data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1553404
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study aimed to compare oral microbiome profiles between obese and lean individuals without clinical periodontitis, and to assess changes in the oral microbiome of obese subjects following bariatric surgery. Individuals with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 were enrolled in the obese group, whereas those with a BMI < 23 served as controls. The obese surgery group, which consented to bariatric surgery, was followed up at 1, 3, and 6 months with clinical examinations. Oral examinations were conducted and periodontal disease was classified based on the probing results. Saliva, buccal and subgingival microbiome samples were analyzed for community diversity, relative bacterial abundance, and differential abundance analysis between control(n=24) and obese group(n=31). To evaluate the effect size and statistical power, we used micropower, a simulationbased method for Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance-based β-diversity comparisons. The obese group exhibited distinct alpha diversity (buccal : Chao1 p = 0.0002, Shannon p= 0.0003, supragingival : Shannon p < 0.0001) compared with the control group.The obese group exhibited distinct alpha diversity (buccal : Chao1 p = 0.0002, Shannon p= 0.0003, supragingival : Shannon p < 0.0001) and principal coordinate analysis compared with the control group. Bray-Curtis distance analysis indicated a significant disparity in microbiome composition distribution in saliva samples ( p = 0.003) and buccal ( p = 0.002) and subgingival plaque samples (p = 0.001). Although the obese and normal weight groups exhibited no significant periodontal differences, the obese group showed distinct species associated with periodontal disease, especially in subgingival plaque including Filifactor alocis, Peptostreptococcaceae spp., Prevotella spp., and Treponema maltophilum. Cluster analysis of the obese surgery group indicated the emergence of microbiomes associated with a healthy state that increased over time including Streptococcus salivarious and various Veillonella spp., whereas clusters containing periodontal pathogens including Porphyromonas spp., tended to diminish. Thus, the oral microbiome at 6 months post-bariatric surgery indicates a potential shift towards a healthy periodontal state.
Keywords: Obesity, Bariatric Surgery, oral microbiome, Periodontal disease, Saliva
Received: 30 Dec 2024; Accepted: 27 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kim, Na, Oh, Han, Kim, Hong, Lee, Park and Chung. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hyo-Jung Lee, Department of Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
Young Suk Park, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
Jin Chung, Department of Oral Microbiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Busan, 50612, Republic of Korea
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.