Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiomes
Sec. Environmental Microbiomes
Volume 3 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/frmbi.2024.1399416
This article is part of the Research Topic Women in Environmental Microbiomes View all 9 articles

Microbial community structure in recovering forests of Mount St. Helens

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States
  • 2 University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, United States
  • 3 University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States
  • 4 The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
  • 5 Tecan Genomics, Redwood City, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The type and abundance of biotic propagules and legacies in recovering ecosystems are important variables for determining post-disturbance successional trajectories. Soil microorganisms regulate nutrient cycling, interact with many other organisms, and therefore may support successional pathways and complementary ecosystem functions, even in harsh conditions. The 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens had devastating effects above and belowground in forested montane ecosystems, including the burial and destruction of soil microbes. Historic forest management methods, such as old-growth and clearcut regimes, and locations of small mammal enclosures, may have influenced microbiome resilience in response to this catastrophic eruption. Our study compared the microbes in Volcanic eruption and microbiome rescue old-growth and clearcut forests, as well as in locations of historic short-term gopher enclosures (Thomomys talpoides), to evaluate community response to forest management practices and to examine vectors for dispersing microbial consortia to the surface of the Pumice Plain. These biotic interactions may have primed ecological succession in Bear Meadow and the Pumice Plain by creating microsite conditions conducive to primary succession and plant establishment. Using molecular techniques, we examined bacterial, fungal, and AMF communities to determine how these variables affected microbial communities and soil properties. We found that bacterial/archaeal 16S, fungal ITS2, and AMF SSU community composition varied among forestry practices and among sites with long-term lupine plots and gopher enclosures. The findings also related to detected differences in C and N concentrations and ratios in soil from our study sites. These data suggest that the fungal communities from previously clearcut locations were less diverse than in gopher plots within the Pumice Plain. These clearcut meadows also harbor fewer ancestral AM fungal taxa than were found within the old-growth forest. By investigating both forestry practices and mammals in microbial dispersal, we evaluated how these interactions may have promoted revegetation and ecological succession within the Pumice Plains of Mount St. Helens. In addition to providing evidence about how dispersal vectors and forest structure influence post-eruption soil microbiomes, this project also informs research and management communities about belowground processes and microbial functional traits in facilitating succession and ecosystem function.

    Keywords: succession 1, bacteria2, fungi3, AM Fungi4, Mount St. Helens5, community assembly6, legacy effects7, eruption7 ; diversity

    Received: 11 Mar 2024; Accepted: 22 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Maltz, Allen, Phillips, Freund, Hernandez, Shulman, Andrews, Botthoff and Aronson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Mia R. Maltz, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 06269, Connecticut, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.