Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1537286

Dynamic Changes in the Gut Microbiota of SPF Bama Piglets During Breast and Formula Feeding

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
  • 2 State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan Province, China
  • 3 International Joint Research Laboratory in Universities of Jiangsu Province of China for Domestic Animal Germplasm Resources and Genetic Improvement, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
  • 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
  • 5 Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
  • 6 Key laboratory of pig industry sciences, ministry of Agriculture and Rural Afairs, Chongqing Key laboratory of pig industry sciences, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in the growth performance, health status, and welfare of pigs.Breast milk is a key factor in the colonization of gut microbiota and the overall health of newborn piglets. With advancements in breeding technology, formula milk has been widely adopted as a substitute for breast milk. This study aims to investigate the effects of sow feeding (natural breastfeeding) and formula milk feeding on the gut microbiota of specific pathogen-free (SPF) Bama pigs. Using metagenomic sequencing technology, we analyzed 114 fecal samples to uncover the impacts of different feeding methods on gut microbial diversity, dominant microbial populations, metabolic functions, carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs).The results revealed significant differences in the structure and function of gut microbiota between the breast milk (BM) group and the formula milk (FM) group at day 21. The BM group exhibited higher gut microbial diversity compared to the FM group, along with more extensive metabolic functions at both the gene and species levels. Notably, the FM group demonstrated higher activity in galactose metabolism and glycan metabolism, particularly at day 21. Additionally, the FM group showed significantly higher levels of ARGs against glycopeptide antibiotics at days 21 and 28 compared to the BM group. This study also found that breastfeeding and formula feeding differentially regulate the metabolic activity of gut microbiota and the expression of related enzymes, which may have long-term effects on nutrient absorption and disease resistance in pigs. These findings provide new insights into how different feeding methods shape the gut microbiota of pigs and offer a scientific basis for optimizing feeding strategies and improving breeding efficiency.

    Keywords: Gut Microbiota, pig breeding, breastfeeding, formula feeding, Metagenomics, SPF Bama pig

    Received: 30 Nov 2024; Accepted: 03 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Liu, Yu, Shen, Lu, Kong, Sun, Wei, Jin, Ge and Zeng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Bo Zeng, Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.