Joaquim Teixeira de Avelar Júnior1*
Edleusa Lima-Batista1
Célio José Castro Junior2
Adriano Monteiro de Castro Pimenta1
Raquel Gouvêa Dos Santos3
Elaine Maria Souza-Fagundes4
Maria Elena De Lima1,2*- 1Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- 2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina e Biomedicina da Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- 3Centro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear (CDTN), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- 4Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Breast cancer is the most common cancer that affects women globally and is among the leading cause of women’s death. Triple-negative breast cancer is more difficult to treat because hormone therapy is not available for this subset of cancer. The well-established therapy against triple-negative breast cancer is mainly based on surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Among the drugs used in the therapy are cisplatin and carboplatin. However, they cause severe toxicity to the kidneys and brain and cause nausea. Therefore, it is urgent to propose new chemotherapy techniques that provide new treatment options to patients affected by this disease. Nowadays, peptide drugs are emerging as a class of promising new anticancer agents due to their lytic nature and, apparently, a minor drug resistance compared to other conventional drugs (reviewed in Jafari et al., 2022). We have recently reported the cytotoxic effect of the antimicrobial peptide LyeTx I-b against glioblastoma cells (Abdel-Salam et al., 2019). In this research, we demonstrated the cytotoxic effect of the peptide LyeTx I-b, alone and combined with cisplatin, against triple-negative cell lines (MDA-MD-231). LyeTx-I-b showed a selectivity index 70-fold higher than cisplatin. The peptide:cisplatin combination (P:C) 1:1 presented a synergistic effect on the cell death and a selective index value 16 times greater than the cisplatin alone treatment. Therefore, an equi-effective reduction of cisplatin can be reached in the presence of LyeTx I-b. Cells treated with P:C combinations were arrested in the G2/M cell cycle phase and showed positive staining for acridine orange, which was inhibited by bafilomycin A1, indicating autophagic cell death (ACD) as a probable cell death mechanism. Furthermore, Western blot experiments indicated a decrease in P21 expression and AKT phosphorylation. The decrease in AKT phosphorylation is indicative of ACD. However, other studies are still necessary to better elucidate the pathways involved in the cell death mechanism induced by the peptide and the drug combinations. These findings confirmed that the peptide LyeTx I-b seems to be a good candidate for combined chemotherapy to treat breast cancer. In addition, in vivo studies are essential to validate the use of LyeTx I-b as a therapeutic drug candidate, alone and/or combined with cisplatin.
1 Introduction
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer in women and contributes to almost 25% of all cases and 15% of all cancer deaths (Bray et al., 2018). The subtype triple-negative, responsible for 15–20% of all breast cancer cases (Anders et al., 2016), is more aggressive and difficult to treat (Gonçalves Jr et al., 2018). Due to the lack of estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors (Bauer et al., 2007), and the inactivation of the BRCA1 gene (Anders et al., 2016), hormonal therapy, one of the most common treatments for breast cancer (Puhalla et al., 2012; Wahba and El-Hadaad, 2015), is not available, worsening the prognosis of the disease compared to other types of breast cancers (Ismail-Khan and Bui, 2010). Indeed, the treatment is only based on chemotherapy and surgery (Wahba and El-Hadaad, 2015), even though radiotherapy can be employed in some cases (Wahba and El-Hadaad, 2015). In addition, among the different types of breast cancers, triple-negative is the most immunogenic tumor. Among the factors that confer this immunogenicity are the expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). PD-1 is critical in inhibiting immune responses. PD-L1 is considered an inhibitory cofactor of the immune response that, by binding to PD-1 present in PD1-positive cells, suppresses the immune response and induces death by apoptosis (Han et al., 2020). Moreover, PD-L1 favors the escape of tumor cells from the immune response. Therefore, inhibitors of the checkpoint inhibitor class PD1/D-L1 have been shown to be therapeutic options for treating triple-negative breast cancer. Inhibitors such as pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 inhibitor, and atezolizumab (PD-L1) have been approved by the FDA for cancer treatment (Han et al., 2020; Heeke and Tan, 2021). Since targeting signaling molecules is virtually difficult for triple-negative breast cancer treatment, discovering new therapeutic drugs or combining two or more drugs and searching for synergistic benefits may be especially valuable in triple-negative breast cancer treatment (Jhan and Andrechek, 2017). In this scenario, it is fundamental to assess the potential of combination treatment (Jhan and Andrechek, 2017).
Platinum compounds (e.g., cisplatin and carboplatin) are chemotherapy agents used to deal with triple-negative breast cancers (Wahba and El-Hadaad, 2015). They cause DNA damage (Dasari and Tchounwou, 2014) by chemically binding to the DNA and blocking replication and transcription events (Fuertes et al., 2003; Wang and Lippard, 2005; Dasari and Tchounwou, 2014; Melnikov et al., 2016). Nonetheless, severe side effects, such as vomiting (Kottschade et al., 2016), nephrotoxicity (Manohar and Leung, 2018), and drug resistance, limit their efficacy (Jhan and Andrechek, 2017; Rocha et al., 2018; De Luca et al., 2019; Gomes et al., 2019). A strategy to circumvent these issues would be the combined therapy, in which different anticancer agents with different targets and objectives are employed. In this approach, different chemotherapeutic agents are administered, targeting different populations. Therefore, the probability of killing all tumor cells (Palmer and Sorger, 2017), reducing resistance (Chou, 2006; Foucquier and Guedj, 2015), and decreasing toxicity compared to monotherapy increases (Mokhtari et al., 2017). The combination of regular chemotherapy compounds and anticancer peptides is well described in the literature (Hazama et al., 2014; Su et al., 2014; Qiao et al., 2018).
LyeTx I-Des-His (or LyeTx I-b) is a synthetic antimicrobial peptide derived from LyeTx I, a peptide purified from the venom of the spider Lycosa erythrognatha (Santos et al., 2010; Reis et al., 2018). Recently, we demonstrated that LyeTx I-b has cytotoxic activity against the glioblastoma cell model (Abdel-Salam et al., 2019). As demonstrated using microorganisms, it is believed that this peptide acts by a membranolytic mechanism (Reis et al., 2018; Abdel-Salam et al., 2019) since the cancer cell membrane is also negatively charged (Chen et al., 2016). However, other mechanisms of action of this peptide in cancer cells cannot be excluded, and studies have been conducted to elucidate these mechanisms. A combination of a platinum compound and an antimicrobial peptide showing cytotoxicity for tumoral cells is a rational choice that explores different mechanisms of action against these cells.
Therefore, the main goal of this work was to evaluate the activity of LyeTx I-b and its combination with cisplatin against the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231.
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Materials
The cell lines used in this study were MDA-MB-231 (ATCC#: HTB-26) and HEK-293 (ATCC#: CRL-1573). The culture medium used was Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10%) (Invitrogen Company, Carlsbad, California, United States). The peptide LyeTx I-b (sequence: CH3CO-IWLTALKFLGKNLGKLAKQQLAKL-NH2) was purchased from GenOne Company (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Cisplatin, propidium iodide, Acridine orange, and Hoechst dye were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, United States). All reagents used in this research were of analytical grade.
2.2 Methods
2.2.1 Cell Culture
The cell lines MDA-MB-231 and HEK-293 were cultured in DMEM supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10%) and incubated at 37°C, in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
2.2.2 Cell Viability Assay
Cytotoxicity was evaluated using the tetrazolium dye (MTT) assay (Mosmann, 1983; Abdel-Salam et al., 2019). MTT at 5 mg/ml was added to the treated cells and incubated for 4 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. After this time, the supernatant was carefully removed, and the formazan crystals were solubilized with 100 µl of 2-propanol containing 0.04 m HCl and read at 595 nm in a Varioskan Lux apparatus. The IC50 values were calculated with GraphPad Prism v. 5.01 software using nonlinear regression. Results were expressed as a percentage of cell survival or death.
2.2.3 Cell Treatment
MDA-MB-231 or HEK-293 cells were plated (10,000 cells/well) in 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were divided into five groups of treatments: monotherapies with increasing concentrations (0.39–12.5 µM) of LyeTx I-b or cisplatin (1.17–300 µM) and a combination of three different ratios of LyeTx I-b peptide (P) and cisplatin (C). Molar ratios (P:C) were based on a maximum concentration of 12.5 µM of LyeTx I-b in all treatments and twofold serial dilutions to 1:1, 3:1, and 1:3 combinations, as specified in Table 1. The combined effect of both drugs was analyzed using isobolograms, as previously reported (Tallarida, 2000, 2016). Graphic isobolograms were created using the IC50 values and a statistical test was performed (t-test; statistical significance of 95%) (Tallarida, 2000, 2016; Chou, 2006) using Microsoft Excel.
TABLE 1. Concentrations used in each combination to perform isobologram analyses.
2.2.4 Cell Cycle
The DNA content of cells was evaluated by the Nicoletti method, based on fluorescence that separates different populations in distinct cell cycle phases and evaluates DNA fragmentation (Nicoletti et al., 1991). MDA-MD-231 cells were plated (300,000/per well in 6-well plates) and incubated for 48 h at an IC50 concentration found for each combination and each compound studied. After each treatment, the cells were trypsinized and washed; the recovered medium was centrifuged at 2,000 g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the recovered precipitate was treated with 300 µl of an HFS- solution, containing 0.1% (w/v) sodium citrate; 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100, and 50 µg/ml propidium iodide for 1 h. Then, the fluorescence emitted by the dye used was read on a FACScan using the 585/42 filter.
2.2.5 Acridine Orange Incorporation Assay
The MDA-MB-231 cells were plated (300,000/well in 96-well plates), incubated for 48 h at an IC50 concentration found for each combination and each compound studied, in the absence or the presence of 10 nm bafilomycin A1 pre-treated for 1 h. After each treatment, the cells were trypsinized and washed with the recovered medium centrifuged at 2,000 g for 5 min. After that, the solution was discarded, and 300 µl of a solution containing 5 µg/ml acridine orange in PBS was added to the cells (Murugan and Amaravadi, 2016). The preparation obtained was read in the FACScan using the 530/30 and 670LP filters.
The data obtained were analyzed with FlowJo 10.0 software.
2.2.6 Immunoblotting
Following the drug treatments, MDA-MB-231 cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (0.15 m NaCl, 0.05 m Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 0.05 m EDTA, 1% Nonidet P40, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) containing protease inhibitors (1.0 mm AEBSF and 10.0 µg/ml of both leupeptin and aprotinin). The total cellular protein (50 µg) for each sample was subjected to SDS-PAGE (10%), followed by electroblotting onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% BSA in wash buffer (150.0 mm NaCl, 10.0 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 0.1% Tween 20) for 2 h. Then, they were incubated with either rabbit anti-phospho AKT1 (S473, DB Biotech # DB 127 0.1; 1:1,000), rabbit anti-phospho ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204, Invitrogen S.812.9 # MA5-15173; 1:1,000), rabbit anti-p21 (F-5, Santa Cruz # SC 6246; 1:300), mouse anti-p53 (DO-1, Santa Cruz # SC 126; 1:1,000), or antibodies in wash buffer containing 5% BSA overnight at 4°C. Membranes were rinsed three times with wash buffer and then incubated with the secondary peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Millipore, # AP307P) diluted 1:3,000 or anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, # 626520; 1:2000) in wash buffer containing 5% BSA for 1 h. Then, they were rinsed three times with wash buffer, incubated with Western blot detection reagents (Millipore, Luminata Forte Western HRP Substrate, # WBLUF0500), and scanned and analyzed using ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare). Membranes were stripped and incubated with either rabbit anti-AKT (DB Biotech, # DB 126 0.1; 1:1,000), rabbit anti-ERK1/2 (Invitrogen K.913.4, # MA5-1,534; 1:1,000) or rabbit anti-β actin (Sigma RM112, # MATB523; 1:3,000) in wash buffer containing 5% BSA overnight for 4°C. Membranes were rinsed three times with the wash buffer and then incubated with the secondary peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Millipore, # AP307P) diluted 1:3,000 or anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, # 626520), (1:2000) in wash buffer containing 5% BSA for 1 h and probed with the secondary antibody anti-rabbit IgG diluted 1:5,000 to determine total AKT, ERK1/2, and p21 and p53 expression. Non-saturated, immunoreactive AKT, ERK1/2, p21, and p53 bands were quantified by scanning densitometry. The immuno-band intensity was calculated using ImageJ software. The number of AKT and ERK1/2 phospho-bands was divided by the number of pixels of total AKT and ERK1/2 to normalize the phosphorylation levels of kinases to total kinase expression and p21 and p53. Bands were divided by the number of pixels of β actin to normalize the expression levels.
2.2.7 Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed by the one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) statistical test, followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test. A statistical significance of 95% for all tests was considered.
3 Results
3.1 Cell Viability Evaluation
LyeTx I-b and cisplatin treatments induced cytotoxicity in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 1) against MDA-MB-231 (triple-negative breast cancer cells) and HEK-293 (fetal kidney cells). The IC50 values of LyeTx I-b were 2.47 µM against MDA-MB-231 and 7.88 µM against HEK-293. The IC50 values of cisplatin were 94.69 and 3.96 µM against MDA-MB-231 and HEK-293, respectively.
FIGURE 1. Comparison of cytotoxicity of LyeTx I-b or cisplatin, as indicated on the x-axis, in MDA-MB-231 (a, b, n = 8) and in HEK-293 cells (c, d, n = 3)). Experiments were performed after 48 h of treatment and evaluated by MTT assay.
The selectivity index (SI) value ( the HEK [IC50]/MDA [IC50] ratio ) for the peptide LyeTx I-b was 3.19, which is 77 times higher than that of cisplatin (0.041).
3.2 Isobolographic Analysis of LyeTx I-b Combined With Cisplatin Demonstrated Synergism for One of the Studied Doses
Isobolographic analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of combined drug treatments against MDA-MB-231 and HEK-293.
The proportions of LyeTx I-b and cisplatin (P:C = 1:1, 3:1, and 1:3) were evaluated against MDA-MB-231 and HEK-293 cells, resulting in concentration-dependent curves (Figure 2) for each proportion. These curves were made using the following equation: % death = 100%–% viability. The IC50 values found for each treatment against the cells and the SI values are shown in Table 2.
FIGURE 2. Cell death evaluation (%) by combined treatments of LyeTx I-b and cisplatin, in different proportions as indicated, against MDA-MB-231, n = 6 (A) and HEK-293 cells, n = 5 (B). Cell death was evaluated by MTT assay, after 48 h of treatments with the compounds.
TABLE 2. IC50 values of the compounds in different proportions.
The isobolographic statistical analysis considering the IC50 of each treatment revealed that the combination of LyeTx I-b with cisplatin (proportion 1:1) against MDA-MB-231 provoked a synergistic effect. In contrast, the other two combinations (3:1 and 1:3) presented an additive effect. On the other hand, when tested against HEK-293 cells, the compounds in all the proportions studied (i.e., 1:1, 3:1, and 1:3) showed a synergistic effect, which was demonstrated by the t-test. Figure 3 shows the isobolograms of both cell lines. Regarding the SI values (the ratio between HEK-293 IC50 and MDA-MB-231 IC50; HEK [IC50]/MDA [IC50]), it was found that the combinations 1:1, 3:1, and 1:3 presented SI of 0.67, 0.85, and 0.37, respectively (Table 2), which were higher than that of cisplatin (0.041).
FIGURE 3. IC50 isobolograms to each combined treatment of LyeTx I-b and cisplatin, in different proportions (as indicated), against MDA-MB-231 (A) and HEK-293 cells (B). A t-test was performed between each experimental IC50 and the theoretical IC50, showing that against MDA-MB-231 cells, combined treatment 1:1 (P:C) was statistically different from the theoretical value. For HEK-293 cells, all combined treatments were statistically different from their respective theoretical values.
3.3 Cell Cycle Progression Indicated Arrest in the Cell Cycle
The cell cycle analysis indicated different progressions in the distinct groups (Figures 4A,B). In quantification, sub-diploid DNA augment was observed in the cisplatin mono treatment group, and an increase in the G2/M phase to groups 1:1 and 1:3 of combined treatments was also detected. In addition, an increase in the S phase of cisplatin and 1:3 combined treatment and a decrease in the G0/G1 phase for the mono treatment with cisplatin and combined treatments (P:C) were found in all the proportions investigated. The increase in the G2/M phase was interpreted as indicative of the fact that a considerable population was arrested in this cell cycle phase.
FIGURE 4. Cell cycle evaluation by the DNA content marked with propidium iodide after 48 h of treatment against MDA-MB-231 cells. (A) A representative histogram showing the results to each treatment for their respective IC50 values . (B) Phase quantification (n = 4) to each treatment for their respective IC50 values. Statistical tests were performed by one-way ANOVA displayed by the codes in figure. #p < 0.05; **, ++, ## p < 0.01 and ***, +++, ### p < 0.001.
3.4 Acridine Orange Assay Indicated the Formation of Acid Vacuole Organelles
The evaluation of autophagy by acid vacuole organelles was performed using metachromatic acridine orange dye. This dye displays green fluorescence at neutral pH and red at acidic pH. The assay demonstrated that, in all treatments, there was an increase of red organelles (Figure 5A), which was higher in the LyeTx I-b and combined treatments than in the cisplatin group, as stated by the statistical test (Figure 6A).
FIGURE 5. Flow cytometry representative profiles of acid vacuolar organelles after 48 h of each treatment for their respective IC50 values against MDA-MB-231 cells analyzed by acridine orange fluorescent stain. (A) Results obtained show the population shift of all treatments, especially to LyeTx I-b and the combined treatments. (B) Representative results show the population shift ablation with the previous pretreatment with bafilomycin A1, an ATPase proton pump inhibitor.
FIGURE 6. Acridine orange fluorescent stain quantification (n = 4) of red cells (MDA-MB-231) marked by this dye after 48 h of each treatment for their respective IC50values. (A) Quantification results for each treatment with the statistics as specified in the figure. (B) Quantification results for each treatment with the previous pretreatment with bafilomycin A1, an ATPase proton pump inhibitor. ***,+++ p < 0.001 and “ns”: not significant.
Pre-treatments with bafilomycin A1 showed that an increase in all red was ablated, decreasing to the control levels as observed in Figure 5B and quantifications as seen in Figure 6B, suggesting a vacuolar pH influence on the redshift.
3.5 AKT, ERK, P53, and P21 Immunoblotting Patterns Post-Treatment
Immunoblots showed a decrease of AKT phosphorylation in the LyeTx I-b and combined treatments groups, as well as a reduction of P21 expression in all treatments. On the other hand, ERK phosphorylation decreased after LyeTx I-b treatment, and P53 was increased in the groups treated with cisplatin and a combination of P:C (1:3) (Figures 7A,B).
FIGURE 7. Effects of each treatment (for their respective IC50 values) against MDA-MB-231 cells analyzed after 24 h by Western blot. For AKT and ERK, the results show the phosphorylation pattern of these proteins to each treatment. For P53 and P21, the results show the expression pattern of these proteins. (A) A representative Western blot shows the pattern found. (B) Quantification of the proteins investigated (n = 4). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
4 Discussion
Cisplatin is a well-based therapy in clinics (Fleming et al., 2004; Silver et al., 2010; Valle et al., 2014; Wahba and El-Hadaad, 2015) despite its strong side effects, such as nephrotoxicity, vomiting, ototoxicity, myelotoxicity, and neuropathy (Kottschade et al., 2016; Starobova and Vetter, 2017; Manohar and Leung, 2018). For these reasons, combined therapy, an alternative that has been previously studied in basic research and clinical trials, could be helpful to prevent or decrease these clinical side effects (Fleming et al., 2004; Su et al., 2014; Qiao et al., 2018). The peptide LyeTx I-b has been shown to have good anticancer activity in glioblastoma cells (Abdel-Salam et al., 2019) and in a 4T1 mouse mammary carcinoma model (Abdel-Salam et al., 2021). It is noteworthy that the tumor, metastases, and nodules were decreased in LyeTxI-b-treated animals, and an area of necrosis was visible at the site of the treated tumors.
In the present work, we confirmed the activity of LyeTxI-b against breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) and evaluated the possibility of this peptide improving the activity of cisplatin. The IC50 values found for LyeTxI-b against MDA-MB-231 and HEK-293 cells were 2.47 and 7.88 µM, respectively. It shows apparent lower toxicity of the peptide in the control cells (HEK-293) compared to cancer cells, while cisplatin did not show selectivity in the breast cancer cells used in this study. However, it should be more explored and assayed in other noncancer cells. A combined treatment using this peptide and cisplatin against MDA-MB-231cells resulted in better selectivity index (SI) values for the combinations 1:1 (SI of 0.67) and 3:1 (0.85) (peptide:cisplatin) compared to cisplatin, the chemotherapy established in clinics. This finding is important due to the need to use a well-established drug with new testing drugs, such as the peptide LyeTxI-b. The SI values found for the combinations 1:1 and 3:1 were higher, 16 and 20 times, respectively, than cisplatin (SI = 0.041). Moreover, the proportion 1:1 presented a synergistic effect, as observed in the isobolographic analysis, indicating that this combination, unlike cisplatin alone, seems to be a promising option for advanced trials in vivo.
Since one of the worst side effects of cisplatin is nephrotoxicity (Starobova and Vetter, 2017), the SI values of the combinations 1:1 and 1:3 suggest that the combination presented in this study could be less nephrotoxic than that caused by the cisplatin monotherapy treatment. This decrease in toxicity is also based on the non-tumoral cell model (HEK-293), which originated from a fetal kidney, used as our toxicity control. Nephrotoxicity occurs in 20–30% of patients treated with cisplatin (Miller et al., 2010), and this phenomenon is increased by aging (Liu et al., 2018), being a significant issue in most patients treated for breast cancer, a common pathology in aged women. The isobolographic analyses showed that the best combination seems to be 1:1, with synergistic effect among the drugs, good SI, and using about 48 times less cisplatin than that used in monotherapy. Furthermore, LyeTx I-b did not present histopathological alterations in organs such as the spleen, heart, brain, lungs, and kidneys in the studies conducted by Abdel-Salam et al. (2021). This indicates that an in vivo trial for the combination of LyeTx I-b with cisplatin would not present significant damages, suggesting fewer side effects when using this combination.
Our data indicate that the combination of LyeTx I-b with cisplatin in the proportion 1:1 against MDA-MB-231 cells provoked a synergistic effect. In contrast, the other two proportions (i.e., 3:1 and 1:3) presented an additive effect. This finding suggests that the cooperation between the drugs to kill MDA-MB-231 cells depends on the proportion of the constituents in the mixture, in which the ratio of 1:1 is the more cooperative among our tested conditions. This is not an uncommon finding for drugs used in combination and have a differential profile of interaction according to the proportion of the constituents (Gessner and Cabana, 1970). Nevertheless, the mechanism behind such differential interaction is elusive and requires further investigation. The synergistic effects of this combined treatment could be explained considering that each compound acts by a different mechanism of action, in which LyeTx I-b acts primarily by a membranolytic mechanism (Santos et al., 2010; Abdel-Salam et al., 2019). In addition, we have recently shown an immunomodulatory effect of this peptide, which significantly decreased the expression of IL-1β in tumor and lung tissues and increased the levels of IL-10 anti-inflammatory cytokines in the primary tumor of 4T1 mouse mammary carcinoma (Abdel Salam et al., 2021) as observed in other AMPs. It is known that IL-10 protects from carcinogenic and improves tumor immune surveillance, besides inhibiting tumor migration and progression, particularly in the early stages of breast cancer (Mumm et al., 2011; Holen et al., 2016). On the other hand, cisplatin damages DNA (Dasari and Tchounwou, 2014). Therefore, the combination of both compounds targeting different sites could increase the efficacy of the treatment of mammary cancer.
The evaluation of a possible mechanism of death for the combination of LyeTx1-b with cisplatin suggested autophagic cell death (ACD). This mechanism occurs by autophagosome vesicles, which engulf the cell organelles leading to an autodigestion process, in some cases, this process can also digest antiapoptotic proteins facilitating cell death cascade, such as apoptosis (Kroemer et al., 2009; Azzopardi et al., 2017; Denton and Kumar, 2019).
The cell cycle revealed a G2/M arrest to the 1:1 and 1:3 combinations of LyeTx I-b with cisplatin. An increase in the G2/M phase is evidence of G2/M arrest, a well-known indicative of ACD (Dotiwala et al., 2013; Azzopardi et al., 2017; Mathiassen et al., 2017). This ACD hypothesis is corroborated by assays with acridine orange that suffers metachromasia in lower pH, emitting fluorescence in the 670 nm range (red). As the autophagosome activity is dependent on the decrease in pH inside the vesicle, it is expected a shift from green to red in cells compromised with autophagic events (Han and Burgess, 2010; Murugan and Amaravadi, 2016). Therefore, as observed in our experiments, all combined treatments and the mono treatment with LyeTx I-b exhibited a significant cell population shift toward the red positive marked area in the analysis. For the combinations of LyeTx I-b with cisplatin (1:1, 3:1, and 1:3), the cell population move toward red positive marked cells was 42.8, 48, and 50.2 times, respectively, compared to the control. This cell population shift is due to the active acid autophagosomes, as previously described (Nagelkerke et al., 2015; Klionsky et al., 2016; Honorato et al., 2020). Additionally, we tested the cells pretreated with bafilomycin A1, a well-known autophagic inhibitor. We observed a reversion in the effects to the control levels, indicating that the red fluorescence is autophagosome-dependent (Shacka et al., 2006; Klionsky et al., 2016; Thomé et al., 2016).
Using the protein markers AKT1, ERK, and P21, we found that the profiles of AKT1 and P21 were modified. The AKT1 phosphorylation reduction is indicative of a catabolic state, and it is related to the autophagic activity (Cao et al., 2015; Shao et al., 2016; Palmieri et al., 2017). Furthermore, in some conditions, when AKT is active, it regulates autophagy suppression (Settembre et al., 2011; Palmieri et al., 2017). The decrease of P21, whose activity is related to separate cyclin CDK complexes (Abbas and Dutta, 2009), could explain the arrest in the G2/M cell cycle. Due to this activity, the decrease in P21 expression is probably related to allowing cells to pass through G1 and S phases and be arrested in G2/M by another P21-independent mechanism. As ERK phosphorylation remains at the control levels, except for a modest LyeTx I-b-induced decrease, this protein appears not to be involved in response to the combined treatment. The importance of this finding is because ERK activity increase is involved in autophagy related to survival and not to autophagic cell death events (Nagelkerke et al., 2015).
In summary, we found that the combination of LyeTx I-b with cisplatin has a better SI value when compared to cisplatin alone. The combination in the proportion 1:1 is synergistic, and the mechanistic studies suggest autophagic cell death as the primary cell death mechanism involved. On the other hand, Abdel-Salam and collaborators found in neuroblastoma cell lines a necroptotic cell death mechanism when these cells were treated with LyeTx I-b peptide (Abdel-Salam et al., 2019), suggesting that the peptide can stimulate different cell death mechanisms, depending on the cell line. Furthermore, in the in vitro 4T1 mouse mammary carcinoma model, the effect of this peptide was associated with the induction of apoptosis and inhibition of cell proliferation (Abdel Salam et al., 2021). We suppose that the combination of the peptide LyeTx-I-b with other anticancer drugs could give good results to improve the treatment of other cancer types. In vivo experiments will be conducted to validate the efficacy of the combined treatment (peptide:cisplatin) in a model of triple-negative cancer.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author Contributions
JA and EL performed the experiments; JA, ES, RD, AP, and ML conceived and designed the experiments; JA, ES, EL, and CC analyzed the data; and JA, ES, RD, and ML were responsible for guiding the experiments and writing the manuscript.
Funding
The authors acknowledge sponsor agencies Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq (procesesses numbers: 304337/2019-6, 405175/2018-3 and 406048/2018-5), Minas Gerais State Research Foundation -FAPEMIG (processes: CBB-APQ 03767/16 and CBB-APQ 01781/17); Coordination for the improvement of higher Education Staff - CAPES - Brazil and Alexander von Humbold Foundation, Germany (process: 99999008121/2014-01). which allowed this research possible as well the Laboratory of Flow Cytometry at the Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, where flow cytometry experiments were performed.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abbas, T., and Dutta, A. (2009). p21 in Cancer: Intricate Networks and Multiple Activities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9 (6), 400–414. doi:10.1038/nrc2657
Abdel-Salam, M. A. L., Carvalho-TavaresGomes, J. K. S., GomesKitten, K. S. G. T., Teixeira-Carvalho, A., Kitten, G. T., Nyffeler, J., et al. (2019). The Synthetic Peptide LyeTxI-B Derived from Lycosa Erythrognatha Spider Venom Is Cytotoxic to U-87 MG Glioblastoma Cells. Amino Acids 51, 433–449. doi:10.1007/s00726-018-2678-4
Abdel-Salam, M. A. L., Pinto, B., Cassali, G., Bueno, L., Pêgas, G., Oliveira, F., et al. (2021). LyeTx I-B Peptide Attenuates Tumor Burden and Metastasis in a Mouse 4T1 Breast Cancer Model. Antibiotics 10, 1136. doi:10.3390/antibiotics10091136
Anders, C. K., Abramson, V., Tan, T., and Dent, R. (2016). The Evolution of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: From Biology to Novel Therapeutics. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 35, 34–42. doi:10.1200/EDBK_159135
Azzopardi, M., Farrugia, G., and Balzan, R. (2017). Cell-cycle Involvement in Autophagy and Apoptosis in Yeast. Mech. Ageing Development 161, 211–224. doi:10.1016/j.mad.2016.07.006
Bauer, K. R., Brown, M., Cress, R. D., Parise, C. A., and Caggiano, V. (2007). Descriptive Analysis of Estrogen Receptor (ER)-negative, Progesterone Receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer, the So-Called Triple-Negative Phenotype. Cancer 109, 1721–1728. doi:10.1002/cncr.22618
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., and Jemal, A. (2018). Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer J. Clinicians 68, 394–424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492
Cao, B., Li, J., Zhou, X., Juan, J., Han, K., Zhang, Z., et al. (2015). Clioquinol Induces Pro-death Autophagy in Leukemia and Myeloma Cells by Disrupting the mTOR Signaling Pathway. Sci. Rep. 4. doi:10.1038/srep05749
Chen, B., Le, W., WangLi, Y. Z., Li, Z., Wang, D., Lin, L., et al. (2016). Targeting Negative Surface Charges of Cancer Cells by Multifunctional Nanoprobes. Theranostics 6, 1887–1898. doi:10.7150/thno.16358
Chou, T.-C. (2006). Theoretical Basis, Experimental Design, and Computerized Simulation of Synergism and Antagonism in Drug Combination Studies. Pharmacol. Rev. 58, 621–681. doi:10.1124/pr.58.3.10
Dasari, S., and Tchounwou, P. B. (2014). Cisplatin in Cancer Therapy: Molecular Mechanisms of Action. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 740, 364–378. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.025
De Luca, A., ParkerAng, L. J. W. H., Ang, W. H., Rodolfo, C., Gabbarini, V., Hancock, N. C., et al. (2019). A Structure-Based Mechanism of Cisplatin Resistance Mediated by Glutathione Transferase P1-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 13943–13951. doi:10.1073/pnas.1903297116
Denton, D., and Kumar, S. (2019). Autophagy-dependent Cell Death. Cell Death Differ 26, 605–616. doi:10.1038/s41418-018-0252-y
Dotiwala, F., Eapen, V. V., Harrison, J. C., Arbel-Eden, A., Ranade, V., Yoshida, S., et al. (2013). DNA Damage Checkpoint Triggers Autophagy to Regulate the Initiation of Anaphase, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E41–E49. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218065109
Fleming, G. F., Brunetto, V. L., Cella, D., Look, K. Y., Reid, G. C., Munkarah, A. R., et al. (2004). Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin Plus Cisplatin with or without Paclitaxel Plus Filgrastim in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Jco 22, 2159–2166. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.07.184
Foucquier, J., and Guedj, M. (2015). Analysis of Drug Combinations: Current Methodological Landscape. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 3, e00149. doi:10.1002/prp2.149
Fuertes, M., Castilla, J., Alonso, C., and Pérez, J. (2003). Cisplatin Biochemical Mechanism of Action: From Cytotoxicity to Induction of Cell Death through Interconnections between Apoptotic and Necrotic Pathways. Cmc 10, 257–266. doi:10.2174/0929867033368484
Gessner, P. K., and Cabana, B. E. (1970). A Study of the Interaction of the Hypnotic Effects and of the Toxic Effects of Chloral Hydrate and Ethanol. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 174 (2), 247–259. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5451362/
Gomes, L. R., Rocha, C. R. R., Martins, D. J., Fiore, A. P. Z. P., Kinker, G. S., Bruni-Cardoso, A., et al. (2019). ATR Mediates Cisplatin Resistance in 3D-Cultured Breast Cancer Cells via Translesion DNA Synthesis Modulation. Cell Death Dis 10. doi:10.1038/s41419-019-1689-8
Gonçalves, H., Guerra, M. R., Duarte Cintra, J. R., Fayer, V. A., Brum, I. V., and Bustamante Teixeira, M. T. (2018). Survival Study of Triple-Negative and Non-triple-negative Breast Cancer in a Brazilian Cohort. Clin. Med. Insights Oncol. 12, 117955491879056. doi:10.1177/1179554918790563
Han, J., and Burgess, K. (2010). Fluorescent Indicators for Intracellular pH. Chem. Rev. 110, 2709–2728. doi:10.1021/cr900249z
Han, Y., Liu, D., and Li, L. (2020). PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway: Current Researches in Cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 10 (3), 727–742. PMID: 32266087. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32266087/
Hazama, S., Nakamura, Y., Tanaka, H., Hirakawa, K., Tahara, K., Shimizu, R., et al. (2014). A Phase ΙI Study of Five Peptides Combination with Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy as a First-Line Therapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer (FXV Study). J. Translational Med. 12, 108. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-12-108
Heeke, A. L., and Tan, A. R. (2021). Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 40, 537–547. doi:10.1007/s10555-021-09972-4
Holen, I., Lefley, D. V., Francis, S. E., Rennicks, S., Bradbury, S., Coleman, R. E., et al. (2016). IL-1 Drives Breast Cancer Growth and Bone Metastasis In Vivo. Oncotarget 7, 75571–75584. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.12289
Honorato, J. R., Hauser‐Davis, R. A., Saggioro, E. M., Correia, F. V., Sales‐Junior, S. F., Soares, L. O. S., et al. (2020). Role of Sonic Hedgehog Signaling in Cell Cycle, Oxidative Stress, and Autophagy of Temozolomide Resistant Glioblastoma. J. Cel Physiol 235, 3798–3814. doi:10.1002/jcp.29274
Ismail-Khan, R., and Bui, M. M. (2010). A Review of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Control 17, 173–176. doi:10.1177/107327481001700305
Jafari, A., Babajani, A., Sarrami Forooshani, R., Yazdani, M., and Rezaei-Tavirani, M. (2022). Clinical Applications and Anticancer Effects of Antimicrobial Peptides: From Bench to Bedside. Front. Oncol. 12, 819563. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.819563
Jhan, J.-R., and Andrechek, E. R. (2017). Triple-negative Breast Cancer and the Potential for Targeted Therapy. Pharmacogenomics 18, 1595–1609. doi:10.2217/pgs-2017-0117
Klionsky, D. J., Abdelmohsen, K., Abe, A., AbedinAbeliovich, M. J. H., and Arozena, A. A. (2016). Guidelines for the Use and Interpretation of Assays for Monitoring Autophagy (3rd Edition). Autophagy 12 (1), 1–222. doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356
Kottschade, L., Novotny, P., Lyss, A., Mazurczak, M., Loprinzi, C., and Barton, D. (2016). Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting: Incidence and Characteristics of Persistent Symptoms and Future Directions NCCTG N08C3 (Alliance). Support Care Cancer 24, 2661–2667. doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3080-y
Kroemer, G., Galluzzi, L., Vandenabeele, P., Abrams, J., Alnemri, E. S., Baehrecke, E. H., et al. (2009). Classification of Cell Death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2009. Cel Death Differ 16, 3–11. doi:10.1038/cdd.2008.150
Liu, J.-q., Cai, G.-y., Wang, S.-y., Song, Y.-h., Xia, Y.-y., Liang, S., et al. (2018). The Characteristics and Risk Factors for Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in the Elderly. Tcrm 14, 1279–1285. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S165531
Manohar, S., and Leung, N. (2018). Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity: a Review of the Literature. J. Nephrol. 31, 15–25. doi:10.1007/s40620-017-0392-z
Mathiassen, S. G., De Zio, D., and Cecconi, F. (2017). Autophagy and the Cell Cycle: A Complex Landscape. Front. Oncol. 7. doi:10.3389/fonc.2017.00051
Melnikov, S. V., Söll, D., Steitz, T. A., and Polikanov, Y. S. (2016). Insights into RNA Binding by the Anticancer Drug Cisplatin from the crystal Structure of Cisplatin-Modified Ribosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 4978–4987. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw246
Miller, R. P., Tadagavadi, R. K., Ramesh, G., and Reeves, W. B. (2010). Mechanisms of Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity. Toxins 2, 2490–2518. doi:10.3390/toxins2112490
Mokhtari, R. B., Homayouni, T. S., Baluch, N., Morgatskaya, E., Kumar, S., Das, B., et al. (2017). Combination Therapy in Combating Cancer. Oncotarget 8, 38022–38043. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.16723
Mosmann, T. (1983). Rapid Colorimetric Assay for Cellular Growth and Survival: Application to Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assays. J. Immunol. Methods 65 (1-2), 55–63. doi:10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4
Mumm, J. B., Emmerich, J., Zhang, X., Chan, I., Wu, L., Mauze, S., et al. (2011). IL-10 Elicits IFNγ-dependent Tumor Immune Surveillance. Cancer Cell 20, 781–796. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2011.11.003
Murugan, S., and Amaravadi, R. K. (2016). Methods for Studying Autophagy within the Tumor Microenvironment. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 899, 145–166. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26666-4_9
Nagelkerke, A., Sweep, F. C. G. J., Geurts-Moespot, A., Bussink, J., and Span, P. N. (2015). Therapeutic Targeting of Autophagy in Cancer. Part I: Molecular Pathways Controlling Autophagy. Semin. Cancer Biol. 31, 89–98. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.05.004
Nicoletti, I., Migliorati, G., Pagliacci, M. C., Grignani, F., and Riccardi, C. (1991). A Rapid and Simple Method for Measuring Thymocyte Apoptosis by Propidium Iodide Staining and Flow Cytometry. J. Immunol. Methods 139 (2), 271–279. doi:10.1016/0022-1759(91)90198-o
Palmer, A. C., and Sorger, P. K. (2017). Combination Cancer Therapy Can Confer Benefit via Patient-To-Patient Variability without Drug Additivity or Synergy. Cell 171, 1678–1691. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.009
Palmieri, M., Pal, R., Nelvagal, H. R., Lotfi, P., Stinnett, G. R., Seymour, M. L., et al. (2017). mTORC1-independent TFEB Activation via Akt Inhibition Promotes Cellular Clearance in Neurodegenerative Storage Diseases. Nat. Commun. 8. doi:10.1038/ncomms14338
Puhalla, S., Bhattacharya, S., and Davidson, N. E. (2012). Hormonal Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Model Disease for the Personalization of Cancer Care. Mol. Oncol. 6, 222–236. doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2012.02.003
Qiao, G., Xu, H., Li, C., Li, X., Farooqi, A., Zhao, Y., et al. (2018). Granulin A Synergizes with Cisplatin to Inhibit the Growth of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ijms 19, 3060. doi:10.3390/ijms19103060
Reis, P. V. M., Boff, D., Verly, R. M., Melo-Braga, M. N., Cortés, M. E., Santos, D. M., et al. (2018). LyeTxI-b, a Synthetic Peptide Derived from Lycosa Erythrognatha Spider Venom, Shows Potent Antibiotic Activity In Vitro and In Vivo. Front. Microbiol. 9. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00667
Rocha, C., SilvaQuinet, M. A., Quinet, A., Cabral-Neto, J., and Menck, C. (2018). DNA Repair Pathways and Cisplatin Resistance: an Intimate Relationship. Clinics 73. doi:10.6061/clinics/2018/e478s
Santos, D. M., Verly, R. M., Piló-Veloso, D., de Maria, M., de Carvalho, M. A. R., Cisalpino, P. S., et al. (2010). LyeTx I, a Potent Antimicrobial Peptide from the Venom of the Spider Lycosa Erythrognatha. Amino Acids 39, 135–144. doi:10.1007/s00726-009-0385-x
Settembre, C., Di Malta, C., Polito, V. A., Arencibia, M. G., Vetrini, F., Erdin, S., et al. (2011). TFEB Links Autophagy to Lysosomal Biogenesis. Science 332, 1429–1433. doi:10.1126/science.1204592
Shacka, J. J., Klocke, B. J., and Roth, K. A. (2006). Autophagy, Bafilomycin and Cell Death: the "A-B-Cs" of Plecomacrolide-Induced Neuroprotection. Autophagy 2, 228–230. doi:10.4161/auto.2703
Shao, X., Lai, D., Zhang, L., and Xu, H. (2016). Induction of Autophagy and Apoptosis via PI3K/AKT/TOR Pathways by Azadirachtin A in Spodoptera Litura Cells. Sci. Rep. 6. doi:10.1038/srep35482
Silver, D. P., RichardsonEklund, A. L. A. C., Eklund, A. C., Wang, Z. C., Szallasi, Z., Li, Q., et al. (2010). Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Jco 28, 1145–1153. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4725
Starobova, H., and Vetter, I. (2017). Pathophysiology of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 10. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2017.00174
Su, X., Dong, C., Zhang, J., Su, L., Wang, X., Cui, H., et al. (2014). Combination Therapy of Anti-cancer Bioactive Peptide with Cisplatin Decreases Chemotherapy Dosing and Toxicity to Improve the Quality of Life in Xenograft Nude Mice Bearing Human Gastric Cancer. Cel Biosci. 4, 7. doi:10.1186/2045-3701-4-7
Tallarida, R. J. (2016). Drug Combinations: Tests and Analysis with Isoboles. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol. 72. doi:10.1002/0471141755.ph0919s72
Tallarida, R. J. (2000). Drug Synergism and Dose-Effect Data Analysis. ISBN 9781584880455. doi:10.1201/9781420036107
Thomé, M. P., Filippi-Chiela, E. C., Villodre, E. S., Migliavaca, C. B., Onzi, G. R., Felipe, K. B., et al. (2016). Ratiometric Analysis of Acridine orange Staining in the Study of Acidic Organelles and Autophagy. J. Cel Sci 129 (24), 4622–4632. doi:10.1242/jcs.195057
Valle, J. W., Furuse, J., Jitlal, M., Beare, S., Mizuno, N., Wasan, H., et al. (2014). Cisplatin and Gemcitabine for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: a Meta-Analysis of Two Randomised Trials. Ann. Oncol. 25, 391–398. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt540
Wahba, H. A., and El-Hadaad, H. A. (2015). Current Approaches in Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Biol. Med. 12 (2), 106–116. doi:10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2015.0030
Keywords: antitumoral peptide, breast cancer, MDA-MB-231, Lycosa erythrognatha, drug combination, isobolographic analysis, LyeTxI-b peptide
Citation: Avelar Júnior JTd, Lima-Batista E, Castro Junior CJ, Pimenta AMdC, Dos Santos RG, Souza-Fagundes EM and De Lima ME (2022) LyeTxI-b, a Synthetic Peptide Derived From a Spider Venom, Is Highly Active in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells and Acts Synergistically With Cisplatin. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9:876833. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.876833
Received: 15 February 2022; Accepted: 04 April 2022;
Published: 04 May 2022.
Edited by:
Hang Fai Kwok, University of Macau, ChinaReviewed by:
Volker Herzig, University of the Sunshine Coast, AustraliaTeodora Alexa-Stratulat, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania
Copyright © 2022 Avelar Júnior, Lima-Batista, Castro Junior, Pimenta, Dos Santos, Souza-Fagundes and De Lima. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Joaquim Teixeira de Avelar Júnior, YXZlbGFyanRAZ21haWwuY29t; Maria Elena De Lima, bWFyaWFlbGVuYUBmYWN1bGRhZGVzYW50YWNhc2FiaC5lZHUuYnI=