Obstructive sleep apnea in the hemodialysis population: are clinicians putting existing scientific evidence into practice?
- 1Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- 2University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas, MO, United States
- 3Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States
A Commentary on
Obstructive sleep apnea in the hemodialysis population: are clinicians putting existing scientific evidence into practice
By Burkhalter DA, Cartellá A, Cozzo D, Ogna A and Forni Ogna V (2024) Front. Nephrol. 4:1394990. doi: 10.3389/fneph.2024.1394990
Background
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is well associated with an increased risk for various comorbidities and events, including cardiovascular disease and stroke (1). This condition is believed to affect nearly 1 billion individuals worldwide, and there is a growing concern for an underdiagnosis of OSA worldwide (2). There is also a body of evidence that describes a nuanced relationship between OSA and individuals with renal disease (3–6). Some studies have observed greater difficulty in diagnosing or identifying high-risk for OSA in patients with renal disease by using standard screening questionnaires, including the Adjusted Neck Circumference (ANC), Berlin Questionnaire, and STOP-BANG questionnaire, compared to the general population (7). Patients with renal disease who are appropriately diagnosed with OSA can allow clinical providers to better personalize management plans for their patients. For example, there is evidence that suggests patients with sleep apnea and chronic renal failure may be able to better correct their sleep apnea by undergoing nocturnal hemodialysis (8). Secondly, individuals with an appropriate and timely diagnosis of OSA can benefit from establishing a sleep plan with their OSA providers, including acquiring positive airway pressure devices (2, 9). This makes it critical for clinical providers to utilize strong judgment and leverage the tools necessary to diagnose and manage OSA in patients with renal disease. Moreover, this relationship was further explored in the article by Burkhalter et al. (4), evaluating diagnostic awareness of OSA by the patient’s nephrology providers. This commentary article aims to build upon the results found by this study.
Discussion
A multicenter, cross-sectional study was described in the article by Burkhalter et al. (4), which aimed to explore further the relationship between OSA and end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and their nephrology providers. It assessed the prevalence of confirmed OSA diagnosis in this patient population and the awareness of this diagnosis among the nephrology providers. Another aim of the study was to analyze whether the knowledge of OSA adjusted the hemodialysis treatment plan that the nephrology provider offered to the patient. Regarding the prevalence, the investigators of this study found that 40% of the patients with a confirmed diagnosis of OSA were not correctly identified by the nephrology provider. Regarding the latter point, it was reported that only half of the nephrology providers reported awareness regarding “the pathophysiological link between fluid overload and OSA” and 25% reported using this knowledge in their patient’s hemodialysis fluid management plan (4). Among the salient findings in this study by Burkhalter et al., its data is suggestive that nephrology providers had difficulty in discerning OSA in their hemodialysis patients. It can be argued that the expertise of OSA truly is held by clinicians with formal training in pulmonary and sleep medicine. However, this makes it imperative for a multidisciplinary approach by nephrologists and primary medicine providers to refer their patients to OSA specialists. This commentary aims to suggest a possible quality improvement screening protocol for patients undergoing hemodialysis to better identify individuals at high risk for OSA. Two primary aims of OSA screening at a hemodialysis center would be to improve the underdiagnosis of OSA among patients with end-stage renal disease and to improve sleep education and quality. For patients on hemodialysis therapy and their caregivers, it is reported that sleep and fatigue/energy as ranked among the top priorities for hemodialysis outcomes rather than morbidity itself (10). This finding emphasizes the inherent value of this patient population in gaining quality sleep.
The multidisciplinary approach for a screening protocol for patients undergoing hemodialysis is demonstrated in Figure 1 and can involve the primary care provider and the nephrologist. During follow-up visits, the patient’s primary care provider can utilize standard screening questionnaires (i.e., ANC, Berlin Questionnaire, STOP-BANG). While the current literature suggests that these questionnaires have demonstrated lower reporting rates for patients with end-stage renal disease and chronic kidney disease, they provide a cost-effective, rapid protocol that can be implemented. Current literature suggests that survey screening can be improved at the primary care level (11). Instrumental monitoring equipment, including type III home monitors and polysomnogram evaluations, would be superior in this patient population and potentially ergonomically advantageous given the nature of longitudinal monitoring during dialysis sessions compared to follow-up visits for a primary care provider (12). However, implementation costs could serve as a barrier to these methodologies (13, 14). On the other hand, a study also proposed and validated a diagnostic algorithm that could be implemented in the electronic medical record during dialysis sessions (15). This diagnostic algorithm utilized age (cutoff value: >70 years), neck circumference (cutoff value: >40 cm), and time of renal replacement therapy (cutoff value: >5 years). The study demonstrated that this algorithm performed better than standardized questionnaires for OSA risk stratification (15). However, there needs to be more data that investigates the proposal of a cut-off value of the number of criteria that need to be met to enter the subsequent level of screening proposed in this algorithm (i.e., ambulatory polygraphy). Moreover, the present limitations in the diagnostic algorithm include the age criteria which make it difficult to apply this algorithm in a generalized sense for individuals with ESRD under the age of 70. Additionally, most clinicians ought to consider that the weight loss associated with CKD diagnosis will reduce likelihood of referral for sleep apnea evaluation based on BMI criteria alone as well. Given that there is no guideline for appropriate screening of hemodialysis patients for OSA risk, the direction towards optimizing OSA screening in hemodialysis centers may rely upon increasing the awareness of nephrologists regarding signs of OSA in their dialysis patients and using their clinical judgment to implement instrumental sleep monitoring tests to confirm diagnosis. This suggests that dialysis centers should strengthen their sleep medicine infrastructure by providing one-time polysomnograms to patients enrolling in hemodialysis at the center or home sleep testing devices (16). Likewise, nephrologists should be able to educate patients regarding sleep hygiene and empower patients to monitor their sleep quality (17). This can empower patients to request a formal sleep evaluation from their nephrologist (18). Overall, these findings suggest the need for closer collaboration between primary care providers, nephrologists, and sleep medicine providers and the need to develop and validate personalized screening models for OSA for hemodialysis patients.
Figure 1. Multidisciplinary model for primary care physicians and nephrologists to utilize standardized OSA risk questionnaires and their clinical judgment to order instrumental tools to reduce the underdiagnosis of OSA in individuals undergoing hemodialysis. It is likewise essential for both provider groups to educate patients on the importance of quality sleep.
Author contributions
AJ: Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – original draft. SS: Project administration, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. FQ: Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Slowik JM, Sankari A, Collen JF. Obstructive sleep apnea. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL (2024).
2. Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: A literature-based analysis - PMC. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007763/ (Accessed 16 June 2024).
3. Abuyassin B, Sharma K, Ayas NT, Laher I. Obstructive sleep apnea and kidney disease: A potential bidirectional relationship? J Clin Sleep Med JCSM Off Publ. Am Acad Sleep Med. (2015) 11:915–24. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4946
4. Frontiers. Obstructive sleep apnea in the hemodialysis population: are clinicians putting existing scientific evidence into practice doi: 10.3389/fneph.2024.1394990/full (Accessed 17 June 2024)
5. 1384 Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Fluid Management in the Hemodialysis: Are Clinicians Putting Existing Scientific Evidence into Practice?, in: Nephrology dialysis transplantation . Oxford Academic. Available online at: https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article/39/Supplement_1/gfae069-0862-1384/7678486 (Accessed 17 June 2024).
6. Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with impaired renal function in patients with diabetic kidney disease, in: Scientific reports . Available online at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-85023-w (Accessed 17 June 2024).
7. Nicholl DDM, Ahmed SB, Loewen AHS, Hemmelgarn BR, Sola DY, Beecroft JM, et al. Diagnostic value of screening instruments for identifying obstructive sleep apnea in kidney failure. J Clin Sleep Med JCSM Off Publ. Am Acad Sleep Med. (2013) 9:31–8. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.2334
8. Hanly Patrick J. Pierratos andreas improvement of sleep apnea in patients with chronic renal failure who undergo nocturnal hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. (2001). doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101113440204
9. Zou D, Vits S, Egea C, Ehrsam-Tosi D, Lavergne F, Azpiazu M, et al. New approach to streamline obstructive sleep apnea therapy access using peripheral arterial tone-based home sleep test devices. Front Sleep. (2023). doi: 10.3389/frsle.2023.1256078
10. Urquhart-Secord R, Craig JC, Hemmelgarn B, Tam-Tham H, Manns B, Howell M, et al. Patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in hemodialysis: an international nominal group technique study. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl Kidney Found. (2016) 68:444–54. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.02.037
11. Bakhai SY, Nigam M, Saeed M, Krishnan A, Reynolds JL. Improving OSA screening and diagnosis in patients with hypertension in an academic safety net primary care clinic: quality improvement project. BMJ Open Qual. (2017) 6:e000105. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000105
12. Pisano A, Zoccali C, Bolignano D, D’Arrigo G, Mallamaci F. Sleep apnoea syndrome prevalence in chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Kidney J. (2024) 17. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad179
13. Validation of the apneaLink for the screening of sleep apnea: A novel and simple single-channel recording device . Available online at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17694728/ (Accessed 17 June 2024).
14. Kapur V, Blough DK, Sandblom RE, Hert R, de Maine JB, Sullivan SD, et al. The medical cost of undiagnosed sleep apnea. Sleep. (1999) 22:749–55. doi: 10.1093/sleep/22.6.749
15. Forni Ogna V, Ogna A, Pruijm M, Bassi I, Zuercher E, Halabi G, et al. Prevalence and diagnostic approach to sleep apnea in hemodialysis patients: A population study. BioMed Res Int. (2015) 2015:103686. doi: 10.1155/2015/103686
16. Alshammari B, Alkubati SA, Pasay-an E, Alrasheeday A, Alshammari HB, Asiri SM, et al. Sleep quality and its affecting factors among hemodialysis patients: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Healthcare. (2023) 11:2536. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182536
17. Campbell DJ, Estephan LE, Mastrolonardo EV, Amin DR, Huntley CT, Boon MS. Evaluating chatGPT responses on obstructive sleep apnea for patient education. J Clin Sleep Med JCSM Off Publ. Am Acad Sleep Med. (2023) 19:1989–95. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10728
Keywords: obstructive sleep apnea, dialysis, referral, quality improvement, commentary
Citation: Jamal A, Singh SP and Qureshi F (2024) Commentary: Obstructive sleep apnea in the hemodialysis population: are clinicians putting existing scientific evidence into practice? Front. Nephrol. 4:1450204. doi: 10.3389/fneph.2024.1450204
Received: 17 June 2024; Accepted: 23 September 2024;
Published: 07 November 2024.
Edited by:
Anil Agarwal, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, United StatesReviewed by:
Safia Khan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United StatesCopyright © 2024 Jamal, Singh and Qureshi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fawad Qureshi, cXVyZXNoaS5mYXdhZEBtYXlvLmVkdQ==