and stroke is surveillance effects. Either active cancer or acute stroke brings people to medical systems more frequently than usual, which results in surveillance bias from frequent medical checkups (44). Therefore, alerts for the codevelopment of cancer and stroke in a short period, the arrangement of diagnostic exams, and prompt treatment are warranted.

Certain types of cancer are more frequently found in combination with stroke. Lung cancer with stroke was the most frequently noticed in the cancer registries (27, 45) as well as in our study. This high frequency could come from hypercoagulopathy, tumor emboli, metastasis to the brain, or perhaps because of the high prevalence of lung cancer itself. Lung, liver and colorectal cancers as the most prevalent cancers in Taiwan (46) codeveloped stroke frequently (Figure 3A). After adjusted with total number of cancer survivors, the percentages of combining stroke in lung, liver, and colorectal cancers were no longer high (Figure 3B). Therefore, high frequency of codeveloping stroke was related to high prevalence of certain cancers. However, breast cancer was also a prevalent cancer but with only 2.3% patients having stroke (Figure 3B). According to Taiwan Cancer Registry, majority of breast cancer patients were diagnosed at stage I or II, especially when mammography screening was promoted by public health policy in Taiwan since 2004 (47, 48). Furthermore, survival rate was high in breast cancer with 5-year-survival rate over 80% (49). Lower stage of cancer and good survival rate was less likely to induce systemic change in coagulation or cancer treatment related complications such as stroke.

Gastric cancer is a prothrombotic cancer by expressing tissue factors in tumor and by increasing coagulation-related proteins (thrombin, fibrinogen, fibrinopeptide A and d-dimer) in blood (50). The prothrombotic nature leads to venous thromboembolism in thirteen percent of gastric cancer patients (51) and might also explains the 10.2% high ratio of codeveloping stroke during whole follow-up period and 4.7% within one year before and after cancer diagnosis (Supplementary Figure 1).

The majority of patients with prostate cancer were elderly with the highest mean age among different cancers (77.4 ± 7.5 years old in prostate cancer with stroke; 73.6 ± 8.8 years old in prostate cancer-only patients). Age is an unmodifiable risk factor for both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke (52). Androgen-deprivation therapy to treat prostate cancer further added on risk of stroke (53). By multiple causative factors, there's a relatively high percentage (9.4%) of prostate cancer patients codeveloping stroke.

Leukemia as a malignancy of blood cell leads to defected fibrinolysis and releases procoagulants to induce disseminated intravascular coagulation (54). In an epidemiologic study of National Inpatient Sample dataset, active acute myeloid leukemia patients had 50-fold increases of concomitant stroke if compared to all admissions (55). In our dataset, 6.3% of leukemia patients had stroke within one year before and after leukemia (Supplementary Figure 1).

Notably, when we studied the percentages of stroke codevelopment in different cancers, an extraordinarily high percentage (20.0%) was noted in malignant brain tumors (Figure 3B). Brain tumors cause vessel compression, postoperative stroke, and radiotherapy vasculopathy-related stroke (56), intracerebral hemorrhage (57), as well as cerebral venous thrombosis (58). Cerebral venous thrombosis is a relatively low incident stroke type. When we searched the database, only 32 cases were identified. Among them only 2 cases had malignancies which were non-brain (one unspecified solid malignancy and one thyroid cancer). Therefore, role of venous thrombosis in brain tumor related stroke was unable to be demonstrated here. When examining peri-cancerous period, strokes occurred in 13.9% of brain tumor patients within one year before and after cancer diagnosis (Supplementary Figure 1). The radiation therapy induced arterial stenosis was less likely to occur within one year after radiation exposure and was not causative for most brain tumor related stroke (59). Of other stroke inducing factors, primary brain tumor had local effects of hypercoagulation by expression tissue factor (60). Post-operative stroke also accounted half of stroke in a case series of primary brain tumor (56). To summarize, the high prevalence of stroke in brain tumors is explained by disease complications and treatment-specific mechanisms.

In some cancers with delayed onset of stroke, cancer treatment–related mechanisms have been considered. For example, nasopharyngeal cancer is a relatively prevalent cancer in Taiwan (57) and the use of radiotherapy plus chemotherapy and radiotherapy alone for treating nasopharyngeal cancer increased the risk of postcancer stroke (29, 39). Treatment-related stroke, especially radiotherapy-induced carotid stenosis in head and neck cancer required a certain period of time to develop, which was reflected in the mean interval from nasopharyngeal cancer to stroke (1.6 ± 3.6 years in our study) and could continue to accumulate even 10 years after cancer treatment (29).

Conclusion

Cancer increased the risk of stroke. Stroke events were nested around the time of cancer diagnosis and occurred 0.5 years prior to cancer on average, regardless of whether the stroke was acute ischemic stroke, transient ischemic stroke, or intracerebral hemorrhage. Certain cancers codeveloped with stroke relatively frequently (e.g., lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma), whereas some other cancers had relatively high percentages of stroke development, such as malignant brain tumor, lung cancer, gastric cancer, leukemia and prostate cancer. Paraneoplastic complications of cancer, cancer treatment-specific mechanisms, and medical surveillance effects were considered to contribute to the nesting phenomenon of strokes around the time of cancer diagnosis.

Data Availability

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

YW and KC wrote the main manuscript text. YW, C-PL, CW, C-HL, and YS designed the study. TL run the statistical analysis. KC supervised statistical methods. YW and TL prepared Figures 1–5.

Funding

This study is funded by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital research grants CLRPG2C0024, CLRPG2G0081, and CMRPG2H0221.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Department of Research and Development of Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for research resource supports and the Rising Statistic Consultant Inc. for statistical consultation. This manuscript was edited by Wallace Academic Editing. This study is based in part on data from the National Health Insurance Research Database provided by the National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare and managed by National Health Research Institutes (Registered number NHIRD-104-210). The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare or National Health Research Institutes.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2019.00579/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1. Ratio of stroke within one year before and after diagnosis of different cancers.

References

1. Chen PC, Muo CH, Lee YT, Yu YH, Sung FC. Lung cancer and incidence of stroke: a population-based cohort study. Stroke. (2011) 42:3034–9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.615534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Navi BB, Singer S, Merkler AE, Cheng NT, Stone JB, Kamel H, et al. Cryptogenic subtype predicts reduced survival among cancer patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2014) 45:2292–7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005784

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Selvik HA, Thomassen L, Logallo N, Naess H. Prior cancer in patients with ischemic stroke: the Bergen NORSTROKE study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2014) 23:919–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Taccone FS, Jeangette SM, Blecic SA. First-ever stroke as initial presentation of systemic cancer. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2008) 17:169–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2008.01.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Uemura J, Kimura K, Sibazaki K, Inoue T, Iguchi Y, Yamashita S. Acute stroke patients have occult malignancy more often than expected. Eur Neurol. (2010) 64:140–4. doi: 10.1159/000316764

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kim SJ, Park JH, Lee MJ, Park YG, Ahn MJ, Bang OY. Clues to occult cancer in patients with ischemic stroke. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e44959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044959

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ho Chan WS. Taiwan's healthcare report 2010. EPMA J. (2010) 1:563–85. doi: 10.1007/s13167-010-0056-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. (2007) 370:1453–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Yu KH, Kuo CF, Huang LH, Huang WK, See LC. Cancer risk in patients with inflammatory systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a nationwide population-based dynamic cohort study in Taiwan. Medicine. (2016) 95:e3540. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003540

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kao WH, Hong JH, See LC, Yu HP, Hsu JT, Chou IJ, et al. Validity of cancer diagnosis in the National Health Insurance database compared with the linked National Cancer Registry in Taiwan. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. (2018) 27:1060–6. doi: 10.1002/pds.4267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chen DY, Mao CT, Tsai ML, Hsieh MJ, Lin YS, Cherng WJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction patients under dialysis—a nationwide cohort study. Circ J. (2016) 80:363–70. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0778

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Andrade SE, Harrold LR, Tjia J, Cutrona SL, Saczynski JS, Dodd KS, et al. A systematic review of validated methods for identifying cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack using administrative data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. (2012) 21:100–28. doi: 10.1002/pds.2312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hsieh CY, Chen CH, Li CY, Lai ML. Validating the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke in a National Health Insurance claims database. J Formos Med Assoc. (2015) 114:254–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.09.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Liberman AL, Kamel H, Mullen MT, Messé SR. International classification of diseases, ninth revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes can identify cerebral venous thrombosis in hospitalized adults. Neurohospitalist. (2016) 6:147–50. doi: 10.1177/1941874416648198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. (2005) 43:1130–9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Chan TC, Fan I, Liu MS, Su MD, Chiang PH. Addressing health disparities in chronic kidney disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2014) 11:12848–65. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111212848

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Terzikhan N, Verhamme KM, Hofman A, Stricker BH, Brusselle GG, Lahousse L. Prevalence and incidence of COPD in smokers and non-smokers: the Rotterdam Study. Eur J Epidemiol. (2016) 31:785–92. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0132-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ho TW, Ruan SY, Huang CT, Tsai YJ, Lai F, Yu CJ. Validity of ICD9-CM codes to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from National Health Insurance claim data in Taiwan. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. (2018) 13:3055–63. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S174265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Wu VC, Chen TH, Wu M, Huang CH, Chen SW, Cheng CW, et al. Risk of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C infections—a 13-year nationwide population-based study. J Cardiol. (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.03.009. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Hauer AJ, Ruigrok YM, Algra A, Van Dijk EJ, Koudstaal PJ, Luijckx GJ, et al. Age-specific vascular risk factor profiles according to stroke subtype. J Am Heart Assoc. (2017) 6:e005090. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, Mcculloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. (2004) 351:1296–305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA. (2001) 285:2864–70. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.22.2864

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. (1999) 94:496–509. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Wu C-Y, Chen Y-J, Ho HJ, Hsu YC, Kuo KN, Wu M-S, et al. Association between nucleoside analogues and risk of hepatitis B virus–related hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following liver resection. JAMA. (2012) 308:1906–14. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11975

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Chen KF, Tsai MY, Wu CC, Han ST. Effectiveness of treatments and diagnostic tools and declining mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a 12-year population-based cohort study. J Intensive Care Med. (2019). doi: 10.1177/0885066619827270. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Torner A, Duberg AS, Dickman P, Svensson A. A proposed method to adjust for selection bias in cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol. (2010) 171:602–8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp432

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Cestari DM, Weine DM, Panageas KS, Segal AZ, Deangelis LM. Stroke in patients with cancer: incidence and etiology. Neurology. (2004) 62:2025–30. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000129912.56486.2B

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Navi BB, Reiner AS, Kamel H, Iadecola C, Elkind MSV, Panageas KS, et al. Association between incident cancer and subsequent stroke. Ann Neurol. (2015) 77:291–300. doi: 10.1002/ana.24325

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Chu CN, Chen SW, Bai LY, Mou CH, Hsu CY, Sung FC. Increase in stroke risk in patients with head and neck cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Cancer. (2011) 105:1419–23. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.361

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Tsai SJ, Huang YS, Tung CH, Lee CC, Lee MS, Chiou WY, et al. Increased risk of ischemic stroke in cervical cancer patients: a nationwide population-based study. Radiat Oncol. (2013) 8:41. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-41

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kuan AS, Teng CJ, Wu HH, Su VY, Chen YT, Chien SH, et al. Risk of ischemic stroke in patients with ovarian cancer: a nationwide population-based study. BMC Med. (2014) 12:53. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-53

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Kuan AS, Chen SC, Yeh CM, Hung MH, Hung YP, Chen TJ, et al. Risk of ischemic stroke in patients with gastric cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Medicine. (2015) 94:e1336. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001336

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Van Herk-Sukel MP, Shantakumar S, Penning-Van Beest FJ, Kamphuisen PW, Majoor CJ, Overbeek LI, et al. Pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke in lung cancer patients: results from a longitudinal study. Lung. (2013) 191:501–9. doi: 10.1007/s00408-013-9485-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Schwarzbach CJ, Schaefer A, Ebert A, Held V, Bolognese M, Kablau M, et al. Stroke and cancer: the importance of cancer-associated hypercoagulation as a possible stroke etiology. Stroke. (2012) 43:3029–34. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.658625

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Kim K, Lee JH. Risk factors and biomarkers of ischemic stroke in cancer patients. J Stroke. (2014) 16:91–6. doi: 10.5853/jos.2014.16.2.91

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Li SH, Chen WH, Tang Y, Rau KM, Chen YY, Huang TL, et al. Incidence of ischemic stroke post-chemotherapy: a retrospective review of 10,963 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2006) 108:150–6. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.03.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Wells R. Syndromes of hyperviscosity. N Engl J Med. (1970) 283:183–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197007232830406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Varki A. Trousseau's syndrome: multiple definitions and multiple mechanisms. Blood. (2007) 110:1723–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-053736

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Smith GL, Smith BD, Buchholz TA, Giordano SH, Garden AS, Woodward WA, et al. Cerebrovascular disease risk in older head and neck cancer patients after radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. (2008) 26:5119–25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. O'neill BP, Dinapoli RP, Okazaki H. Cerebral infarction as a result of tumor emboli. Cancer. (1987) 60:90–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

41. Zhang YY, Chan DK, Cordato D, Shen Q, Sheng AZ. Stroke risk factor, pattern and outcome in patients with cancer. Acta Neurol Scand. (2006) 114:378–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00709.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Navi BB, Singer S, Merkler AE, Cheng NT, Stone JB, Kamel H, et al. Recurrent thromboembolic events after ischemic stroke in patients with cancer. Neurology. (2014) 83:26–33. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000539

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Van Gijn J, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage: diagnosis, causes and management. Brain. (2001) 124:249–78. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.2.249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Haut ER, Pronovost PJ. Surveillance bias in outcomes reporting. JAMA. (2011) 305:2462–3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.822

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Lee MJ, Chung JW, Ahn MJ, Kim S, Seok JM, Jang HM, et al. Hypercoagulability and mortality of patients with stroke and active cancer: the OASIS-CANCER study. J Stroke. (2017) 19:77–87. doi: 10.5853/jos.2016.00570

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Chiang CJ, Wang YW, Lee WC. Taiwan's Nationwide Cancer Registry System of 40 years: past, present, and future. J Formos Med Assoc. (2019) 118:856–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.01.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Pan HB, Wong KF, Yang TL, Hsu GC, Chou CP, Huang JS, et al. The outcome of a quality-controlled mammography screening program: experience from a population-based study in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc. (2014) 77:531–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.06.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Yen AM, Tsau HS, Fann JC, Chen SL, Chiu SY, Lee YC, et al. Population-based breast cancer screening with risk-based and universal mammography screening compared with clinical breast examination: a propensity score analysis of 1429890 Taiwanese women. JAMA Oncol. (2016) 2:915–21. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Chiang CJ, Lo WC, Yang YW, You SL, Chen CJ, Lai MS. Incidence and survival of adult cancer patients in Taiwan, 2002–2012. J Formos Med Assoc. (2016) 115:1076–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Repetto O, De Re V. Coagulation and fibrinolysis in gastric cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2017) 1404:27–48. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13454

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Caine GJ, Stonelake PS, Lip GY, Kehoe ST. The hypercoagulable state of malignancy: pathogenesis and current debate. Neoplasia. (2002) 4:465–73. doi: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900263

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Boehme AK, Esenwa C, Elkind MS. Stroke risk factors, genetics, and prevention. Circ Res. (2017) 120:472–95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Meng F, Zhu S, Zhao J, Vados L, Wang L, Zhao Y, et al. Stroke related to androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Cancer. (2016) 16:180. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2221-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Tallman MS, Kwaan HC. Reassessing the hemostatic disorder associated with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. (1992) 79:543–53.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

55. Del Prete C, Kim T, Lansigan F, Shatzel J, Friedman H. The epidemiology and clinical associations of stroke in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a review of 10,972 admissions from the 2012 national inpatient sample. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. (2018) 18:74–7.e71. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Kreisl TN, Toothaker T, Karimi S, Deangelis LM. Ischemic stroke in patients with primary brain tumors. Neurology. (2008) 70:2314–20. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000314648.82924.6f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Iwama T, Ohkuma A, Miwa Y, Sugimoto S, Itoh T, Takada M, et al. Brain tumors manifesting as intracranial hemorrhage. Neurol Med Chir. (1992) 32:130–5. doi: 10.2176/nmc.32.130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Khoury MN, Missios S, Edwin N, Sakruti S, Barnett G, Stevens G, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage in setting of glioblastoma with venous thromboembolism. Neuro-Oncol Pract. (2016) 3:87–96. doi: 10.1093/nop/npv028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Campen CJ, Kranick SM, Kasner SE, Kessler SK, Zimmerman RA, Lustig R, et al. Cranial irradiation increases risk of stroke in pediatric brain tumor survivors. Stroke. (2012) 43:3035–40. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661561

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Guan M, Jin J, Su B, Liu WW, Lu Y. Tissue factor expression and angiogenesis in human glioma. Clin Biochem. (2002) 35:321–5. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9120(02)00312-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar