Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Microbial Symbioses

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1575405

This article is part of the Research Topic Microbial Symbiosis and Infectious Disease Dynamics in Reptiles and Wildfowl View all 5 articles

Characterization and comparison of the fecal bacterial microbiota in Red back pine root snake (Oligodon formosanus) and Chinese slug-eating snake (Pareas chinensis)

Provisionally accepted
Cong Xiao Cong Xiao 1Liu Xiangnan Liu Xiangnan 2Tong Fei Tong Fei 3*
  • 1 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • 2 Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China
  • 3 Fu Shun Vocational Technology Institute, Fu Shun, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The gastrointestinal tracts and oral cavities of animals harbor complex microbial communities that assist hosts in nutrient absorption and immune responses, thereby influencing behavior, development, reproduction, and overall health. In this study, we utilized metagenomic sequencing technology to conduct a detailed analysis of the fecal bacterial communities of six Red Back Pine Root Snakes (Oligodon formosanus, XT) and three Chinese Slug-Eating Snakes (Pareas chinensis, Z) to examine the differences in microbial community composition in different environments. The results indicated that Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobia, Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria are the dominant phyla in the Red Back Pine Root Snakes (XT species), while the Chinese Slug-Eating Snakes (Z species) includes Patescibacteria in addition to these six. Additionally, alpha diversity analysis revealed significant differences in species abundance at the family level between the two snake species, with the species abundance in Z samples being significantly higher than that in XT. Finally, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis of the functional genes in the microbial communities revealed that compared to Z, XT showed higher abundance in pathways related to transcription, translation, environmental adaptation, membrane transport, cellular communities - prokaryotes, cellular motility, and replication and repair. This is likely due to the different living environments and dietary habits of the two snake species. Overall, this study provided a comparative analysis of the gut microbiota of the two snake species, offering valuable insights for future research on zoonotic diseases, as well as on the environment, ecology, evolution, behavior, and seasonality in relation to humans and snakes.

    Keywords: Red back pine root snake (Oligodon formosanus), Chinese slug-eating snake (Pareas chinensis), Gut Microbiota, Microbial function, bacterial pathogens

    Received: 12 Feb 2025; Accepted: 25 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Xiao, Xiangnan and Fei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Tong Fei, Fu Shun Vocational Technology Institute, Fu Shun, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more