- 1Department of Nanobiotechnology, PSG Institute of Advanced Studies, Coimbatore, India
- 2Salem Microbes Pvt Ltd, Salem, India
- 3Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering and Computing, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Microbial prospecting and biomaterials
Diversity in microbial species, ecology, metabolisms, and survival techniques provides scientists with clues to bioprospect them for various applications. Microbial bio-prospecting especially for bio-derived materials, molecules, enzymes, etc., have been studied as an alternative to various synthetic methodologies that have both economic and environmental impacts. Applying bioengineering concepts, microorganisms have been investigated as living factories for production of various biomolecules, biopolymers, enzymes, etc., on continuous basis that have potential applications in many fields (Huang et al., 2022). For example, microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates, bacterial cellulose, biogenic nanomaterials, bacterial collagens, enzymes, protein materials, etc., have superior biocompatibility, biodegradability and ease of production (intracellular/extracellular) when compared to related synthetic molecules and materials (Ghosh et al., 2021). Considering the advances in research in microbial bioprospecting and biomaterials, review and research articles were invited from researchers through this Research Topic on “Microbial prospecting and biomaterials.” Very interesting articles were received from various authors among which six articles were accepted for publication in “Frontiers in Microbiology” after thorough reviewing. A short note on the articles published is as follows. Thirupathi et al., reported the application of biologically synthesized Se-ZnO bimetallic nanoparticles using aqueous seaweed extract derived from Padina boergesenii macroalgae. The in vitro analysis indicated that the synthesized biometallic nanoparticle was effective against MCF-7 breast cancer and HeP G2 liver cancer cell lines with significant IC50 value. The authors suggested that the synthesized NPs by eco- and green technological method could be a potential substitute for the development of nutraceutical and therapeutic formulations against synthetic inhibitors of cancer. Similarly, Jangid et al., consolidated the bioprospecting of Aspergillus sp. based bioactive molecules having potential anticancer activity. The authors addressed the recent developments in drug delivery, genome mining, pharmacological profiling, role of synthetic biology and omics in discovering Aspergillus sp. derived anticancer compounds. Nair and Subathra Devi, reported the isolation of potential serratiopeptidase producing Serratia marcescens VS56 from soil samples having anti-inflammatory and clot lysing activity that could be potentially scaled up for biomedical applications. Phycocyanins derived from cyanobacteria have applications in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries and bioprospecting them remains essential. Shafiei et al., reported the methodology to achieve high pure phycocyanin from Cyanobium sp. isolated from waterfall in Tehran, Iran. These phycosyanin had considerable IC50 value against Calu-6 human lung cancer cell line. Veilumuthu et al., reported endophytic Streptomyces sp. isolated from tomato plant having genes for polyketide antibiotics. The isolate had kendomycin biosynthetic clusters for five Type I polyketide synthases. Kendomycin B was reported to be capable of microbial protein binding, membrane damage and bringing changes in nucleoid morphology in bacteria. Zhang et al., reported reverse metabolic engineering process through which Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10; an essential ubiquinone used in pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic additive industries) yield can be improved. They used two new mutagenesis techniques namely 12C6+ heavy-ion beam and a high-voltage prick electric field, to induce mutations in R. spheroids V-0 (V-0). They isolated and overexpressed nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent dehydrogenase (NAD) gene for enhancing productivity. The mechanism VK-2-3 CoQ10 enhancement was determined using gene knock down study. In summary, the research works reported here reinforces the capacity of using microbial prospecting approaches for developing new products and enhancing the yield of current byproducts. We strongly hope that the studies reported in this Research Topic will kindle new areas aligned to microbial prospecting for novel product development and process optimization that have not been explored yet. We thank all the authors who actively participated in this Research Topic by submitting their valuable research works. We are also grateful to all the reviewers, journal associates, and co-editors who have spent their quality time in reviewing the manuscripts for this Research Topic.
Author contributions
SR: Writing – original draft. KL: Writing – review & editing. KP: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
KL was employed by Salem Microbes Pvt Ltd.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ghosh, S., Ahmad, R., Zeyaullah, M., and Khare, S. K. (2021). Microbial nano-factories: synthesis and biomedical applications. Front. Chem. 9:626834. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.626834
Keywords: microbial prospecting, biomaterials, bioengineering, bionanomaterials, enzymes
Citation: Rajendran S, Loganathan K and Popat KC (2025) Editorial: Microbial prospecting and biomaterials. Front. Microbiol. 15:1540191. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1540191
Received: 05 December 2024; Accepted: 18 December 2024;
Published: 07 January 2025.
Edited and reviewed by: William James Hickey, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
Copyright © 2025 Rajendran, Loganathan and Popat. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Selvakumar Rajendran, cnNrQHBzZ2lhcy5hYy5pbg==