AUTHOR=Mitsi Georgia , Mendoza Enrique Urrea , Wissel Benjamin D. , Barbopoulou Elena , Dwivedi Alok K. , Tsoulos Ioannis , Stavrakoudis Athanassios , Espay Alberto J. , Papapetropoulos Spyros TITLE=Biometric Digital Health Technology for Measuring Motor Function in Parkinson’s Disease: Results from a Feasibility and Patient Satisfaction Study JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neurology VOLUME=8 YEAR=2017 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2017.00273 DOI=10.3389/fneur.2017.00273 ISSN=1664-2295 ABSTRACT=Objectives

To assess the feasibility, predictive value, and user satisfaction of objectively quantifying motor function in Parkinson’s disease (PD) through a tablet-based application (iMotor) using self-administered tests.

Methods

PD and healthy controls (HCs) performed finger tapping, hand pronation–supination and reaction time tasks using the iMotor application.

Results

Thirty-eight participants (19 with PD and 17 HCs) were recruited in the study. PD subjects were 53% male, with a mean age of 67.8 years (±8.8), mean disease duration of 6.5 years (±4.6), Movement Disorders Society version of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale III score 26.3 (±6.7), and Hoehn & Yahr stage 2. In the univariate analysis, most tapping variables were significantly different in PD compared to HC. Tap interval provided the highest predictive ability (90%). In the multivariable logistic regression model reaction time (reaction time test) (p = 0.021) and total taps (two-target test) (p = 0.026) were associated with PD. A combined model with two-target (total taps and accuracy) and reaction time produced maximum discriminatory performance between HC and PD. The overall accuracy of the combined model was 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.93–1). iMotor use achieved high rates of patients’ satisfaction as evaluated by a patient satisfaction survey.

Conclusion

iMotor differentiated PD subjects from HCs using simple alternating tasks of motor function. Results of this feasibility study should be replicated in larger, longitudinal, appropriately designed, controlled studies. The impact on patient care of at-home iMotor-assisted remote monitoring also deserves further evaluation.