AUTHOR=von Au Sabrina , Helmich Ingo , Kieffer Simon , Lausberg Hedda TITLE=Phasic and repetitive self-touch differ in hemodynamic response in the prefrontal cortex–An fNIRS study JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neuroergonomics VOLUME=4 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroergonomics/articles/10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1266439 DOI=10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1266439 ISSN=2673-6195 ABSTRACT=Introduction

Each individual touches the own body several 100 times a day. While some researchers propose a self-regulatory function of self-touch, others report that self-touching increases nervousness. This controversy appears to be caused by the fact that researchers did not define the kind of self-touch they examined and actually, referred to different types of self-touch. Thus, kinematically defining different types of self-touch, such as phasic (discrete), repetitive, and irregular, and exploring the neural correlates of the different types will provide insight into the neuropsychological function of self-touching behavior.

Methods

To this aim, we assessed hemodynamic responses in prefrontal brain areas using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and behavioral responses with NEUROGES®. Fifty-two participants were recorded during three specific kinematically types of self-touch (phasic, irregular, repetitive) that were to be performed on command. The recently developed toolbox Satori was used for the visualization of neuronal processes.

Results

Behaviorally, the participants did not perform irregular self-touch reliably. Neurally, the comparison of phasic, irregular and repetitive self-touch revealed different activation patterns. Repetitive self-touch is associated with stronger hemodynamic responses in the left Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex than phasic self-touch.

Discussion

These brain areas have been reported to be associated with self-regulatory processes. Furthermore, irregular self-touch appears to be primarily generated by implicit neural control. Thus, by distinguishing kinematically different types of self-touch, our findings shed light on the controverse discussion on the neuropsychological function of self-touch.