
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Infectious Agents and Disease
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1579175
This article is part of the Research Topic Infectious disease control in the microbial functional genomics era View all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli poses a critical public health threat in Nigeria, where limited genomic surveillance hinders the understanding of virulence-resistance interplay. This cross-sectional study employed whole-genome sequencing to characterize 107 MDR-E isolates from a Nigerian tertiary hospital (2019-2020), analysing virulence genes, mobile genetic elements (MGEs), phylogroups, sequence types (STs), pathotypes, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We identified 2,021 virulence genes across nine functional categories, dominated by immune evasion (terC, 96.3%), adherence (fimH, 86%), and iron acquisition (fyuA, 63.6%). Strikingly, 81.3% of virulence genes were linked to MGEs, including MITEEc1 (75.7% of isolates) and IS30 (56.1%), with IncFII (17.8%) and Col156 (12.1%) plasmids co-harbouring virulence (e.g., traJ/traT, senB) and AMR genes (e.g., blaTEM-1B). Phylogroup B2 (32.7%) dominated, exhibiting high resistance to ampicillin (97.1%) and emerging meropenem resistance (11.4%). Globally disseminated STs (ST131, ST410, ST648) carried significantly more diverse virulence genes than minor clones (p = 0.028) and were strongly associated with double-serine QRDR mutations (gyrA_S83L: 97.6%, parC_S80I: 97.6%), which correlated with more virulence genes (24.2 vs. 22.3 genes) and resistance (MAR index: 0.7 vs. 0.5) compared to minor clones. Notably, 92% (61/66) of high-risk clones harboured these mutations, versus 57% (21/37)of low-risk clones, suggesting a fitness advantage enabling major clones to sustain larger genetic cargoes. Pathotyping revealed 54.2% as extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC), with 72.4% of these being uropathogenic (UPEC) and 5.2% ExPEC/EAEC hybrids, alongside 43.9% atypical ExPEC strains. Hierarchical clustering demonstrated phylogroup B2's genetic diversity and co-localization of plasmid-borne virulence/AMR genes. These findings underscore Nigeria's MDR-E crisis, driven by MGE-facilitated gene transfer, hybrid pathotypes, and globally disseminated high-risk clones harbouring double-serine QRDR mutations. There is continued need for robust genomic surveillance, stringent infection control measures, enhanced antibiotic stewardship, and exploration of antivirulence strategies (e.g., targeting fimH or yeh) to curb the spread of these highly adaptable pathogens in resource-limited settings and beyond.
Keywords: Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli1, Virulence Factors2, Phylogenetic Diversity3, whole-genome sequencing (WGS)4, Mobile Genetic Elements (MGEs)5, IncFII Plasmids6, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)7, Pathotypes8
Received: 18 Feb 2025; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Medugu, Aworh, Iregbu, Nwajiobi-Princewill, Hull, Harden, Singh, Obaro, Egwuenu, Adegboye, Egah, Uzairue, Mohammed, Nwafia and Thakur. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Nubwa Medugu, Nile University of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.