AUTHOR=Gallegos Ayala Guillermo I. , Haslacher David , Krol Laurens R. , Soekadar Surjo R. , Zander Thorsten O. TITLE=Assessment of mental workload across cognitive tasks using a passive brain-computer interface based on mean negative theta-band amplitudes JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neuroergonomics VOLUME=4 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroergonomics/articles/10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1233722 DOI=10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1233722 ISSN=2673-6195 ABSTRACT=
Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) can provide real-time and continuous assessments of mental workload in different scenarios, which can subsequently be used to optimize human-computer interaction. However, assessment of mental workload is complicated by the task-dependent nature of the underlying neural signals. Thus, classifiers trained on data from one task do not generalize well to other tasks. Previous attempts at classifying mental workload across different cognitive tasks have therefore only been partially successful. Here we introduce a novel algorithm to extract frontal theta oscillations from electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings of brain activity and show that it can be used to detect mental workload across different cognitive tasks. We use a published data set that investigated subject dependent task transfer, based on Filter Bank Common Spatial Patterns. After testing, our approach enables a binary classification of mental workload with performances of 92.00 and 92.35%, respectively for either low or high workload vs. an initial no workload condition, with significantly better results than those of the previous approach. It, nevertheless, does not perform beyond chance level when comparing high vs. low workload conditions. Also, when an independent component analysis was done first with the data (and before any additional preprocessing procedure), even though we achieved more stable classification results above chance level across all tasks, it did not perform better than the previous approach. These mixed results illustrate that while the proposed algorithm cannot replace previous general-purpose classification methods, it may outperform state-of-the-art algorithms in specific (workload) comparisons.