Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1542059

Effects of high stocking density on the growth performance, intestinal health and bile salts composition of broiler chickens

Provisionally accepted
Yuanyang Dong Yuanyang Dong 1Yuqi Zheng Yuqi Zheng 1*Haoyu Liu Haoyu Liu 1*Yaru Wang Yaru Wang 1*Jiaqing Cui Jiaqing Cui 1*Yuan Wu Yuan Wu 1Lei Yan Lei Yan 2*Zhiqiang Miao Zhiqiang Miao 1*Miaomiao Han Miaomiao Han 1Chenxuan Huang Chenxuan Huang 1Peifeng Li Peifeng Li 1*Yuan Su Yuan Su 1*Yiru Shen Yiru Shen 3Junzhen Zhang Junzhen Zhang 1*Jianmin Yuan Jianmin Yuan 4Bingkun Zhang Bingkun Zhang 4Jianhui Li Jianhui Li 1*
  • 1 College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
  • 2 Shandong New Hope Liuhe Group Ltd, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
  • 3 Poultry Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 4 College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The intestinal dysfunction plays an important role in the decreased growth performance of broiler chickens under high stocking density. Gut microbiota plays an important role in maintaining intestinal health. However, the modulation pathway of gut microbiota by regulating the intestinal barrier and histomorphology remains unknown.Methods: One hundred and forty-four male Arbor Acres broilers (22-d-old) with similar weight were randomly assigned to two treatments: a high (HSD, 20 broilers/m 2 ) or low stocking density treatment (LSD, 14 broilers/m 2 ), with six replicates per treatment. The experimental period was 20 d, from 22-42 days of age.The final body weight at 42 d of age was lower in the HSD group (P = 0.0013) and average daily feed intake (P = 0.016) and weight gain of broilers from 22-42 d decreased (P = 0.012). In the HSD group on day 42, villus height and the ratio of villus height to the crypt depth in the ileum decreased (P <0.05); mRNA expression of tight junction proteins, occludin (P <0.01) and ZO1 (P <0.05), were downregulated; whereas IL-6, TNFα, and NFκB p65 (P <0.05) and IL-1β (P <0.01) were upregulated. The HSD treatment increased the relative abundance of Lactobacillus (P =0.045) and decreased that of Alistipes (P =0.031). Cecal concentrations of acetic (P <0.05) and butyric acids (P <0.05) decreased. Gut metabolites co-metabolized by the host and gut microbiota were altered in the HSD group, with decreases in glycerophospholipid and tryptophan metabolites negatively correlated with Lactobacillus (P <0.05). The metabolite content of conjugated bile acids decreased and free bile acids increased (P <0.05) with HSD.Bile salt hydrolase (BSH) was increased in the intestine of HSD-treated broilers (P <0.01). The total cholic acid content of the HSD group was lower in the jejunum and ileum (P <0.05) but higher in the cecum than in the LSD group (P <0.01).Lactobacillus, along with enhanced BSH activity and excessive unabsorbed free bile acids. This resulted in ileal epithelial cells damage, inflammation, decreased growth performance of broilers under high stocking densities.

    Keywords: high stocking density, broiler, intestinal barrier, intestinal microbiota, Bile salt hydrolase

    Received: 09 Dec 2024; Accepted: 31 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Dong, Zheng, Liu, Wang, Cui, Wu, Yan, Miao, Han, Huang, Li, Su, Shen, Zhang, Yuan, Zhang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Yuqi Zheng, College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
    Haoyu Liu, College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
    Yaru Wang, College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
    Jiaqing Cui, College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
    Lei Yan, Shandong New Hope Liuhe Group Ltd, Qingdao, 266061, Shandong Province, China
    Zhiqiang Miao, College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
    Peifeng Li, College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
    Yuan Su, College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
    Junzhen Zhang, College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
    Jianhui Li, College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.