
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1547979
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Soil nitrogen loss through NH3 volatilization and N2O emissions is a crucial issue in soil ecosystems. In this study, we explored the effects of biochar and the nitrification inhibitor DMPP (dimethyl -phenyl -piperazinium, a nitrification inhibitor) in vegetable soils under 60% and 200% WHC(Water Holding Capacity). Five treatments were set: CK (control), urea (N), urea + biochar (N+C), urea + nitrification inhibitor (N+DMPP), and urea + nitrification inhibitor + biochar (N+C+DMPP). Results found that biochar promoted soil nitrification and ammonia volatilization under both moisture conditions, with higher NH3 rate accumulation at 200%WHC. DMPP maintained high NH4 + -N concentration and increased soil ammonia volatilization, but effectively reduced N2O emissions, especially at 200%WHC. The N+C+DMPP treatment further significantly decreased N2O cumulative emissions compared to N+DMPP. QPCR results showed that N+C treatment significantly increased AOB (ammonia-oxidizing bacteria) copies compared to N treatment. Applying DMPP alone or with biochar reduced AOB copies by 50.0% and 45.7% respectively. Soil ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) responded oppositely to DMPP; AOA amounts in N+DMPP and N+C+DMPP treatments increased significantly during the culture. At 60%WHC, the greenhouse effect potential of N+DMPP and N+C+DMPP treatments were 39.0% and 43.2% lower than N respectively. At 200%WHC, their GWP were decreased by 13.8% and 0.08% compared to N. Adding biochar alone increased the soil's greenhouse potential at both water contents. In conclusion, using nitrification inhibitors alone or in combination with biochar is more effective in reducing the greenhouse effect potential of soil active nitrogen emissions.
Keywords: biochar, Nitrification inhibitor, Water contents, active N emissions, amoA
Received: 27 Dec 2024; Accepted: 03 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 HE, LYU, wang, yuan, liu, li and He. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Lili He, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.