ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Food Microbiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1547190

Phylogeny and Divergence of the 100 Most Common Salmonella Serovars Available in the NCBI Pathogen Detection Database

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States
  • 2Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Despite the emergence of whole genome sequencing (WGS) for Salmonella characterization, serotype assignment remains important as it allows identification of Salmonella subgroups that differ in distribution, virulence, and ecology. However, it has been shown that multiple divergent lineages of the same Salmonella serovar may have evolved independently multiple times and may present distinct epidemiological characteristics. Previous studies that aimed to identify the phylogeny of certain Salmonella serovars often used isolates from specific geographical locations or outbreaks and a small number of isolates to infer the phylogeny. To address these limitations and to advance the understanding of Salmonella's evolutionary patterns, we (i) identified the phylogenetic grouping (i.e., mono-, para-, or polyphyly) of the 100 most common Salmonella serovars analyzing 63,204 genomes available in the NCBI Pathogen Detection database, (ii) identified, for each polyphyletic serovar, the lineages that contain the majority of genomes, and (iii) inferred the antigen divergence between the five most common serovars (i.e., Salmonella Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Newport, I 4,[5],12:i:-, and Infantis) and their respective closely-related serovars. Among the 100 most common Salmonella serovars analyzed, 19 serovars are monophyletic, nine are paraphyletic, and 72 are polyphyletic. In 47 of the 72 polyphyletic serovars, one lineage contains more than 90% of the serovar's confirmed genomes. Antigen divergence results suggest that serovars Typhimurium and I 4,[5],12:i:-(often referred to as monophasic Typhimurium) have emerged independently of each other multiple times, except for the major I 4,[5],12:i:-lineage, which emerged from the major Typhimurium lineage. Furthermore, divergence in Salmonella serovars appears to primarily occur through modifications in the H1 antigen. Hence, this study shows that (i) a much larger number of serovars than previously known are polyphyletic; (ii) serovars previously known to be polyphyletic contain more lineages than previously known; and (iii) many serovars include lineages that only have a few isolates with a given serovar. Our data suggests that, in the age of genomics, molecular serotyping should be combined with other phylogenetically informative

Keywords: Salmonella, Serovar, phylogeny, evolution, divergence, whole-genome sequence, antigen

Received: 17 Dec 2024; Accepted: 09 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Samut, Kemmerling, Orsi, Wiedmann, Chen and Resendiz-Moctezuma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Cristina Resendiz-Moctezuma, Department of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, 14853, New York, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more