
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Neurol. , 05 July 2017
Sec. Neurotrauma
Volume 8 - 2017 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00326
This article is part of the Research Topic Karolinska Institutet 200-Year Anniversary Symposium on Injuries to the Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nervous System - An Update on Recent Advances in Regenerative Neuroscience View all 10 articles
This article is a correction to:
New Treatments for Spinal Nerve Root Avulsion Injury
A corrigendum on
Missing Funding:
In the original article, I neglected to include the funders: Wellcome Trust, Karolinska Institutet, Swedish Defence FOT-AF.9221006, and Darwin Trust of Edinburgh. The author apologizes for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Text Correction:
In the original article, there were two errors with the inclusion of the texts:
“Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies have demonstrated dose dependent efficacy in oral administration of the RARbeta agonist. Toxicological tests have shown little adverse effects. Clinical trials are now imminent in the most experienced centers for plexus injuries (London and Stockholm) using this first drug that can be given orally for direct treatment of a spinal cord injury.”
and
“A new drug that can be given orally restores sensory functions and muscle coordination after such injury by means of regeneration within the spinal cord. If successful in clinical trials this drug can be considered for many other CNS injuries.”
Corrections by deleting those texts have been done to section “Adjuvant therapy for spinal cord sensory regeneration” paragraph six and seven.
The author apologizes for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
The original article has been updated.
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Keywords: nerve plexus, root avulsion, neurotization, adjuvant therapy, sensory recovery, spinal cord regeneration
Citation: Carlstedt T (2017) Corrigendum: New Treatments for Spinal Nerve Root Avulsion Injury. Front. Neurol. 8:326. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00326
Received: 06 June 2017; Accepted: 22 June 2017;
Published: 05 July 2017
Edited and Reviewed by: Michael G. Fehlings, University Health Network, Canada
Copyright: © 2017 Carlstedt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Thomas Carlstedt, Y2FybHN0ZWR0LnRob21hc0Bnb29nbGVtYWlsLmNvbQ==
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.