Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Infectious Agents and Disease

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1570952

This article is part of the Research Topic Insights in Infectious Agents and Disease: 2023/2024 View all 34 articles

Clinical isolation, biofilm formation, and pathogenicity analysis of different species of the Stephanoascus ciferrii complex

Provisionally accepted
Shilan Xu Shilan Xu 1Baiyuan Fan Baiyuan Fan 2Shuo Gao Shuo Gao 1Jia Jia Jia Jia 1Yan Zhang Yan Zhang 1Han Shen Han Shen 1Wanqing Zhou Wanqing Zhou 1*
  • 1 Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China
  • 2 Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The Stephanoascus ciferrii complex, comprising Stephanoascus ciferrii, Candida allociferrii, and Candida mucifera, is an emerging fungal pathogen with increasing isolation rates and antifungal resistance. However, detailed information about clinical isolation rates and pathogenicity comparisons among the three species are lacking. In order to fill in this information gap, this study aimed to investigate and compare the clinical isolation rates and pathogenicity of the three species. Twenty-seven S. ciferrii complex strains isolated from the secretion specimens of patients admitted to Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between 2012 and 2023 were included. According to the results of ITS sequencing, there were 15 strains of S. ciferrii, 7 strains of C. allociferrii, and 5 strains of C. mucifera. Antifungal susceptibility testing demonstrated that the S. ciferrii complex exhibited high MICs against azole antifungal agents, particularly fluconazole, while it showed lower MICs against echinocandins (P < 0.001). S. ciferrii displayed higher MICs against caspofungin than C. allociferrii (P < 0.05). The results of biofilm quantification using crystal violet staining indicated C. allociferrii exhibited stronger biofilm-forming ability than S. ciferrii in RPMI-1640 medium (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between C. allociferrii and C. mucifera or between S. ciferrii and C. mucifera. The results were similar with the metabolic activity by using XTT assay. The G. mellonella larvae infection experiments revealed that the survival rates of larvae infected by strains of the S. ciferrii complex were 60%, 50%, and 48% at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, respectively. Furthermore, the G. mellonella larvae lethality caused by C. allociferrii and C. mucifera were significantly higher than that caused by S. ciferrii (P < 0.001). This study is the first to describe and compare the pathogenicity and biofilm formation ability of the three species of S. ciferrii complex in the clinical context. Our research reveals the high prevalence of S. ciferrii in the complex and elucidates the correlation between fungal drug resistance, biofilm formation, and virulence, thus providing essential empirical evidence for further study of the clinical pathogenic characteristics of each species in the complex and treatment strategies.

    Keywords: Stephanoascus ciferrii complex, Candida allociferrii, Candida mucifera, Galleria mellonella larvae, Biofilm, pathogenicity, Antifungal treatment, Drug Resistance

    Received: 04 Feb 2025; Accepted: 18 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Xu, Fan, Gao, Jia, Zhang, Shen and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Wanqing Zhou, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more