
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1493333
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
To investigate the effects of maize rotation on potato yield, quality, and soil microbial communities, this study was based on fields that had been under potato monoculture for five years and established six experimental treatments: potato-potato-potato (IR-A), potato-maize-potato (IR-B), potato-maize-maize (IR-C), potato-potato-potato (RF-A), potato-maize-potato (RF-B), and potato-maize-maize (RF-C). The results showed that under the IR planting model, IR-B significantly increased potato yield and vitamin C content while reducing reducing sugar content compared to IR-A (p<0.05). In the RF planting model, RF-B significantly increased potato yield, starch content, and vitamin C content compared to RF-A (p<0.05). Microbial community structure results indicated that crop rotation significantly enhanced the relative abundance of microorganisms such as Bradyrhizobium, Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Purpureocillium, Streptomyces, and Halovivax (p<0.05). These microorganisms are involved in the cycling of carbon, phosphorus, and other nutrients in the soil, playing an important role in promoting root growth , organic matter decomposition, and alleviating soil salinization. The LEfSe and RDA indicated significant differences in microbial communities between monoculture and crop rotation (p<0.05), with soil slow-growing rhizobia, Burkholderia, and actinomycetes positively correlated with potato yield and quality. Additionally, KEGG functional annotation of different treatments revealed that K00239, K00626, K01681, and K01915 were involved in three key metabolic pathways related to carbon and nitrogen. A total of 20 significantly enriched pathways were identified (p<0.05), among which K01681 is involved in the tricarboxylic acid cycle and is a differential gene in the RF-B treatment, suggesting that the efficient expression of K01681 during crop rotation contributes to the material cycling of the soil ecosystem. LEfSe analysis of the bins revealed that under the RF-C treatment, the relative abundance of Hyphomicrobiales was significantly higher than in other treatments (p<0.05). Hyphomicrobiales are involved in the nitrogen fixation process and play an important role in soil nutrient cycling and plant nutrition. In summary, the potato-maize rotation significantly altered the composition of soil microbial communities (p<0.05), increasing the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms. This change helps maintain the health of the soil ecosystem, promotes nutrient cycling, reduces the incidence of diseases, and effectively improves both the yield and quality of potatoes.
Keywords: Potato, Maize, continuous cropping, Soil microbial, Metagenome
Received: 09 Sep 2024; Accepted: 19 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Sun, Wang, Lin, Yin, Wang, Wang, Wang, Fan and Jiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jiying Sun, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.