
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1561749
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction:This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy in comparison to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) for patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.Materials and methods:Four databases(PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched published from establishment of database to June 1,2024, for articles studying VA dual therapy compared to BQT for patients with H. pylori infection. Meta-analyses of eradication rates, adverse events, compliance and cost were preformed.Results:A total of 17 studies were included for meta-analysis. Compared with BQT, VA increased the incidence of H. pylori eradication rate, with significant difference under the ITT analysis (86.9% vs. 80.4%, RR= 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, P= 0.01) but there no significant difference under the PP analysis (90.7% vs. 86.5%, RR= 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.08, P= 0.13). Besides, VA significantly increased compliance ( RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, P< 0.01) and decreased the occurrence of total adverse events (27.0% vs 11.5%, RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.37-0.51, P< 0.01). Furthermore, VA has lower cost compared to BQT.Our findings indicated that VA dual therapy provided a higher eradication rate, enhanced compliance, decreased adverse events, and lowered cost relative to BQT for patients with H. pylori infection.
Keywords: H. pylori, Amoxicillin, Vonoprazan, eradication, Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, Compliance, Adverse event, Meta-analysis 1
Received: 16 Jan 2025; Accepted: 04 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Pan, Li, Jiang, Su, Gao, Yang, Qin, Zou, Liang and Quan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Liying Pan, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, 545026, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.