- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China
- 2Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, DongGuan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, China
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, China
- 5Department of Oncology and Hematology, The Six People’s Hospital of Huizhou City, Huiyang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Huizhou, China
Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death globally. Hypoxia can suppress the activation of the tumor microenvironment (TME), which contributes to distant metastasis. However, the role of hypoxia-mediated TME in predicting the diagnosis and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients remains unclear.
Methods: Both RNA and clinical data from the LUAD cohort were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to further screen prognosis-related hypoxia gene clusters. Time-dependent receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves were established to evaluate the predictive sensitivity and specificity of the hypoxia-related risk signature. The characterization of gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and TME immune cell infiltration were further explored to identify hypoxia-related immune infiltration.
Results: Eight hypoxia-related genes (LDHA, DCN, PGK1, PFKP, FBP1, LOX, ENO3, and CXCR4) were identified and established to construct a hypoxia-related risk signature. The high-risk group showed a poor overall survival compared to that of the low-risk group in the TCGA and GSE68465 cohorts (p < 0.0001). The AUCs for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival were 0.736 vs. 0.741, 0.656 vs. 0.737, and 0.628 vs. 0.649, respectively. The high-risk group was associated with immunosuppression in the TME.
Conclusion: The hypoxia-related risk signature may represent an independent biomarker that can differentiate the characteristics of TME immune cell infiltration and predict the prognosis of LUAD.
Introduction
Lung cancer is the most common malignant tumor and one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide (Sung et al., 2021). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancer cases, which comprises approximately 40–50% cases of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and 20–30% cases of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) (Liu et al., 2021; Siegel et al., 2020). Despite advances in chemoradiotherapy and targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) represent promising advances in the treatment of lung cancer (Hiley et al., 2016; Bhandari et al., 2021; Fountzilas et al., 2021); however, the clinical response rate of ICIs is only 20%, which can seriously hinder its wider application (Borghaei et al., 2015; Brahmer et al., 2015; Reck et al., 2016; Rittmeyer et al., 2017).
Increasing evidence suggests that the accumulation of immunosuppressive cell subsets within the tumor microenvironment (TME) (e.g., tumor-associated macrophages [TAM], myeloid-derived suppressor cells [MDSCs], and regulatory T cells [Tregs]) can influence the prognosis and clinical benefit of ICI therapy (Chen et al., 2021; Fogli et al., 2021; Semba et al., 2021). Multiple immunosuppressive mechanisms in the TME, including the tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), have been identified as major factors that regulate immune resistance (Ji et al., 2012). As a feature of unstable vasculature and a high metabolic rate, hypoxia is a hallmark of tumorigenesis in various cancers (Semenza, 2014). Hypoxia can both induce an immunosuppressive TME, which decreases the effect of immunotherapy (Fukumura et al., 2018), as well as upregulate PD-L1 expression, which further promotes tumor escape (Barsoum et al., 2014; Noman et al., 2014; Koh et al., 2016; Ruf et al., 2016). The hypoxia-related gene signature may be a key regulator in mediating tumor immune evasion. Thus, the identification of a hypoxia-related risk signature may predict the subpopulations of clinical ICI therapy and provide a novel means of improving the clinical curative effect.
In this study, mRNA expression and the clinical information of LUAD samples were downloaded from the TCGA and GEO databases. Eight hypoxia-related genes were identified and established to construct a hypoxia-related risk signature. The risk signature could differentiate the high- and low-risk subgroups, and a high-risk hypoxia signature has been associated with the inactivation of TME immune cell infiltration. Thus, targeting hypoxia-related genes may represent novel therapeutic targets that can enhance the proportion of LUAD patients who can be treated with ICIs.
Methods
Data Acquisition and Processing
RNA expression and clinical data related to the LUAD cohort were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) and GENE EXPRESSION OMNIBUS database (GEO, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The independent cohort was used to verify the results of the TCGA dataset. Two authors (ZLD and TXL) independently reviewed the RNA-seq transcriptome and clinical data from both datasets to avoid any potential errors.
Construction of a Protein-Protein Interaction Network
To identify hypoxia-related hub genes, a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using the STRING database (http://string-db.org). Genes with a node degree >0.4 were considered to be hub genes in the PPI network. PPI network visualization and analysis were further performed using Cytoscape software (https://cytoscape.org/).
Establishment of a Hypoxia-Related Risk Signature
To establish the hypoxia-related risk signature, a univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for prognosis-related hypoxia-associated genes. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was further used to calculate the corresponding risk coefficient according to the gene expression of the input gene set, and the risk score was created for each patient. The risk score was calculated using the following formula:
where Expi represents the level of hypoxia gene expression, and Coei represents the corresponding multivariate Cox regression coefficient.
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis
Patients were divided into low- and high-risk groups based on the median risk score. A gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) 3.0 (http://www.broad.mit.edu/gsea/) detected different signaling genes. Each analysis performed 1,000 gene combinations. NES >1 and nominal p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Development of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves
To assess the hypoxia related risk signature, a univariate Cox regression was used to analyze prognostic hub genes with clinical information. Significant prognostic hub genes were further analyzed using a multivariate Cox regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the risk model for predicting the OS.
Evaluation of Immune Cell Type Factions
To characterize the immune cell types in the TME, CIBERSORT (https://cibersort.stanford.edu/) was used to clarify the deconvolution of the immune cell subtype expression matrix based on linear support vector regression. In accordance with the methods described by Zhang J. et al. (2020), the immune infiltration characteristics of 22 immune cell subpopulations were evaluated between high- and low-related risk groups in LUAD.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using standard R packages (version 3.6.2). A Student’s t-test was used to compare the continuous and discrete variables. A Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to compare the categorical clinicopathological variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the OS and differences were assessed using a two-sided log-rank test. p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Results
Establishment of a Hypoxia-Related Risk Signature
Details of the clinical data from the two cohorts used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Figure 1 shows the flow chart of the process used to screen hypoxia-related genes, and the hypoxia-related gene set was downloaded from the TCGA-LUAD cohort. To investigate the interactive roles of hypoxia-related genes, a PPI network analysis was applied using the STRING online database and Cytoscape software (Figure 2A). The 50 genes with the most significant interactions were obtained (Figure 2B). A univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that 19 key genes were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) in patients with LUAD (p < 0.05; Figure 2C). A multivariate Cox regression analysis further showed that eight hypoxia-related genes, including lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), decorin (DCN), phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1), phosphofructokinase (PFKP), fructose-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1), lysyl oxidase (LOX), enolase 3 (ENO3), and C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4 (CXCR4), were obtained (Figure 2D). The correlation analysis showed that there was a significant correlation among the hypoxia-related genes in the TCGA-LUAD and GSE68465 cohort, including a positive correlation for DCN and CXCR4, and a negative correlation for DCN and LDHA (Supplementary Figure S1). The hypoxia-related risk signature was developed based on the key eight hypoxia-related genes. The risk score formula was listed as follows: hypoxia related risk signature = (0.45 × LDHA) + (−0.18×DCN) + (−0.25 × PGK1) + (0.14 × PFKP) + (−0.12 × FBP1) + (0.27 × LOX) + (−0.17 × ENO3) + (−0.18 × CXCR4).
FIGURE 2. Identification of key hypoxia-related genes in LUAD. (A) The protein-protein interaction network of hypoxia-related genes. (B) A total of 50 of the most relevant hypoxia-related key genes. (C, D) Univariate (C) and multivariate Cox (D) regression analysis of key hypoxia-related genes.
Prognostic Significance of the Hypoxia Risk Signature
To identify the clinical application of the hypoxia-related risk signature, a cluster analysis showed that the TCGA-LUAD cohort could be divided into high- (n = 297) and low-risk (n = 297) groups and differential expression was observed in the hypoxia-related genes between the two groups (Figure 3A). The distribution of risk scores and survival status of the TCGA-LUAD patients are shown in Figures 3B,C. The further percentage of survival showed that compared with the 26% death in the low-risk group, the high-risk group had a 46% death (Figure 3D). A prognostic analysis identified that the high risk group had a poor survival compared to the low risk group in the TCGA-LUAD cohort (p < 0.001; Figure 3D). The hypoxia-related risk signature was further validated in the GSE68465 cohort. A total of 442 patients were stratified into high- (n = 221) and low-risk (n = 221) subgroups using the median risk score values (Figure 4A). The LUAD patients in the high-risk group exhibited a higher probability of earlier death (Figures 4B,C) and had significantly worse OS compared to those in the low-risk group (p < 0.001; Figure 4D). Taken together, these results indicate that the hypoxia-related risk signature may function as a biomarker to predict the prognosis of patients with LUAD.
FIGURE 3. Prognostic value of the hypoxia-related risk signature in the TCGA database. (A) Heatmap of high- and low-risk LUAD patients stratified by eight key hypoxia-related genes in the TCGA cohort. (B) Distribution and median survival time of the high- and low-risk LUAD patients in the TCGA cohort. (C) Distribution of the survival status of high- and low-risk LUAD patients. The X-axis represents the number of patients, and the Y-axis represents the survival time. (D) Survival and mortality rates in the high- and low-risk LUAD patients. (E) OS analysis of high- or low-risk LUAD patients.
FIGURE 4. Prognostic value of the hypoxia-related risk signature in the GSE68465 dataset. (A) Heatmap of high- and low-risk LUAD patients stratified by eight hypoxia related key genes in GSE68465 dataset (B) Distribution and median survival time of high- and low-risk LUAD patients in the GSE68465 dataset. (C) Distribution of high- and low-risk LUAD patients. (D) Survival and mortality in the high- and low-risk LUAD patients. (E) OS analysis of high- or low-risk LUAD patients.
Evaluation Value of the Hypoxia Risk Signature
To determine whether the hypoxia-related risk signature could be used as an independent prognostic factor, univariate, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the signature-based risk score using the TCGA and GSE68465 cohorts. The results of the univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that tumor (T) stage, lymph node (N) stage, and hypoxia-related risk score were positively correlated with the OS in the TCGA and GSE68465 cohorts (p < 0.001; Figures 5A,B). The multivariate survival analysis showed that the T stage, N stage, and hypoxia-related risk score were significantly associated with the OS, which suggested that the hypoxia-related risk score could be defined as an independent prognostic factor in patients with LUAD (p < 0.001; Figures 5C,D).
FIGURE 5. The independent prognostic analysis of the hypoxiarelated risk signature. (A, B) Univariate Cox analysis of clinical characteristics and hypoxiarelated risk signature in the TCGA (A) and GSE68465 dataset (B). (C, D) Multivariate Cox analysis in the TCGA (C) and GSE68465 dataset (D). (E, F) AUC of the hypoxia risk signature in the TCGA (E) and GSE68465 datasets (F).
To further evaluate the predictive accuracy of the hypoxia-related risk signature, the ROC curves of the hypoxia-related risk signature were performed. The results showed that AUC at 1, 3, and 5 years in the TCGA-LUAD and GSE68465 cohorts were 0.736 vs 0.741, 0.656 vs 0.737, and 0.628 vs 0.649, respectively (Figures 5E,F). These results suggest that the hypoxia-related risk signature had an excellent predictive prognostic ability and provided a useful biomarker with clinical application.
Immune Cell Infiltration in the Tumor Microenvironment (TME)
A GSEA analysis was performed to investigate the potential signaling pathways activated by hypoxia-related genes, The results showed that the hypoxia-related genes were associated with interferon gamma, B cell, and natural killer (NK0 cell infiltration in the TCGA and GSE68465 cohorts (Supplementary Figure S2). These results indicate that the hypoxia-related genes mediated the malignant features of LUAD by regulating immune cell infiltration in the TME.
Thus, we next analyzed the immune cell infiltration of the 22 immune cell subgroups using the CIBERSORT algorithm. The results showed that the distribution ratio of the infiltrating immune cells between the high- and low-risk groups in the TCGA and GSE68465 cohorts were significantly different (Supplementary Figures S3A,B). A component analysis of the immune cells from the TME showed that activated CD4+ T memory cells, resting NK cells, M0 and M1 macrophages, resting mast cells, and resting dendritic cells were significantly different between the high- and low-risk groups (p < 0.05; Supplementary Figures S3C–H). A cluster analysis revealed that there was a distinct difference in the immune molecules between the high- and low-risk groups (p < 0.05; Figure 6A). The relative expression analysis indicated that the expression of V-domain Ig Suppressor of T cell Activation (VISTA), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA4), T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), inducible T cell costimulator (ICOS), C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3), and C-C motif chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) were significantly downregulated in the high-risk groups (p < 0.05; Figures 6B–G). In contrast, PD-L1 and B7-H3 expression were significantly upregulated in the high-risk groups (p < 0.05; Figures 6H,I). A correlation analysis revealed that VISTA, CTLA4, TIGIT, ICOS, CXCR3, and CCR5 were negatively associated with the hypoxia-related risk score, whereas PD-L1 and B7-H3 were positively associated with the hypoxia-related risk score (p < 0.05; Figures 6B–I). These results revealed that the hypoxia-related risk signature may be involved in tumorigenesis by regulating immune cell infiltration into the TME and can be used to predict patient prognosis.
FIGURE 6. Immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME) in LUAD. (A) Heatmap of immune-related gene sets between the high- and low-risk LUAD patients. (B–G) Expression of VISTA (B), CTLA4 (C), TIGT (D), ICOS (E), CXCR3 (F), CCR5 (G) PD-L1 (H), and B7-H3 (I) in high- and low-risk LUAD patients.
Discussion
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (Bray et al., 2018; Siegel et al., 2020). Chemoradiotherapy and targeted therapies are the dominant therapeutic strategies used to treat patients with NSCLC; however, the prognosis is poor, with a median OS of only 9–11 months (Scagliotti et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2016). Hypoxia is an important phenomenon associated with solid tumors that contributes to metastasis, deregulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME), and resistance to therapy (Goyette et al., 2021). In this study, we comprehensively analyzed the expression of hypoxia-related genes in the TCGA and GEO databases, and established a hypoxia-related risk signature, which can differentiate LUAD patients into high- and low-risk groups.
The hypoxia-related risk signature consists of eight hypoxia-related genes, including LDHA, DCN, PGK1, PFKP, FBP1, LOX, ENO3, and CXCR4. LDHA is an enzyme that catalyzes the mutual conversion of pyruvate and lactic acid, as well as promotes invasion, metastasis, nest loss, and apoptosis resistance in various cancers (Cheng et al., 2021; Crowley et al., 2021; Gupta et al., 2021). Multiple studies have suggested that DCN can suppress lung cancer progression by blocking receptor tyrosine kinases (Horvath et al., 2014). Moreover, decreased DCN expression correlates with lymphatic metastasis in patients with lung cancer (Biaoxue et al., 2011). While PGK1 up-regulation was found to trigger autophagy in tumorigenesis (Qian et al., 2017a; Qian et al., 2017), it was also associated with resistance to chemoradiotherapy (Cai et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2015). PFKP is a rate-limiting enzyme involved in glycolysis that has been found to be upregulated in various types of cancer (Park et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2017). NK cell dysfunction induced by FBP1 inhibited glycolysis during lung cancer progression (Cong et al., 2018). LOX upregulation in cancer has been shown to be involved in cancer progression and metastasis (Murdocca et al., 2021). A knockdown of ENO3 expression exhibited a selective anticancer effect in STK11 mutant lung cancer cells (Park et al., 2019). In addition, a CXCR4 blockade can improve anti-PD-L1 therapy in triple negative breast cancer(Zhou et al., 2021). These results indicate that targeting hypoxia-related risk genes may represent a promising method of treating patients with lung cancer.
In this study, a multivariate Cox regression analysis of the hypoxia-related risk signature, which could indicated that it could act as an independent predictor of OS in LUAD. The predictive prognostic value of hypoxia-related risk signatures is greatly validated in TCGA and GEO database. However, the signatures need to be validated in prospective studies. GSEA revealed that hypoxia-related genes (LDHA, DCN, PGK1, PFKP, FBP1, LOX, ENO3, and CXCR4) involved in various immune cell infiltration in the TME. The CIBERSORT analysis also identified distinct differences in the distribution of immune cells between the high- and low-risk groups. The correlation analysis also verified that the expression of immune check-point molecules, including PD-L1, were associated with the hypoxia-related risk score. Recent studies have identified that FOXO4 regulated the glycolysis process of gastric cancer by disrupting the HIF-1α-FOXO4-LDHA axis (Wang et al., 2021). Hypoxia-induced circular RNA has_circRNA_403,658 promotes bladder cancer cell growth through activation of LDHA (Wei et al., 2019). Activation of PGK1 under hypoxic conditions promoted glycolysis and increased stem cell-like properties and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells (Zhang Y. et al., 2020). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy repressed the warburg effect and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hypoxic NSCLC cells via the HIF-1α/PFKP axis (Zhang et al., 2021). The study by Li et al. reported that a GBE1 blockade promoted the secretion of CCL5 and CXCL10 to recruit CD8+ T lymphocytes into the TME and upregulate PD-L1 expression in LUAD cells via the IFN-I/STING signaling pathway (Li et al., 2019). EML4-ALK enhanced PD-L1 expression in LUAD via HIF1α and STAT3 (Koh et al., 2016). Thus, hypoxia-related risk genes may represent a novel target for immunotherapy in LUAD by modulating cell infiltration into the TME.
However, there were also several limitations associated with this study. First, since all the data in this study were derived from public databases and retrospective analyses, the hypoxia-related risk signature must be further validated by multiple centers. Second, TME cell infiltration had a distinct distribution between the high- and low-risk groups; thus, the potential function and mechanisms mediated by the hypoxia-related risk genes must be further explored.
Conclusion
In summary, we performed a comprehensive genomic analysis of hypoxia-related risk genes and established a hypoxia-related risk signature that could stratify the risk and predict OS in patients with LUAD by modulating TME cell infiltration. Thus, targeting hypoxia-related risk genes may represent a promising method of improving the immunotherapeutic efficiency of patients with lung cancer.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author Contributions
JZ and TL designed the article. ZD, TL, and GL participated in the data analyses and interpretation of the results. ZD, TL, ZD, BW, and BC prepared the figures. ZD, LG, and JZ wrote the article. All authors have read and approved the article.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82003212), the Guangzhou Key Medical Discipline Construction Project Fund (02-412-B205002-1004042), and the Discipline Construction Project of Guangzhou Medical University During the 14th Five-Year Plan (06-410-2107181).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2021.757421/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4; GSEA, Gene set enrichment analysis; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitors; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; NSCLC, Non-small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; PD-1, programmed cell death 1; PPI, protein-protein interaction; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; TME, tumor microenvironment; TAM, tumor-associated macrophages; Treg, regulatory T cells; TMB, tumor mutation burden; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.
References
Barsoum, I. B., Smallwood, C. A., Siemens, D. R., and Graham, C. H. (2014). A Mechanism of Hypoxia-Mediated Escape from Adaptive Immunity in Cancer Cells. Cancer Res. 74 (3), 665–674. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0992
Bhandari, N. R., Hess, L. M., Han, Y., Zhu, Y. E., and Sireci, A. N. (2021). Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with RET Fusion-Positive Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. Immunotherapy 13, 893–904. doi:10.2217/imt-2021-0035
Biaoxue, R., Xiguang, C., Hua, L., Hui, M., Shuanying, Y., Wei, Z., et al. (2011). Decreased Expression of Decorin and p57(KIP2) Correlates with Poor Survival and Lymphatic Metastasis in Lung Cancer Patients. Int. J. Biol. Markers 26 (1), 9–21. doi:10.5301/jbm.2011.6372
Borghaei, H., Paz-Ares, L., Horn, L., Spigel, D. R., Steins, M., Ready, N. E., et al. (2015). Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 373 (17), 1627–1639. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1507643
Brahmer, J., Reckamp, K. L., Baas, P., Crinò, L., Eberhardt, W. E. E., Poddubskaya, E., et al. (2015). Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 373 (2), 123–135. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1504627
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., and Jemal, A. (2018). Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer J. Clinicians 68 (6), 394–424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492
Cai, Q., Wang, S., Jin, L., Weng, M., Zhou, D., Wang, J., et al. (2019). Long Non-coding RNA GBCDRlnc1 Induces Chemoresistance of Gallbladder Cancer Cells by Activating Autophagy. Mol. Cancer 18 (1), 82. doi:10.1186/s12943-019-1016-0
Chen, A., Jiang, Y., Li, Z., Wu, L., Santiago, U., Zou, H., et al. (2021). Chitinase-3-like 1 Protein Complexes Modulate Macrophage-Mediated Immune Suppression in Glioblastoma. J. Clin. Invest. 131, e147552. doi:10.1172/JCI147552
Cheng, C. S., Tan, H. Y., Wang, N., Chen, L., Meng, Z., Chen, Z., et al. (2021). Functional Inhibition of Lactate Dehydrogenase Suppresses Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Progression. Clin. Translational Med. 11 (6), e467. doi:10.1002/ctm2.467
Cong, J., Wang, X., Zheng, X., Wang, D., Fu, B., Sun, R., et al. (2018). Dysfunction of Natural Killer Cells by FBP1-Induced Inhibition of Glycolysis during Lung Cancer Progression. Cel Metab. 28 (2), 243–255. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.021
Crowley, D., Avramovic, G., Cullen, W., Farrell, C., Halpin, A., Keevans, M., et al. (20212019). New Hepatitis C Virus Infection, Re-infection and Associated Risk Behaviour in Male Irish Prisoners: a Cohort Study, 2019. Arch. Public Health 79 (1), 97. doi:10.1186/s13690-021-00623-2
Fogli, L. K., Aurigemma, R., Sommers, C. L., Singh, A., Bourcier, K., and Ernstoff, M. S. (2021). Challenges and Next Steps in the Advancement of Immunotherapy: Summary of the 2018 and 2020 National Cancer Institute Workshops on Cell-Based Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors. J. Immunother. Cancer 9 (7), e003048. doi:10.1136/jitc-2021-003048
Fountzilas, E., Lampaki, S., Koliou, G.-A., Koumarianou, A., Levva, S., Vagionas, A., et al. (2021). Real-world Safety and Efficacy Data of Immunotherapy in Patients with Cancer and Autoimmune Disease: The Experience of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. doi:10.1007/s00262-021-02985-6
Fukumura, D., Kloepper, J., Amoozgar, Z., Duda, D. G., and Jain, R. K. (2018). Enhancing Cancer Immunotherapy Using Antiangiogenics: Opportunities and Challenges. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15 (5), 325–340. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.29
Goyette, M.-A., Elkholi, I. E., Apcher, C., Kuasne, H., Rothlin, C. V., Muller, W. J., et al. (2021). Targeting Axl Favors an Antitumorigenic Microenvironment that Enhances Immunotherapy Responses by Decreasing Hif-1α Levels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118 (29), e2023868118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2023868118
Gupta, V. K., Sharma, N. S., Durden, B., Garrido, V. T., Kesh, K., Edwards, D., et al. (2021). Hypoxia-driven Oncometabolite L-2HG Maintains Stemness-Differentiation Balance and Facilitates Immune Evasion in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Res. 81, 4001–4013. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-2562
Hiley, C. T., Le Quesne, J., Santis, G., Sharpe, R., de Castro, D. G., Middleton, G., et al. (2016). Challenges in Molecular Testing in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients with Advanced Disease. The Lancet 388 (10048), 1002–1011. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31340-X
Horváth, Z., Kovalszky, I., Fullár, A., Kiss, K., Schaff, Z., Iozzo, R. V., et al. (2014). Decorin Deficiency Promotes Hepatic Carcinogenesis. Matrix Biol. 35, 194–205. doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2013.11.004
Ji, R.-R., Chasalow, S. D., Wang, L., Hamid, O., Schmidt, H., Cogswell, J., et al. (2012). An Immune-Active Tumor Microenvironment Favors Clinical Response to Ipilimumab. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 61 (7), 1019–1031. doi:10.1007/s00262-011-1172-6
Kim, N. H., Cha, Y. H., Lee, J., Lee, S.-H., Yang, J. H., Yun, J. S., et al. (2017). Snail Reprograms Glucose Metabolism by Repressing Phosphofructokinase PFKP Allowing Cancer Cell Survival under Metabolic Stress. Nat. Commun. 8, 14374. doi:10.1038/ncomms14374
Koh, J., Jang, J.-Y., Keam, B., Kim, S., Kim, M.-Y., Go, H., et al. (2016). EML4-ALK Enhances Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Expression in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma via Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-1α and STAT3. Oncoimmunology 5 (3), e1108514. doi:10.1080/2162402X.2015.1108514
Li, L., Yang, L., Cheng, S., Fan, Z., Shen, Z., Xue, W., et al. (2019). Lung Adenocarcinoma-Intrinsic GBE1 Signaling Inhibits Anti-tumor Immunity. Mol. Cancer 18 (1), 108. doi:10.1186/s12943-019-1027-x
Liu, T., Luo, H., Zhang, J., Hu, X., and Zhang, J. (2021). Molecular Identification of an Immunity- and Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. BMC Cancer 21 (1), 783. doi:10.1186/s12885-021-08541-w
Murdocca, M., De Masi, C., Pucci, S., Mango, R., Novelli, G., Di Natale, C., et al. (2021). LOX-1 and Cancer: An Indissoluble Liaison. Cancer Gene Ther. doi:10.1038/s41417-020-00279-0
Noman, M. Z., Desantis, G., Janji, B., Hasmim, M., Karray, S., Dessen, P., et al. (2014). PD-L1 Is a Novel Direct Target of HIF-1α, and its Blockade under Hypoxia Enhanced MDSC-Mediated T Cell Activation. J. Exp. Med. 211 (5), 781–790. doi:10.1084/jem.20131916
Park, C., Lee, Y., Je, S., Chang, S., Kim, N., Jeong, E., et al. (2019). Overexpression and Selective Anticancer Efficacy of ENO3 in STK11 Mutant Lung Cancers. Mol. Cell 42 (11), 804–809. doi:10.14348/molcells.2019.0099
Park, Y.-Y., Kim, S.-B., Han, H. D., Sohn, B. H., Kim, J. H., Liang, J., et al. (2013). Tat-activating Regulatory DNA-Binding Protein Regulates Glycolysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Regulating the Platelet Isoform of Phosphofructokinase through microRNA 520. Hepatology 58 (1), 182–191. doi:10.1002/hep.26310
Qian, X., Li, X., Cai, Q., Zhang, C., Yu, Q., Jiang, Y., et al. (2017a). Phosphoglycerate Kinase 1 Phosphorylates Beclin1 to Induce Autophagy. Mol. Cel. 65 (5), 917–931. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.027
Qian, X., Li, X., and Lu, Z. (2017b). Protein Kinase Activity of the Glycolytic Enzyme PGK1 Regulates Autophagy to Promote Tumorigenesis. Autophagy 13 (7), 1246–1247. doi:10.1080/15548627.2017.1313945
Reck, M., Rodríguez-Abreu, D., Robinson, A. G., Hui, R., Csőszi, T., Fülöp, A., et al. (2016). Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 375 (19), 1823–1833. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1606774
Rittmeyer, A., Barlesi, F., Waterkamp, D., Park, K., Ciardiello, F., von Pawel, J., et al. (2017). Atezolizumab versus Docetaxel in Patients with Previously Treated Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (OAK): A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet 389 (10066), 255–265. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X
Ruf, M., Moch, H., and Schraml, P. (2016). PD-L1 Expression Is Regulated by Hypoxia Inducible Factor in clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 139 (2), 396–403. doi:10.1002/ijc.30077
Scagliotti, G. V., Parikh, P., von Pawel, J., Biesma, B., Vansteenkiste, J., Manegold, C., et al. (2008). Phase III Study Comparing Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine with Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients with Advanced-Stage Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. Jco 26 (21), 3543–3551. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0375
Semba, T., Wang, X., Xie, X., Cohen, E. N., Reuben, J. M., Dalby, K. N., et al. (2021). Identification of the JNK-Active Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cluster Associated with an Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. doi:10.1093/jnci/djab128
Semenza, G. L. (2014). Oxygen Sensing, Hypoxia-Inducible Factors, and Disease Pathophysiology. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 9, 47–71. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-012513-104720
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., and Jemal, A. (2020). Cancer Statistics, 2020. CA A. Cancer J. Clin. 70 (1), 7–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21590
Sun, S., Liang, X., Zhang, X., Liu, T., Shi, Q., Song, Y., et al. (2015). Phosphoglycerate Kinase-1 Is a Predictor of Poor Survival and a Novel Prognostic Biomarker of Chemoresistance to Paclitaxel Treatment in Breast Cancer. Br. J. Cancer 112 (8), 1332–1339. doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.114
Sun, Y., Niu, W., Du, F., Du, C., Li, S., Wang, J., et al. (2016). Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Antitumor Properties of Anlotinib, an Oral Multi-Target Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors. J. Hematol. Oncol. 9 (1), 105. doi:10.1186/s13045-016-0332-8
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., et al. (2021). Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A. Cancer J. Clin. 71 (3), 209–249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
Wang, J., Zhang, P., Zhong, J., Tan, M., Ge, J., Tao, L., et al. (2016). The Platelet Isoform of Phosphofructokinase Contributes to Metabolic Reprogramming and Maintains Cell Proliferation in clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Oncotarget 7 (19), 27142–27157. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.8382
Wang, X. H., Jiang, Z. H., Yang, H. M., Zhang, Y., and Xu, L. H. (2021). Hypoxia‐induced FOXO4/LDHA axis Modulates Gastric Cancer Cell Glycolysis and Progression. Clin. Translational Med. 11 (1), e279. doi:10.1002/ctm2.279
Wei, Y., Zhang, Y., Meng, Q., Cui, L., and Xu, C. (2019). Hypoxia-induced Circular RNA has_circRNA_403658 Promotes Bladder Cancer Cell Growth through Activation of LDHA. Am. J. Transl. Res. 11 (11), 6838–6849.
Zhang, J., Zhong, X., Jiang, H., Jiang, H., Xie, T., Tian, Y., et al. (2020a). Comprehensive Characterization of the Tumor Microenvironment for Assessing Immunotherapy Outcome in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. aging 12 (22), 22509–22526. doi:10.18632/aging.103460
Zhang, L., Ke, J., Min, S., Wu, N., Liu, F., Qu, Z., et al. (2021). Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Represses the Warburg Effect and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Hypoxic NSCLC Cells via the HIF-1α/PFKP Axis. Front. Oncol. 11, 691762. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.691762
Zhang, Y., Cai, H., Liao, Y., Zhu, Y., Wang, F., and Hou, J. (2020b). Activation of PGK1 under Hypoxic Conditions Promotes Glycolysis and Increases Stem Cell like Properties and the Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells via the AKT Signalling Pathway. Int. J. Oncol. 57 (3), 743–755. doi:10.3892/ijo.2020.5083
Keywords: lung cancer, hypoxia, immunity, overall survival, risk signature
Citation: Dai Z, Liu T, Liu G, Deng Z, Yu P, Wang B, Cen B, Guo L and Zhang J (2021) Identification of Clinical and Tumor Microenvironment Characteristics of Hypoxia-Related Risk Signature in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8:757421. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.757421
Received: 12 August 2021; Accepted: 22 October 2021;
Published: 15 November 2021.
Edited by:
Anindya Ghosh, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, United StatesReviewed by:
Ramya Sivakumar, University of Washington, United StatesSaroj Kumari, Nation Institute of Immunology, India
Copyright © 2021 Dai, Liu, Liu, Deng, Yu, Wang, Cen, Guo and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Liyi Guo, MTM4MDI4Njk1NTFAMTM5LmNvbQ==; Jian Zhang, emhhbmdqaWFuQGd6aG11LmVkdS5jbg==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work