Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1495676
This article is part of the Research Topic Bioinformatics approaches to investigate antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in human, animal and environment View all 7 articles

Study on the factors affecting the resistance and transmission of Staphylococcus aureus in the 'animal-environment-worker' of the broiler feeding cycle

Provisionally accepted
Fangyuan Hu Fangyuan Hu 1Yaopeng Liu Yaopeng Liu 1Wang Lin Wang Lin 2Juan Wang Juan Wang 2*Na Liu Na Liu 2Yan Li Yan Li 3*Xiaoxiao Duan Xiaoxiao Duan 3*Junwei Wang Junwei Wang 2*Mingzhe Lu Mingzhe Lu 2*Keguang Han Keguang Han 1*Zhina Qu Zhina Qu 2*Junhui Liu Junhui Liu 2*
  • 1 College of Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
  • 2 China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
  • 3 Qingdao Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (S.aureus) poses an increasingly serious threat to agricultural safety and public health. Based on the concept of "One Health", this study analysed the multidrug resistance and transmission factors of S. aureus isolated from the "animal-environment-human" interface during one feeding cycle of commercial broilers in China by using antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole genome sequencing (WGS) technologies. The results showed that in stage 1, the isolation rate of S. aureus was 1.32% (6/453), that of workers was 25.0% (4/16), and that of environment samples was 0.69% (2/287), the multidrug-resistance rate was 83.33%. After one feeding cycle, the isolation rate of S. aureus (221/772, 28.63%) increased significantly (P < 0.01) during stage 2, and the multi-resistance rate was as high as 97%.The resistance rate to eight drugs including erythromycin, clindamycin, enrofloxacin, oxfloxacin, doxycycline, fosfenicol, tylosin, and tamagliflozin were elevated, but the differences were not significant (P > 0.05). The dominant strain in both stages was ST398 (79.13%), which was prevalent in 11 types of samples from three sources and clustered in the same sub-branch of the SNP evolutionary tree, and the loci of difference between strains ranged from 1-541, and with SNPs of less than 10 between the human strains of stage1 and three sources in stage 2. The 42 representative strains carried mobile elements mainly plasmid replicons (10 types), transposons (3 types) and 20 antibiotic resistance genes in 9 classes. 10 ST398 strains found the fosB gene for fosfomycin resistance, and 6 ST9 strains from stage 2 found the mecA resistance gene, the SNP evolutionary analysis showed that the fosB resistance gene might have been brought in by workers during stage 1. This study reveals the critical impact of environmental residual and worker-carried S. aureus, as well as the transmission of antibiotic resistance in stage 1. It highlighted the importance of the "One Health" approach and biosecurity measures and provided recommendations for the prevention of the spread of pathogens and resistance.

    Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, broiler, AMR, MDR, One Health

    Received: 13 Sep 2024; Accepted: 24 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Hu, Liu, Lin, Wang, Liu, Li, Duan, Wang, Lu, Han, Qu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Juan Wang, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
    Yan Li, Qingdao Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
    Xiaoxiao Duan, Qingdao Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
    Junwei Wang, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
    Mingzhe Lu, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
    Keguang Han, College of Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
    Zhina Qu, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
    Junhui Liu, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.