
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
GENERAL COMMENTARY article
Front. Neuroanat. , 23 July 2014
Volume 8 - 2014 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2014.00069
This article is part of the Research Topic The Human Brain’s Place in Nature: Evolution of Large Brains View all 13 articles
This article is a commentary on:
Comparative neuronal morphology of the cerebellar cortex in afrotherians, carnivores, cetartiodactyls, and primates
A corrigendum on
Comparative neuronal morphology of the cerebellar cortex in afrotherians, carnivores, cetartiodactyls, and primates
by Jacobs, B., Johnson, N. L., Wahl, D., Schall, M., Maseko, B. C., Lewandowski, A., et al. (2014) Front. Neuroanat. 8:24. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00024
There was a typographical error in Table 2 of Jacobs et al. (2014) as one partial row of data is repeated. Specifically, for Vol., the values for the Clouded Leopard Stellate cells are repeated in place of the Granule cells. For the Clouded Leopard Granule cells, the values should NOT be the following:
Mean = 691.9, SD = 222.2, L95% = 247.4, U95% = 1136.4.
Instead, these values should be:
Mean = 51.4, SD = 32.9, L95% = −14.4, U95% = 117.3.
None of the corrections are in bold font.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Keywords: dendrite, morphometry, Golgi method, brain evolution, cerebellum
Citation: Jacobs B, Johnson NL, Wahl D, Schall M, Maseko BC, Lewandowski A, Raghanti MA, Wicinski B, Butti C, Hopkins WD, Bertelsen MF, Walsh T, Roberts JR, Reep RL, Hof PR, Sherwood CC and Manger PR (2014) Corrigendum: Comparative neuronal morphology of the cerebellar cortex in afrotherians, carnivores, cetartiodactyls, and primates. Front. Neuroanat. 8:69. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00069
Received: 02 June 2014; Accepted: 27 June 2014;
Published online: 23 July 2014.
Edited and reviewed by: Suzana Herculano-Houzel, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Copyright © 2014 Jacobs, Johnson, Wahl, Schall, Maseko, Lewandowski, Raghanti, Wicinski, Butti, Hopkins, Bertelsen, Walsh, Roberts, Reep, Hof, Sherwood and Manger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence:YmphY29ic0Bjb2xvcmFkb2NvbGxlZ2UuZWR1
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.