AUTHOR=Heilicher Mickela , Crombie Kevin M. , Cisler Josh M. 

TITLE=Test-Retest Reliability of fMRI During an Emotion Processing Task: Investigating the Impact of Analytical Approaches on ICC Values

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neuroimaging

VOLUME=1

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroimaging/articles/10.3389/fnimg.2022.859792

DOI=10.3389/fnimg.2022.859792

ISSN=2813-1193

ABSTRACT=<p>Test-retest reliability of fMRI is often assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), a numerical representation of reliability. Reports of low reliability at the individual level may be attributed to analytical approaches and inherent bias/error in the measures used to calculate ICC. It is unclear whether low reliability at the individual level is related to methodological decisions or if fMRI is inherently unreliable. The purpose of this study was to investigate methodological considerations when calculating ICC to improve understanding of fMRI reliability. fMRI data were collected from adolescent females (<italic>N</italic> = 23) at pre- and post-cognitive behavioral therapy. Participants completed an emotion processing task during fMRI. We calculated ICC values using contrasts and β coefficients separately from voxelwise and network (ICA) analyses of the task-based fMRI data. For both voxelwise analysis and ICA, ICC values were higher when calculated using β coefficients. This work provides support for the use of β coefficients over contrasts when assessing reliability of fMRI, and the use of contrasts may underlie low reliability estimates reported in the existing literature. Continued research in this area is warranted to establish fMRI as a reliable measure to draw conclusions and utilize fMRI in clinical settings.</p>