- 1Proteolysis Laboratory, Department of Structural Biology, Molecular Biology Institute of Barcelona (IBMB), Higher Scientific Research Council (CSIC), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- 2Institute of Molecular Physiology (IMP), Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz (JGU), Mainz, Germany
The astacins are a family of metallopeptidases (MPs) that has been extensively described from animals. They are multidomain extracellular proteins, which have a conserved core architecture encompassing a signal peptide for secretion, a prodomain or prosegment and a zinc-dependent catalytic domain (CD). This constellation is found in the archetypal name-giving digestive enzyme astacin from the European crayfish Astacus astacus. Astacin catalytic domains span ∼200 residues and consist of two subdomains that flank an extended active-site cleft. They share several structural elements including a long zinc-binding consensus sequence (HEXXHXXGXXH) immediately followed by an EXXRXDRD motif, which features a family-specific glutamate. In addition, a downstream SIMHY-motif encompasses a “Met-turn” methionine and a zinc-binding tyrosine. The overall architecture and some structural features of astacin catalytic domains match those of other more distantly related MPs, which together constitute the metzincin clan of metallopeptidases. We further analysed the structures of PRO-, MAM, TRAF, CUB and EGF-like domains, and described their essential molecular determinants. In addition, we investigated the distribution of astacins across kingdoms and their phylogenetic origin. Through extensive sequence searches we found astacin CDs in > 25,000 sequences down the tree of life from humans beyond Metazoa, including Choanoflagellata, Filasterea and Ichtyosporea. We also found < 400 sequences scattered across non-holozoan eukaryotes including some fungi and one virus, as well as in selected taxa of archaea and bacteria that are pathogens or colonizers of animal hosts, but not in plants. Overall, we propose that astacins originate in the root of Holozoa consistent with Darwinian descent and that the latter genes might be the result of horizontal gene transfer from holozoan donors.
1 Introduction
The astacins are a family of extracellular zinc-dependent metallopeptidases (MPs) named after a digestive enzyme discovered in the 1960s in the European crayfish Astacus astacus L., as named by Linnaeus (Linnaeus, 1758), which was also referred to as Astacus fluviatilis F. by Fabricius (Fabricius, 1796). The enzyme was first named “Astacus protease” or “low-molecular-weight protease” (Pfleiderer et al., 1967), and the designation “astacin” was coined after related proteins had been found in other organisms [for reviews, see (Dumermuth et al., 1991; Jiang and Bond, 1992; Stöcker et al., 1993; Bond and Beynon, 1995; Zwilling and Stöcker, 1997; Gomis-Rüth et al., 2012a; Stöcker et al., 2013a; Stöcker et al., 2013b; Bond, 2019)]. Moreover, the astacins were the first identified members of the metzincin clan of MPs together with the matrix metalloproteinases, serralysins and adamalysins/a-disintegrin-and-metalloproteinases (ADAMs), which share common topologies and zinc-binding environments as inferred from structural studies (Bode et al., 1993; Stöcker and Bode, 1995; Gomis-Rüth, 2003; Sterchi, 2008; Gomis-Rüth, 2009; Cerdà-Costa and Gomis-Rüth, 2014; Arolas et al., 2018). Astacins function as protein degraders during digestion, developmental tissue turnover and differentiation, and embryonic hatching, but also as sophisticated shedders of membrane-bound substrates (Jiang and Bond, 1992; Gomis-Rüth et al., 2012a; Stöcker et al., 2013b; Bond, 2019). They are subdivided into the bone morphogenetic protein 1 (BMP1)/“Tolloid”-like proteinases (BTPs), meprins, hatching enzymes, and other astacins (Sterchi et al., 2008). Recent genomes have unravelled a plethora of genes encoding proteins annotated as astacins in various organisms within metazoans, which date back to 760 million years ago (Berman 2019).
In this article, we both dissected reported molecular structures and calculated new high-confidence computational models to analyse the molecular determinants of the most relevant astacin domains. Based on structural and molecular specifications of the prototypic astacin catalytic domain (CD), we further performed comprehensive sequence similarity searches to identify potential family members outside vertebrates to locate the origin of astacins according to Darwinian descent. Finally, we screened and reviewed the literature available for functional and evolutionary implications of the distinct astacin subfamilies outside vertebrates.
2 Results and discussion
2.1 Architecture and function of relevant astacin-family domains
Astacins across all phyla minimally comprise a zinc-binding CD, which is preceded by an upstream propeptide or prodomain (PRO) for latency and a signal peptide (S) for targeting to the plasmalemma or the extracellular space in animals [(Gomis-Rüth et al., 2012a); Figure 1]. However, most astacins are multidomain proteins, which have acquired a diverse set of additional domains (Figure 1). We retrieved reported experimental crystal structures of a CD, a “MAM” domain [first identified in meprin, A5 protein and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase μ; (Cismasiu et al., 2004)], a “TRAF” domain [reminiscent of tumour-necrosis-factor receptor-associated factor; (Park, 2018)] and PRO domains, and computed high-confidence computational models of the “CUB” domain [first identified at the sequence level in complement subcomponents C1r/C1s, Uegf and BMP1; (Bork and Beckmann, 1993)] and epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains (see the Methods section) for their molecular analysis.
![www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/1080836/fmolb-09-1080836-HTML-r1/image_m/fmolb-09-1080836-g001.jpg)
FIGURE 1. Astacin domain combinations and phylogenetic occurrence. Metazoan astacins minimally comprise an N-terminal signal-peptide for extracellular secretion (S), a propeptide or prodomain conferring latency (PRO) and a catalytic zinc-dependent metallopeptidase domain (CD). Moreover, most astacins evince additional domains, listed with Prosite database codes (PS; https://prosite.expasy.org): ABC (ABC-transporter; PS00211), CD (catalytic protease domain; PS51864), C (cytoplasmic tail), CLEC (C-type lectin; PS50041), CUB (found in complement subcomponents C1r/C1s, Uegf and BMP1; PS01180), EGF (epidermal growth factor-like; PS00022), FA58C (factor-5/8 type-C domain; PS500229), FN3 (fibronectin type-III domain; PS508539), HYR (hyalin repeat protein; PS50825), I (intervening domain in meprin α, contains a furin cleavage site), IG (immunoglobulin-like; PS508359), KRING (kringle; PS00021), LC (low complexity domain, disordered), LCCL (Limulus C-domain; PS50820), LYSM (extracellular receptor domain; PS51782), MAM (found in meprin, A5 protein and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase μ; PS00740), MATH (meprin and traf homology domain; PS50144), PAN (also dubbed APPLE; found in plasma kallikrein and factor XI; PS50948), PLAC (polycystin-1, lipoxygenase and α-toxin; PS50095), PTX (pentraxin; PS51828), RICIN (ricin-type lectin; PS50231), SH2 (SARC homology domain; PS50001), ShKT (K+-channel-blocking Stichodactyla helianthus toxin; PS51670), SMB (somatomedin; PS50958), SRCR (cysteine-rich scavenger receptor; PS50287), SUSHI (sushi adhesion domain; PS50923), TPR (tetratricopeptide repeat; PS50005), TSP (thrombospondin-like domain; PS50092), VWF (von-Willebrand-factor domain; PS50234), ZF-UBR (UBR-type zinc-finger; PS51157) and ZP2 (zona pellucida protein 2 domain; PS51034). On the left, typical astacin family members are listed, for which physiological functions are documented (see Supplementary Table S1 for complete protein and gene names, and UniProt access codes). Phylogenetic occurrences are indicated on the right.
The CD is ascribed to protein family Pfam-01400 (Figure 1) and spans ∼200 residues. It contains two or three disulfide bonds at variable positions (Gomis-Rüth et al., 2012a) and is divided into an upper N-terminal subdomain and a lower C-terminal subdomain by an extended active-site cleft, as first revealed by the crystal structure of archetypal crayfish astacin (Bode et al., 1992; Gomis-Rüth et al., 1993) (Figure 2A). The N-terminal subdomain is rich in regular secondary structure and contains a hallmark five-stranded β-sheet (β1–β5; Figure 2A), whose lowermost strand β4 frames the upper rim of the active-site cleft when viewed in the standard orientation of MPs (Gomis-Rüth et al., 2012b) (Figure 2A, left), and two helices: the “backing helix” and the “active-site helix”. The latter encompasses most of a characteristic zinc-binding motif (HEXXHXXGXXH; amino-acid one letter code; X stands for any residue), which is found across astacins and other metzincin families (Bode et al., 1993; Stöcker et al., 1993; Yiallouros et al., 2000; Gomis-Rüth et al., 2012a; Cerdà-Costa and Gomis-Rüth, 2014; Arolas et al., 2018). The helix includes the first two zinc-liganding histidines and the general base/acid glutamate required for catalysis (Arolas et al., 2018). After the glycine of the motif, the chain undergoes a sharp turn and enters the C-terminal subdomain, which is more irregular and just encompasses a short β-ribbon (β6–β7) and a “C-terminal helix” as regular secondary structure (Figure 2A). The C-terminal subdomain provides two more zinc ligands, viz., the third histidine of the motif and a downstream tyrosine, which is swung out in a “tyrosine-switch” motion upon substrate binding to stabilize the reaction intermediate during catalysis (Grams et al., 1996; Yiallouros et al., 2000). This tyrosine is found two positions after another conserved element within metzincins, the “Met-turn” methionine (Bode et al., 1993; Tallant et al., 2010), which creates a hydrophobic base for the metal-binding site (Tallant et al., 2010). The tyrosine and the methionine are embedded in a characteristic SIMHY-motif in astacins (Stöcker et al., 1993).
![www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/1080836/fmolb-09-1080836-HTML-r1/image_m/fmolb-09-1080836-g002.jpg)
FIGURE 2. Representative structures of the most relevant astacin domains. (A) Ribbon-type plot of the mature Astacus astacus crayfish astacin catalytic domain [PDB 1AST; residues 50–251, see UniProt P07584; (Bode et al., 1992; Gomis-Rüth et al., 1993)], which is shown in the standard orientation of MPs [left; (Gomis-Rüth et al., 2012b)] and vertically rotated by 90 degrees (right). Regular secondary structure elements are shown as yellow β-strands (β1–β7) and aquamarine α-helices (αA–αC). The first five strands constitute the typical five-stranded β-sheet of astacins (Gomis-Rüth et al., 2012a) and the helices are dubbed “backing helix” (αA), “active-site helix” (αB) and “C-terminal helix” (αC). The latter is split in two by a kink. Unbound mature astacin has its catalytic zinc cation (magenta sphere) bound in trigonal-bipyramidal coordination by the three histidines (①–③) of a characteristic zinc-binding motif [HEXXHXXGXXH; (Bode et al., 1993)] plus a more distal downstream tyrosine (④) and the catalytic solvent molecule [small red sphere; (Arolas et al., 2018)]. The glutamate within the motif (⑤) is the general base/acid for catalysis (Arolas et al., 2018). The “Met-turn” with the conserved methionine [⑥; (Bode et al., 1993; Tallant et al., 2010)] is shown as an orange ribbon. The mature N-terminal residue (labelled N) is bound to the family-specific glutamate (E103) [⑦; (Gomis-Rüth, 2003)] after the third zinc-binding histidine. The C-terminus is also labelled (C) and the two disulfide bonds of the structure (C42–C198 and C64–C84) are further displayed with sulphur atoms in green. (B) The structure of the unique EGF-like domain of human BMP1 predicted with AlphaFold (Jumper et al., 2021) shows two β-ribbons and three disulfide bonds. Two orthogonal orientations are displayed. (C) Experimental structure of the MAM domain of meprin β [PDB 4GWM; (Arolas et al., 2012)] in two orthogonal orientations. The β-sandwich domain (residues 259–427, see UniProt Q16820) features two disulfide bonds and a structural sodium cation (blue sphere) octahedrally coordinated by six protein oxygens. (D) Structure of the first CUB domain of human BMP predicted with AlphaFold in two orthogonal orientations, which show a β-sandwich architecture with two disulfide bonds. (E) Experimental structure of the TRAF domain of meprin β [PDB 4GWM; (Arolas et al., 2012)] in two orthogonal orientations. The β-sandwich domain (residues 428–597, see UniProt Q16820) has two short helices and a β-ribbon grafted into strand-connecting loops. (F–I) Experimental zymogen structures as Cα–traces in standard orientation (top panels) and after a vertical 90-degree rotation (bottom panels) of (F) crayfish astacin [PDB 3LQ0; (Guevara et al., 2010)], (G) human meprin β [PDB 4GWM; (Arolas et al., 2012)], (H) myroilysin from the bacterium Myroides sp. [PDB 5GWD; (Xu et al., 2017)] and (I) astacin from the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus [PDB 8A28; (Guevara et al., 2022)]. Only the PROs (aquamarine) and CDs (sandy brown) are displayed for clarity, together with the catalytic zinc ions (magenta spheres) and the side chains of the respective aspartate/cysteine-switch residue.
Finally, another structural characteristic of astacin CDs is an unaccessible N-terminus (Gomis-Rüth et al., 2012a; Guevara et al., 2022). Maturation cleavage occurs at a bond that is occluded in the zymogen, which entails that partial unfolding of the segment flanking the activation site and/or preliminary cleavages are required for activation (Guevara et al., 2010; Arolas et al., 2012; Guevara et al., 2022). Upon final cleavage, the first six or seven residues of the mature enzyme are amply repositioned and penetrate the mature enzyme moiety, so the first two or three residues are completely buried in the molecular structure (Gomis-Rüth et al., 1993; Arolas et al., 2012; Ran et al., 2020; Guevara et al., 2022). Moreover, the new N-terminus binds the “family-specific” glutamate immediately after the third zinc-binding histidine (Bode et al., 1993; Gomis-Rüth, 2003), either directly through its side chain or through the α-amino group via a solvent molecule (Figure 2A). This feature is unique among MPs and reminiscent of trypsin-like serine endopeptidases, which dedicate an aspartate next to the catalytic serine to bind the likewise buried mature N-terminus (Bode et al., 1986). The astacin glutamate is immediately followed by an XXRXDRD motif (Gomis-Rüth, 2003) whose charged residues establish interactions relevant for domain stability.
A MAM domain is found after the CD in meprins α and β, Limulus and Hydra astacins and other (potential) family members (Figure 1) (Arolas et al., 2012; Eckhard et al., 2021; Guevara et al., 2022). The crystal structure of human meprin β (Arolas et al., 2012; Eckhard et al., 2021) reveals that its MAM domain is a β-sandwich consisting of a four- and a five-stranded antiparallel β-sheet, which are twisted and rotated ∼25 degrees relative to each other (Figure 2B). The domain conforms to a jelly-roll architecture featuring two four-stranded Greek key motifs and is connected by two disulfide bonds. Furthermore, the domain has a sodium-binding site, at which the cation is octahedrally coordinated by six oxygens from side chains and the main chain of the protein (Figure 2B). The overall architecture of the domain conforms to the structural criteria defined for the MAM protein family (Pfam-00629), which was identified in silico in meprin α and β, A5 protein, and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase μ (Beckmann and Bork, 1993). Comparison with other MAM domains reveals that the central β-sandwich is conserved but the loops responsible for functionality deviate, as well as the metal-binding capacity and arrangement (Aricescu et al., 2006; Yelland and Djordjevic, 2016). This domain appears to have adhesive functions and, in meprin β, it contributes to dimerization by bringing the CD and TRAF domains together (Arolas et al., 2012; Eckhard et al., 2021).
Uniquely for astacins, meprins α and β exhibit a TRAF domain downstream of the MAM domain (Figure 1) (Arolas et al., 2012; Eckhard et al., 2021). The crystal structure of human meprin β (Arolas et al., 2012; Eckhard et al., 2021) shows that this moiety features two twisted four-stranded antiparallel β-sheets, which are rotated ∼40 degrees relative to each other (Figure 2C, left) and give rise to a flatter sandwich than in MAM (compare Figure 2B, right and Figure 2C, right). The strands are connected by loops of variable length, which include two short helical segments plus a short β-ribbon and give rise to a double Greek key architecture. The second Greek key is inserted into the first one but does not form a jelly roll. The only cysteine of this domain (C492) is buried and unbound, the N- and the C-terminus are on contiguous β-strands of the front β-sheet (Figure 2C, left), the C-terminus protrudes from the top surface of the domain (Figure 2C, right). In general, the TRAF domain of meprin β resembles tumor-necrosis-factor receptor-associated factors, which are mediators of cell activation engaged in homo- and heterodimerization and originated the TRAF protein family (Pfam-00917) (Zapata et al., 2001).
Further relevant for astacins are CUB domains (Figure 1), which were first identified in complement subcomponents C1r/C1s, Uegf and BMP1 (Bork and Beckmann, 1993) and form protein family Pfam-00431. They occur in BTP-subfamily astacins including BMP1, as well as in echinoderm astacins, a paralogue within A. astacus and several other orthologues in up to five copies (Figure 1). According to a highly reliable AlphaFold computational model (see Figure 2D and the Methods section), the first CUB domain of human BMP1 would be a β-sandwich made of an antiparallel four-stranded β-sheet and a mixed parallel/antiparallel five-stranded β-sheet, which would be both partially twisted. Their strands would be nearly parallel (Figure 2D, left), in contrast to MAM (Figure 2B, left) and TRAF (Figure 2C, left), and connected by mostly short loops. Two disulfide bonds would crosslink the domain. CUB domains were apparently present in the last common ancestor of eumetazoans and are currently found in synaptic proteins (González-Calvo et al., 2022). Remarkably, combinations of CUB and MAM domains are found in neuropilins, which are receptors for axon guidance cues and play synaptic roles (González-Calvo et al., 2022). Moreover, a CUB domain is engaged in the “Venus-flytrap” mechanism of inhibition of endopeptidases by the human pan-peptidase tetrameric inhibitor α2-macroglobulin. It participates in major structural rearrangement of the C-terminal half of the protomer, which further includes three more domains (Marrero et al., 2012; Goulas et al., 2017; Luque et al., 2022). A CUB domain also participates in the “snap-trap” mechanism of monomeric α2-macroglobulin-related inhibitors from commensal and pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica (Wong and Dessen, 2014; Garcia-Ferrer et al., 2015; Goulas et al., 2017).
Next, EGF domains (Pfam-00008) are widely present in up to six copies in several astacins, including meprins, BTPs and proteins from nematodes and echinoderms (Figure 1). Generally, they are found in many animal proteins in the extracellular part of membrane-bound or secreted proteins (Bork et al., 1996). In meprin β, the EGF-like domain is considered a hinge domain, which moves the dimer from a membrane-proximal position for cleavage of transmembrane substrates, such as the amyloid precursor protein, to a membrane-distal position upon binding to its endogenous inhibitor fetuin B (Karmilin et al., 2019; Eckhard et al., 2021). We obtained a generally reliable AlphaFold computational model (see the Methods section) for the EGF-like domain of human BMP1 (see Figure 2E). It revealed a ∼40-residue structure cross-connected by three disulfide bonds for structural integrity and two β-hairpins, which overall conform to the standard architecture of these domains (Wouters et al., 2005).
Finally, large diversity is found across astacin PROs, which range between 34 and 486 residues and just share the motif FXGDI among animal orthologues (Guevara et al., 2010; Gomis-Rüth et al., 2012a). The PROs of crayfish astacin (Figure 2F), human meprin β (Figure 2G), bacterial myroilysin (Figure 2H) and horseshoe crab astacin (Figure 2I) have been structurally characterized. They revealed essentially unstructured peptides running along the cleft of the CD in the opposite direction of a true substrate, which precludes their intramolecular cleavage (Guevara et al., 2010; Arolas et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2017; Guevara et al., 2022). The catalytic solvent molecule bound to the catalytic zinc ion in the mature CD (Figure 2A) is replaced by either the aspartate of the motif in the three animal zymogens (Guevara et al., 2010; Arolas et al., 2012; Guevara et al., 2022) or a cysteine in the bacterial enzyme (Xu et al., 2017), which lacks the motif. These residues operate according to an “aspartate-switch” or “cysteine-switch” mechanism of latency, respectively. Such mechanisms have been also reported, among others, for the MPs fragilysin-3 from Bacteroides fragilis (Goulas et al., 2011) and matrix metalloproteinases (Springman et al., 1990; Rosenblum et al., 2007), respectively.
2.2 Astacins possibly originate in Holozoa
Multicellularity presumably originated several times in unicellular opisthokont holozoans, which have been suggested as precursors of metazoans [(Sebé-Pedrós et al., 2017; Berman 2019)]. To better understand the hierarchical clustering of the distinct phyla within Holozoa, which originate 1.3 billion years ago (Berman 2019), and to put our phylogenetic studies into context, we tentatively assembled a consensus dendrogram based on current literature (Figure 3) given the apparent disparity in the available models (see Section 3.2). This hypothesis entails that Holozoa would split into Teretosporea, themselves consisting of Corallochytrea/Pluriformea (alias Opisthokonta incertae sedis) and Ichthyosporea, and Filozoa. These, in turn, would divide into Filasterea and Choanozoa. The latter would consist of Choanoflagellata, which are unicellular flagellates, and Metazoa, which encompass the multicellular animals and date back to about 760 million years ago (Berman 2019). Up the tree, Bilateria would englobe animals with a plane of symmetry (including Xenacoelomorpha), except echinoderms, which evince post-larval (secondary) pentaradial symmetry. They sequentially would team up with Cnidaria, Placozoa, Porifera and Ctenophora to eventually form Metazoa (Figure 3).
![www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/1080836/fmolb-09-1080836-HTML-r1/image_m/fmolb-09-1080836-g003.jpg)
FIGURE 3. Classification of holozoans. Dendrogram depicting the herein proposed hierarchical clustering of phyla within holozoans assembled based on current literature (Ryan et al., 2010; Ruggiero et al., 2015; Torruella et al., 2015; Cannon et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2017; Sebé-Pedrós et al., 2017; Whelan et al., 2017; Adl et al., 2019; Giribet et al., 2019; Laumer et al., 2019; Marlétaz et al., 2019; Sogabe et al., 2019; Hickman et al., 2020; Schoch et al., 2020; Schulze and Kawauchi, 2021). Phylum Chordata is further shown for its constituting subphyla Vertebrata, Tunicata/Urochordata and Cephalochordata. The first two give rise to Olfactores.
We performed searches for astacins in several protein and gene databases (see Section 3.1), which revealed > 25,000 entries for potential peptidases of the M12A family. This is how astacins are defined in the MEROPS database of peptidases and their inhibitors [www.ebi.ac.uk/merops; (Rawlings and Bateman, 2021)]. In addition, > 12,000 sequences from > 1,000 species of identified and putative family members were found within family PF01400 within the PFAM database (Mistry et al., 2021). At this point, high-confidence manually curated sequence searches were performed with the sequence of the mature CD of crayfish astacin. The resulting hit sequences were verified to span the entire CD and contain the intact zinc-binding motif, as well as the family-specific glutamate followed by the XXRXDRD and SIMHY motifs, with just minimal conservative substitutions (Figure 4 reproduces selected aligned example sequences). They were further checked to contain a PRO with the zinc-blocking aspartate. A subgroup of sequences was chosen for alignments, phylogenetic tree construction and physiological considerations (Supplementary Table S1; Sections 2.4–2.7). In addition, Table 1 presents a selection of described and potential non-vertebrate metazoan astacins.
![www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/1080836/fmolb-09-1080836-HTML-r1/image_m/fmolb-09-1080836-g004.jpg)
FIGURE 4. Sequence alignment of 20 astacins representing different animal phyla excerpted from the sets shown in Figure 5, Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1. In the headline, “pro” labels three residues of the prodomain with the conserved aspartate residue (underlaid green) responsible for latency of the proenzyme, which is absent from myroilysin. The red asterisks below “act” indicate the site of proteolytic activation (maturation). Cysteines are underlaid yellow. “Zinc” labels the three zinc-binding histidines (underlaid blue), the catalytically essential glutamate (Arolas et al., 2018) following the first histidine is underlaid magenta, and the family-specific glutamate after the third histidine in underlaid green. Its negatively charged sidechain forms a salt bridge with the positively charged mature amino terminus after activation. Also labelled is the Met-turn (“Met”, underlaid black) with the tyrosine zinc ligand underlaid blue. Finally, S1’ indicates the region shaping the binding pocket of the P1’ residue of substrates within the catalytic cleft (Schechter and Berger, 1967; Gomis-Rüth et al., 2012b). Sequences: MEPβ HOMSA (Homo sapiens, human, phylum Chordata, subphylum Vertebrata), MEPβ PETMA (Petromyzon marinus, lamprey, phylum Chordata, subphylum Vertebrata), SMD SACKO (Sackoglossus kowalevskii, acorn worm, phylum Hemichordata), CUB ASTRU (Asterias rubens, sea star, phylum Echinodermata), LysM RAMVA (Ramazottius varieornatus, water bear, phylum Tardigrada), TLD DROME (Drosophila melanogaster, fruit fly, phylum Arthropoda, subphylum Hexapoda), LASTMAM LIMPO (Limulus polyphemus, horseshoe crab, phylum Arthropoda, subphylum Chelicerata), AST ASTAS (Astacus astacus, crayfish, phylum Arthropoda, subphylum Crustacea), HCH1 CAEEL (Caenorhabditis elegans, nematode, phylum Nematoda), ShKT PRICA (Priapulus caudatus, cactus worm, phylum Priapulida), CUBMAM BUGNE (Bugula neritina, common bugula, phylum Bryozoa), ShKT LINUN (Lingula unguis, lamp shell, phylum Brachiopoda), AST DIMGY (Dimorphilius gyrociliatus, phylum Annelida), MAMEGF BRAPC (Brachionus plicatilis, rotifer, phylum Rotifera), ShKT8 MYTCO (Mytilus coruscus, Korean mussel, phylum Mollusca), ShKT SCHMD (Schmidtea mediterranea, triclad flatworm, phylum Platyhelminthes), ASTLD MNELE (Mnemiopsis leidyi, sea walnut, Phylum Ctenophora), HAS7 HYDVU (Hydra vulgaris, hydra, phylum Cnidaria), CUBEGF TRIAD, Trichoplax adherens, flat-bodied animal, phylum Placozoa and IG4 AMPQE (Amphimedon queenslandica, sponge, phylum Porifera). In addition, an astacin xenologue from the bacterium Myroides sp., the only known astacin with a proven cysteine switch activation mechanism (Xu et al., 2017; Ran et al., 2020), was further included for comparison (MYR MYRSP).
We consistently found astacin sequences from humans down the tree of life until the root of subphylum Vertebrata (a selection is provided by Supplementary Table S1), among which the jawless fishes (Agnatha) are most basal, with two extant genera: lampreys and hagfishes (Supplementary Table S1). Vertebrata associate with the subphyla Tunicata/Urochordata, which includes sea squirts and the base tunicate Ciona intestinalis, and Cephalochordata, which features the lancelet (amphioxus), to form the phylum Chordata (Figure 3). These taxa also evinced abundant astacins. In addition, we could find sequences for the phyla Echinodermata and Hemichordata within Ambulacraria, which together with Chordata form Deuterostomia. Within Ecdysozoa, we could retrieve sequences from Tardigrada and Arthropoda but not Onychophora within Panarthropoda; Priapulida but not Kinorhyncha or Loricifera within Scalidophora; and Nematoda but not Nematomorpha within Nematoida. Out of Gnatifera plus Chaetognatha, we could only get hits for Rotifera. As to Lophotrochozoa, we found astacins in Annelida, Bryozoa, Brachiopoda and Mollusca. Next, we identified potential orthologues within Platyhelminthes but not Mesozoa and Gastrotricha. All these phyla constitute Protostomia, which together with Deuterostomia form Nephrozoa (Figure 3). The latter give rise to Bilateria together with Xenacoelomorpha, for which we could find sequences in two organisms (Table 1). Finally, we could identify astacins in all the remaining more primitive metazoan phyla: Cnidaria, Placozoa, Porifera and Ctenomorpha. All these results (Figure 3; Table 1) suggest that astacins are systematically present at least down to the root of Metazoa.
Choanoflagellata have been discussed as animal precursors for a long time, since they are similar to choanocytes of sponges (Hickman et al., 2020). However, a search for astacins within Monosiga brevicolis (King et al., 2008), Salpingoeca rosetta [formerly Proterospongia sp.; (Fairclough et al., 2013)] and Monosiga ovata of this phylum did not reveal significantly similar proteins. In addition, organisms from the next related taxa, Filasterea (Capsaspora owczarzaki), Ichthyosporea (Sphaeroforma arctica) and Corallochytrea/Pluriformea (Corallochytrium limacisporum and Syssomonas multiformis), which together with Metazoa and Choanoflagellata constitute the Holozoa (Figure 3), did not contain potential orthologs either in the generally available databases. At this point, we got access to unpublished genome sequences from a series of organisms at the root of Holozoa, viz., the Choanoflagellata Acanthoeca spectabilis, Choanoeca perplexa, Diaphanoeca grandis, Salpingoeca dolichothecata, Salpingoeca infusorum, Salpingoeca kvevrii, Salpingoeca macrocollata, Salpingoeca punica, Salpingoeca urceolata and Stephanoeca diplocostata; the Filastereum Ministeria vibrans; and the Ichthyosporea Amoebidium parasiticum, Abeoforma whisleri and Pirum gemmata [I. Ruiz-Trillo & M. Leger, personal communication, and (Torruella et al., 2015; Carr et al., 2017; Grau-Bové et al., 2017)]. We identified several potential astacin orthologues in Diaphanoeca grandis (e.g., comp29462_c0_seq1:1552770, comp29716_c0_seq2:1462332 and comp33115_c0_seq4:851467), Salpingoeca dolichothecata (e.g., comp24492_c1_seq1:7011852, comp14956_c0_seq2:1981400 and comp26781_c0_seq6:13261), Amoebidium parasiticum (Amoebidium_parasiticum_Apar_comp21710_c1_seq1m30654/1239) and Ministeria vibrans (Ministeria_vibrans_Mvib_g2222t1/16202), whose sequences are provided in Supplementary Figure S1. Altogether, these findings would suggest that astacins probably originate in the root of Holozoa according to Darwinian descent.
A selection of invertebrate and vertebrate sequences (Supplementary Table S1) enabled us to construct a phylogenetic tree for metazoan astacins (Figure 5), which was solely based on a sequence alignment of the respective CDs. Three sequences encompassed multiple CDs, which originate in the most basal sponge Amphimedon qeeenslandica (UniProt code [UP] A0A1X7U9V1), the nematode hookworm Ancylostoma caninum (UP A0A368GTC8) and the blow fly Lucilia cuprina (UP A0A0L0BYD0). This tree does not mirror the phylogenesis of organisms presented in Figure 3 since it contains both orthologous and paralogous astacins. Indeed, members of the distinct subfamilies evinced separate clustering (Figure 5). The tree is not comprehensive, since only a selection of astacins comprising the minimal setup of typical sequential and structural motifs (as outlined above) were included. Nevertheless, certain clusters of astacins can be recognized. These are, starting clockwise in the upper left quadrant of the circular tree (Figure 5), the 1) hatching enzymes, which originate from the same root as ovastacin; 2) ShKT-carrying astacins from chordates, nematodes, cnidarians, priapulids and arthropods (chelicerates and crustaceans), which include the prototypal crayfish astacin; 3) a clade containing the meprins; 4) a second cluster of ShKT-astacins, mostly from cnidarians (right centre); 5) proteins rich in MAM, EGF and CUB domains (right bottom); and 6) the BTPs (left bottom).
![www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/1080836/fmolb-09-1080836-HTML-r1/image_m/fmolb-09-1080836-g005.jpg)
FIGURE 5. Phylogenetic tree based on the catalytic domains of a selection of 147 astacins. The list of species and UniProt and GenBank accession numbers are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The asterisk in the top right quadrant indicates the position of the prototypical name-giving enzyme astacin from the crayfish Astacus astacus. Crayfish astacin is translated with a signal peptide for extracellular targeting, a prodomain conferring latency and a catalytic protease domain (see also Figure 1). The domain compositions of astacins consisting merely of these three domains are omitted for clarity. Astacin-like proteases with more complex domain structures are shown schematically. A detailed list of domains with Prosite database accession numbers is contained in Figure 1 and in Supplementary Table S1.
2.3 Scattered presence of astacins outside Holozoa
Searches in non-holozoan Eukaryota including plants, fungi and the fungus-like Oomycota revealed merely < 400 sequences scattered across Alveolata, Stramenopila, Rhizaria, Archaeplastida (Haptista), Excavata (Discoba) and some Amoebozoa clades. By contrast, no astacins were detected in any of the other eukaryotic taxa except for the silver mallet wood Rhodamnia argentea [GenBank code (GB) XP_030553468], the only plant orthologue retrieved. However, this entry was debunked as a contamination with a tolloid-like chelicerate astacin from the wheat curl mite Aceria tosichella (UP A0A8B8R4B3).
The observation of astacin-like proteins within Stramenopila is remarkable since this taxon alone already accounts for ∼200 of the hits. These are heterokonts that were formerly grouped into fungi (Holomycota) but currently are considered to be closer to brown algae than to fungi (Sebé-Pedrós et al., 2017). They further include the Oomycetes (“egg fungi”), a clade containing many parasitic/saprophytic organisms, which in turn encompass most of the hits within Stramenopila. Among them is Aphanomyces astaci, a well-known parasite of the North American crayfish Cambarus clarkii, which developed resistance against this pest. However, when American crayfish were brought to Europe in the late 19th century, A. astaci infection caused the “crayfish plague” in the endogenous crayfish population (A. astacus), which almost caused its extinction (Diéguez-Uribeondo and Söderhäll, 1993). Oomycetes are known champions of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) (Koonin et al., 2001; Keeling and Palmer, 2008), thereby gathering enzymes useful to target their prey (Judelson, 2017). This genetic transfer route could thus explain the generally scattered but locally focused presence of astacin CDs, which is inconsistent with Darwinian descent, in eukaryotes outside Holozoa.
HGT could also account for the sporadic occurrence of astacin-like peptidases in archaea, bacteria and viruses, which would thus also be xenologues (Koonin et al., 2001). Examples of archaeal sequences were found in Candidatus korarcheota (UP A0A662SFB1), Nitrosopumilus sp. (GB MCA9827382), Methanotrichaceae archaeon (GB MBN1323470) and Halobacteriales archaeon QH_6_64_20 (GB PSP40402). Viral sequences were restricted to Lutzomyia reovirus 2 (UP A0A0H4M9A8). The more populous bacterial examples were from Bacillus cereus (GB WP_235610182), Acinetobacter baumanii (GB WP_207273295), Klebsiella pneumoniae (GB NAU77905), Bacillus thuringiensis (GB WP_228528809), Legionella pneumophila (GB WP_061484376), Bacillus mycoides (GB WP_186320991), among others. Overall, the vast majority of bacterial astacin hosts live in intimate contact with animals, which would facilitate HGT of genes from eukaryotes to prokaryotes. Among them are those of the biochemically studied proteins flavastacin from Flavobacterium meningosepticum [also known as Elizabethkingia meningoseptica; UP Q47899; (Tarentino et al., 1995)] and myroilysins from Myroides profundi (UP B5B0E6) and Myroides sp. CSLB8 (UP A0A0P0DZ84) (Xu et al., 2017; Ran et al., 2020). In the latter case, zymogenic latency was shown to follow a different mechanism from the animal forms [see Section 2.1; (Guevara et al., 2022)], which would further support an HGT event as the origin of its presence in the bacterium. This is reminiscent of the aforementioned fragilysin-3, which originates in a member of the human colon microbiota. Its CD was proposed to be an adamalysin/ADAM xenologue acquired by HGT from the host that separately evolved to derive a distinct mechanism of latency (Goulas et al., 2011; Goulas et al., 2013).
2.4 Functional and evolutionary aspects of BMP1/tolloid-like peptidases
In the phylum Chordata, subphylum Vertebrata, order Mammalia, six genes encode astacin peptidases [bmp1, tll1, tll2, mepa, mepb and astl; http://degradome.uniovi.es/met.html; (Quesada et al., 2009)]. The first three genes code for the BMP1, TLL1 and TLL2 proteins, which belong to the BTPs (Wozney et al., 1988; Nguyen et al., 1994). They are characterized by an arrangement of five CUB domains and two EGF-like domains C-terminal of the CD and are present in virtually all metazoan phyla (Figures 1, 5). BTPs are important for dorsoventral patterning in metazoan embryogenesis (Sato and Sargent, 1990; Holley et al., 1996; de Robertis, 2008; de Robertis and Tejeda-Muñoz, 2022). In deuterostomes, they are also crucial for extracellular matrix assembly through the processing of precursors of matrix components, growth factors and their receptors (Kessler et al., 1996; Ge and Greenspan, 2006). The CUB and EGF-like domains of these astacins bear important exosites for substrate recognition and targeting toward the extracellular matrix (Sieron et al., 2000; Garrigue-Antar et al., 2004; Ge and Greenspan, 2006; Hintze et al., 2006; Hopkins et al., 2007; Wermter et al., 2007). Although BTPs are closely linked with bilaterian morphogenesis, which supposedly originated in “Urbilateria” (de Robertis, 2008; de Robertis and Tejeda-Muñoz, 2022), they are not restricted to Bilateria and are also present in radially symmetric metaozans, Cnidaria (Saina et al., 2009) and Ctenophora (Pang et al., 2011). Related proteins with slightly deviating CUB/EGF arrangements were also found in the basal placozoan species Trichoplax adhaerens (CUBEGF_TRIAD) and in several other astacins (Figure 5). Taken together, BTPs are pan-metazoan astacins with essential functions in embryogenesis, which exert further additional functions in several metazoan phyla.
2.5 Functional and evolutionary aspects of meprin metallopeptidases
Two other human astacin genes, mepa and mepb, encode meprin α and meprin β for which orthologs have only been detected among vertebrates. Both meprins are membrane bound but meprin α is released already in the trans-Golgi network by furin cleavage and stays membrane bound only in association with meprin β. The latter is a “sheddase”, which releases cell-surface proteins such as growth factors, cytokines, receptors, as well as amyloid precursor protein through cleavage at its β-secretase site. Deregulation of meprins leads to neurodegenerative diseases, changes in barrier function (such as in the blood brain barrier), inflammatory bowel disease, fibrosis, nephritis and cancer (Sterchi et al., 2008; Arolas et al., 2012; Becker-Pauly and Pietrzik, 2016; Arnold et al., 2017; Eckhard et al., 2021; Gindorf et al., 2021; Bayly-Jones et al., 2022; Werny et al., 2022). The unique domain composition of meprins includes MAM, TRAF and EGF-like domains (Figures 1, 5), and although MAM- and EGF-containing astacins have been identified in other metazoan phyla (see Figures 1, 5; Supplementary Table S1), none of these are apparently membrane bound or exhibit comparable physiological potential to vertebrate meprins. Finally, our database searches unravelled meprin-like astacin-CDs also in basal vertebrates such as lamprey (MEPβ_PETMA) and hagfish (MEPα_EPTBU), which just encompass the S, PRO, CD and MAM moieties (see Figures 1, 5; Supplementary Table S1), similarly to a reported horseshoe crab enzyme [LASTMAM_LIMPO; (Becker-Pauly et al., 2009; Guevara et al., 2022)].
2.6 Astacins in animal reproduction
The sixth human astacin is ovastacin, which is encoded by the astl gene and is expressed only in oocytes among mammals (Burkart et al., 2012). Absence of ovastacin results in subfertility, since it is released during the cortical reaction after intrusion of a sperm cell and causes hardening of the zona pellucida of the extracellular matrix surrounding the egg. This provides rigidity and robustness to the resulting embryo until its implantation in the uterus (Stöcker et al., 2014; Körschgen et al., 2017). Ovastacin has the basic domain composition S-PRO-CD, which is followed by a disordered domain of unknown function. This domain stays connected with the oolemma after the release of the enzyme into the perivitelline space during the cortical reaction, which suggests a function in membrane anchoring and shedding of ovastacin (Körschgen et al., 2017). A similar function to ovastacin was reported for alveolin from the medaka fish Oryzias latipes, which likewise hardens the envelope of the fertilized egg (zygote) in bony fishes (Shibata et al., 2000).
In egg-laying vertebrates like fishes, amphibians, reptiles and birds, a specialized group of astacin MPs termed hatching enzymes has evolved (Nagasawa et al., 2022). They are absent from mammals and involved in the cleavage of the eggshell. They optionally contain an additional pair of cysteine residues in the N-terminal subdomain of their mature CDs compared to crayfish astacin, as well as extra C-terminal CUB domains (Figures 1, 5). Hatching enzymes are also present in egg-laying invertebrates, such as the crayfish A. astacus, which in addition to the prototypic digestive astacin archetype possesses the “Astacus embryonic astacin” (AEA_ASTAS in Figure 5; Supplementary Table S1; Geier and Zwilling, 1998). Finally, a reproductive astacin was also described from Drosophila seminal plasma (SEMP1_DROME; Figure 5; Supplementary Table S1). This MP is involved in a proteolytic cascade that triggers sperm capacitation and thus regulates fertility in the fruitfly (LaFlamme et al., 2012; LaFlamme and Wolfner, 2013; LaFlamme et al., 2014).
2.7 Astacins of helminths and cnidarians
The genome analysis of the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans uncovered 40 astacins termed “nematode astacins” (Möhrlen et al., 2003; Park et al., 2010). Moreover, in a comprehensive analysis of 154 helminth species of the phyla Nematoda and Platyhelminthes, many of them parasitic, an enormous radiation of astacins was also observed (Martín-Galiano and Sotillo, 2022). Most remarkable are the > 100 different additional domains that occur downstream of the CD in variable combinations, thus yielding an enormous functional versatility for these proteins. These domains do not only include protein-protein and protein-carbohydrate interacting domains, but also additional enzymatic functions, such as trypsin-like serine peptidases and hydroxylases.
Particularly striking are astacins containing “ShKT” domains, which mimic a toxin from the sea anemone Stychodactyla helianthus that blocks potassium channels (Castañeda et al., 1995). We found such ShKT-astacins in Nematoda (CAEEL, ONCVO, ANCCA and TRISP; see Figure 5; Table 1; Supplementary Table S1), Plathyhelminthes (SCHMD, ECHMU and SCHJA), Arthropoda (PENVA and DAPMA), Priapulida (PRICA), Bryozoa (BUGNE and LINUN), Mollusca (MYTCO) and Cnidaria (HYDVU, HYDEC, PODCA, NEMVE), as well as in the lower chordates sea squirt (HALRO and CIOIN) and lancelet (BRABE). In Figure 5, ShKT-astacins are labelled with pink branch tips (see Supplementary Table S1). These astacins are mostly expressed in epithelia forming barriers to the environment or in the digestive tract, which suggests functions in protection and defence, as well as preservation of the epithelial integrity (Park et al., 2010; Isolani et al., 2018). However, considering the parasitic lifestyle of many of the organisms harbouring ShKT-astacins, the combination of proteolytic and toxin domains may also challenge the respective host (Moran et al., 2013; Martín-Galiano and Sotillo, 2022). Similarly, toxicity has also been reported for astacins lacking ShKT domains from spider venoms (Trevisan-Silva et al., 2010), in which other proteins may take over the role of the latter domains in linking proteolytic activity with specific toxicity. This is reminiscent of the snake venom MPs from the adamalysin/ADAM family, for which forms spanning only the CD are not haemorrhagic while those encompassing further C-terminal disintegrin-like and cysteine-rich domains may be haemorrhagic (Fox and Serrano, 2009; Gomis-Rüth et al., 2013; Herrera et al., 2018). Finally, many ShKT-astacins carry additional CUB, EGF, MAM, etc. domains that may serve to modulate activity. Examples are the morphogenetically active Hydra vulgaris ShKT-proteins HMP1, HMP2 and HAS7 (Figure 5; Supplementary Table S1). While HMP1 is involved in head formation and head regeneration (Yan et al., 1995), HMP2 has a function in foot morphogenesis (Yan et al., 2000) and HAS7 specifically cleaves Hydra WNT3 during head morphogenesis and thereby restricts head organizer formation (Ziegler et al., 2021; Holstein, 2022).
2.8 New functions of astacins
A surprising function for an astacin peptidase was very recently reported for the sea star Asterias rubens, which underpins the enormous versatility of nature’s toolbox. In zoology textbooks [e.g., (Hickman et al., 2020)], the locomotion of Asteroidea on a surface is usually explained as the concerted action of a multitude of tiny sucking pods in the podia of the tube feet lining the oral face of the animal’s arms. However, pod attachment is apparently not based on suction but on a secreted glue consisting of adhesive matrix proteins that are left on the surface after detachment. The latter is mediated by an astacin MP spanning a CD and a CUB domain (CUB_ASTRU; see Figure 5; Supplementary Table S1), which is specifically secreted by de-adhesive gland cells and releases the adhesive material from the surface of the tube feet (Algrain et al., 2022).
3 Materials and methods
3.1 Database searches
Sequence searches were performed with the Psi-Blast program (Altschul and Koonin, 1998) within UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org) and GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) using standard parameters, as well as with the Ensembl genome browser (http://www.ensembl.org), within the Choanobase database (King, 2005) and the Merops database [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/merops; (Rawlings and Bateman, 2021)]. Literature searches for described astacins were performed with the keyword “astacin*” within PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), which retrieved 342 papers. Hits were manually curated.
3.2 Compilation of a dendrogram for holozoans
The currently available trees for holozoans in zoology textbooks such as (Hickman et al., 2020) present several discrepancies with models proposed by recent research publications (Cannon et al., 2016; Giribet et al., 2019; Laumer et al., 2019). These are based on massive sequence data generated in the last decade by increasingly affordable sequencing methods, first through the Illumina MiSeq platform and more recently through MinION sequencing (Santos et al., 2020), which are also partially applicable to natural history collections (Folk et al., 2021). As an example, phylum Chaetognatha was considered a separate clade at the same level as Spiralia and Ecdysozoa, while it is currently envisaged as a sister clade of Gnathifera within Spiralia (Kocot et al., 2017). Also setting phylum Porifera at the root of Metazoa contradicts recent models, which choose Ctenophora for this place (Giribet et al., 2019; Laumer et al., 2019). Finally, recent work proposed new models at the base of Holozoa, with Ichtyosporea and Corallochytrea/Pluriformea forming Teretosporea, which together with Filozoa give rise to Holozoa (Torruella et al., 2015; Arroyo et al., 2020). Accordingly, we assembled a dendrogram for holozoans based on consensus information extracted from these and other recent publications (Ryan et al., 2010; Ruggiero et al., 2015; Torruella et al., 2015; Cannon et al., 2016; Kocot et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2017; Sebé-Pedrós et al., 2017; Whelan et al., 2017; Adl et al., 2019; Giribet et al., 2019; Laumer et al., 2019; Marlétaz et al., 2019; Sogabe et al., 2019; Schoch et al., 2020; Schulze and Kawauchi, 2021).
3.3 Computation of alignments and phylogenetic trees
Amino-acid sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees were computed using the Seaview program (http://doua.prabi.fr/software/seaview) (Galtier et al., 1996; Gouy et al., 2010). Alignments were performed with Clustal Omega within Seaview (Sievers et al., 2011) using default parameters. Manual adjustment of the S1’ regions in Figure 4 was performed based on overlays of the X-ray crystal structures of crayfish astacin [Protein Data Bank (PDB) access codes 1AST, 1QJI] and zebrafish hatching enzyme 1 (PDB 3LQB). Phylogenetic trees were calculated with PhyML using the maximum likelihood approach as implemented in Seaview (Guindon et al., 2010). The BLOSUM62 scoring matrix was used and 100 bootstrap replications were computed in each case. Trees were represented with Figtree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk).
3.4 Computation of three-dimensional structural models
Precise and accurate computational models of specific astacin domains were obtained with the AlphaFold program (Jumper et al., 2021; Tunyasuvunakool et al., 2021). To this aim, the program was locally installed in a high-performance computing cluster operated with linux and the amino acid sequences were fed into the program, which was run employing standard parameters. Quality of the predicted models was monitored through the average predicted local distance difference test (pLDD1) value. Values exceeding 90% are considered to originate in high-accuracy models, while those above 80% correspond to generally correct models for the backbone (Tunyasuvunakool et al., 2021). The unique EGF-like domain of human BMP1 (residues 547–590, see UP P13497) was predicted as a generally correct model for the backbone given an average pLDD1 value of 82.5%. Moreover, the first CUB domain of human BMP1 (residues 321–434, see UP P13497) was predicted highly accurately (average pLDD1 = 91.5%). Three-dimensional structure figures were prepared using Chimera (Goddard et al., 2018).
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Author contributions
FXG-R and WS conceived and supervised the project, performed calculations and sequence searches, and wrote the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported in part by grants from Spanish and Catalan public and private bodies (grant/fellowship references PID2019-107725RG-I00 and PDC2022-133344-I00 by MICIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, 2017SGR3 and Fundació La Marató de TV3 201815).
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to I. Ruiz-Trillo and M. Leger from the Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF) for their assistance in identifying astacin sequences at the root of Holozoa.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2022.1080836/full#supplementary-material
References
Adl, S. M., Bass, D., Lane, C. E., Lukes, J., Schoch, C. L., Smirnov, A., et al. (2019). Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 66 (1), 4–119. doi:10.1111/jeu.12691
Algrain, M., Hennebert, E., Bertemes, P., Wattiez, R., Flammang, P., and Lengerer, B. (2022). In the footsteps of sea stars: Deciphering the catalogue of proteins involved in underwater temporary adhesion. Open Biol. 12 (8), 220103. doi:10.1098/rsob.220103
Altschul, S. F., and Koonin, E. V. (1998). Iterated profile searches with PSI-BLAST--a tool for discovery in protein databases. Trends biochem. Sci. 23 (11), 444–447. doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01298-5
AmbuAli, A., Monaghan, S. J., McLean, K., Inglis, N. F., Bekaert, M., Wehner, S., et al. (2020). Identification of proteins from the secretory/excretory products (SEPs) of the branchiuran ectoparasite Argulus foliaceus (Linnaeus, 1758) reveals unique secreted proteins amongst haematophagous ecdysozoa. Parasit. Vectors 13 (1), 88. doi:10.1186/s13071-020-3964-z
Aricescu, A. R., Hon, W. C., Siebold, C., Lu, W., van der Merwe, P. A., and Jones, E. Y. (2006). Molecular analysis of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase μ-mediated cell adhesion. EMBO J. 25 (4), 701–712. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600974
Arnold, P., Boll, I., Rothaug, M., Schumacher, N., Schmidt, F., Wichert, R., et al. (2017). Meprin metalloproteases generate biologically active soluble interleukin-6 receptor to induce trans-signaling. Sci. Rep. 7, 44053. doi:10.1038/srep44053
Arolas, J. L., Broder, C., Jefferson, T., Guevara, T., Sterchi, E. E., Bode, W., et al. (2012). Structural basis for the sheddase function of human meprin β metalloproteinase at the plasma membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (40), 16131–16136. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211076109
Arolas, J. L., Goulas, T., Cuppari, A., and Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2018). Multiple architectures and mechanisms of latency in metallopeptidase zymogens. Chem. Rev. 118 (11), 5581–5597. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00030
Arroyo, A. S., Iannes, R., Bapteste, E., and Ruiz-Trillo, I. (2020). Gene similarity networks unveil a potential novel unicellular group closely related to animals from the Tara Oceans Expedition. Genome Biol. Evol. 12 (9), 1664–1678. doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa117
Barnard, A.-C., Nijhof, A. M., Gaspar, A. R. M., Neitz, A. W. H., Jongejan, F., and Maritz-Olivier, C. (2012). Expression profiling, gene silencing and transcriptional networking of metzincin metalloproteases in the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Vet. Parasitol. 186 (3-4), 403–414. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.026
Baska, P., Wisniewski, M., Krzyzowska, M., Dlugosz, E., Zygner, W., Gorski, P., et al. (2013). Molecular cloning and characterisation of in vitro immune response against astacin-like metalloprotease Ace-MTP-2 from. Exp. Parasitol. 133 (4), 472–482. doi:10.1016/j.exppara.2013.01.006
Bayly-Jones, C., Lupton, C. J., Fritz, C., Venugopal, H., Ramsbeck, D., Wermann, M., et al. (2022). Helical ultrastructure of the metalloprotease meprin α in complex with a small molecule inhibitor. Nat. Commun. 13 (1), 6178. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33893-7
Becker-Pauly, C., Bruns, B. C., Damm, O., Schütte, A., Hammouti, K., Burmester, T., et al. (2009). News from an ancient world: Two novel astacin metalloproteases from the horseshoe crab. J. Mol. Biol. 385 (1), 236–248. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.062
Becker-Pauly, C., and Pietrzik, C. U. (2016). The metalloprotease meprin β is an alternative β-secretase of APP. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 9, 159. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2016.00159
Beckmann, G., and Bork, P. (1993). An adhesive domain detected in functionally diverse receptors. Trends biochem. Sci. 18 (2), 40–41. doi:10.1016/0968-0004(93)90049-s
Berman, J. J. (2019). “Chapter 5 – phylogeny: Eukaryotes to chordates,” in Evolution’s clinical guidebook – translating acient genes into precision medicine. Editor J. J. Berman (London (UK): Academic Press Elsevier). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-817126-4.00005-9
Bode, W., Gomis-Rüth, F. X., Huber, R., Zwilling, R., and Stöcker, W. (1992). Structure of astacin and implications for activation of astacins and zinc-ligation of collagenases. Nature 358, 164–167. doi:10.1038/358164a0
Bode, W., Gomis-Rüth, F. X., and Stöcker, W. (1993). Astacins, serralysins, snake venom and matrix metalloproteinases exhibit identical zinc-binding environments (HEXXHXXGXXH and Met-turn) and topologies and should be grouped into a common family, the ´metzincins´. FEBS Lett., 331, 134–140. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(93)80312-i
Bode, W., and Huber, R. (1986). “Crystal structure of pancreatic serine endopeptidases,” in Molecular and cellular basis of digestion. Editors P. Desnuelle, and H. Sjoström&O. Norén (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
Bond, J. S., and Beynon, R. J. (1995). The astacin family of metalloendopeptidases. Protein Sci. 4, 1247–1261. doi:10.1002/pro.5560040701
Bond, J. S. (2019). Proteases: History, discovery, and roles in health and disease. J. Biol. Chem. 294 (5), 1643–1651. doi:10.1074/jbc.TM118.004156
Borchert, N., Becker-Pauly, C., Wagner, A., Fischer, P., Stöcker, W., and Brattig, N. W. (2007). Identification and characterization of onchoastacin, an astacin-like metalloproteinase from the filaria Onchocerca volvulus. Microbes Infect. 9 (4), 498–506. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2007.01.007
Borges, M. H., Figueiredo, S. G., Leprevost, F. V., de Lima, M. E., Cordeiro, M. do N., Diniz, M. R., et al. (2016). Venomous extract protein profile of Brazilian tarantula Grammostola iheringi: Searching for potential biotechnological applications. J. Proteomics 136, 35–47. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2016.01.013
Bork, P., and Beckmann, G. (1993). The CUB domain. A widespread module in developmentally regulated proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 231 (2), 539–545. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1305
Bork, P., Downing, A. K., Kieffer, B., and Campbell, I. D. (1996). Structure and distribution of modules in extracellular proteins. Q. Rev. Biophys. 29 (2), 119–167. doi:10.1017/s0033583500005783
Burkart, A. D., Xiong, B., Baibakov, B., Jiménez-Movilla, M., and Dean, J. (2012). Ovastacin, a cortical granule protease, cleaves ZP2 in the zona pellucida to prevent polyspermy. J. Cell Biol. 197 (1), 37–44. doi:10.1083/jcb.201112094
Cannon, J. T., Vellutini, B. C., Smith, J., Ronquist, F., Jondelius, U., and Hejnol, A. (2016). Xenacoelomorpha is the sister group to Nephrozoa. Nature 530 (7588), 89–93. doi:10.1038/nature16520
Carr, M., Richter, D. J., Fozouni, P., Smith, T. J., Jeuck, A., Leadbeater, B. S. C., et al. (2017). A six-gene phylogeny provides new insights into choanoflagellate evolution. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 107, 166–178. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2016.10.011
Castañeda, O., Sotolongo, V., Amor, A. M., Stöcklin, R., Anderson, A. J., Harvey, A. L., et al. (1995). Characterization of a potassium channel toxin from the Caribbean Sea anemone Stichodactyla helianthus. Toxicon 33 (5), 603–613. doi:10.1016/0041-0101(95)00013-c
Cerdà-Costa, N., and Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2014). Architecture and function of metallopeptidase catalytic domains. Protein Sci. 23 (2), 123–144. doi:10.1002/pro.2400
Cho, H. K., Nam, B. H., Kong, H. J., Han, H. S., Hur, Y. B., Choi, T. J., et al. (2008). Identification of softness syndrome-associated candidate genes and DNA sequence variation in the sea squirt, Halocynthia roretzi. Mar. Biotechnol. 10 (4), 447–456. doi:10.1007/s10126-008-9084-y
Cismasiu, V. B., Denes, S. A., Reilander, H., Michel, H., and Szedlacsek, S. E. (2004). The MAM (meprin/A5-protein/PTPmu) domain is a homophilic binding site promoting the lateral dimerization of receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase mu. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (26), 26922–26931. doi:10.1074/jbc.M313115200
da Silveira, R. B., Wille, A. C., Chaim, O. M., Appel, M. H., Silva, D. T., Franco, C. R., et al. (2007). Identification, cloning, expression and functional characterization of an astacin-like metalloprotease toxin from Loxosceles intermedia (Brown spider) venom. Biochem. J. 406 (2), 355–363. doi:10.1042/BJ20070363
Davis, S. W., and Smith, W. C. (2002). Expression cloning in ascidians: Isolation of a novel member of the asctacin protease family. Dev. Genes Evol. 212 (2), 81–86. doi:10.1007/s00427-002-0211-x
de Maere, V., Vercauteren, I., Geldhof, P., Gevaert, K., Vercruysse, J., and Claerebout, E. (2005). Molecular analysis of astacin-like metalloproteases of Ostertagia ostertagi. Parasitology 130, 89–98. doi:10.1017/s0031182004006274
de Robertis, E. M. (2008). Evo-devo: Variations on ancestral themes. Cell 132 (2), 185–195. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.003
de Robertis, E. M., and Tejeda-Muñoz, N. (2022). Evo-Devo of Urbilateria and its larval forms. Dev. Biol. 487, 10–20. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2022.04.003
Diab, M. R., Ahmed, M. M., Hussein, E. H., and Mohammed, A. M. A. (2021). Isolation of the Astacin-like metalloprotease coding gene (astl) and assessment of its insecticidal activity towards Spodoptera littoralis and Sitophilus oryzae. Jordan J. Biol. Sci. 14 (4), 677–685. doi:10.54319/jjbs/140407
Diéguez-Uribeondo, J., and Söderhäll, K. (1993). Procambarus clarkii Girard as a vector for the crayfish plague fungus, Aphanomyces astaci Schikora. Aquac. Res. 24 (6), 761–765. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.1993.tb00655.x
Dumermuth, E., Sterchi, E. E., Jiang, W. P., Wolz, R. L., Bond, J. S., Flannery, A. V., et al. (1991). The astacin family of metalloendopeptidases. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 21381–21385. doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)54648-2
Eckhard, U., Körschgen, H., von Wiegen, N., Stöcker, W., and Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2021). The crystal structure of a 250-kDa heterotetrameric particle explains inhibition of sheddase meprin β by endogenous fetuin-B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118 (14), e2023839118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2023839118
Fabricius, J. C. (1796). Nomenclator entomologicus enumerans insecta omnia in J. C. Fabricii Entomologia Systematica emendata et aucta 1792. Manchester (UK): Impensis Nicholson.
Fairclough, S. R., Chen, Z., Kramer, E., Zeng, Q., Young, S., Robertson, H. M., et al. (2013). Premetazoan genome evolution and the regulation of cell differentiation in the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta. Genome Biol. 14 (2), R15. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-2-r15
Ferreira, A. H., Cristofoletti, P. T., Lorenzini, D. M., Guerra, L. O., Paiva, P. B., Briones, M. R., et al. (2007). Identification of midgut microvillar proteins from Tenebrio molitor and Spodoptera frugiperda by cDNA library screenings with antibodies. J. Insect Physiol. 53 (11), 1112–1124. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.06.007
Folk, R. A., Kates, H. R., LaFrance, R., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., and Guralnick, R. P. (2021). High-throughput methods for efficiently building massive phylogenies from natural history collections. Appl. Plant Sci. 9 (2), e11410. doi:10.1002/aps3.11410
Foradori, M. J., Tillinghast, E. K., Smith, J. S., Townley, M. A., and Mooney, R. E. (2006). Astacin family metallopeptidases and serine peptidase inhibitors in spider digestive fluid. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 143 (3), 257–268. doi:10.1016/j.cbpb.2005.08.012
Fox, J. W., and Serrano, S. M. (2009). Timeline of key events in snake venom metalloproteinase research. J. Proteomics 72 (2), 200–209. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2009.01.015
Freeman, R., Ikuta, T., Wu, M., Koyanagi, R., Kawashima, T., Tagawa, K., et al. (2012). Identical genomic organization of two hemichordate hox clusters. Curr. Biol. 22 (21), 2053–2058. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.052
Fuzita, F. J., Pinkse, M. W. H., Patane, J. S. L., Juliano, M. A., Verhaert, P. D. E. M., and Lopes, A. R. (2015). Biochemical, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of digestion in the scorpion Tityus serrulatus: Insights into function and evolution of digestion in an ancient arthropod. PLoS One 10 (4), e0123841. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123841
Fuzita, F. J., Pinkse, M. W. H., Verhaert, P. D. E. M., and Lopes, A. R. (2015). Cysteine cathepsins as digestive enzymes in the spider Nephilengys cruentata. Insect biochem. Mol. Biol. 60, 47–58. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2015.03.005
Galtier, N., Gouy, M., and Gautier, C. (1996). SEAVIEW and PHYLO_WIN: Two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12 (6), 543–548. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/12.6.543
Garcia-Ferrer, I., Arêde, P., Gómez-Blanco, J., Luque, D., Duquerroy, S., Castón, J. R., et al. (2015). Structural and functional insights into Escherichia coli α2-macroglobulin endopeptidase snap-trap inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 8290–8295. doi:10.1073/pnas.1506538112
Garrigue-Antar, L., Francois, V., and Kadler, K. E. (2004). Deletion of epidermal growth factor-like domains converts mammalian tolloid into a chordinase and effective procollagen C-proteinase. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (48), 49835–49841. doi:10.1074/jbc.M408134200
Ge, G., and Greenspan, D. S. (2006). Developmental roles of the BMP1/TLD metalloproteinases. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today 78 (1), 47–68. doi:10.1002/bdrc.20060
Geier, G., and Zwilling, R. (1998). Cloning and characterization of a cDNA coding for Astacus embryonic astacin, a member of the astacin family of metalloproteases from the crayfish Astacus astacus. Eur. J. Biochem. 253 (3), 796–803. doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2530796.x
Gerdol, M., Cervelli, M., Mariottini, P., Oliverio, M., Dutertre, S., and Modica, M. V. (2019). A recurrent motif: Diversity and evolution of ShKT domain containing proteins in the vampire snail Cumia reticulata. Toxins (Basel) 11 (2), 106. doi:10.3390/toxins11020106
Gindorf, M., Storck, S. E., Ohler, A., Scharfenberg, F., Becker-Pauly, C., and Pietrzik, C. U. (2021). Meprin β: A novel regulator of blood-brain barrier integrity. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 41 (1), 31–44. doi:10.1177/0271678X20905206
Giribet, G., and Edgecombe, G. D. (2019). “Perspectives in animal phylogeny and evolution,” in Perspectives on evolutionary and developmental biology essays for Alessandro Minelli. Editor G. Fusco (Padova (I: Padova University Press).
Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Meng, E. C., Pettersen, E. F., Couch, G. S., Morris, J. H., et al. (2018). UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27 (1), 14–25. doi:10.1002/pro.3235
Gómez Gallego, S., Loukas, A., Slade, R. W., Neva, F. A., Varatharajalu, R., Nutman, T. B., et al. (2005). Identification of an astacin-like metallo-proteinase transcript from the infective larvae of Strongyloides stercoralis. Parasitol. Int. 54 (2), 123–133. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2005.02.002
Gomis-Rüth, F. X., Botelho, T. O., and Bode, W. (2012). A standard orientation for metallopeptidases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1824, 157–163. doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.04.014
Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2009). Catalytic domain architecture of metzincin metalloproteases. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 15353–15357. doi:10.1074/jbc.R800069200
Gomis-Rüth, F. X., Stöcker, W., Huber, R., Zwilling, R., and Bode, W. (1993). Refined 1.8 Å X-ray crystal structure of astacin, a zinc-endopeptidase from the crayfish Astacus astacus L. Structure determination, refinement, molecular structure and comparison with thermolysin. J. Mol. Biol. 229 (4), 945–968. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1098
Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2003). Structural aspects of the metzincin clan of metalloendopeptidases. Mol. Biotechnol. 24, 157–202. doi:10.1385/MB:24:2:157
Gomis-Rüth, F. X., Trillo-Muyo, S., and Stöcker, W. (2012). Functional and structural insights into astacin metallopeptidases. Biol. Chem. 393, 1027–1041. doi:10.1515/hsz-2012-0149
Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2013). “Zinc adamalysins,” in Encyclopedia of metalloproteins. Editors V. N. Uversky, R. H. Kretsinger&E, and A. Permyakov (Heidelberg (Germany): Springer-Verlag).
González-Calvo, I., Cizeron, M., Bessereau, J. L., and Selimi, F. (2022). Synapse formation and function across species: Ancient roles for CCP, CUB, and TSP-1 structural domains. Front. Neurosci. 16, 866444. doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.866444
Goulas, T., Arolas, J. L., and Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2011). Structure, function and latency regulation of a bacterial enterotoxin potentially derived from a mammalian adamalysin/ADAM xenolog. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108 (5), 1856–1861. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012173108
Goulas, T., Garcia-Ferrer, I., Marrero, A., Marino-Puertas, L., Duquerroy, S., and Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2017). Structural and functional insight into pan-endopeptidase inhibition by α2-macroglobulins. Biol. Chem. 398, 975–994. doi:10.1515/hsz-2016-0329
Goulas, T., and Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2013). “Fragilysin,” in Handbook of proteolytic enzymes. Editors N. D. Rawlings&G, and S. Salvesen (Oxford, Great Britain: Academic Press).
Gouy, M., Guindon, S., and Gascuel, O. (2010). SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27 (2), 221–224. doi:10.1093/molbev/msp259
Grams, F., Dive, V., Yiotakis, A., Yiallouros, I., Vassiliou, S., Zwilling, R., et al. (1996). Structure of astacin with a transition-state analogue inhibitor. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 671–675. doi:10.1038/nsb0896-671
Grau-Bové, X., Torruella, G., Donachie, S., Suga, H., Leonard, G., Richards, T. A., et al. (2017). Dynamics of genomic innovation in the unicellular ancestry of animals. eLife 6, e26036. doi:10.7554/eLife.26036
Guevara, T., Rodríguez-Banqueri, A., Stöcker, W., Becker-Pauly, C., and Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2022). Zymogenic latency in a ∼250-million-year-old astacin metallopeptidase. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. 78, 1347–1357. doi:10.1107/S2059798322009688
Guevara, T., Yiallouros, I., Kappelhoff, R., Bissdorf, S., Stöcker, W., and Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2010). Proenzyme structure and activation of astacin metallopeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 285 (18), 13958–13965. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.097436
Guindon, S., Dufayard, J. F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., and Gascuel, O. (2010). New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59 (3), 307–321. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq010
Hartigan, A., Kosakyan, A., Peckova, H., Eszterbauer, E., and Holzer, A. S. (2020). Transcriptome of Sphaerospora molnari (Cnidaria, Myxosporea) blood stages provides proteolytic arsenal as potential therapeutic targets against sphaerosporosis in common carp. BMC Genomics 21 (1), 404. doi:10.1186/s12864-020-6705-y
Hernández-Elizárraga, V. H., Olguín-Lápez, N., Hernández-Matehuala, R., Ocharán-Mercado, A., Cruz-Hernández, A., Guevara-González, R. G., et al. (2019). Comparative analysis of the soluble proteome and the cytolytic activity of unbleached and bleached Millepora complanata ("Fire Coral") from the Mexican Caribbean. Mar. Drugs 17 (7), 393. doi:10.3390/md17070393
Herrera, C., Escalante, T., Rucavado, A., Fox, J. W., and Gutiérrez, J. M. (2018). Metalloproteinases in disease: Identification of biomarkers of tissue damage through proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 15 (12), 967–982. doi:10.1080/14789450.2018.1538800
Hewitson, J. P., Harcus, Y., Murray, J., van Agtmaal, M., Filbey, K. J., Grainger, J. R., et al. (2011). Proteomic analysis of secretory products from the model gastrointestinal nematode Heligmosomoides polygyrus reveals dominance of venom allergen-like (VAL) proteins. J. Proteomics 74 (9), 1573–1594. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2011.06.002
Hickman, C., Keen, S., Eisenhour, D., Larson, A., and l’Anson, H. (2020). Integrated principles of zoology. New York (USA): McGraw-Hill Education.
Hintze, V., Höwel, M., Wermter, C., Grosse Berkhoff, E., Becker-Pauly, C., Beermann, B., et al. (2006). The interaction of recombinant subdomains of the procollagen C-proteinase with procollagen I provides a quantitative explanation for functional differences between the two splice variants, mammalian tolloid and bone morphogenetic protein 1. Biochemistry 45 (21), 6741–6748. doi:10.1021/bi060228k
Holley, S. A., Neul, J. L., Attisano, L., Wrana, J. L., Sasai, Y., O'Connor, M. B., et al. (1996). The Xenopus dorsalizing factor noggin ventralizes Drosophila embryos by preventing DPP from activating its receptor. Cell 86 (4), 607–617. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80134-8
Holstein, T. W. (2022). The role of cnidarian developmental biology in unraveling axis formation and Wnt signaling. Dev. Biol. 487, 74–98. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2022.04.005
Hopkins, D. R., Keles, S., and Greenspan, D. S. (2007). The bone morphogenetic protein 1/Tolloid-like metalloproteinases. Matrix Biol. 26 (7), 508–523. doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2007.05.004
Huang, L., Wang, Z., Yu, N., Li, J., and Liu, Z. (2018). Toxin diversity revealed by the venom gland transcriptome of Pardosa pseudoannulata, a natural enemy of several insect pests. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D. Genomics Proteomics 28, 172–182. doi:10.1016/j.cbd.2018.09.002
Hunt, V. L., Tsai, I. J., Coghlan, A., Reid, A. J., Holroyd, N., Foth, B. J., et al. (2016). The genomic basis of parasitism in the Strongyloides clade of nematodes. Nat. Genet. 48 (3), 299–307. doi:10.1038/ng.3495
Isolani, M. E., Abril, J. F., Salo, E., Deri, P., Bianucci, A. M., and Batistoni, R. (2013). Planarians as a model to assess in vivo the role of matrix metalloproteinase genes during homeostasis and regeneration. PLoS ONE 8 (2), e55649. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055649
Isolani, M. E., Batistoni, R., Ippolito, C., Bianucci, A. M., Marracci, S., and Rossi, L. (2018). Astacin gene family of metalloproteinases in planarians: Structural organization and tissue distribution. Gene Expr. Patterns 28, 77–86. doi:10.1016/j.gep.2018.03.003
Jiang, W., and Bond, J. S. (1992). Families of metalloendopeptidases and their relationships. FEBS Lett. 312 (2-3), 110–114. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(92)80916-5
Jing, Y., Toubarro, D., Hao, Y., and Simoes, N. (2010). Cloning, characterisation and heterologous expression of an astacin metalloprotease, Sc-AST, from the entomoparasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 174 (2), 101–108. doi:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2010.07.004
Jochim, R. C., Teixeira, C. R., Laughinghouse, A., Mu, J., Oliveira, F., Gomes, R. B., et al. (2008). The midgut transcriptome of Lutzomyia longipalpis: Comparative analysis of cDNA libraries from sugar-fed, blood-fed, post-digested and Leishmania infantum chagasi-infected sand flies. BMC Genomics 9, 15. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-15
Judelson, H. S. (2017). Metabolic diversity and novelties in the oomycetes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 71, 21–39. doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093609
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., et al. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596 (7873), 583–589. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
Kang, C., Han, D. Y., Park, K. I., Pyo, M. J., Heo, Y., Lee, H., et al. (2014). Characterization and neutralization of Nemopilema nomurai (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae) jellyfish venom using polyclonal antibody. Toxicon 86, 116–125. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.04.005
Kanzawa, N., Ogawa, T., Asakura, M., Okiyama, K., Honda, M., and Tsuchiya, T. (2008). Comparative expression and tissue distribution analyses of astacin-like squid metalloprotease in squid and cuttlefish. Zool. Sci. 25 (1), 14–21. doi:10.2108/zsj.25.14
Kanzawa, N., Tatewaki, S., Watanabe, R., Kunihisa, I., Iwahashi, H., Nakamura, K., et al. (2005). Expression and tissue distribution of astacin-like squid metalloprotease (ALSM). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 142 (2), 153–163. doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2005.05.018
Karmilin, K., Schmitz, C., Kuske, M., Körschgen, H., Olf, M., Meyer, K., et al. (2019). Mammalian plasma fetuin-B is a selective inhibitor of ovastacin and meprin metalloproteinases. Sci. Rep. 9, 546. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37024-5
Keeling, P. J., and Palmer, J. D. (2008). Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9 (8), 605–618. doi:10.1038/nrg2386
Kessler, E., Takahara, K., Biniaminov, L., Brusel, M., and Greenspan, D. S. (1996). Bone morphogenetic protein-1: the type I procollagen C-proteinase. Science 271, 360–362. doi:10.1126/science.271.5247.360
Khamtorn, P., Rungsa, P., Jangpromma, N., Klaynongsruang, S., Daduang, J., Tessiri, T., et al. (2020). Partial proteomic analysis of Brown widow spider (Latrodectus geometricus) venom to determine the biological activities. Toxicon. X 8, 100062. doi:10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100062
King, N., Westbrook, M. J., Young, S. L., Kuo, A., Abedin, M., Chapman, J., et al. (2008). The genome of the choanoflagellate Monosiga brevicollis and the origin of metazoans. Nature 451 (7180), 783–788. doi:10.1038/nature06617
Kocot, K. M., Struck, T. H., Merkel, J., Waits, D. S., Todt, C., Brannock, P. M., et al. (2017). Phylogenomics of Lophotrochozoa with consideration of systematic error. Syst. Biol. 66 (2), 256–282. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syw079
Koonin, E. V., Makarova, K. S., and Aravind, L. (2001). Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes: Quantification and classification. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55, 709–742. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.709
Körschgen, H., Kuske, M., Karmilin, K., Yiallouros, I., Balbach, M., Floehr, J., et al. (2017). Intracellular activation of ovastacin mediates pre-fertilization hardening of the zona pellucida. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 23 (9), 607–616. doi:10.1093/molehr/gax040
Kumar, P., Kannan, M., ArunPrasanna, V., Vaseeharan, B., and Vijayakumar, S. (2018). Proteomics analysis of crude squid ink isolated from Sepia esculenta for their antimicrobial, antibiofilm and cytotoxic properties. Microb. Pathog. 116, 345–350. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.01.039
LaFlamme, B. A., Avila, F. W., Michalski, K., and Wolfner, M. F. (2014). A Drosophila protease cascade member, seminal metalloprotease-1, is activated stepwise by male factors and requires female factors for full activity. Genetics 196 (4), 1117–1129. doi:10.1534/genetics.113.160101
LaFlamme, B. A., Ram, K. R., and Wolfner, M. F. (2012). The Drosophila melanogaster seminal fluid protease "seminase" regulates proteolytic and post-mating reproductive processes. PLoS Genet. 8 (1), e1002435. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002435
LaFlamme, B. A., and Wolfner, M. F. (2013). Identification and function of proteolysis regulators in seminal fluid. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 80 (2), 80–101. doi:10.1002/mrd.22130
Laumer, C. E., Fernández, R., Lemer, S., Combosch, D., Kocot, K. M., Riesgo, A., et al. (2019). Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla. Proc. Biol. Sci. 286, 20190831. doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.0831
Lepage, T., Ghiglione, C., and Gache, C. (1992). Spatial and temporal expression pattern during sea urchin embryogenesis of a gene coding for a protease homologous to the human protein BMP-1 and to the product of the Drosophila dorsal-ventral patterning gene tolloid. Development 114 (1), 147–163. doi:10.1242/dev.114.1.147
Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema nature per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis synonymis, locis. Stockholm, Sweden): Laurentius Salvius, Holmiae.
Liu, G., Zhou, Y., Liu, D., Wang, Q., Ruan, Z., He, Q., et al. (2015). Global transcriptome analysis of the tentacle of the jellyfish Cyanea capillata using deep sequencing and expressed sequence tags: Insight into the toxin- and degenerative disease-related transcripts. PLoS One 10 (11), e0142680. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142680
Liu, Q. R., Hattar, S., Endo, S., MacPhee, K., Zhang, H., Cleary, L. J., et al. (1997). A developmental gene (Tolloid/BMP-1) is regulated in Aplysia neurons by treatments that induce long-term sensitization. J. Neurosci. 17 (2), 755–764. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-02-00755.1997
Lu, F. H., Tang, S. M., Shen, X. J., Wang, N., Zhao, Q. L., Zhang, G. Z., et al. (2010). Molecular cloning and characterization of hatching enzyme-like gene in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Mol. Biol. Rep. 37 (3), 1175–1182. doi:10.1007/s11033-009-9483-9
Lu, T.-M., Kanda, M., Satoh, N., and Furuya, H. (2017). The phylogenetic position of dicyemid mesozoans offers insights into spiralian evolution. Zool. Lett. 3, 6. doi:10.1186/s40851-017-0068-5
Lun, H. M., Mak, C. H., and Ko, R. C. (2003). Characterization and cloning of metallo-proteinase in the excretory/secretory products of the infective-stage larva of Trichinella spiralis. Parasitol. Res. 90 (1), 27–37. doi:10.1007/s00436-002-0815-0
Luque, D., Goulas, T., Mata, C. P., Mendes, S. R., Gomis-Rüth, F. X., and Castón, J. R. (2022). Cryo-EM structures show the mechanistic basis of pan-peptidase inhibition by human α2-macroglobulin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119 (19), e2200102119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2200102119
Marlétaz, F., Peijnenburg, K. T. C. A., Goto, T., Satoh, N., and Rokhsar, D. S. (2019). A new spiralian phylogeny places the enigmatic arrow worms among Gnathiferans. Curr. Biol. 29 (2), 312e3–318. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.042
Marrero, A., Duquerroy, S., Trapani, S., Goulas, T., Guevara, T., Andersen, G. R., et al. (2012). The crystal structure of human α2-macroglobulin reveals a unique molecular cage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 3340–3344. doi:10.1002/anie.201108015
Martín-Galiano, A. J., and Sotillo, J. (2022). Insights into the functional expansion of the astacin peptidase family in parasitic helminths. Int. J. Parasitol. 52 (4), 243–251. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2021.09.001
Mashanov, V. S., Zueva, O. R., and García-Arraras, J. E. (2012). Expression of Wnt9, TCTP, and Bmp1/Tll in sea cucumber visceral regeneration. Gene Expr. Patterns 12 (1-2), 24–35. doi:10.1016/j.gep.2011.10.003
Medina-Santos, R., Guerra-Duarte, C., de Almeida Lima, S., Costal-Oliveira, F., Alves de Aquino, P., Oliveira do Carmo, A., et al. (2019). Diversity of astacin-like metalloproteases identified by transcriptomic analysis in Peruvian Loxosceles laeta spider venom and in vitro activity characterization. Biochimie 167, 81–92. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2019.08.017
Mistry, J., Chuguransky, S., Williams, L., Qureshi, M., Salazar, G. A., Sonnhammer, E. L. L., et al. (2021). Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49 (D1), D412–D419. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa913
Möhrlen, F., Hutter, H., and Zwilling, R. (2003). The astacin protein family in Caenorhabditis elegans. Eur. J. Biochem. 270 (24), 49093891–49094920. doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03891.x
Möhrlen, F., Maniura, M., Plickert, G., Frohme, M., and Frank, U. (2006). Evolution of astacin-like metalloproteases in animals and their function in development. Evol. Dev. 8 (2), 223–231. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.00092.x
Moran, Y., Praher, D., Schlesinger, A., Ayalon, A., Tal, Y., and Technau, U. (2013). Analysis of soluble protein contents from the nematocysts of a model sea anemone sheds light on venom evolution. Mar. Biotechnol. 15 (3), 329–339. doi:10.1007/s10126-012-9491-y
Nagasawa, T., Kawaguchi, M., Nishi, K., and Yasumasu, S. (2022). Molecular evolution of hatching enzymes and their paralogous genes in vertebrates. BMC Ecol. Evol. 22 (1), 9. doi:10.1186/s12862-022-01966-2
Nguyen, T., Jamal, J., Shimell, M. J., Arora, K., and O'Connor, M. B. (1994). Characterization of tolloid-related-1: A BMP-1-like product that is required during larval and pupal stages of Drosophila development. Dev. Biol. 166 (2), 569–586. doi:10.1006/dbio.1994.1338
Pan, T.-L., Gröger, H., Schmid, V., and Spring, J. (1998). A toxin homology domain in an astacin-like metalloproteinase of the jellyfish Podocoryne carnea with a dual role in digestion and development. Dev. Genes Evol. 208, 259–266. doi:10.1007/s004270050180
Pang, K., Ryan, J. F., Baxevanis, A. D., and Martindale, M. Q. (2011). Evolution of the TGF-β signaling pathway and its potential role in the ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi. PLoS One 6 (9), e24152. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024152
Park, H. H. (2018). Structure of TRAF family: Current understanding of receptor recognition. Front. Immunol. 9, 1999. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01999
Park, J.-O., Pan, J., Möhrlen, F., Schupp, M.-O., Johnsen, R., Baillie, D. L., et al. (2010). Characterization of the astacin family of metalloproteases in C. elegans. BMC Dev. Biol. 10, 14. doi:10.1186/1471-213X-10-14
Pfleiderer, G., Zwilng, R., and Sonneborn, H. H. (1967). On the evolution of endopeptidases, 3. A protease of molecular weight 11, 000 and a trypsin-like fraction from Astacus fluviatilis fabr. Hoppe. Seylers. Z. Physiol. Chem. 348 (10), 1319–1331.
Prosdocimi, F., Bittencourt, D., da Silva, F. R., Kirst, M., Motta, P. C., and Rech, E. L. (2011). Spinning gland transcriptomics from two main clades of spiders (order: Araneae)--insights on their molecular, anatomical and behavioral evolution. PLoS One 6 (6), e21634. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021634
Quesada, V., Ordoñez, G. R., Sánchez, L. M., Puente, X. S., and López-Otn, C. (2009). The degradome database: Mammalian proteases and diseases of proteolysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D239–D243. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn570
Ran, T., Li, W., Sun, B., Xu, M., Qiu, S., Xu, D. Q., et al. (2020). Crystal structure of mature myroilysin and implication for its activation mechanism. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 156, 1556–1564. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.205
Ranjit, N., Jones, M. K., Stenzel, D. J., Gasser, R. B., and Loukas, A. (2006). A survey of the intestinal transcriptomes of the hookworms, Necator americanus and Ancylostoma caninum, using tissues isolated by laser microdissection microscopy. Int. J. Parasitol. 36 (6), 701–710. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.01.015
Rawlings, N. D., and Bateman, A. (2021). How to use the MEROPS database and website to help understand peptidase specificity. Protein Sci. 30 (1), 83–92. doi:10.1002/pro.3948
Reynolds, S. D., Angerer, L. M., Palis, J., Nasir, A., and Angerer, R. C. (1992). Early mRNAs, spatially restricted along the animal-vegetal axis of sea urchin embryos, include one encoding a protein related to tolloid and BMP-1. Development 114 (3), 769–786. doi:10.1242/dev.114.3.769
Riehle, M. A., Garczynski, S. F., Crim, J. W., Hill, C. A., and Brown, M. R. (2002). Neuropeptides and peptide hormones in Anopheles gambiae. Science 298 (5591), 172–175. doi:10.1126/science.1076827
Roberts, S., Goetz, G., White, S., and Goetz, F. (2009). Analysis of genes isolated from plated hemocytes of the Pacific oyster, Crassostreas gigas. Mar. Biotechnol. 11 (1), 24–44. doi:10.1007/s10126-008-9117-6
Rosenblum, G., Meroueh, S., Toth, M., Fisher, J. F., Fridman, R., Mobashery, S., et al. (2007). Molecular structures and dynamics of the stepwise activation mechanism of a matrix metalloproteinase zymogen: Challenging the cysteine switch dogma. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (44), 13566–13574. doi:10.1021/ja073941l
Ruggiero, M. A., Gordon, D. P., Orrell, T. M., Bailly, N., Bourgoin, T., Brusca, R. C., et al. (2015). A higher level classification of all living organisms. PLoS One 10 (4), e0119248. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119248
Ryan, J. F., Pang, K., Program, N. C. S., Mullikin, J. C., Martindale, M. Q., and Baxevanis, A. D. (2010). The homeodomain complement of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi suggests that Ctenophora and Porifera diverged prior to the ParaHoxozoa. Evodevo 1 (1), 9. doi:10.1186/2041-9139-1-9
Saina, M., Genikhovich, G., Renfer, E., and Technau, U. (2009). BMPs and chordin regulate patterning of the directive axis in a sea anemone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (44), 18592–18597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900151106
Santos, A., van Aerle, R., Barrientos, L., and Martínez-Urtaza, J. (2020). Computational methods for 16S metabarcoding studies using Nanopore sequencing data. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18, 296–305. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.01.005
Sarras, M. P., Yan, L., Leontovich, A., and Zhang, J. S. (2002). Structure, expression, and developmental function of early divergent forms of metalloproteinases in hydra. Cell Res. 12 (3-4), 163–176. doi:10.1038/sj.cr.7290123
Sato, S. M., and Sargent, T. D. (1990). Molecular approach to dorsoanterior development in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 137, 135–141. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(90)90014-a
Schechter, I., and Berger, A. (1967). On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. 1967. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 27, 497–502. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.08.015
Schoch, C. L., Ciufo, S., Domrachev, M., Hotton, C. L., Kannan, S., Khovanskaya, R., et al. (2020). NCBI taxonomy: A comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database 2020, baaa062–21. doi:10.1093/database/baaa062
Schulze, A. J., and Kawauchi, G. Y. (2021). How many sipunculan species are hiding in our oceans? Diversity 13 (2), 43. doi:10.3390/d13020043
Schwerin, S., Zeis, B., Lamkemeyer, T., Paul, R. J., Koch, M., Madlung, J., et al. (2009). Acclimatory responses of the Daphnia pulex proteome to environmental changes. II. Chronic exposure to different temperatures (10 and 20ºC) mainly affects protein metabolism. BMC Physiol. 9, 8. doi:10.1186/1472-6793-9-8
Sebé-Pedrós, A., Degnan, B. M., and Ruiz-Trillo, I. (2017). The origin of Metazoa: A unicellular perspective. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18 (8), 498–512. doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.21
Semenova, S. A., Rudenskaya, G. N., Rebrikov, D. V., and Isaev, V. A. (2006). cDNA cloning, purification and properties of Paralithodes camtschatica metalloprotease. Protein Pept. Lett. 13 (6), 571–575. doi:10.2174/092986606777145887
Shibata, Y., Iwamatsu, T., Oba, Y., Kobayashi, D., Tanaka, M., Nagahama, Y., et al. (2000). Identification and cDNA cloning of alveolin, an extracellular metalloproteinase, which induces chorion hardening of medaka (Oryzias latipes) eggs upon fertilization. J. Biol. Chem. 275 (12), 8349–8354. doi:10.1074/jbc.275.12.8349
Shimell, M. J., Ferguson, E. L., Childs, S. R., and O'Connor, M. B. (1991). The Drosophila dorsal-ventral patterning gene tolloid is related to human bone morphogenetic protein 1. Cell 67, 469–481. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90522-Z
Sieron, A. L., Tretiakova, A., Jameson, B. A., Segall, M. L., Lund-Katz, S., Khan, M. T., et al. (2000). Structure and function of procollagen C-proteinase (mTolloid) domains determined by protease digestion, circular dichroism, binding to procollagen type I, and computer modeling. Biochemistry 39 (12), 3231–3239. doi:10.1021/bi992312o
Sievers, F., Wilm, A., Dineen, D., Gibson, T. J., Karplus, K., Li, W., et al. (2011). Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539. doi:10.1038/msb.2011.75
Soblik, H., Younis, A. E., Mitreva, M., Renard, B. Y., Kirchner, M., Geisinger, F., et al. (2011). Life cycle stage-resolved proteomic analysis of the excretome/secretome from Strongyloides ratti--identification of stage-specific proteases. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10 (12), M111.010157010157. doi:10.1074/mcp.M111.010157
Sogabe, S., Hatleberg, W. L., Kocot, K. M., Say, T. E., Stoupin, D., Roper, K. E., et al. (2019). Pluripotency and the origin of animal multicellularity. Nature 570 (7762), 519–522. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1290-4
Sonenshine, D. E., Bissinger, B. W., Egekwu, N., Donohue, K. V., Khalil, S. M., and Roe, R. M. (2011). First transcriptome of the testis-vas deferens-male accessory gland and proteome of the spermatophore from Dermacentor variabilis (Acari: Ixodidae). PLoS One 6 (9), e24711. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024711
Sotillo, J., Sánchez-Flores, A., Cantacessi, C., Harcus, Y., Pickering, D., Bouchery, T., et al. (2014). Secreted proteomes of different developmental stages of the gastrointestinal nematode Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13 (10), 2736–2751. doi:10.1074/mcp.M114.038950
Springman, E. B., Angleton, E. L., Birkedal-Hansen, H., and Van Wart, H. E. (1990). Multiple modes of activation of latent human fibroblast collagenase : Evidence for the role of a Cys73 active-site zinc complex in latency and a "cysteine switch" mechanism for activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 364–368. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.1.364
Stepek, G., McCormack, G., Birnie, A. J., and Page, A. P. (2011). The astacin metalloprotease moulting enzyme NAS-36 is required for normal cuticle ecdysis in free-living and parasitic nematodes. Parasitology 138 (2), 237–248. doi:10.1017/S0031182010001113
Stepek, G., McCormack, G., and Page, A. P. (2010). Collagen processing and cuticle formation is catalysed by the astacin metalloprotease DPY-31 in free-living and parasitic nematodes. Int. J. Parasitol. 40 (5), 533–542. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.10.007
Stepek, G., McCormack, G., Winter, A. D., and Page, A. P. (2015). A highly conserved, inhibitable astacin metalloprotease from Teladorsagia circumcincta is required for cuticle formation and nematode development. Int. J. Parasitol. 45 (5), 345–355. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2015.01.004
Sterchi, E. E. (2008). Special issue: Metzincin metalloproteinases. Mol. Asp. Med. 29 (5), 255–257. doi:10.1016/j.mam.2008.08.007
Sterchi, E. E., Stöcker, W., and Bond, J. S. (2008). Meprins, membrane-bound and secreted astacin metalloproteinases. Mol. Asp. Med. 29, 309–328. doi:10.1016/j.mam.2008.08.002
Stöcker, W., and Bode, W. (1995). Structural features of a superfamily of zinc-endopeptidases: The metzincins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5 (3), 383–390. doi:10.1016/0959-440x(95)80101-4
Stöcker, W., and Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2013). “Astacins: Proteases in development and tissue differentiation,” in Proteases: Structure and function. Editor K. Brix&W. Stöcker (Vienna, Austria: Springer-Verlag). doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0885-7
Stöcker, W., Gomis-Rüth, F. X., Bode, W., and Zwilling, R. (1993). Implications of the three-dimensional structure of astacin for the structure and function of the astacin-family of zinc-endopeptidases. Eur. J. Biochem. 214, 215–231. doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17915.x
Stöcker, W., Karmilin, K., Hildebrand, A., Westphal, H., Yiallouros, I., Weiskirchen, R., et al. (2014). Mammalian gamete fusion depends on the inhibition of ovastacin by fetuin-B. Biol. Chem. 395 (10), 1195–1199. doi:10.1515/hsz-2014-0189
Stöcker, W., Ng, M., and Auld, D. S. (1990). Fluorescent oligopeptide substrates for kinetic characterization of the specificity of Astacus protease. Biochemistry 29, 10418–10425. doi:10.1021/bi00497a018
Stöcker, W., and Yiallouros, I. (2013). “Chapter 188 - astacin,” in Handbook of proteolytic enzymes. Editors N. D. Rawlings&G, and S. Salvesen (Oxford: Academic Press). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-382219-2.00188-5
Tallant, C., García-Castellanos, R., Baumann, U., and Gomis-Rüth, F. X. (2010). On the relevance of the Met-turn methionine in metzincins. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 13951–13957. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.083378
Tang, S. M., Ding, L. P., Shen, X. J., Wu, J., Lu, F. H., Zhou, Q. M., et al. (2011). Full-length cDNA cloning and expression characteristic analysis of hatching enzyme-like gene in the Chinese oak silkworm. Antheraea Pernyi. Sci. Seric. 27, 1000–1007.
Tang, S. M., Zhao, X. H., Wu, J., Qiu, Z. Y., and Shen, X. J. (2011). Cloning and bioinformatics analysis of hatching enzyme gene in Chinese wild silkworm (Bombyx mandarina). Acta agri. Jiangxi 23, 1–5.
Tarentino, A. L., Quinones, G., Grimwood, B. G., Hauer, C. R., and Plummer, T. H. (1995). Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of flavastacin: An O-glycosylated prokaryotic zinc metalloendopeptidase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 319 (1), 281–285. doi:10.1006/abbi.1995.1293
Toprak, U., Erlandson, M., Baldwin, D., Karcz, S., Wan, L., Coutu, C., et al. (2016). Identification of the Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) peritrophic matrix proteins and enzymes involved in peritrophic matrix chitin metabolism. Insect Sci. 23 (5), 656–674. doi:10.1111/1744-7917.12225
Torruella, G., de Mendoza, A., Grau-Bové, X., Antó, M., Chaplin, M. A., del Campo, J., et al. (2015). Phylogenomics reveals convergent evolution of lifestyles in close relatives of animals and fungi. Curr. Biol. 25 (18), 2404–2410. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.053
Trevisan-Silva, D., Gremski, L. H., Chaim, O. M., da Silveira, R. B., Meissner, G. O., Mangili, O. C., et al. (2010). Astacin-like metalloproteases are a gene family of toxins present in the venom of different species of the Brown spider (genus Loxosceles). Biochimie 92 (1), 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2009.10.003
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Zidek, A., et al. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome. Nature 596 (7873), 590–596. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1
Varatharajalu, R., Parandaman, V., Ndao, M., Andersen, J. F., and Neva, F. A. (2011). Strongyloides stercoralis excretory/secretory protein strongylastacin specifically recognized by IgE antibodies in infected human sera. Microbiol. Immunol. 55 (2), 115–122. doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2010.00289.x
Wagner, W., Möhrlen, F., and Schnetter, W. (2002). Characterization of the proteolytic enzymes in the midgut of the European Cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Insect biochem. Mol. Biol. 32 (7), 803–814. doi:10.1016/s0965-1748(01)00167-9
Walter, A., Bechsgaard, J., Scavenius, C., Dyrlund, T. S., Sanggaard, K. W., Enghild, J. J., et al. (2017). Characterisation of protein families in spider digestive fluids and their role in extra-oral digestion. BMC Genomics 18 (1), 600. doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3987-9
Wermter, C., Höwel, M., Hintze, V., Bombosch, B., Aufenvenne, K., Yiallouros, I., et al. (2007). The protease domain of procollagen C-proteinase (BMP1) lacks substrate selectivity, which is conferred by non-proteolytic domains. Biol. Chem. 388 (5), 513–521. doi:10.1515/BC.2007.054
Werny, L., Colmorgen, C., and Becker-Pauly, C. (2022). Regulation of meprin metalloproteases in mucosal homeostasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Cell Res. 1869 (1), 119158. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.119158
Whelan, N. V., Kocot, K. M., Moroz, T. P., Mukherjee, K., Williams, P., Paulay, G., et al. (2017). Ctenophore relationships and their placement as the sister group to all other animals. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1 (11), 1737–1746. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0331-3
Williamson, A. L., Lustigman, S., Oksov, Y., Deumic, V., Plieskatt, J., Mendez, S., et al. (2006). Ancylostoma caninum MTP-1, an astacin-like metalloprotease secreted by infective hookworm larvae, is involved in tissue migration. Infect. Immun. 74 (2), 961–967. doi:10.1128/IAI.74.2.961-967.2006
Wong, S. G., and Dessen, A. (2014). Structure of a bacterial α2-macroglobulin reveals mimicry of eukaryotic innate immunity. Nat. Commun. 5, 4917. doi:10.1038/ncomms5917
Wouters, M. A., Rigoutsos, I., Chu, C. K., Feng, L. L., Sparrow, D. B., and Dunwoodie, S. L. (2005). Evolution of distinct EGF domains with specific functions. Protein Sci. 14 (4), 1091–1103. doi:10.1110/ps.041207005
Wozney, J. M., Rosen, V., Celeste, A. J., Mitsock, L. M., Whitters, M. J., Kriz, R. W., et al. (1988). Novel regulators of bone formation : Molecular clones and activities. Science 242, 1528–1534. doi:10.1126/science.3201241
Xiong, X., Chen, L., Li, Y., Xie, L., and Zhang, R. (2006). Pf-ALMP, a novel astacin-like metalloproteinase with cysteine arrays, is abundant in hemocytes of pearl oyster Pinctada fucata. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1759 (11-12), 526–534. doi:10.1016/j.bbaexp.2006.09.006
Xu, D., Zhou, J., Lou, X., He, J., Ran, T., and Wang, W. (2017). Myroilysin Is a new bacterial member of the M12A family of metzincin metallopeptidases and is activated by a cysteine switch mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 292 (13), 5195–5206. doi:10.1074/jbc.M116.758110
Yan, J., Cheng, Q., Li, C. B., and Aksoy, S. (2002). Molecular characterization of three gut genes from Glossina morsitans morsitans: Cathepsin B, zinc-metalloprotease and zinc-carboxypeptidase. Insect Mol. Biol. 11 (1), 57–65. doi:10.1046/j.0962-1075.2001.00308.x
Yan, L., Fei, K., Zhang, J., Dexter, S., and Sarras, M. P. (2000). Identification and characterization of hydra metalloproteinase 2 (HMP2): A meprin-like astacin metalloproteinase that functions in foot morphogenesis. Development 127 (1), 129–141. doi:10.1242/dev.127.1.129
Yan, L., Pollock, G. H., Nagase, H., and Sarras, M. P. (1995). A 25.7 x 103 Mr hydra metalloproteinase (HMP1), a member of the astacin family, localizes to the extracellular matrix of Hydra vulgaris in a head-specific manner and has a developmental function. Development 121, 1591–1602. doi:10.1242/dev.121.6.1591
Yang, S., and Wu, X. (2009). Tolliod-like gene in Crassostrea ariakensis: Molecular cloning, structural characterization and expression by RLO stimulation. Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 27 (2), 130–135. doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2008.11.020
Yelland, T., and Djordjevic, S. (2016). Crystal structure of the neuropilin-1 MAM domain: Completing the neuropilin-1 ectodomain picture. Structure 24 (11), 2008–2015. doi:10.1016/j.str.2016.08.017
Yiallouros, I., Grosse-Berkhoff, E., and Stöcker, W. (2000). The roles of Glu93 and Tyr149 in astacin-like zinc peptidases. FEBS Lett. 484, 224–228. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02163-3
Yokozawa, Y., Tamai, H., Tatewaki, S., Tajima, T., Tsuchiya, T., and Kanzawa, N. (2002). Cloning and biochemical characterization of astacin-like squid metalloprotease. J. Biochem. 132 (5), 751–758. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003283
Yoshida, A., Nagayasu, E., Nishimaki, A., Sawaguchi, A., Yanagawa, S., and Maruyama, H. (2011). Transcripts analysis of infective larvae of an intestinal nematode, Strongyloides venezuelensis. Parasitol. Int. 60 (1), 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2010.10.007
Young, A. R., Mancuso, N., Meeusen, E. N. T., and Bowles, V. M. (2000). Characterisation of proteases involved in egg hatching of the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Int. J. Parasitol. 30 (8), 925–932. doi:10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00073-4
Yu, D., Ji, C., Zhao, J., and Wu, H. (2016). Proteomic and metabolomic analysis on the toxicological effects of as (III) and as (V) in juvenile mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Chemosphere 150, 194–201. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.113
Zapata, J. M., Pawlowski, K., Haas, E., Ware, C. F., Godzik, A., and Reed, J. C. (2001). A diverse family of proteins containing tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor domains. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (26), 24242–24252. doi:10.1074/jbc.M100354200
Ziegler, B., Yiallouros, I., Trageser, B., Kumar, S., Mercker, M., Kling, S., et al. (2021). The Wnt-specific astacin proteinase HAS-7 restricts head organizer formation in Hydra. BMC Biol. 19 (1), 120. doi:10.1186/s12915-021-01046-9
Zobel-Thropp, P. A., Correa, S. M., Garb, J. E., and Binford, G. J. (2014). Spit and venom from scytodes spiders: A diverse and distinct cocktail. J. Proteome Res. 13 (2), 817–835. doi:10.1021/pr400875s
Zobel-Thropp, P. A., Mullins, J., Kristensen, C., Kronmiller, B. A., David, C. L., Breci, L. A., et al. (2019). Not so dangerous after all? Venom composition and potency of the pholcid (daddy long-leg) spider Physocyclus mexicanus. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 256. doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00256
Zobel-Thropp, P. A., Thomas, E. Z., David, C. L., Breci, L. A., and Binford, G. J. (2014). Plectreurys tristis venome: A proteomic and transcriptomic analysis. J. Venom. Res. 5, 33–47.
Keywords: evolution of metallopeptidases, catalytic domain (CD), darwinian descent, horizontal gene transfer (HGT), phylogeny of enzymes
Citation: Gomis-Rüth FX and Stöcker W (2023) Structural and evolutionary insights into astacin metallopeptidases. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9:1080836. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1080836
Received: 26 October 2022; Accepted: 30 November 2022;
Published: 04 January 2023.
Edited by:
Salvatore Santamaria, University of Surrey, United KingdomReviewed by:
Ana Crnkovic, National Institute of Chemistry, SloveniaRajan Sankaranarayanan, Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology (CCMB), India
Copyright © 2023 Gomis-Rüth and Stöcker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: F. Xavier Gomis-Rüth, fxgr@ibmb.csic.es; Walter Stöcker, stoecker@uni-mainz.de