
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1527405
This article is part of the Research TopicUnravelling the Unknown of the Rumen Microbiome: Implications for Animal Health, Productivity, and BeyondView all 23 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study investigated the effects of quercetin on in vitro rumen fermentation parameters, methane production, and microflora in beef cattle. A completely randomized design was adopted. Quercetin was added to the fermentation substrates at 0% (group C), 0.5% (group Q1), 1% (group Q2) and 1.5% (group Q3). Anaerobic fermentation was carried out at 39°C for 48 h, gas production (GP) was recorded at different times, gas composition was determined, and methane (CH4) production was calculated. Fermentation parameters and dry matter digestibility (DMD) were determined after 48 h. Moreover, rumen fluid was collected for rumen bacterial and archaeal flora determination. The results were as follows: 1) After 32 h of fermentation, the GP decreased in response to the addition of quercetin. With increasing quercetin concentration, the theoretical maximum gas production decreased quadratically before 20 h (P quadratic = 0.032). There was a quadratic increase in gas production (P quadratic = 0.024). With increasing quercetin supplementation, the NH3-N content increased quadratically (P quadratic = 0.027). MCP increased linearly and quadratically with quercetin (P linear = 0.002, P quadratic = 0.005), whereas DMD decreased linearly and quadratically with quercetin (P linear = 0.013, P quadratic = 0.032). Both 0.5% and 1% quercetin significantly reduced the butyrate content (P quadratic = 0.002). With the addition of quercetin, the levels of butyrate, isobutyrate, isovalerate and total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) first decreased but then increased (P quadratic < 0.05). 2) With increasing quercetin concentration, methane production (P quadratic = 0.009) and the methane proportion (P quadratic < 0.001) decreased quadratically. 3) The ACE index and Chao1 index increased quadratically with quercetin supplementation (P quadratic < 0.05). The relative abundance of Succiniclasticum in groups Q1 and Q3 increased, whereas the relative abundances of norank_f__norank_o__Rickettsiales and Curtobacterium decreased in all quercetin groups at the genus level (P < 0.05). 4) Quercetin supplementation did not affect the diversity of the archaeal community, but the relative abundance of Methanobrevibacter in group Q2 decreased. Overall, quercetin influenced in vitro rumen fermentation and the bacterial flora to decrease methane production and promote rumen nitrogen utilization and MCP synthesis.
Keywords: Quercetin, beef cattle, in vitro, Rumen fermentation, gas production, microflora
Received: 13 Nov 2024; Accepted: 11 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xiao, Du, Manlin, Wang, Dong, Ju, Zhang, Peng, Wang, Zheng and Meng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Wei Manlin, College of Animal Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia Minzu University, Tongliao, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.