Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Microbial Symbioses

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1554644

This article is part of the Research Topic Unveiling Microbiome Interactions and Functions in Soil Hotspots View all 4 articles

Root Separation Modulates AMF Diversity and Composition in Tomato-Potato Onion Intercropping Systems

Provisionally accepted
Musawar Ibrahim Musawar Ibrahim 1Asad Ullah Asad Ullah 1Xinjie Pan Xinjie Pan 1Jianzeng Lu Jianzeng Lu 1Musaddiq Ibrahim Musaddiq Ibrahim 2Kunpeng Cao Kunpeng Cao 1Shou Liu Shou Liu 1Xingang Zhou Xingang Zhou 1Danmei Gao Danmei Gao 1*Fengzhi Wu Fengzhi Wu 1*
  • 1 Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China
  • 2 Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Plant-plant interactions shape arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) communities in rhizosphere soil, with tomato/potato-onion intercropping emerging as a promising agro-ecological strategy to optimize resource utilization. However, the role of root separation methods in modulating AMF diversity within intercropping systems remains unclear. Specifically, whether the AMF community in the rhizosphere of tomato and potato-onion intercropping differs from monoculture and how root separation methods modulate these effects. This study evaluates the effects of various root separation methods (no separation, 0.45µm nylon membrane, 38µm nylon membrane, and solid separation) on AMF diversity and composition in tomato/potato-onion intercropping and monoculture systems. High-throughput Illumina MiSeq sequencing was used to assess AMF diversity indices (Ace, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson), and Principal Coordinate Analysis evaluated community structure. Results showed that the non-separation mode achieved the highest Ace and Chao1 indices, indicating greater richness, while intercropping lowered Shannon and Simpson indices. Intercropping significantly reduced Glomerales but increased Paraglomerales, under the non-separation mode. Similarly, it decreased Glomus while increasing Paraglomus in the rhizosphere of both crops. Principal Coordinate Analysis revealed that root separation distinctly altered AMF community structure, reflecting specific barrier effects on AMF interactions. Intercropping increased AMF abundance in the tomato rhizosphere but reduced it in potato-onion as shown by 18S rRNA gene abundance. These findings emphasize that minimizing root separation in intercropping enhances AMF diversity and functionality, providing valuable insights for sustainable agricultural management. Understanding the role of root interactions in shaping AMF communities can help optimizing intercropping strategies to improve soil health and nutrient dynamics.

    Keywords: AMF, CMNs, intercropping, Root barrier, plant-plant interaction, soil microbial community

    Received: 02 Jan 2025; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Ibrahim, Ullah, Pan, Lu, Ibrahim, Cao, Liu, Zhou, Gao and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Danmei Gao, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China
    Fengzhi Wu, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more