AUTHOR=Qian Qiuyang , Hu Xiaoling , Lai Qian , Ng Stephanie C. , Zheng Yongping , Poon Waisang 

TITLE=Early Stroke Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb Assisted with an Electromyography-Driven Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation-Robotic Arm

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neurology

VOLUME=8

YEAR=2017

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2017.00447

DOI=10.3389/fneur.2017.00447

ISSN=1664-2295

ABSTRACT=<sec id="ST1"><title>Background</title><p>Effective poststroke motor rehabilitation depends on repeated limb practice with voluntary efforts. An electromyography (EMG)-driven neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)-robot arm was designed for the multi-joint physical training on the elbow, the wrist, and the fingers.</p></sec><sec id="ST2"><title>Objectives</title><p>To investigate the training effects of the device-assisted approach on subacute stroke patients and to compare the effects with those achieved by the traditional physical treatments.</p></sec><sec id="ST3"><title>Method</title><p>This study was a pilot randomized controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up. Subacute stroke participants were randomly assigned into two groups, and then received 20-session upper limb training with the EMG-driven NMES-robotic arm (NMES-robot group, <italic>n</italic> = 14) or the time-matched traditional therapy (the control, <italic>n</italic> = 10). For the evaluation of the training effects, clinical assessments including Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Modified Ashworth Score (MAS), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Function Independence Measurement (FIM) were conducted before, after the rehabilitation training, and 3 months later. Session-by-session EMG parameters in the NMES-robot group, including normalized co-contraction Indexes (CI) and EMG activation level of target muscles, were used to monitor the progress in muscular coordination patterns.</p></sec><sec id="ST4"><title>Results</title><p>Significant improvements were obtained in FMA (full score and shoulder/elbow), ARAT, and FIM [<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, effect sizes (EFs) &gt; 0.279] for both groups. Significant improvement in FMA wrist/hand was only observed in the NMES-robot group (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, EFs = 0.435) after the treatments. Significant reduction in MAS wrist was observed in the NMES-robot group after the training (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05, EFs = 0.145) and the effects were maintained for 3 months. MAS scores in the control group were elevated following training (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05, EFs &gt; 0.24), and remained at an elevated level when assessed 3 months later. The EMG parameters indicated a release of muscle co-contraction in the muscle pairs of biceps brachii and flexor carpi radialis and biceps brachii and triceps brachii, as well as a reduction of muscle activation level in the wrist flexor in the NMES-robot group.</p></sec><sec id="ST5"><title>Conclusion</title><p>The NMES-robot-assisted training was effective for early stroke upper limb rehabilitation and promoted independence in the daily living comparable to the traditional physical therapy. It could achieve higher motor outcomes at the distal joints and more effective release in muscle tones than the traditional therapy.</p></sec><sec id="ST6"><title>Clinical Trial Registration</title><p><uri xlink:href="http://ClinicalTrials.gov" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ClinicalTrials.gov</uri>, identifier NCT02117089; date of registration: April 10, 2014.</p></sec>