RETRACTED: Modeling Brain Somatic Mosaicism With Cerebral Organoids, Including a Note on Mutant Microglia

Verheijen, Bert M.

doi:10.3389/fnmol.2019.00277

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Mol. Neurosci. , 14 November 2019

Sec. Methods and Model Organisms

Volume 12 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2019.00277

RETRACTED: Modeling Brain Somatic Mosaicism With Cerebral Organoids, Including a Note on Mutant Microglia

Retracted

A retraction of this article was approved in:

Retraction: Modeling Brain Somatic Mosaicism With Cerebral Organoids, Including a Note on Mutant Microglia
1. Read retraction

$\r\nBert M. Verheijen,*$ Bert M. Verheijen^1,2*

¹Department of Translational Neuroscience, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
²Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands

This article has been retracted. Please follow the link to the full retraction notice for details.

Citation: Verheijen BM (2019) Modeling Brain Somatic Mosaicism With Cerebral Organoids, Including a Note on Mutant Microglia. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 12:277. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00277

Received: 25 September 2019; Accepted: 31 October 2019;
Published: 14 November 2019; Retracted: 14 December 2020.

Edited by:

Björn Spittau, University of Rostock, Germany

Reviewed by:

Barbara Monti, University of Bologna, Italy
Ryuji Morizane, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

RETRACTED: Modeling Brain Somatic Mosaicism With Cerebral Organoids, Including a Note on Mutant Microglia

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good