ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Systems Microbiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1579219

Phylogenetic diversity and community structure of Planctomycetota from plant biomass-rich environments

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
  • 2University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
  • 3University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • 4Interdisciplinary Center for Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Porto, Portugal

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Biomass-rich environments host diverse microbial communities that contribute to the degradation and recycling of organic matter. Understanding the community structure within these habitats is essential for elucidating the ecological roles and metabolic capacities of specific microbial groups.Here, we conducted an analysis of biomass-rich environments including diverse soil types, sediments, anaerobic digesters, termite guts, termite nests and other decaying biomasses, to explore the phylogenetic diversity and community structure of the Planctomycetota phylum, using short-read 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. All sampled environments showed presence of Planctomycetota, with relative abundance ranging from nearly absent in animal manure to approximately 10% in soils. Across all samples, virtually 1900 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified, classified into diverse classes within Planctomycetota. Planctomycetotal phylogenetic diversity was the highest in soils and sediments while termite guts with the lowest phylogenetic diversity were confined to a few core OTUs across different termite species. Notably, a single OTU, closely matching the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the Singulisphaera genus, was detected in all environments, though with relative abundance ranging from only a few reads to over 6% of the planctomycetotal community. Four environments such as soil, sediment, termite nest and decaying biomasses showed similar community structure with predominant genera such as Tepidisphaera, Telmatocola, and distantly related to Thermogutta, and Anatilimnicola. However, weighted UniFrac analysis revealed that the planctomycetotal communities in termite nests exhibited closer phylogenetic relatedness compared to those in other habitats. Termite gut communities were the most divergent, followed by those in anaerobic digesters, where OTUs assigned to Anaerobaca and Anaerohalosphaera were the most abundant. Termite gut and phytoplankton bloom samples were dominated by OTUs affiliated with Pirellulales, suggesting their host-specific associations. Animal manure showed the presence of Planctomycetota, with 25% of detected OTUs not recognized by the SILVA database, possibly representing a novel, host-specific lineage distantly related to the Pirellulales order.

Keywords: Planctomycetota, Planctomycetes diversity, Taxonomic profiling, 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, microbial community structure, biomass-rich environments, Anaerobic digester, termite gut

Received: 18 Feb 2025; Accepted: 10 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Klimek, Lage and Calusinska. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Dominika Klimek, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Magdalena Calusinska, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more