Giuditta Gambino1
Rebecca Bhik-Ghanie2
Giuseppe Giglia1
M. Victoria Puig3
Juan Ramirez-Villegas4
Daniel Zaldivar2*- 1Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- 2National Institute of Mental Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
- 3Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (IN2), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
- 4Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
Editorial on the Research Topic
Neuromodulatory ascending systems: Their influence at the microscopic and macroscopic levels
Brain activity and behavior are constantly changing (Puig et al., 2014; Disney, 2021). Recent studies in both animal models and humans have revealed that such variations are not random in nature but controlled through slow-acting neuromodulatory systems which influence our ability to process the influx of information, make decisions and take appropriate actions. Traditional anatomical, electrophysiological, stimulation, and lesion studies have revealed several important groups of pathways which are typically localized in brainstem/hypothalamic centers (McCormick et al., 2020). These so-called neuromodulatory ascending systems are known as the basal forebrain cholinergic system (ACh), noradrenergic brain stem, serotonergic brainstem, dopaminergic system (DA), endocannabinoids, oxytocin, nitric oxide-, and others less investigated (Puig and Gulledge, 2011; Gambino et al., 2020; Tong et al., 2021). All of these systems are known to broadly project to different brain areas, affect interneuronal communication, change synaptic efficacy, and influence cognitive processes.
Hence, to understand the functioning of a given brain network, it is not only sufficient to know its elements, but one needs to understand how these elements are interlinked and dynamically interact (Zaldivar et al., 2022). In recent years, great progress has been made towards characterizing the role of neuromodulation and it is, therefore, more than timely that Frontiers Research Topic has chosen to devote a special topic on this subject. This brief editorial attempts to provide an overview about the publications in this special issue and should serve as an introduction to those unfamiliar with the topic.
Neurotransmitters and neuromodulators often share similar molecular elements, with main differences depending on the structure and function of their respective receptors. Neurotransmitters are released by presynaptic neurons, they directly and immediately influence their postsynaptic targets. The fast influence of many neurotransmitters comes about because their receptors are harnessed to ion-channels that open almost instantaneously in the presence of the neurotransmitter ligand to modulate ion conductance. Neuromodulators tend to act much more slowly and endure for a longer duration, since their receptors are coupled to cell physiology via second messenger pathways. Ultimately, the influence of neuromodulation tightly depends on receptor location, distribution and density. Indeed, these aspects were essential in the study of Ogata et al., where authors evaluated how the uneven balance of dopamine receptors affects the role of medium spiny neurons in the direct and indirect motor pathways (Albin et al., 1989; Kravitz et al., 2010). This prompts speculation that axons of these two pathways might independently coordinate their responses to shape motor- or limbic-related information processing in the striatum.
The cholinergic system is one of the most widely investigated neuromodulatory systems as it is involved in multiple aspects of sensory processing (Runfeldt et al., 2014; Minces et al., 2017; Zaldivar et al., 2018), learning and memory (Atherton et al., 2015; Ramirez-Villegas et al., 2021), and it has been causally linked to different types of dementia (Baxter and Chiba, 1999). However, to what extent does the role of ACh result from the local influence on neural circuits (Zaldivar et al., 2018) or from the interactions between multiple and remote circuits instantiated by ACh itself (Runfeldt et al., 2014)? In the attempt to infer this differential role of cholinergic modulation, Tsolias and Medalla found that two areas of the prefrontal cortex—commonly associated with arousal and motivation during executive functions—have distinct regional and laminar receptor distribution and density. This clear difference in ratio of muscarinic receptors type 1 and 2 in these areas is surprising since both regions were assumed to share similarities in their anatomy and function. It is not far-fetched to hypothesize that these findings suggest that cholinergic neuromodulatory control might optimize the bottom-up and top-down signals at different processing stages to facilitate the transfer of information and during similar time scales.
Most neural circuits in the animal kingdom must be sufficiently flexible to allow behavioral adaptation in response to their unique ecological and social landscape. Neuromodulators lead to the assemblage of information between neural circuits so that they can be orchestrated to support behaviors in the species' repertoires. However, such flexibility is not only given by the diversity of neuromodulators, neurons and receptors, but it is also attained by the neuron's capability to be influenced by more than one neuromodulator (Marder et al., 2014). This is clearly highlighted by the findings from Kotsyuba and Dyachuk, who found that in some crustaceans the synthesis of dopamine, serotonin and acetylcholine takes place in the optic nerve. Markedly, authors identified that axons expressing enzymes for the synthesis of these neuromodulators were close to the neurosecretory cells which can further influence animals' behavior.
Understanding how disturbances in neuromodulatory pathways might yield to brain disorders is of high importance for neuroscience research. Although we have learned a great deal of information about the anatomical abnormalities associated with brain disorders we are still far from understanding how these abnormalities may be causally linked. Zhao et al. provided an in depth review about the Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and the role that disturbances in neuromodulatory ascending pathways might play in the development of ASD. Zhao et al. proposed that other less investigated neuromodulatory systems might enhance our understanding about the origin, progression, and treatment of this disorder. Authors emphasized in animal models and in clinical studies using treatments targeting the oxytocinergic and serotoninergic systems have shown to exert beneficial influence (Wichers et al., 2019).
The key problems in the field of neuromodulation are not different from critical questions that have long been posed by the systems neuroscience community. Among others, how does neuromodulatory ascending pathway inputs provide neurons with the flexibility to adjust neural activity? How do neuromodulators orchestrate the activity to give rise to the large repertoire of behaviors in the animal kingdom? To succeed in this endeavor, we need a combination of technological advances, a better understanding of anatomy and physiology and well-crafted experimental designs. In accordance with these questions, the present research topic has contributed to determining the multifaceted role of ascending neuromodulatory pathways in neural networks and behavioral dynamics from basic to more complex experimental models.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Funding
This work was supported by a DFG grant ZA990/1 to DZ.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the MSCA EU proposal 841301 - DREAM, European Commission; Horizon 2020 - Research and Innovation Framework Programme to JFRV.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Albin, R. L., Young, A. B., and Penney, J. B. (1989). The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends Neurosci. 12, 366–375. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90074-X
Atherton, L. A., Dupret, D., and Mellor, J. R. (2015). Memory trace replay: the shaping of memory consolidation by neuromodulation. Trends Neurosci. 38, 560–570. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.004
Baxter, M. G., and Chiba, A. A. (1999). Cognitive functions of the basal forebrain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 178–183. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)80024-5
Disney, A. A. (2021). Neuromodulatory control of early visual processing in macaque. Annu. Rev. Vis. Sci. 7, 181–199. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-100119-125739
Gambino, G., Rizzo, V., Giglia, G., Ferraro, G., and Sardo, P. (2020). Cannabinoids, TRPV and nitric oxide: the three ring circus of neuronal excitability. Brain Struct. Funct. 225, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01992-9
Kravitz, A. V., Freeze, B. S., Parker, P. R., Kay, K., Thwin, M. T., Deisseroth, K., et al. (2010). Regulation of parkinsonian motor behaviours by optogenetic control of basal ganglia circuitry. Nature 466, 622–626. doi: 10.1038/nature09159
Marder, E., O'Leary, T., and Shruti, S. (2014). Neuromodulation of circuits with variable parameters: single neurons and small circuits reveal principles of state-dependent and robust neuromodulation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 37, 329–346. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013958
McCormick, D. A., Nestvogel, D. B., and He, B. J. (2020). Neuromodulation of brain state and behavior. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 43, 391–415. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-100219-105424
Minces, V., Pinto, L., Dan, Y., and Chiba, A. A. (2017). Cholinergic shaping of neural correlations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 5725–5730. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1621493114
Puig, M. V., and Gulledge, A. T. (2011). Serotonin and prefrontal cortex function: neurons, networks, and circuits. Mol. Neurobiol. 44, 449–464. doi: 10.1007/s12035-011-8214-0
Puig, M. V., Rose, J., Schmidt, R., and Freund, N. (2014). Dopamine modulation of learning and memory in the prefrontal cortex: insights from studies in primates, rodents, and birds. Front. Neural Circuits 8, 93. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00093
Ramirez-Villegas, J. F., Besserve, M., Murayama, Y., Evrard, H. C., Oeltermann, A., and Logothetis, N. K. (2021). Coupling of hippocampal theta and ripples with pontogeniculooccipital waves. Nature 589, 96–102. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2914-4
Runfeldt, M. J., Sadovsky, A. J., and MacLean, J. N. (2014). Acetylcholine functionally reorganizes neocortical microcircuits. J. Neurophysiol. 112, 1205–1216. doi: 10.1152/jn.00071.2014
Tong, R., Chater, T. E., Emptage, N. J., and Goda, Y. (2021). Heterosynaptic cross-talk of pre- and postsynaptic strengths along segments of dendrites. Cell Rep. 34, 108693. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108693
Wichers, R. H., Findon, J. L., Jelsma, A., Giampietro, V., Stoencheva, V., Robertson, D. M., et al. (2019). Modulation of brain activation during executive functioning in autism with citalopram. Transl. Psychiatry 9, 286. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0641-0
Zaldivar, D., Koyano, K. W., Ye, F. Q., Godlove, D. C., Park, S. H., Russ, B. E., et al. (2022). Brain-wide functional connectivity of face patch neurons during rest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2206559119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206559119
Keywords: neuromodulation, networks, neuroanatomy, circuits, brain disorders
Citation: Gambino G, Bhik-Ghanie R, Giglia G, Puig MV, Ramirez-Villegas J and Zaldivar D (2022) Editorial: Neuromodulatory ascending systems: Their influence at the microscopic and macroscopic levels. Front. Neural Circuits 16:1028154. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2022.1028154
Received: 25 August 2022; Accepted: 13 October 2022;
Published: 26 October 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Nicoletta Berardi, University of Florence, Italy
Copyright © 2022 Gambino, Bhik-Ghanie, Giglia, Puig, Ramirez-Villegas and Zaldivar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Daniel Zaldivar, daniel.zaldivarperez@nih.gov