Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiomes
Sec. Host and Microbe Associations
Volume 3 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/frmbi.2024.1432202

Mouse Diet and Vendor Impact Microbiome Perturbation and Recovery from Early-life Pulses of Amoxicillin

Provisionally accepted
Noelle Curtis-Joseph Noelle Curtis-Joseph 1Rachel Peterson Rachel Peterson 2Claire E. Brown Claire E. Brown 2Chapman Beekman Chapman Beekman 2Peter Belenky Peter Belenky 3*
  • 1 Molecular Biology, Cellular Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, United States
  • 2 Molecular Microbiology & Immunology, Brown University, Providence, United States
  • 3 Brown University, Providence, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The gut microbiome is a dynamic ecosystem shaped by various factors, including diet, sex, and environment. This system plays a crucial role in host health, such that perturbation in the form of antibiotics can lead to a vast array of negative outcomes. Accordingly, a growing body of work seeks to develop interventions to protect the microbiome during antibiotic exposure. While it is well established that antibiotics can disrupt the microbiome in the short term, how the impact of antibiotics is modulated by factors such as diet, sex, and environment is poorly understood. In this study, we analyzed how sex, diet and early life environment (vendor of origin) modulate the impact and recovery of the microbiome in mice treated with oral amoxicillin. Utilizing 16S rRNA gene sequencing and bioinformatic analyses, we looked at the microbiome response to antibiotics under high-sugar and high-fat (Western) and standard high-fiber mouse (Chow) diets in male and female C57BL/6 from Jackson Laboratory, and female mice from Charles River Laboratories. The microbiome composition of each set of mice had a distinct pre-antibiotic starting point, depending on vendor, sex, and diet. These differences were further exacerbated by antibiotic exposure and revealed that each group responded differently to this perturbation. In particular, we found that the Western diet microbiome had an exacerbated response to antibiotics with greater changes in alpha, and beta diversity, and microbial composition when compared to the antibiotic-treated Chow diet cohort. In particular, we detected blooms in Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococcaceae, and Peptostreptococcaceae that were not found in the Chow diet. The response to antibiotics on each diet also appeared to be vendor and sex dependent. Charles River female mice furthermore had less Bifidobacteriaceae, Clostridia_UCG.014, and Clostridiaceae compared to Jackson Laboratory females in a Western diet, while female mice had more Bacteroides, Bilophila, and Parasutterella compared to male mice. In a narrow sense, these findings underscore the importance of considering vendor source, diet, and sex when examining antibiotics' impact on mice. The broader implications suggest that we will likely need to utilize patient-specific microbiomeinformed approaches in the development of human therapeutics to safeguard the microbiome during antibiotic exposure.

    Keywords: microbiome, gut microbiome, westen diet, early-life antibiotics, murine microbiome, antibiotics

    Received: 13 May 2024; Accepted: 08 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Curtis-Joseph, Peterson, Brown, Beekman and Belenky. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Peter Belenky, Brown University, Providence, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.