
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiomes
Sec. Environmental Microbiomes
Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frmbi.2025.1540197
This article is part of the Research TopicEcological Roles and Functional Contributions of Environmental Microbiomes in Ecosystem DynamicsView all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Rumen microbial communities are known to drive methane (CH4) production, but their dynamics in variable "real-world" farming environments are less understood. This research aims to identify specific microbial taxa linked to CH4 emission in commercial dairy farms by employing 16S rRNA gene sequencing, thereby providing a more ecologically relevant understanding of CH4 production in real-world settings.Rumen fluid samples were collected from 212 cows across seventeen Dutch dairy farms. Methane production was measured from these dairy cows using the GreenFeed system and expressed as CH4 intensity (g fat-and proteincorrected milk yield -1 ). Rumen microbiota was analyzed using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Analysis was performed to assess association between microbial taxa and CH4 intensity, using data from individual cattle across the dairy farm. We observed that diet and lactation stage influenced CH4 intensity, consistent with previous studies. Results showed higher CH4 intensity in cows during late lactation, and feeding type, particularly fresh grass intake, strongly influenced rumen microbiota. However, after classifying low and high CH4 emitting cows, only limited differences in microbiota composition could be measured. Few taxa, like Lachnospiraceae, were common across both groups, while Ruminoccocaceae and Rikenellaceae were more abundant in low emitters, and Oscillospiraceae in high emitters.Methanobrevibacter differentiated CH₄ emission groups, but archaeal methanogen abundance may not accurately reflect CH₄ variation due to methodological limitations, including reliance on relative abundance, limited taxonomic resolution, and primer bias. Using a bacterial-biased 16S rRNA approach, we observed a limited number of consistent bacterial taxa associated with CH4 intensity highlights the challenges of studying dairy farms under practical conditions, where variability in diet, genetics, and management practices complicates the identification of specific rumen microbes associated with CH4 emission. Even with control over key variables, the inherent variability of on-farm conditions impeded the detection of stable microbial patterns. In conclusion, our study clearly indicates that understanding CH4 emissions from dairy cattle in real-world settings fundamentally requires a broader ecological perspective where rumen microbes are recognized as key determinants influencing microbiota signals within multi-factorial farm settings. .
Keywords: dairy cattle, emission, GreenFeed system, Living Lab, Methane, microbiome, Rumen
Received: 05 Dec 2024; Accepted: 08 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Roques, Koning, Bossers, Van Gastelen, Schokker, Zaccaria, Sebek and Kar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Soumya Kanti Kar, Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.