Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1524452

Global Prevalence of Macrolide-Resistant Staphylococcus spp.: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Mycology, Pasteur Institute of Iran,, Tehran, Alborz, Iran
  • 2 Department of Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran, tehran, Iran
  • 3 Department of Basic Sciences, Shushtar School of Medical Sciences, Shoushtar, Iran
  • 4 Department of Microbiology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fars, Iran, Fars, Iran
  • 5 Faculty of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Hamadan, Iran
  • 6 Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Alborz, Iran

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Staphylococcus is a genus of bacteria responsible for various infections ranging from mild skin to severe systemic diseases. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are significant challenges owing to their resistance to multiple antibiotics, including macrolides, such as erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin.Objective: This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize data on the prevalence of macrolide resistance in Staphylococcus spp., identify trends and changes in resistance patterns over time, and assess how testing methods and guidelines affect reported resistance rates.The study conducted a systematic search of the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases. Studies have reported the proportion of macrolide-resistant Staphylococcus spp. Two authors independently extracted and analyzed the data using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analyses were performed based on country, continent, species, AST guidelines, methods, and period.In total, 223 studies from 76 countries were included. The pooled prevalence of resistance to erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin were 57.3 %, 52.6%, and 57.9%, respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I²>95%, p<0.001).Oceania (72%) had the highest erythromycin resistance, whereas Europe had the lowest (40.7%). Subgroup analyses revealed variations in resistance based on the species, with higher resistance in MRSA than in MSSA and CoNS than in other species. Over time, a slight decrease in erythromycin resistance has been observed (59.6% from 2015-2019 to 55% from [2020][2021][2022][2023].This study emphasizes the high prevalence of macrolide resistance in Staphylococcus spp. and its notable regional variation. These findings highlight the necessity for standardized methodologies and global surveillance to manage macrolide resistance effectively. Controlling antibiotic resistance should prioritize enhancing public health measures and updating treatment guidelines.

    Keywords: Staphylococcus, macrolide, Meta-analysis, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase-negative staphylococci

    Received: 07 Nov 2024; Accepted: 22 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Sholeh, Beig, Navidifar, Parvizi, Mofid and Golab. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Mohammad Sholeh, Department of Mycology, Pasteur Institute of Iran,, Tehran, Alborz, Iran

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.