ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1570764
Combined inactivation of the SOS response with TCA fumarases and the adaptive response enhances antibiotic susceptibility against Escherichia coli
Provisionally accepted- 1Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
- 2Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena / CSIC / Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
- 3Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Asturias, Spain
- 4Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología. Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Targeting bacterial DNA damage responses such as the SOS response represents a promising strategy for enhancing the efficacy of existing antimicrobials. This study focuses on a recently discovered DNA damage response mechanism involving tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) fumarases and the adaptive response, crucial for Escherichia coli survival in the presence of genotoxic methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). We investigated whether this pathway contributes to protection against antibiotics, either separately or in combination with the SOS response.Methods: An isogenic collection of E. coli BW25113 mutants was used, including strains deficient in fumarases (ΔfumA, ΔfumB, ΔfumC) and the adaptive response (ΔalkA, ΔalkB, ΔaidB). Additional SOS response inactivation (ΔrecA) was conducted by P1 phage transduction. All mutants were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, growth curve analysis, survival and evolution assays. To validate the relevance of these findings, experiments were also performed in a quinolone-resistant E. coli ST131 clinical isolate.Results and discussion: Overall, no significant differences or only moderate increases in susceptibility were observed in the single mutants, with ΔfumC and ΔaidB mutants showing the highest susceptibility. To enhance this effect, these genes were then inactivated in combination with the SOS response by constructing ΔfumC/ΔrecA and ΔaidB/ΔrecA mutants. These combinations exhibited significant differences in susceptibility to various antimicrobials, particularly cephalosporins and quinolones, and especially in the ΔfumC/ΔrecA strain. To further assess these results, we constructed an E. coli ST131 ΔfumC/ΔrecA mutant, in which a similar trend was observed. Together, these findings suggest that co-targeting the SOS response together with fumarases or the adaptive response could enhance the effectiveness of antibiotics against E. coli, potentially leading to new therapeutic strategies.
Keywords: antibiotic stress, Resistance reversion, DNA damage response, fumarases, adaptive response, SOS response
Received: 04 Feb 2025; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Murillo-Torres, Peñalver-Fernández, Quero-Delgado, Diaz-Diaz, Romero-Muñoz, Recacha, Docobo-Pérez and Rodriguez-Martínez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: José Manuel Rodriguez-Martínez, Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.