Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1549044

Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance via State-of-the-Art Technologies Versus Conventional Methods

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia
  • 2 Department of Public Health, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah, 51452 P.O. Box 6666, Saudi Arabia, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
  • 3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
  • 4 Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
  • 5 Pharmacy Department, Armed Forces Hospital, King Abdul Aziz Naval base in Jubail, Jubail 35517, Saudi Arabia, Jubail, Saudi Arabia
  • 6 Department of Public Health, College of Applied Medical Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia, Abha, Saudi Arabia
  • 7 Department of Basic Oral Sciences and Dental Education, Biochemistry Division, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
  • 8 Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, 52571, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia
  • 9 Department of Pharmacy sciences, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Dariyah, Riyadh 13713, Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 10 Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is recognized as one of the foremost global health challenges, complicating the treatment of infectious diseases and contributing to increased morbidity and mortality rates. Traditionally, microbiological culture and susceptibility testing methods, such as disk diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays, have been employed to identify AMR bacteria. However, these conventional techniques are often labor intensive and time consuming and lack the requisite sensitivity for the early detection of resistance. Recent advancements in molecular and genomic technologies—such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs), PCR-based diagnostic methods, and CRISPR-based diagnostics—have revolutionized the diagnosis of AMR. These innovative approaches provide increased sensitivity, reduced turnaround times, and the ability to identify genetic resistance mechanisms. This review seeks to examine the advantages and disadvantages of both emerging technologies and traditional methods for detecting AMR, emphasizing the potential benefits and limitations inherent to each. By understanding the strengths and limitations of these technologies, stakeholders, including researchers, healthcare professionals, regulatory agencies, health authorities, financial managers, and patients, can make informed decisions aimed at preventing the emergence and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant strains, thereby ultimately increasing patient safety.

    Keywords: Antimicrobial Resistance Detection: Modern vs. Traditional Methods Antibiotic resistance, detection, Contemporary technologies, Genomics, microbial community 1. Introduction

    Received: 30 Dec 2024; Accepted: 11 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Elbehiry, Marzouk, Abalkhail, Abdelsalam, Ihab, Alasiri, Ibrahem, Ellethy, Almuzaini, Aljarallah, Abu-Okail and Edrees. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Ayman Elbehiry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more