
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1570703
This article is part of the Research TopicSoil Carbon Sequestration and Microbial Energy MetabolismView all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Soil bacteria play a pivotal role in regulating multifaceted functions of terrestrial ecosystems.Unraveling the succession of bacterial communities and the feedback mechanism on soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics help embed the ecology of microbiome into C cycling model. However, how wetland restoration drives soil bacterial community assembly and species association to regulate microbial C metabolism remains unclear. Here, we investigated soil bacterial diversity, community structure and co-occurrence network, enzyme activities and SOC decomposition in restored wetlands for one, three, and four years from paddy fields in Northeast China. Wetland restoration for three and four years increased taxonomic (richness) and phylogenetic diversities by 2.39-3.96% and 2.13-3.02%, respectively, and increased the relative contribution of nestedness to community dissimilarity, indicating increased richness changed soil bacterial community structure. However, wetland restoration for three and four years decreased the richness index of aerobic Firmicutes by 5.04-5.74% due to stronger anaerobic condition characterized by increased soil Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ from 0.20 to 0.64.Besides, wetland restoration for four year decreased network complexity (characterized by decreased node number by 2.51%, edge number by 9.62%, positive/negative edge number by 6.37%, average degree by 5.74% and degree centralization by 6.34%). Robustness index decreased with the increase of restoration duration, while vulnerability index increased with the increase of restoration duration, indicating that wetland restoration decreased network stability of soil bacterial communities. These results might be because stronger anaerobic condition induced the decrease of aerobic Bacilli richness index in keystone module, thereby reducing positive association within keystone module. Decreased positive species association within keystone module in turn weakened microbial C metabolism by decreasing hydrolase activities from 7.49 to 5.37 mmol kg SOC -1 h -1 and oxidase activities from 627 to 411 mmol kg SOC -1 h -1 , leading to the decrease of SOC decomposition rate from 1.39 to 1.08 g C kg SOC -1 during wetland restoration. Overall, our results suggested that although wetland restoration after agricultural abandonment increased soil bacterial diversity, it decreased positive association within Bacilli-dominated keystone module under stronger anaerobic condition, which weakened microbial C metabolism and SOC decomposition.
Keywords: agricultural abandonment, bacterial diversity, Co-occurrence network, Carbon Metabolism, Soil organic carbon decomposition, wetland restoration
Received: 04 Feb 2025; Accepted: 17 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zheng, Liu, Li, Chen, Li, Dong, Yang, Miao, Yuan and Ding. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Weixin Ding, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.