data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Phage Biology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1530819
This article is part of the Research Topic Harnessing Bacteriophages and Phage-Engineered Products for Antibacterial and Anticancer Therapies: Challenges and Opportunities View all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The combined use of bacteriophages and antibiotics represents a promising strategy for combating multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. However, the lack of uniformity in methods for assessing combination effects and experimental protocols has resulted in inconsistent findings across studies. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of interactions between phages and antibiotics on Klebsiella pneumoniae strains using various statistical approaches to formalize combination effects. Effects were assessed for four antibiotics from distinct classes (gentamicin, levofloxacin, meropenem, chloramphenicol), three phages from different genera (Dlv622, Seu621, FRZ284), and a depolymerase (Dep622) on three K. pneumoniae strains of the KL23 capsule type. Antibiotics were used at Cmax concentrations, and phages at sublethal levels. A modified t-test, Bliss independence model, two-way ANOVA, and checkerboard assay were employed to evaluate the results. Among 48 combinations, 33 effects were statistically significant, including 26 cases of synergy and 7 of antagonism. All statistical methods showed consistency in identifying effects; however, the t-test and Bliss method detected a greater number of effects. The strongest synergy was observed with levofloxacin in combination with Seu621 or Dep622 across all bacterial strains. Checkerboard assays confirmed synergy in selected cases but indicated that combined effects could vary with antimicrobial concentrations. The choice of analytical method substantially impacts the detection of phage-antibiotic effects. The t-test and Bliss method, due to their simplicity and sensitivity, may be optimal for clinical application, while two-way ANOVA for confirming strong interactions. These results emphasize the need to consider interaction characteristics when designing therapeutic strategies.
Keywords: Phage, antibiotic, capsule depolymerase, Synergy, Antagonism, K. pneumoniae
Received: 19 Nov 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gorodnichev, Krivulia, Kornienko, Abdraimova, Malakhova, Zaichikova, Bespiatykh, Manuvera and Shitikov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Roman B Gorodnichev, Federal Scientific Clinical Center of Physical and Chemical Medicine, Federal Medical & Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.