ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nephrol.

Sec. Clinical Research in Nephrology

Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneph.2025.1546419

This article is part of the Research TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Urinary Tract Infection - Epidemiology, Diagnosis and TreatmentView all articles

Trends in the Burden of Urinary Tract Infections and Interstitial Nephritis: China vs. Global, 1990–2021, with Projections to 2036

Provisionally accepted
Bin  NiuBin Niu1kangqiang  wengkangqiang weng2hu  Lihu Li2linlu  Shelinlu She2Yingbo  DaiYingbo Dai2*ruoyun  Xieruoyun Xie3*
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China
  • 2Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, Zhuhai, China
  • 3Department of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) and interstitial nephritis (IN) are global public health challenges, with significant disparities in disease burden across socio-demographic levels. This study examines trends in incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disabilityadjusted life years (DALYs) for UTIs and IN from 1990 to 2021, leveraging the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) dataset and exploring their relationship with sociodemographic index (SDI).Using GBD data, we analyzed age-standardized incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs for UTIs and IN globally and regionally. Statistical methods included Joinpoint regression, Age-Period-Cohort models, and decomposition analysis to quantify the contributions of demographic and epidemiological changes to disease trends. Sociodemographic disparities and risk factor attributions were assessed using inequality metrics.From 1990 to 2021, the burden of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and interstitial nephritis (IN) showed mixed trends globally. In China, age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) dropped from 1272.60 to 1184.13 per 100,000, prevalence rates (ASPR) from 24.21 to 22.52, mortality rates (ASMR) from 0.98 to 0.48, and DALYs from 24.67 to 10.99, reflecting consistent reductions across all metrics. Globally, ASMR declined slightly, but ASIR increased from 5294.50 to 5531.88, and ASPR rose from 100.96 to 105.36. Population growth and aging drove global increases, offset by epidemiological improvements in high-SDI regions, highlighting disparities requiring targeted interventions.Despite progress in reducing mortality, disparities in UTIs and IN burden persist, particularly in low-SDI regions. Effective interventions, including improved healthcare access and targeted risk factor management, are essential to address the growing burden in vulnerable populations. These findings provide actionable insights for global health strategies to reduce inequalities in disease outcomes.

Keywords: Urinary Tract Infections, interstitial nephritis, Global burden of disease, Epidemiology, Disability-adjusted life years, Healthcare Disparities

Received: 12 Jan 2025; Accepted: 08 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Niu, weng, Li, She, Dai and Xie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yingbo Dai, Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, Zhuhai, China
ruoyun Xie, Department of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more